Accounting and assessment of ecosystem services of Novokuznetsk coal-mining area (Kemerovo Oblast)

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Development of territories with excessive mineral resource use is traditionally based on income from mining and mineral resources processing. At the same time, their ecosystems are an important source of human well-being as they produce many ecosystem services. Reaching a compromise between two sources of territory development – abiotic services (coal mining) and ecosystem services – is one of the major objectives of sustainable development of the regions with excessive mineral resource use. This article assesses and compares ecosystem and abiotic services in the coal-mining area in Kemerovo oblast in monetary and physical terms. The results of economic evaluation of ecosystem and abiotic services are considered to be a key element in efficiency assessment of spatial organization of environmental management concerning sustainable development of the territory.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

G. Fomenko

Research and Consulting Syndicate Cadaster Institute; Yaroslavl State Technical University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: info@nipik.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Yaroslavl

M. Fomenko

Research and Consulting Syndicate Cadaster Institute

Email: info@nipik.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Yaroslavl

K. Loshadkin

Research and Consulting Syndicate Cadaster Institute; Yaroslavl State Technical University

Email: info@nipik.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Yaroslavl

A. Mikhailova

Research and Consulting Syndicate Cadaster Institute

Email: info@nipik.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Yaroslavl

参考

  1. Anuchin D.N. Izbrannye geograficheskie raboty [Selected Geographical Works]. Moscow, 1949. 388 p.
  2. Baklanov P.Y., Karakin V.P. Natural-resource space: Differentiation, boundaries, types. Geography and Natural Resources, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 308–313.
  3. Bobylev S.N. Ekonomika prirodopol’zovaniya: uchebnik [Environmental Economics: Textbook]. Moscow: INFRA-M Publ., 2014, 2nd ed. 400 p.
  4. Bobylev S.N., Zakharov V.M. Ekosistemnye uslugi. Chelovek i priroda [Ecosystem Services. Human and Nature]. Moscow: Departament Prirodopol'zovaniya i Okhrany Okruzhayushchei Sredy Goroda Moskvy, TSentr Ustojchivogo Razvitiya i Zdorov'ya Sredy IBR Akad. Nauk, TSentr Ekol. Politiki Rossii, 2015. 100 p.
  5. Vernadsky V.I. Biosfera i noosfera [Biosphere and Noosphere]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1989. 261 p.
  6. Fomenko G.A., Fomenko M.A., Loshadkin K.A., Mikhailova A.V., Ladygina O.V. Denezhnaya otsenka ekosistemnykh uslug [Monetary Assessment of Ecosystem Services]. Yaroslavl: Yaroslavskii Gos. Tech. Univ., 2012. 128 p.
  7. Isakov Yu.A., Kazanskaya N.S., Tishkov A.A. Zonal’nye zakonomernosti dinamiki ekosistem [Zonal Patterns of Ecosystem Dynamics]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1986. 170 p.
  8. Mints A.A. Geographical issues of economic use of natural resources of the US.R. In Voprosy Geografii. Sb. 75: Territorial'naya organizatsiya proizvoditel'nykh sil SSSR [Problems of Geography. Vol. 75: Territorial Organization of the Productive Forces of the USSR]. Moscow, 1968, pp. 19–37. (In Russ).
  9. Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication. UNEP, 2011. 44 p.
  10. Perelet R. Ekonomika i okruzhayushchaya sreda: anglo-russkii slovar' spravochnik [Economy and environment: English-Russian Dictionary-Handbook]. Markandia A., Ed. Moscow: Garvardskii Inst. Mezhd. Razvitiya, 1996. 120 p.
  11. Privalovskaya G.A. Socio-economic aspects of the change of natural complexes in the modern resource-based regions of Russia. In Izmeneniya prirodno-territorial’nykh kompleksov v zonakh antropogennogo vozdeistviya [Changes in Natural and Territorial Complexes in Zones of Anthropogenic Impact]. Moscow: Media-Press, 2006, pp. 4–19. (In Russ.).
  12. Sochava V.B. Uchenie o geosistemakh [The Doctrine of Geosystems]. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ., 1975. 39 p.
  13. Fomenko G.A. Upravlenie prirodookhrannoi deyatel’nost’yu: Osnovy sotsiokul’turnoi metodologii [Environmental Management: Basics of Sociocultural Methodology]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 2004. 390 p.
  14. Fomenko G.A., Fomenko M.A., Loshadkin K.A., Goge Е.А. Ecosystem approach in the territorial management of environmental management and environmental protection. Probl. Reg. Ekol., 2018, no. 1, pp. 50–66. (In Russ.).
  15. Brouwer R. Environmental value transfer: state of the art and future prospects. Ecol. Econ., 2000, vol. 32, no. 1, рр. 137–152.
  16. Burkhard B., Crossman N., Nedkov S., Petz K., Alkemade R. Mapping and modelling ecosystem services for science, policy and practice. Ecosyst. Serv., 2013, no. 4, рр. 1–3.
  17. Costanza R., d’Arge R., de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O’Neill R.V., Paruelo J., Raskin R.G., Sutton P., van den Belt M. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1987, vol. 387, no. 6630, рр. 253–260.
  18. Daily G.C. Introduction: What are ecosystem services. In Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Daily G.C., Ed. Washington: Island Press, 1997, pp. 1–10.
  19. Dasgupta P., Duraiappah A. Chapter 1: Well-beingand wealth. In Inclusive Wealth Report 2012. Measuring Progress Toward Sustainability. UNU-IH.P. UNEP, 2012, pp. 29–53.
  20. De Groot R., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol. Complex., 2010, vol. 7, no. 3, рр. 260–272.
  21. Farber S.C., Costanza R., Wilson M.A. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ., 2002, vol. 41, no. 3, рр. 375–392.
  22. Howarth R.B., Farber S. Accounting for the value of ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ., 2002, vol. 41, no. 3, рр. 421–429.
  23. Maes J., Egoh B., Willemen L., Liquete C., Vihervaara P., Schägner J., Grizzetti B., Drakou E.G., LaNotte A., Zulian G., Bouraoui F., Paracchini M.L., Braat L.C., Bidoglio G. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosyst. Serv., 2012, vol. 1, no. 1, рр. 31–39.
  24. Richardson L., Loomis J., Kroeger T., Casey F. The role of benefit transfer in ecosystem service valuation. Ecol. Econ., 2015, vol. 115, pр. 51–58.
  25. Seppelt R., Fath B., Burkhard B., Fisher J.L., Grêt-Regamey A., Lautenbach S., Pert P., Hotes S., Spangenberg J., Verburg P.H., Van Oudenhoven A.P.E. Form follows function? Proposing a blueprint for ecosystem service assessments based on reviews and case studies. Ecol. Indic., 2012, vol. 21, рр. 145–154.
  26. System of Environmental–Economic Accounting 2012 Experimental Ecosystem Accounting. Statistical Papers, Series F, No. 112. Sales No. E13.XVII.13. United Nations. 2014. Available at: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seearev/ (accessed 18.04.2019).
  27. System of Environmental–Economic Accounting 2012 – Central Framework. Statistical Papers, Series F, No. 109. Sales No. E12.XVII.12. United Nations. 2014. Available at: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seearev/ (accessed 18.04.2019).
  28. TEEB – The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for National and International Policy Makers. Welzel, Germany, 2009. 59 р.
  29. Ulgiati S., Zucaro A., Franzese P.P. Shared wealth or nobody’s land? The worth of natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ., 2011, vol. 70, no. 4, рр. 778–787.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

版权所有 © Russian academy of sciences, 2019