On the Issues of Bringing to Administrative Responsibility in the Implementation of Missionary Activities

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

This article is devoted to the issue of attracting citizens who, by virtue of their religious beliefs, are engaged in missionary activities. At the same time, their actions, often unconsciously, may violate the current legislation, which, accordingly, entails bringing to administrative responsibility. At the same time, attracting such citizens for such administrative offenses, a number of significant contradictions in the actions of employees and in the existing legislation are revealed.

作者简介

Dmitry Ivanov

Moscow Financial and Industrial University «Synergy»; Moscow Regional Bar Association

Email: eleseeff@mail.ru
Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor of the Department of Legal Regulation business and applied jurisprudence Faculty of Law; lawyer Moscow, Russian Federation

参考

  1. «Constitution of the Russian Federation» (adopted by popular vote on 12.12.1993 with amendments approved during the All-Russian vote on 01.07.2020).
  2. Federal Law «On Freedom of Conscience and on Religious Associations» dated 26.09.1997 N 125-FZ (as amended on 11.06.2021).
  3. Criminal Code of the RSFSR, (as amended. The Law of the RSFSR of July 25, 1962 and the Decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR of January 30, 1984 -Vedomosti of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR, 1962, No. 29, Article 449; 1984, No. 5, Article 168).
  4. «Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses» of December 30, 2001 N 195-FZ (ed. from 14.07.2022) (with amendments and additions, intro. effective from 01.09.2022).
  5. Case No. 5-299/2018 of the Magistrate's Court District No. 1 of the city of Slavgorod of the Altai Territory under Part 4 of Article 5.26 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation.
  6. Case No. 5-1/2022 of 09.02.2022 of the Magistrate's Court District No. 11 of the Moscow District Court of Ryazan.
  7. Case No. 12-73/2022 of 01.06.2022 of the Moscow District Court of the city of Ryazan.
  8. Afanasyeva O.A., Koimshidi G.F., Correlation dependence of administrative delinquency in the field of migration with changes in administrative punishment // Publishing House «Yur-VAK», Legal Journal «Problems of Economics and Legal practice», No. 6/2021. pp. 54-60.
  9. Ivanov D.V. Administrative law of the Russian Federation. Textbook // M.-Publishing House «Synergy University», 2020.
  10. Ivanov D.V., On the sources of the norm of administrative coercion in the Old Testament legislation (based on the analysis of the book Leviticus of the Mosaic Pentateuch) // Publishing House «Yur-VAK», Law Journal «Gaps in Russian Legislation», No. 6/2020. pp. 202-207.
  11. Duginets A.S., Kanunnikova N.G., Administrative responsibility for public actions aimed at discrediting the use of the armed forces of the Russian Federation // Publishing House «Yur-VAK», Legal Journal «Gaps in Russian legislation», No. 4/2022. pp. 219-224.
  12. Matyukhina M.G., On the question of the public danger of administrative offenses // Publishing house «Yur-VAK», Legal Journal «Problems of Economics and legal practice», No. 2/2022. pp. 110-113.
  13. Liman Yu.A., Markina M.V., Bringing to administrative responsibility of an official in case of loss of the specified status// Journal «Issues of Sustainable Development of Society, Moscow: Institute for the Development of Education and Consulting, LLC, 2022, pp. 198-203.
  14. Sheveleva A.S., On the issue of administrative and legal regulation of professional training for customs activities, journal «Gaps in Russian legislation», 2021, No. 3.
  15. Shaposhnikov S.G., (2020), Problems of implementing administrative supervision over persons released from places of deprivation of liberty, a practical view // Gaps in Russian legislation, No. 2, 2020, pp. 239-243.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载


##common.cookie##