The Evolution of Cities and Their Functional Diversity

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Resumo

The article deals with the problems of the relationship between the agglomeration effects of localization and urbanization. As an indicator of these processes, the relationship between the population of cities and the number of enterprises and organizations in them is used. It is assumed that the number of enterprises indirectly reflects the diversity of places of employment, although not weighted by industry structure. As a result of the study, a statistically significant relationship between these two indicators was established both for the subjects of the federation and for cities with a population of more than 100 thousand people. The main focus is on the study and explanation of deviations from the general pattern of the rank of the city/the number of enterprises in it. On this basis, the typology of cities is carried out on several grounds: administrative status, economic and geographical location, the presence of large city-forming enterprises. According to the results of the study, specific parametric characteristics were identified that allow us to distinguish single-industry cities. Using the example of the key, the study was continued for settlements with less population, as a result, it was found that for them, geographical location and specialization are more important than population.

Sobre autores

V. Baburin

Faculty of Geography, Moscow State University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: vbaburin@yandex.ru
Russia, Moscow

Bibliografia

  1. Бабурин В.Л., Гладкевич Г.И., Даньшин А.И., Савоскул М.С., Сафронов С.Г. Изменение функции места и территориальные конфликты (на примере Боровского района Калужской области) // Вестн. Моск. ун-та. Сер. 5. Геогр. 2018. № 6. С. 72–82.
  2. Бабурин В.Л., Рыбкин А.В. Оценка потенциала агломерационных процессов в территориальных социально-экономических системах (на примере Иркутской городской агломерации) // Региональные исследования. 2019. № 4. С. 4–19.
  3. Лобанов М.М. Формирование комплексов и кластеров в промышленности в условиях рыночных отношений // Журн. Новой экономической ассоциации. 2011. Т. 10. С. 178–182.
  4. Маршалл А. Принципы политической экономии. М.: Прогресс, 1983. Т. 1. 408 с.
  5. Растворцева С.Н. Управление развитием процессов концентрации экономической активности в регионе: подходы новой экономической географии. М.: Экон-информ, 2017. 131 с.
  6. Audretsch D.B., Feldman M.P. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production // American Econ. Rev. 1996. Vol. 86. № 3. P. 630–640.
  7. Beaudry C., Schiffauerova A. Who’s right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate // Res. Policy. 2009. Vol. 38. № 2. P. 318–337.
  8. Glaeser E.L., Kallal H.D., Scheinkmann J.A., Shleifer A. Growth in Cities // J. of Political Econ. 1992. Vol. 100. № 6. P. 1126–1152.
  9. Jacobs J. The Economy of Cities. NY: Random House, 1969. P. 268.
  10. Okubo T. et al. Productivity distribution, firm heterogeneity, and agglomeration: evidence from firm-level data // RJETI I. Iscussiot 1 Paper. 2010. № 1001. 33 p.
  11. Rosenthal S.S., Strange W.C. Geography, industrial organization, and agglomeration // Rev. of Econ. and Statistics. 2003. Vol. 8. № 2. P. 377–393.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
2.

Baixar (258KB)
3.

Baixar (36KB)
4.

Baixar (548KB)
5.

Baixar (36KB)
6.

Baixar (35KB)
7.

Baixar (35KB)
8.

Baixar (38KB)
9.

Baixar (43KB)
10.

Baixar (26KB)
11.

Baixar (577KB)

Declaração de direitos autorais © В.Л. Бабурин, 2023