Bases of classification of branches of the Russian legislation: search for new approaches in digital era


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The article considers the issues of changing the system of legislation in the context of the development of digital technologies, proposes new approaches to the classification of branches of legislation. The purpose of the article is to consider the grounds for classifying Russian legislation in the context of digital technology development. This is done to determine further directions for the transformation of domestic legislation in the digital age. As a result of the research, the author comes to the conclusion that the traditional criteria for classifying branches of legislation should be supplemented with a subjective approach and a criterion for legal regimes. The author concludes that in the context of the development of digital technologies, the nature of the subject of legal regulation will undergo changes. The specifics of participants in legal relations regulated by digital technologies will help to approach the structuring of the legal system in a more differentiated way. The subjective approach will determine in what capacity a person can participate in legal relations. Therefore, it is important to determine the legal status of participants in legal relations regulated using digital technologies when considering additional criteria for classifying branches of legislation and the subject approach. Digital rights and obligations of subjects can exist strictly in a certain sphere, only where a person participates in a relationship that is transferred to a virtual, digital reality. The article concludes that the sphere of regulation includes not only existing social relations in reality, but also relations that arise in the virtual environment. Many traditional branches of legislation in connection with the expansion of the subject of legal regulation, including relations in the virtual environment, need to review the traditional grounds for their classification, the use of additional criteria.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Inna S. Barzilova

Moscow State Law University named after O.E. Kutafina (MSAL)

Email: advantage80@mail.ru
Dr. Sci. (Law), Prof., Professor of the Department of Theory of State and Law Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Кашанина Т.В. Структура права. М., 2017. - 584 с.
  2. Отрасли законодательства и отрасли права Российской Федерации: общетеоретический, межотраслевой, отраслевой и историко-правовой аспекты/под ред. Р.Л. Хачатурова. М., 2017. - 584 с.
  3. Радько Т.Н. Система права. История, современность, перспективы/ Т.Н. Радько, Е.А. Киримова, Д.М. Азми. М., 2019. - 256 с.
  4. Тихомиров Ю.А. От эпизодичности к целевой результативности//Журнал российского права. 2017. № 1. С. 55-62.
  5. Тихомиров Ю.А. Право: прогнозы и риски. М., 2015. - 240 с.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies