Correlation Legitimate Expectation with Certain Legal Principles


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

The article analyzes some aspects of the doctrine of legitimate expectation, which has not received legislative confirmation in Russia, but already appears in the acts of higher courts as a manifestation of other legal principles. The author gives examples of the mention of legitimate expectation in the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, analyzes the relationship of the doctrine of legitimate expectation with estoppel, with the legal principles established in Russian legislation and domestic legal science. The author comes to the conclusion that estoppel, which appeared during the reform of civil legislation, already has sufficient knowledge and practice of application, in contrast to the doctrine of legitimate expectation, which could become an effective tool for protecting powerless subjects in public law relations. The author also brings up for discussion the question of the possible application of legal expectation in the context of not only legal certainty, but also the uniformity of judicial practice. It seems that the regulation and implementation of the principle of legitimate expectation will contribute to the best interaction between society and the state.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Yulia Kovaleva

Kuban State University

Associate Professor of the Department of Theory and History of State and Law Krasnodar, Russian Federation

Gyulnaz Adygezalova

Kuban State University

Email: gyulnaz_2000@mail.ru
Dr. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Theory and History of State and Law Krasnodar, Russian Federation

Bibliografia

  1. Temple Lang J. Legal Certainty and Legitimate Expectations as General Principles of Law // General Principles of European Community Law: reports from a conference in Malmo, 27-28 August 1999, organised by the Swedish Network for European Legal Studies and the j Faculty of Law, University of Lund / Ed. by U. Bernitz and J. Nergelius. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000.
  2. Адыгезалова Г.Э. Социология права Роско Паунда и Толкотта Парсонса: учебное пособие. Краснодар: КубГУ, 2006.
  3. Адыгезалова Г.Э. Социологическая юриспруденция США в XX в.: формирование доктрины, развитие и совершенствование правопорядка. Дисс. … д-ра. юрид. наук. Краснодар, 2017.
  4. Актуальные проблемы теории земельного права России: монография / Е.Н. Абанина, Н.Н. Аверьянова, А.П. Анисимов и др.; под общ. ред. А.П. Анисимова. М.: Юстицинформ, 2020 // СПС «КонсультантПлюс».
  5. Алешкова И.А., Стальнова А.С. Принцип запрета обратной силы закона: особенности реализации и тенденции развития // Государственная власть и местное самоуправление. 2020. № 10. С. 7-13.
  6. Барбук А. Защита законных ожиданий и прямое применение международного права // Белорусский журнал международного права и международных отношений. 2002. № 3. С. 23-30.
  7. Виноградова Е.В. Влияние конституционного принципа поддержания доверия граждан к закону и действиям государства на законодательный процесс // Юридическая техника. 2020. № 14. С. 117-119.
  8. Нигматуллина Э.Ф. Нормообразующие факторы, влияющие на осуществление прав на земельные участки. Казань, 2016.
  9. Шерстобоев О.Н. Защита законных ожиданий - основополагающий принцип административного права // Административное право и процесс. 2019. № 2. С. 21-26.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML


Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies