Experience of classification of Russian regions by the dynamics of ethnic mosaics in the post-Soviet period

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Russian scientists have studied in detail the changes in the ethnic structure of the population of the country’s regions that occurred in the 1990s and 2000s. This analysis can be expanded by including the results of the 2021 census in scientific circulation. The objective of the study is to identify the features of the dynamics of the ethnic structure of the population of the federal subjects of Russia between the 1989 and 2021 censuses based on indicators characterizing the ethnic heterogeneity of the population. In the post-Soviet period, the overwhelming majority of regions of the country experienced positive dynamics in the share of the Russian or titular (in national-territorial entities) population. During this period, a tendency towards homogenization of the ethnic structure of the population of the federal subjects became clearly evident. The “Russian mega-core” has expanded somewhat, including regions and territories with a Russian population share of over 90%, especially in Siberia and the Far East. Among the national-territorial entities, the Chechen and Ingush Republics became mono-ethnic during this period. In most other national-territorial entities, the share of titular peoples also grew, and in many of them the share of titular ethnic groups currently exceeds half of the population and continues to grow. A decrease in the share of the titular population occurred only in seven national-territorial entities. They are located primarily in the north of the European part of Russia: the republics of Karelia, Komi, Udmurtia, Mari El and Chuvashia. The Republic of Adygea and the Jewish Autonomous Oblast also belong to this category.

About the authors

N. K. Terenina

Pskov State University

Email: brazelon@yandex.ru
Pskov, Russia

R. N. Krotok

Pskov State University

Email: roma.krotok@yandex.ru
Pskov, Russia

References

  1. Andreev E.M., Churilova E.V. The results of the 2021 All-Russian Population Census in the light of civil registration statistics and censuses of previous years. Demograf. Obozr., 2023, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 4–20. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v10i3.17967
  2. Bufetova A.N., Kolomak E.A. National heterogeneity in the regions of Russia. EKO, 2017, no. 4, pp. 110–123. (In Russ.).
  3. Bufetova A.N., Kolomak E.A., Mikhaleva M.M. National diversity and economic development of Russian regions. Mir Ekon. Upravl., 2017, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 143–157. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2017-17-3-143-157
  4. Bufetova A.N., Kolomak E.A., Khrzhanovskaya A.A. National and religious diversity of Siberian regions. EKO, 2018, no. 5, pp. 28–44. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30680/ЕСО0131-7652-2018-5-28-44
  5. Campos N., Saleh A., Kuzeyev V. Dynamic ethnic fractionalization and economic growth. J. Int. Trade Econ., 2011, vol. 20, pp. 129–152.
  6. Casey G., Owen A. Inequality and fractionalization. World Dev., 2014, vol. 56, pp. 32 –50.
  7. Ekkel’ B.M. Determination of the mosaic index of the national composition of the republics, territories and regions of the USSR. Sovet. Etnogr., 1976, no. 2, pp. 33–39. (In Russ.).
  8. Fedderke J., Luiz J., de Kadt R. Using fractionalization indexes: Deriving methodological principles for growth studies from time series evidence. Soc. Indic. Res., 2014, vol. 85, pp. 257–278.
  9. Gorokhov S.A. Geografiya religii: Tsikly razvitiya global’nogo konfessional’nogo prostranstva [Geography of Religions: Cycles of Development of the Global Confessional Space]. Moscow: UNITY-DANA Publ., 2020. 235 p.
  10. Gorokhov S.A. Religious fractionalization as a factor of regional economic development in the modern world. Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5: Geogr., 2014, no. 4, pp. 56–61. (In Russ.).
  11. Greenberg J.H. The Measurement of Linguistic Diversity. Language, 1956, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 109–115.
  12. Dorofeeva D.Yu., Savoskul M.S. Changes in the ethnic mosaic of Russian regions. In Etnicheskaya demografiya. Sb. Ser. Demograficheskie issledovaniya [Ethnic Demography. Collection. Ser. Demographic Studies]. Danilova I.A., Kharaeva O.A., Eds. Moscow: MAKS Press Publ., 2010, pp. 72–93. (In Russ.).
  13. Lysenko A.V., Azanov D.S., Vodop’yanova D.S. Ethnocontact zones in the system of ethnocultural zoning of the North Caucasus. Nauka. Innov. Tekhnol., 2013, no. 1, pp. 130–137. (In Russ.).
  14. Lysenko A.V., Vodop’yanova D.S., Azanov D.S. Ethnocontact zones of the North Caucasus. Vestn. Stavropol’. Gos. Univ., 2011, no. 3, pp. 165–170. (In Russ.).
  15. Manakov A.G. Geokul’turnoe prostranstvo severo-zapada Russkoi ravniny: dinamika, struktura, ierarkhiya [Geo-Cultural Space of the North-West of the Russian Plain: Dynamics, Structure, Hierarchy]. Pskov, 2002. 300 p.
  16. Manakov A.G. Spatial patterns in the transformation of the ethnic structure of the Russian population between the 1959 and 2010 censuses. Geogr. Nat. Resour., 2019, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 106–114.
  17. Manakov A.G. Title peoples of the republics of Russia: ethno-demographic trends since 1939. Pskov. Regionolog. Zh., 2022, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 43–64. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37490/S221979310019231-7
  18. Manakov A.G., Sidorovich A.A., Ivanov I.A. Ethnodemographic processes in the Baltic territory in the period from 1959 to 1989. Vestn. Pskov. Gos. Univ., Ser.: Estestv. Fiziko-Matem. Nauki, 2024, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 3–18. (In Russ.).
  19. Montalvo J., Reynal-Querol M. Why ethnic fractionalization? Polarization, Ethnic Conflict and Growth. UPF Working Paper No. 660, 2002. 44 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.394926
  20. Nabieva U.N. Kul’turnaya geografiya Dagestana [Cultural Geography of Dagestan]. Moscow: Institut naslediya, 2002. 210 p.
  21. Nikolaeva E.D. Meta-ethnic heterogeneity of the urban and rural population in Kazakhstan and Central Asia in 1939–1970. Pskov. Regionolog. Zh., 2024, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 102–120. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37490/S221979310031931-7
  22. Orlov A.Yu. Geodemographic studies of ethnoassimilation processes (on the example of the population of the Volga Federal District). Geogr. Prir. Resur., 2011, no. 1, pp. 129–136. (In Russ.).
  23. Orlov A.Yu. Historical and geographical aspects of the transformation of the ethnic structure of the population of the Russian Federation. Reg. Issled., 2013, no. 2, pp. 120–124. (In Russ.).
  24. Papyrakis E., Mo P. Fractionalization, polarization, and economic growth: identifying the transmission channels. Econ. Inq., 2014, vol. 52, pp. 1204–1218.
  25. Pokshishevskii V.V. Methods of studying the ethnic mixture of the urban population. Sovet. Etnogr., 1983, no. 1, pp. 16–23. (In Russ.).
  26. Posner D.N. Measuring Ethnic Fractionalization in Africa. Am. J. Pol. Sci., 2004, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 849–863.
  27. Saltykova Yu.A., Saltykov A.S. The need for an expert assessment of the results of the Russian population census in 2021. In Ekspertnye instituty v XXI veke: tsivilizatsionnye i tsifrovye kontseptsii menyayushchegosya mira. Sb. nauch. tr. Vtoroi mezhdun. nauch.-prakt. konf. [Expert Institutions in the 21st Century: Civilizational and Digital Concepts of a Changing World. Collection of Sci. Papers of the 2d Int. Sci. and Pract. Conf.]. Irkutsk, 2023, pp. 305–307. (In Russ.).
  28. Safronov S.G. Modern trends in the transformation of the ethnic composition of the population of Russia. Baltic Region, 2015, no. 3, pp. 138–153.
  29. Sidorenko N.A. Ethnic mosaic in the realities of the ethno-social history of the Crimea of the 20 century. V Mire Nauch. Otkrytii, 2015, no. 3, pp. 2798–2808. (In Russ.).
  30. Soroko E.L. Ethnically mixed couples in the Russian Federation. Demogr. Obozr., 2014, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 96–123. (In Russ.).
  31. Streletsky V.N. Russia in ethno-cultural dimension: the factors of regionalization and spatial structures. In Regional’noe razvitie i regional’naya politika Rossii v perekhodnyi period [Regional Development and Regional Policy of Russia in the Transition Period]. Moscow, 2011, pp. 146–176. (In Russ.).
  32. Terenina N.K. The index of ethnic contact as a tool for studying territories with a mixed national composition of the population. Pskov. Regionolog. Zh., 2022, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 101–116. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37490/S221979310018427-2
  33. Terenina N.K. Experience of assessing the ethnic contrast of the borders of the republics of the Ural-Volga region. Vestn. Balt. Fed. Univ. Kanta, Ser.: Estestv. Med. Nauki, 2023, no. 3, pp. 40–50. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.5922/gikbfu-2023-3-3
  34. Shabaev Yu.P. Demographic “catastrophe” of the Russian Finno-Ugric peoples: Social and political motivation for the drift of identities. POLITEKS, 2023, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 634–647. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2023.409
  35. Shitikov F.V. Geographic features of the ethno-confessional situation on the territory of the Republic of Buryatia. Izv. Irk. Univ., Ser. Nauki o Zemle, 2015, no. 11, pp. 141–148. (In Russ.).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences