Main directions of improvement of legal technique using digital technologies


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The article discusses issues related to the use of digital technologies to improve legal technology in lawmaking, law enforcement, interpretation and systematization of law. The aim of the study is to identify the features of using digital technologies to improve legal technology, depending on the stages of the law-making process, as well as in the process of applying, interpreting and systematizing law. This is necessary to determine the main directions of using digital technologies in these processes, to optimize rules and tools. techniques of legal technique. As a result of the study, the author comes to the conclusion that the potential of digital technologies in the context of legal means is not being used sufficiently. Digital technologies make it possible to optimize the entire law-making process as much as possible; rationally use the available economic, material, intellectual, organizational resources. The paper concludes that digital technologies significantly reduce the time frame for the implementation of law-making procedures; the effectiveness of monitoring of current legislation, systematization of law is increasing. The means, techniques and rules of legal technique need to be adjusted taking into account the use of digital technologies, their potential and capabilities. In lawmaking, digital technologies play a special role in the subject-technical component of legal technology related to the search, processing, systematization of information necessary for drawing up a draft regulatory legal act. The author comes to the conclusion that digital technologies can be used to rationalize the applicable legal structures, including a list of participants in legal relations, their subjective rights and legal obligations, responsibilities, principles and scope of the rule of law; calculating an algorithm for possible actions of participants in legal relations, determining deviations in their behavior, legal means and mechanisms that can be used in a draft normative legal act. Digital technologies can be used to analyze and select legal terminology used in the text of a regulatory legal act; creation of electronic dictionaries of legal and technical terms; conducting legal, technical and doctrinal examinations of draft regulatory legal acts, etc.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Inna S. Barzilova

Kutafin Moscow State Law University

Email: advantage80@mail.ru
Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor. Professor of the Department of Theory of State and Law. Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Баранов В.М. Очерки техники правотворчества. М., 2021. - 821 с.
  2. Зорькин В.Д. Право против хаоса. 2- изд., испр и доп. М., 2018.- 367с.
  3. Комарова В.В. Механизм непосредственной демократии современной России: система и процедуры. М., 2014. - 559 с.
  4. Кутафин О.Е. Избранные труды. М., 2016. - 367 с.
  5. Радько Т.Н. Система права. История, современность, перспективы/ Т.Н. Радько, Е.А. Киримова, Д.М. Азми. М., 2019. - 256 с.
  6. Современные проблемы организации публичной власти. Монография / рук. авт. колл. и отв. ред. Авакьян С.А. М., 2014. - 596 с.
  7. Тихомиров Ю.А. Право: прогнозы и риски. М., 2015. - 240 с.
  8. Чиркин В.Е. Конституционная терминология. М., 2013. - 674 с.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies