Improving of treatment efficacy for target therapy-taking rheumatoid arthritis patients. Conclusions of Moscow uniform registry of arthritis (MERA)

  • Authors: Zhilyaev E.V.1,2, Lukina G.V.3,4, Koltzova E.N.5, Shmidt E.I.6
  • Affiliations:
    1. Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Further Professional Education «Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education» of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia
    2. ZAO «Urotropican medical center»
    3. V.A. Nasonova FSBSI scientific research institute of rheumatology
    4. Moscow municipal center of rheumatology of State Budgetary Healthcare Institution «Moscow clinical scientific center» of Moscow Health Department
    5. Scientific research institute of health and medical management organization of Moscow Health Department
    6. N.I. Pirogov city clinical hospital № 1
  • Issue: No 5 (2018)
  • Pages: 96-103
  • Section: Articles
  • URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2412-4036/article/view/279481
  • ID: 279481

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The data of the Moscow uniform register of arthrites (MERA) are analyzed. The analysis included patients (n = 554) with rheumatoid arthritis who received genetically engineered biological medicaments or tofacitinib at least for 6 months. During their checking visits, the information concerning the history of life, disease, therapy, and examination data was collected. The effectiveness of treatment was estimated by the achieved value of DAS-28. Under the conditions of a multifactor model, it was performed the search of significant independent predictors of the achieved activity (estimated by DAS28-ESR). It was found, that female sex, pain in the spine during the disease, age were associated with higher values of the studied activity index. A greater number of patient visits in the register and longer targeted therapy were associated with better treatment outcomes. According to the obtained results, the level of the achieved activity of the disease is significantly associated with used targeted drug (p = 0.03). However, there were no statistically significant differences between the different targeted drugs. There was no correlation between the achieved activity of the disease and the basic therapy that was used, and the use of glucocorticoids. Tactical approaches to treatment aimed at increasing its effectiveness are discussed in current article on the ground of abovementioned analysis of the MERA register data.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Evgeny V. Zhilyaev

Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Further Professional Education «Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education» of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia; ZAO «Urotropican medical center»

Email: zhilyayevev@mail.ru
MD, professor of the Department of rheumatology; head physician

Galina V. Lukina

V.A. Nasonova FSBSI scientific research institute of rheumatology; Moscow municipal center of rheumatology of State Budgetary Healthcare Institution «Moscow clinical scientific center» of Moscow Health Department

MD, professor; chief

Ekaterina N. Koltzova

Scientific research institute of health and medical management organization of Moscow Health Department

head of the organization and methodology Department of rheumatology

Evgenia I. Shmidt

N.I. Pirogov city clinical hospital № 1

PhD, head of rheumatology Department

References

  1. Smolen J.S., Aletaha D., Bijlsma J.W., Breedveld F.C., Boumpas D., Burmester G. et al. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: recommendations of an international task force. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2010;69(4):631-7.
  2. Knevel R., Schoels M., Huizinga T. et al. Current evidence of a strategic approach to the management of rheumatoid arthritis with the disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: a systematic literature review informing the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2010;69:987-94.
  3. Smolen J.S., Aletaha D., Machold K.P. Therapeutic strategies in early rheumatoid arthritis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2005;19:163-77.
  4. Smolen J.S., Aletaha D., Bijlsma J.W. et al. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: recommendations of an international task force. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2010;69(4):631-7.
  5. Smolen J.S., Aletaha D., Koeller M., Weisman M.H., Emery P. New therapies for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2007;370(9602):1861-74.
  6. Насонов Е.Л., Мазуров В.И., Каратеев Д.Е. и др. Международные и российские рекомендации по лечению ревматических заболеваний. Проект рекомендаций по лечению ревматоидного артрита Общероссийской общественной организации «Ассоциация ревматологов России». Научно-практическая ревматология. 2014;52(5);477-94.
  7. Lehmann E.L., Romano J.P. Multiple testing and simultaneous inference. Testing statistical hypotheses. 3rd ed. New York: Springer, 2005. 786 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2018 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies