The doctrine of frustration of contract in English Law


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

In the article, the authors provide a detailed analysis of the judicial practice of the genesis, formation and subsequent development of the doctrine of frustration of contract in English Contract Law. The authors show and disclose in details the circumstances the English courts may recognize as the basis for the application of doctrine. The study carried out by the authors allowed them to reflect a certain degree of influence of Roman Law on the genesis and formation of the doctrine, and allowed them to formulate their own conclusions regarding the practice of applying the doctrine of frustration in the Contract Law of England. In particular, the authors conclude that the regulation of the doctrine of frustration of contract is extremely complex. At the same time, the authors of this article note that doctrine is undoubtedly an effective tool for regulating the social relations that arise between the parties of contract. Moreover, the authors point out that by means of such an instrument as the doctrine of frustration of contract, English judges manage to find and maintain a balance between the principles of freedom of contract, pacta sunt servanda (contracts must be enforced) and the principle of justice, which is definitely matters in the conditions of dynamics of change and complexity of social relations in the world.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Olga Protopopova

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Email: oprotopopova@yandex.ru
Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Civil Law of the Department of Civil Law and Process and International Private Law

Stanislav Botvinnik

Email: rck@mail.ru
private lawyer

参考

  1. Paradine v. Jane [1647] EWHC KB J5. URL: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/1647/J5.html
  2. Taylor v. Caldwell [1863] EWHC QB J1. URL: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/1863/J1.html
  3. Stubbs v. Holywell Railway Co (1867) LR 2 Ex 311. URL: http://iamthelaw1.blogspot.com/2007/05/contract-frustration.html
  4. Robinson v. Davison (1871) LR 6 Ex 269. URL: https://clck.ru/Rrkar
  5. Condor v. Baron Knights [1966] 1 WLR 87. URL: http://www.e-lawresources.co.uk/Condor-v-Baron-Knights.php
  6. Nicholl and Knight v. Ashton, Eldridge & Co [1901] 2 KB 126. URL: https://www.e-lawresources.co.uk/Nicholl-and-Knight-v-Ashton%2C-Eldridge--and--Co.php
  7. Cutter v. Powell (1795) EWHC KB J13. URL: https://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/format.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/1795/J13.html&query=(cutter)+AND+(powell)
  8. Arcos v. E.A. Ronaasen and Son [1933] AC 470. URL: https://simplestudying.com/arcos-ltd-v-ea-ronaasen-son/
  9. Krell v. Henry [1903] 2 KB 740. URL: https://www.trans-lex.org/311100/_/krell-v-henry-%5B1903%5D-2-kb-740/
  10. Fibrosa Spolka Akcyjna v. Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour Ltd [1942] UKHL 4. URL: https://clck.ru/RrkDX
  11. Падиряков А. В., Барабаш Р. В. Тщетность договоров, заключенных по праву Англии, как возможное последствие санкций ЕС против российских компаний // Актуальные проблемы экономики и права. 2017. Т. 11, № 1. С. 98-107. doi: 10.21202/1993-047X.11.2017.1.98-107
  12. Петрова Д.С. Доктрина frustration of contract: ее сфера действия, признаки и последствия тщетности договора по английскому праву // Вестник экономического правосудия Российской Федерации. 2017. № 10. С. 115-144.
  13. Петрова Д.С. Тщетность цели договора как частный случай тщетности договора по английскому праву // Вестник экономического правосудия Российской Федерации. 2017. № 12. С. 158-173.
  14. Протопопова О.В. Принципы правового регулирования финансовой системы США // Социально-политические науки. 2018. № 3. С. 119-123.
  15. Чукреев А.А. Доктрина фрустрации в английском договорном праве // Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2017. № 4. С. 188-201.
  16. Arthur Anderson, Frustration of Contract - A Rejected Doctrine, 3 DePaul L. Rev. 1 (1953)
  17. Pawlowski, M. & Brown, J.P. The Termination of Real Property Interests by Frustration under English Law // Nottingham Law Journal. 2018. № 27. P. 46-63.
  18. Treitel G. The Law of Contract. 11th ed. London, 2003. P. 201-214.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML


##common.cookie##