Estimation of the efficacy and safety of using the system of remote monitoring of patients after myocardial infarction


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The aim is to create and estimate the possibility of use, efficacy and safety of system for remote monitoring of health condition of patients after myocardial infarction (MI). Material and methods. Patients admitted to the hospital for myocardial infarction in the period from 09/01/2018 to 05/01/2019 and survived 12 months after it (n=221) were the subject of the study. They were divided into two groups - experimental and control. The experimental group was provided with a link to a Google questionnaire, which patients had to use when episodes of chest pain and/ or shortness of breath appeared. After the performed «pseudorandomization» in the groups, 122 patients were included in the study - 61 person in each group. Results. From June 2020 to June 2021, adverse events occurred in 18,6% of the studied patients: 7,2% died, 1,8% had MI and coronary artery revascularization (CA) for it, 2 patients (0,9%) had a cerebral stroke, 9,5% underwent coronary artery revascularization due to coronary heart disease progression. After «pseudorandomization» of the groups of patients using and not using the remote control system, statistically significant differences were observed only in the frequency of early CA revascularization: it was performed in 16,4% and 4,9% of cases, respectively (p=0,04). Conclusion. The results of current work show us, that the use of the developed and tested system of remote monitoring of the condition of patients who have undergone myocardial infarction, in comparison with routine monitoring of such patients on an outpatient basis, provides similar rates of mortality, the incidence of nonfatal MI and cerebral strokes, hospitalizations for progressive angina pectoris, CA revascularization and promotes the earlier use of invasive tactics in the management of patients with acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Kristina G. Pereverzeva

Academician I.P. Pavlov Ryazan State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia

Email: pereverzevakg@gmail.com
PhD, associate professor of the Department of hospital therapy with a course of medical and social expertise

Sergey S. Yakushin

Academician I.P. Pavlov Ryazan State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia

Email: ssyakushin@yandex.ru
MD, professor, head of the Department of hospital therapy with a course of medical and social expertise

References

  1. Gruska M., Aigner G., Altenberger J. et al. Working Group Rhythmology of the Austrian Cardiological Society. Recommendations on the utilization of telemedicine in cardiology. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2020; 132(23-24): 782-800. doi: 10.1007/s00508-020-01762-2.
  2. Kim J., Alanazi H., Daim Т. Prospects for telemedicine adoption: Prognostic modeling as exemplified by rural areas of USA. Foresight and STI Governance. 2015; 9(4): 32-41. doi: 10.17323/1995-459x.2015.4.32.41.
  3. Nan J., Meng S., Hu H., Jia R. et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction with percutaneous coronary intervention and the use of a telemedicine app before and after the COVID-19 pandemic at a Center in Beijing, China, from August 2019 to March 2020. Med Sci Monit. 2020; 26: e927061. doi: 10.12659/MSM.927061.
  4. Ladapo J.A., Turakhia M.P., Ryan M.P. et al. Health care utilization and expenditures associated with remote monitoring in patients with implantable cardiac devices. Am J. Cardiol. 2016; 117(9): 1455-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.02.015.
  5. Boriani G., Da Costa A., Quesada A. et al. MORE-CARE Study Investigators. Effects of remote monitoring on clinical outcomes and use of healthcare resources in heart failure patients with biventricular defibrillators: results of the MORE-CARE multicentre randomized controlled trial. Eur J. Heart Fail. 2017; 19(3): 416-25. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.626.
  6. Michalakeas C., Katsi V., Soulaidopoulos S. et al. Mobile phones and applications in the management of patients with arterial hypertension. J. Am Soc Hypertens. 2012; 6(5): 346-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2012.08.001.
  7. Poelzl G., Fetz B., Altenberger J. et al. Heart failure disease management programs in Austria 2019: A systematic survey of the Heart Failure Working Group and the Working Group for Cardiological Assistance and Care Personnel of the Austrian Society of Cardiology. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2020; 132(11-12): 310-21. doi: 10.1007/s00508-020-01615-y.
  8. Changizi M., Kaveh M.H. Effectiveness of the mHealth technology in improvement of healthy behaviors in an elderly population - a systematic review. Mhealth. 2017; 3: 51. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2017.08.06.
  9. Погосова Н.В., Юферева Ю.М., Юсубова А.И. с соавт. Профилактическое консультирование с использованием дистанционных технологий - метод эффективного контроля метаболических факторов риска у пациентов с высоким и очень высоким риском развития сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний. Кардиология. 2018; 10: 34-44. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2018.10.10183.
  10. Brunetti N.D., De Gennaro L., Correale M. et al. Pre-hospital electrocardiogram triage with telemedicine near halves time to treatment in STEMI: A meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of non-randomized studies. Int J. Cardiol. 2017; 232: 5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.01.055.
  11. Spaulding E.M., Marvel F.A., Lee M.A. et al. Corrie health digital platform for self-management in secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019; 12(5): e005509. doi: 10.1161/CIRC0UTC0MES.119.005509.
  12. Драпкина О.М., Ливзан М.А., Мартынов А.И. с соавт. Первый российский консенсус по количественной оценке, приверженности к лечению: основные положения. Медицинский вестник Северного Кавказа. 2018; 1-2: 259-271. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.14300/mnnc.2018.13039.
  13. Клинические рекомендации. Острый коронарный синдром без подъема сегмента ST электрокардиограммы. Рубрикатор клинических рекомендаций Минздрав России. 2020. Доступ: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/154_3 (дата обращения - 01.09.2021).
  14. Jobs A., Mehta S.R., Montalescot G. et al. Optimal timing of an invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2017; 390(10096): 737-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31490-3.
  15. Navarese E.P., Gurbel P.A., Andreotti F. et al. Optimal timing of coronary invasive strategy in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2013; 158(4): 261-70. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-4201302190-00006.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2021 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies