Study of the effect of a combination of biocoordination compounds and a water-based probiotic on the performance of broiler chickens

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of a combined probiotic, which included microbial mass of a mixture of live bacteria L. acidophilum, B. adolescentis and chelate complex of amino acids with chromium on the dynamics of growth performance, feed intake and digestibility, slaughter quality, morphological and biochemical blood parameters in the organism of broiler chickens of Arbor Aikress cross (CJSC «Poultry Farm Orenburgskaya»). Up to two weeks of age, the birds were in the preparatory period and received the basic diet (n=60). Starting from the age of 15 days, broilers of the experimental group additionally received with water a combined probiotic at a dose of 0,2 g/kg, and with feed a chelate complex of amino acids with chromium at a dose of 200 mg/kg. The duration of the study period was 28 days. The body weight of broiler chickens of the experimental group was statistically significantly higher by 28 and 42 days of age than in the control by 18 % (p=0,03) and 14 % (p=0,01), respectively. The weight of gutted carcass in the experimental group was higher than in the control group by 24 % (p=0,05). Addition of the studied additive to the diet of birds contributed to the reduction of feed costs per 1 kg of gain by 0,3 kg (14 %). Digestibility of crude protein in the experimental group was significantly higher by 2,7 % (p=0,03). The level of protein in meat of the experimental group was higher than in the control by 2,76 % (p=0,03). The introduction of probiotic in the diet had a stimulating effect on antioxidant enzymes. In broiler chickens of the experimental group the activity of superoxide dismutase and glutathioperoxidase in blood serum was significantly higher than in the control by 13 % (p=0,02) and 7,5 % (p=0,03), respectively. Thus, probiotics, together with the complex of amino acids with chrome, due to its multipurpose action can have a positive effect on the organism of farm poultry and increase the efficiency of poultry farming.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

S. V. Lebedev

Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the RAS

Author for correspondence.
Email: vaisvais13@mail.ru

Dr. Sci. (Biol.)

Russian Federation, 460000, Orenburg, ul. 9 Yanvarya, 29

T. V. Kazakova

Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the RAS

Email: vaisvais13@mail.ru
Russian Federation, 460000, Orenburg, ul. 9 Yanvarya, 29

O. V. Marshinskaia

Федеральный научный центр биологических систем и агротехнологий РАН

Email: vaisvais13@mail.ru
Russian Federation, 460000, Orenburg, ul. 9 Yanvarya, 29

E. V. Kiyaeva

Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the RAS

Email: vaisvais13@mail.ru

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, 460000, Orenburg, ul. 9 Yanvarya, 29

References

  1. Петрянкин Ф. П., Лаврентьев А. Ю., Шерне В. С. Влияние кормления на иммунный статус организма животных (научный обзор) // Вестник Чувашской государственной сельскохозяйственной академии. 2017. № 2(2). С. 46–50.
  2. Астраханцев А. А. Продуктивность цыплят-бройлеров при различных технологических вариантах выращивания // Птицеводство. 2019. № 1. С. 26–30. doi: 10.33845/0033-3239-2019-68-1-26-30.
  3. Бахарев А. А., Александрова С. С. Влияние освещения на продуктивность цыплят бройлеров // Эпоха науки. 2018. № 15. С. 120–124.
  4. Impact of heat stress and nutritional interventions on poultry production / S. P. He, M. A. Arowolo, R. F. Medrano, et al. // World’s Poultry Science Journal. 2018. Vol. 74. No. 4. P. 647–664. doi: 10.1017/S0043933918000727.
  5. Шацких Е. В., Королькова-Субботкина Д. Е. Состояние кишечника цыплят-бройлеров при включении в рацион фитобиотической добавки //Аграрный вестник Урала. 2022. № S14. С. 81–91. doi: 10.32417/1997-4868-2022-229-14-81-91.
  6. Кротова Н. Ю., Лаврентьев А. Ю., Шерне В. С. Продуктивность цыплят-бройлеров при использовании мультиэнзимного препарата // Птицеводство. 2020. № 2. С. 27–30. doi: 10.33845/0033-3239-2020-69-2-27-30.
  7. Грозина А. А. Состав микрофлоры желудочно-кишечного тракта у цыплят-бройлеров при воздействии пробиотика и антибиотика (по данным t-rflp-rt-pcr) // Сельскохозяйственная биология. 2014. № 6. С. 46–58. doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2014.6.46rus.
  8. Yadav S., Jha R. Strategies to modulate the intestinal microbiota and their effects on nutrient utilization, performance, and health of poultry // J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2019. Vol. 10. P. 2. URL: https://jasbsci.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40104–018–0310–9 (дата обращения: 04.09.2023). doi: 10.1186/s40104-018-0310-9.
  9. Dietary effect of probiotics and prebiotics on broiler performance, carcass, and immunity / A. Rehman, M. Arif, N. Sajjad et al. // Poult Sci. 2020 Vol. 99. No. 12. P. 6946–6953. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.043.
  10. Probiotics in poultry feed: A comprehensive review / M. E. Abd El-Hack, M. T. El-Saadony, M. E. Shafi, et al. // J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2020. Vol. 104. No. 6. P. 1835–1850. doi: 10.1111/jpn.13454.
  11. Wu X. Z., Wen Z. G., Hua J. L. Effects of dietary inclusion of Lactobacillus and inulin on growth performance, gut microbiota, nutrient utilization, and immune parameters in broilers // Poult Sci. 2019. Vol. 98. No. 10. P. 4656–4663. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez166.
  12. The use of probiotics as eco-friendly alternatives for antibiotics in poultry nutrition / M. Alagawany, M. E. Abd El-Hack, M. R. Farag, et al. // Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018. Vol. 25. No. 11. P. 10611–10618. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1687-x.
  13. Impact of restricting feed and probiotic supplementation on growth performance, mortality and carcass traits of meat-type quails / R. N. Soomro, M. E. Abd El-Hack, S. S. Shah, et al. // Anim Sci J. 2019. Vol. 90. No. 10. P. 1388–1395. doi: 10.1111/asj.13290.
  14. Neveling D. P., Dicks L. M.T. Probiotics: an Antibiotic Replacement Strategy for Healthy Broilers and Productive Rearing // Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2021. Vol. 13. No. 1. P. 1–11. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12602–020–09640-z (дата обращения: 04.09.2023). doi: 10.1007/s12602-020-09640-z.
  15. Bacillus Probiotics as Alternatives to In-feed Antibiotics and Its Influence on Growth, Serum Chemistry, Antioxidant Status, Intestinal Histomorphology, and Lesion Scores in Disease-Challenged Broiler Chickens / I. P. Ogbuewu, M. Mabelebele, N. A. Sebola, et al. // Front Vet Sci. 2022. Vol. 9. P. 876725. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2022.876725/full (дата обращения: 04.09.2023). doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.876725.
  16. Probiotics as Alternatives to Antibiotics for the Prevention and Control of Necrotic Enteritis in Chickens / R. R. Kulkarni, C. Gaghan, K. Gorrell, et al. // Pathogens. 2022. Vol. 11. No. 6. P. 692. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076–0817/11/6/692 (дата обращения 04.09.2023). doi: 10.3390/pathogens11060692.
  17. Изучение влияния пробиотиков на продуктивные и гематологические показатели крови цыплят-бройлеров / Р. А. Тузиков, С. В. Лебедев, А. Е. Аринжанов и др. // Животноводство и кормопроизводство. 2022. Т. 105. № . 4. С. 195–207. doi: 10.33284/2658-3135-105-4-195.
  18. Wang Y., Gu Q. Effect of probiotic on growth performance and digestive enzyme activity of Arbor Acres broilers // Res Vet Sci. 2010. Vol. 89. No. 2. P. 163–167. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.03.009.
  19. The effect of feed supplementation with zinc chelate and zinc sulphate on selected humoral and cell-mediated immune parameters and cytokine concentration in broiler chickens / Ł. Jarosz, A. Marek, Z. Grądzki, et al. // Res Vet Sci. 2017. Vol. 112. P. 59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2016.09.007.
  20. Effect of pelleting temperature and probiotic supplementation on growth performance and immune function of broilers fed maize/soy-based diets / A. M. Amerah, A. Quiles, P. Medel, et al. // Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2013. Vol. 180. No. 1–4. P. 55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.01.002.
  21. The effects of different growth promoters on performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens / R. Mokhtari, A. R. Yazdani, M. Rezaei, et al. // Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 2010. Vol. 9. No. 20. P. 2633–2639. doi: 10.3923/javaa.2010.2633.2639.
  22. Effect of supplementation of prebiotic mannan-oligosaccharides and probiotic mixture on growth performance of broilers subjected to chronic heat stress / M. U. Sohail, M. E. Hume, J. A. Byrd, et al. // Poult Sci. 2012. Vol. 91. No. 9. P. 2235–2240. doi: 10.3382/ps.2012-02182.
  23. Abdel-Raheem S. M., Sherief M. S. Abd-Allah S. M.S. The effect of single or combined dietary supplementation of mannan oligosacharide and probiotics on performance and slaughter characteristics of broilers // Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2011. Vol. 10. No. 11. P. 854–862. doi: 10.3923/ijps.2011.854.862.
  24. Effect of dietary supplementation of prebiotics and probiotics on intestinal microarchitecture in broilers reared under cyclic heat stress / S. Ashraf, H. Zaneb, M. S. Yousaf, et al. // J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2013. Vol. 97 Suppl 1. P. 68–73. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12041. PMID: 23639019.
  25. Wealleans A. L., Sirukhi M., Egorov I. A. Performance, gut morphology and microbiology effects of a Bacillus probiotic, avilamycin and their combination in mixed grain broiler diets // Br Poult Sci. 2017. Vol. 58. No. 5. P. 523–529. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2017.1349298.
  26. Probiotic level effects on growth performance, carcass traits, blood parameters, cecal microbiota, and immune response of broilers / M. Pourakbari, A. Seidavi, L. Asadpour, et al. // An Acad Bras Cienc. 2016. Vol. 88. No. 2. P. 1011–1021. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201620150071.
  27. Музакаева Х. С. Влияние микроэлементов на ферментативную активность // Вестник Медицинского института. 2020. Т. 17. № . 1. С. 66–69. doi: 10.36684/med-2020-17-1-66-69.
  28. Probiotics as potential antioxidants: a systematic review / V. Mishra, C. Shah, N. Mokashe, et al. // J Agric Food Chem. 2015. Vol. 63. No. 14. P. 3615–3626. doi: 10.1021/jf506326t.
  29. Antioxidant Properties of Probiotic Bacteria / Y. Wang, Y. Wu, Y. Wang, et al. // Nutrients. 2017. Vol. 9. No. 5. P. 521. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2072–6643/9/5/521 (дата обращения: 04.09.2023). doi: 10.3390/nu9050521.
  30. Supplementation of probiotics in water beneficial growth performance, carcass traits, immune function, and antioxidant capacity in broiler chickens / L. Zhang, R. Zhang, H. Jia, et al. // Open Life Sci. 2021. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 311–322. doi: 10.1515/biol-2021-0031.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences