Mandate and Activities of the Special Rapporteur on the Negative Impact of Unilateral Coercive Measures on the Enjoyment of Human Rights

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The article discusses issues related to the mandate and activities of the Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment of human rights, sanctions.It is obvious that since the establishment of the mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures, there remains a need to extend the activities of this Special Procedure, since further work is required to assess the impact of unilateral coercive measures imposed bypassing the UN Security Council and their consequences on human rights and the achievement of sustainable development goals.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Irina V. Shiryova

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation; MIREA — Russian Technological University

Author for correspondence.
Email: irinashiryova@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9878-950X
Scopus Author ID: 57195977774

Associate Professor of the Department of International and Public Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Public Law Disciplines

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

References

  1. Douhan A.F. Unilateral Coercive Measures: Notion and Qualification // Journal of the Belarusian State University. International relations. 2021. No. 2. pp. 26–48.
  2. Dovgan E.F. Legal aspects of the impact of unilateral coercive measures on the achievement of sustainable Development Goals (Part 1). Право. by. 2022. No. 5 (79). pp. 89–98.
  3. Dovgan E.F. Legal aspects of the impact of unilateral coercive measures on the achievement of sustainable development Goals (Part 2) //Право.by. 2022. No. 6 (80). pp. 127–137.
  4. Douhan A.F. Fundamental human rights and coercive measures: impact and interdependence // Journal of the Belarusian State University. International relations. 2017. No. 1. pp. 67–77.
  5. Dovgan E.F. Mechanisms for the protection of human rights in the event of the introduction of unilateral coercive measures in the activities of special mechanisms of the UN Human Rights Council Право.by. 2017. No. 5 (49). pp. 124–131.
  6. Keshner M.V. Issues of legitimacy of limitation by countermeasures of the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the state//Journal of Russian Law. 2021. №3. Р. 152–171.
  7. Starzhenetsky V.V., Burykina V.A., Kuritsyna K.S. Russian anti-sanctions regulation: current state and ways of improvement// Law. 2021. No. 3. Р. 119–142.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies