Clinical effectiveness of the probiotic containing B. longum, B. breve, L. rhamnosus, L. acidophilus in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The study was devoted to evaluating the effectiveness of the probiotic product containing strains of Bifidobacterium longum, Bifidobacterium breve, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus as part of complex therapy of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D). Material and methods. 30 patients (average age 35,2±8,7 years) with IBS-D were examined. In the observed patients, the severity of abdominal pain, flatulence, and stool characteristics were assessed. Feces were cultured for dysbacteriosis and opportunistic flora, depression and anxiety were screened, cognitive function and quality of life was studied. In addition to standard therapy, the patients received the product containing lyophilized probiotic microorganisms (B. longum, B. breve, L. rhamnosus and L. acidophilus 3,9 billion microorganisms in 1 capsule) 1 capsule per day with meals for a period of 8 weeks. Results and conclusion. During therapy with the use of the probiotic in patients with IBS-D, the intensity of abdominal pain, assessed using VAS, significantly decreased from 3,5±1,4 to 1,7±1,2 points, the frequency of stools decreased (from 3,3±0,6 to 1,6±0,3), the type of stool changed (from 5,8±1,2 to 3, 1 ± 1,2). A complete regression of flatulence was found in 36,7% of patients, the frequency of significantly pronounced flatulence decreased significantly from 20 to 3,3%, moderately severe - from 46,7 to 20%. As a result of treatment, an increase in the content of typical E. coli (from 5,3±1,5 to 7,8±0,8 lg CFU/g), bifidobacteria (from 5,6±1,2 to 8,1±1,2 lg CFU/g), lactobacilli (from 5,5±0,8 to 7,5±0,9 lg CFU/g), elimination of opportunistic enterobacteria, hemolytic E. coli, fungi of the genus Candida. A significant decrease in the level of anxiety from 5,9±1,9 to 3,2±0,7 points according to the HADS was established. According to the MoCA, some patients (n=5; 16,7%) had 23 points or less (22,4±0,9), which indicated the presence of cognitive impairment. The treatment with the inclusion of a probiotic led to a significant increase in the index to (26,7±1,5) and regression of the identified changes. Improvement in the quality of life (questionnaire SF-36) was revealed on the scales of psychological health, emotional and role functioning.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Vladimir B. Grinevich

S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Email: grinevich_vb@mail.ru
Dr. med. habil., professor, head of 2nd Department of therapy of doctors' improvement 191163, Saint Petersburg, 63L Suvorovsky Avenue

Yuri A. Kravchuk

S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Email: kravchuk2003@mail.ru
Dr. med. habil., professor of 2nd Department of therapy of doctors' improvement 191163, Saint Petersburg, 63L Suvorovsky Avenue

Denis V. Egorov

S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Email: d.egorov@mail.ru
PhD in Medicine, senior lecturer of 2nd Department of therapy of doctors' improvement 191163, Saint Petersburg, 63L Suvorovsky Avenue

Elena S. Ivanyuk

S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Email: gastroperm@gmail.com
PhD in Medicine, senior lecturer of 2nd Department of therapy of doctors' improvement 191163, Saint Petersburg, 63L Suvorovsky Avenue

Nadira A. Plisikova

S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Email: adira20071@rambler.ru
gastroenterologist at the Clinic of 2nd Department of therapy of doctors' improvement 191163, Saint Petersburg, 63L Suvorovsky Avenue

References

  1. Ивашкин В.Т., Маев И.В., Шелыгин Ю.А. с соавт. Диагностика и лечение синдрома раздраженного кишечника (клинические рекомендации Российской гастроэнтерологической ассоциации и Ассоциации колопроктологов России). Российский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии. 2021; 31(5): 74-95. https://dx.doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2021-31-5-74-95. EDN: MKBDEB.
  2. Lovell R.M., Ford A.C. Global prevalence of and risk factors for irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 10(7): 712-21.e4. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2012.02.029.
  3. Klem F., Wadhwa A., Prokop L.J. et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of irritable bowel syndrome after infectious enteritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2017; 152(5): 1042-54. https://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.039.
  4. Ghaffari P., Shoaie S., Nielsen L.K. Irritable bowel syndrome and microbiome; Switching from conventional diagnosis and therapies to personalized interventions. J Transl Med. 2022; 20(1): 173. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03365-z.
  5. Гриневич В.Б., Кравчук Ю.А., Коржева М.Д. с соавт. Вирусно-микробно-тканевой комплекс кишечника как основа биорегуляции организма человека. Гастроэнтерология Санкт-Петербурга. 2021; 3-4: 16-17. EDN: KHNFGZ.
  6. Симаненков В.И., Маев И.В., Ткачева О Н. с соавт. Синдром повышенной эпителиальной проницаемости в клинической практике. Мультидисциплинарный национальный консенсус. Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика. 2021; 20(1): 2758. https://dx.doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2021-2758. EDN: ZAFIIJ.
  7. Гриневич В.Б., Кравчук Ю.А., Сас Е.И. Эволюция понятия микробно-тканевого комплекса кишечника. Экспериментальная и клиническая гастроэнтерология. 2020; 11: 4-10. https://dx.doi.org/10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-183-11-4-10. EDN: SHPFVY.
  8. Shaik L., Kashyap R., Thotamgari S.R. et al. Gut-brain axis and its neuro-psychiatric effects: A narrative review. Cureus. 2020; 12(10): e11131. https://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11131.
  9. Morais L.H., Schreiber H.L. 4th, Mazmanian S.K. The gut microbiota-brain axis in behaviour and brain disorders. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021; 19(4): 241-55. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-00460-0.
  10. Liang S., Wu X., Jin F. Gut-brain psychology: Rethinking psychology from the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Front Integr Neurosci. 2018; 12: 33. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2018.00033.
  11. Cryan J.F., O'Riordan K.J., Sandhu K. et al. The gut microbiome in neurological disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2020; 19(2): 179-94. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30356-4.
  12. Maiuolo J., Gliozzi M., Musolino V. et al. The contribution of gut microbiota-brain axis in the development of brain disorders. Front Neurosci. 2021; 15: 616883. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.616883.
  13. Frohlich E.E., Farzi A., Mayerhofer R. et al. Cognitive impairment by antibiotic-induced gut dysbiosis: Analysis of gut microbiota-brain communication. Brain Behav Immun. 2016; 56: 140-55. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2016.02.020.
  14. Slykerman R.F., Thompson J., Waldie K.E. et al. Antibiotics in the first year of life and subsequent neurocognitive outcomes. Acta Paediatrica. 2017; 106(1): 87-94. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.13613.
  15. Slykerman R.F., Coomarasamy C., Wickens K. et al. Exposure to antibiotics in the first 24 months of life and neurocognitive outcomes at 11 years of age. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019; 236(5): 1573-82. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-019-05216-0.
  16. Ивашкин В.Т., Маев И.В., Абдулганиева Д.И. с соавт. Практические рекомендации Научного сообщества по содействию клиническому изучению микробиома человека (НСОИМ) и Российской гастроэнтерологической ассоциации (РГА) по применению пробиотиков, пребиотиков, синбиотиков и обогащенных ими функциональных пищевых продуктов для лечения и профилактики заболеваний гастроэнтерологического профиля у детей и взрослых. Российский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии. 2021; 31(2): 65-91. https://dx.doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2021-31-2-65-91. EDN: IWBRVV.
  17. Захаренко С.М. Пробиотики: концепция новая или старая? Медицинский совет. 2018; 14: 56-60. https://dx.doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2018-14-56-60. EDN: PAYLVD.
  18. Burnet P.W., Cowen PJ. Psychobiotics highlight the pathways to happiness. Biol Psychiatry. 2013; 74(10): 708-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.08.002.
  19. Zhu G., Zhao J., Zhang H. et al. Probiotics for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Foods. 2021; 10(7): 1672. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10071672.
  20. Sherman P.M., Johnson-Henry K.C., Yeung H.P. et al. Probiotics reduce enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7- and enteropathogenic E. coli O127:H6-induced changes in polarized T84 epithelial cell monolayers by reducing bacterial adhesion and cytoskeletal rearrangements. Infect Immun. 2005; 73(8): 5183-88. https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.73.8.5183-5188.2005.
  21. Dykstra N.S., Hyde L., Adawi D. et al. Pulse probiotic administration induces repeated small intestinal Muc3 expression in rats. Pediatr Res. 2011; 69(3): 206-11. https://dx.doi.org/10.1203/PDR.0b013e3182096ff0.
  22. Wu R.Y. Impact of prebiotics, probiotics, and gut derived metabolites on host immunity. LymphoSign Journal. 2017; 4(1); Online. https://dx.doi.org/10.14785/lymphosign-2016-0012.
  23. di Vito R., Conte C., Traina G. A multi-strain probiotic formulation improves intestinal barrier function by the modulation of tight and adherent junction proteins. Cells. 2022; 11(16): 2617. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11162617.
  24. Skonieczna-Zydecka K., Marlicz W., Misera A. et al. Microbiome - the missing link in the gut-brain axis: Focus on its role in gastrointestinal and mental health. J Clin Med. 2018; 7(12). pii: E521. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm7120521.
  25. Diop L., Guillou S., Durand H. Probiotic food supplement reduces stress-induced gastrointestinal symptoms in volunteers: A doubleblind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Nutr Res. 2008; 28(1): 1-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2007.10.001.
  26. Messaoudi M., Lalonde R., Violle N. et al. Assessment of psychotropic-like properties of a probiotic formulation (Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175) in rats and human subjects. Br J Nutr. 2011; 105(5): 755-64. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007114510004319.
  27. Luo Y., Keefer L. Role of psychological questionnaires in clinical practice and research within functional gastrointestinal disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021; 33(12): e14297. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14297.
  28. Carson N., Leach L., Murphy K.J. A re-examination of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) cutoff scores.Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018; 33(2): 379-88. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gps.4756.
  29. Соловьева А.П., Горячев Д.В., Архипов В.В. Критерии оценки когнитивных нарушений в клинических исследованиях. Ведомости Научного центра экспертизы средств медицинского применения. 2018; 8(4): 218-230. https://dx.doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2018-8-4-218-230. EDN: YQDKHR.
  30. Rode J., Edebol Carlman H.M.T., Konig J. et al. Probiotic mixture containing Lactobacillus helveticus, Bifidobacterium longum and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Affects brain responses toward an emotional task in healthy subjects: A randomized clinical trial. Front Nutr. 2022; 9: 827182. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.827182.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2022 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies