Some Aspects of the Consideration of Disputes Regarding the Conclusion, Execution and Termination of International Economic Agreements

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The article examines the main individual aspects of the consideration of disputes regarding the conclusion, execution and termination of international economic agreements. Thus, it is noted that based on the consideration of various WTO dispute resolution practices, currently the vast majority of disputes are considered in violation of the deadlines provided for by the procedure, and therefore the author has put forward a proposal to modernize this dispute resolution system. In addition, measures were considered to improve the efficiency of arbitration panels by increasing membership fees of participating states for additional training and increasing salaries for employees. Attention is focused on the fact that qualified dispute resolution is one of the most important advantages of the WTO over other organizations. The current legislation on the topic under study and law enforcement practice are analyzed. At the end of the work, reasonable conclusions were drawn on the problems identified in the work.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Natalia V. Vilskaya

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: namoscow-@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 5771-4087

senior lecturer of the Department of international and public law

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Bystrikova V.S., Demidova T.K. Peaceful means of resolving international disputes // International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2023. No. 1-1, p. 6–8.
  2. Trunk-Fedorova M.P. Transparency in disputes within the framework of the European Union free trade agreements and in the practice of the WTO // International Justice. 2016. No. 1 (17). With. p. 70–80.
  3. Novruzov N.D. Evolution of procedures for resolving international disputes in the GATT/WTO // Magistracy Bulletin. 2021. No. 1-2 (112). P. 44–45.
  4. Diplomatic and Consular Personnel Case (United States v. Iran, 1980). United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (United States of America v. Iran), Judgment of 05/24/1980, I. C. J. Reports 1980. p. 20.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies