TO THE QUESTION OF THE NORMATIVISM RENOVATION IN THE MECHANISM OF LEGAL REGULATION (THE CIVIL LAW ASPECT)


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

The article is dedicated to the renovation (reconstruction, restoration) of Normativism based on the realities of the modern world and the need for preparation of transfer to a «virtual» environment. The article attempts to base the renovation of the Normativism, as it is possible without integrity destruction of its design in general. Legal regulation mechanism is chosen by authors for the study of Normativism due to the traditions of Russian legal science and General arguable promises concerning LRM unity and announcement of all elements of LRM structure as legal means. In the aspect of integrative legal consciousness doctrine development three kinds of Normativism are highlighted in the present article: absolute; conditional; abstract. Various quality-substantial proportions of state and law are in the basis of this Normativism differentiation and thus are their functions. The civil law aspect of Normativism and its renovation research is due to scientific and practical preferences of the authors, the methodological conviction of deduction priority over induction, as well as a large amount of required empirical material and the possibility of objective illustration advanced theoretical theses. The following conclusions are made: first, approaches to the Normativism must be differentiated on the basis of a specific historical period; second, the qualitative diversity of Normativism happens due to the varying ratio of state and legal functions in different historical periods; third, informative quality of Normativism also depends on the real balance of economy-politics-law and their hierarchy in different historical periods.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Elena Malysheva

Russian State University of Justice, Volga branch

Email: e-malysheva@list.ru
PhD in Law, head of department of Civil Law

Varvara Stepanova

Russian State University of Justice, Volga branch

Email: stvarvara@yandex.ru
PhD in Law, Docent of department of Civil Law

Bibliografia

  1. Алексеева Т.А. Современные политические теории. - М., 2000. С. 342.
  2. Елисеев А.П., Мухортов А.А. Некоторые аспекты правоприменительной деятельности как особой формы реализации права// Пробелы в Российском законодательстве. 2014. № 6. С. 225-229.
  3. Новгородцев П.И. Введение в философию права. - СПб.: Лань, 2000. С. 352.
  4. Садохина Н.Е. Решения Конституционного Суда РФ в системе источников российского права// Пробелы в российском законодательстве. 2018. №4. С. 37-40.
  5. Тихомирова Л.В., Тихомиров М.Ю. Юридическая энциклопедия. Издание 5-е, доп., и перераб. / Под ред. М.Ю. Тихомирова. - М., 2001. С. 375.
  6. Тихонов М.С. Экономические основы американского федерализма. (Конституционно-правовые аспекты): Дис. … канд. юрид. наук. - М., 2002. С. 184.
  7. Улен Томас С. Теория рационального выбора в экономическом анализе права // Вестник гражданского права. 2011. №3.
  8. Хандшу Э. Законодательство. Программа и процедура. / - Гайдельберг: Дейкер&Мюллер, 1991. С. 235.
  9. Хмелевская С.А. Нормативизм в теории права: многообразие аспектов// Пробелы в Российском законодательстве. 2015. № 1. С. 45-49.
  10. Энгельс Ф. Людвиг Фейербах и конец классической немецкой философии. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. ПСС. 2-е изд. В 50 т. Т. 21. С. 312.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML


Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies