“New” rural settlements – former urban-type settlements

Capa

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Since the 1920s, when the notion of “urban-type settlement” (UTS) was introduced in Russia, and until the 1980s the number of UTSs was constantly increasing. But since the 1990s, their rapid decline began, and by 2019 more than a third of them were transformed into rural settlements. In this article, the authors try to find out what the “new villages” – the former UTSs are; where they are located; what their functions (largely lost) are, and what the specific features of their population are. From 1989 to 2010, the processes of transformation of UTSs into rural settlements administratively increased rural population of Russia by 2.4 mln people and held back the growth of the urban population share, which increased only slightly from 73.4 to 73.7%. When comparing the census data of 1989 and 2010 in many regions, the “administrative ruralization” radically changed the dynamics of the population: instead of a real decrease in the number of rural residents, Census-2010 showed the increase of rural population. Former UTSs are losing population more rapidly than the rural areas of their municipal districts, and the most intensive outflow is in logging settlements, centers of construction and colonies-settlements. The average population size of the former UTSs is minimal in the North of European Russia and the Far North, and maximum in the European South and in the Ural-Volga area, where the former UTSs-district centers are mostly concentrated, in which change of their status was purely formal.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

A. Chuchkalov

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: chuchkalov_sashka@mail.ru

Faculty of Geography

Rússia, Moscow

A. Alekseev

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: alival@mail.ru

Faculty of Geography

Rússia, Moscow

Bibliografia

  1. Glezer O.B. Local self-government system as a component of the institutional background of settlement pattern in modern Russia. In Voprosy geografii. Sb. 135: Geografiya naseleniya i sotsial'naya geografiya [Problems of Geography. Vol. 135: Geography of Population and Social Geography]. Moscow: Kodeks Publ., 2013, pp. 224-244. (In Russ.).
  2. Glezer O.B. The continuing municipal reform in Russia and the innovations of 2014-2015. In Rossiya 2016: Ezhegodnyi doklad Franko-rossiiskogo analiticheskogo tsentra Observo [Russia 2016: Annual Report of the Franco-Russian Analytical Center Observo]. Moscow: Observo, 2016, pp. 373-386. (In Russ.).
  3. Glezer O.B., Borodina T.L., Artobolevsky S.S. Local self-government reform and administrative territorial system of the subjects of the Russian Federation. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2008, no. 5, pp. 51-64. (In Russ.).
  4. Glezer O.B., Borodina T.L., Artobolevsky S.S. Municipal and administrative territorial system of the subjects of the Russian Federation. In Regional'noe razvitie i regional'naya politika Rossii v perekhodnyi period [Regional Development and Regional Policy in Russia during the Transition Period]. Artobolevsky S.S., Glezer O.B., Eds. Moscow: MGTU im. Baumana, 2011, pp. 241-264. (In Russ.).
  5. Grigorovich M.A. Modern socio-geographical trends in the development of urban-type settlements in old industrial region (on the example of the Middle Urals). Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Geogr.) Dissertation. Yekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical Univ., 2006. 20 p.
  6. Kopoteva I.V. Modern trends in the development of small urban settlements of Karelia. Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Geogr.) Dissertation. St. Petersburg: the Herzen State Pedagogical Univ. of Russia, 1999. 22 p.
  7. Kumo K., Litvinenko T.V. The population of Chukotka in space and time. Ross. Regiony: Vzglyad v Budushchee, 2016, vol. 3, no. 3, рp. 50-66. (In Russ.).
  8. Litvinenko T.V. Post-soviet transformation of natural resources utilization and its impact on dynamics of population in Chukotka Autonomous Okrug. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2013, no. 2, pp. 30-42. (In Russ.).
  9. Prokhorchuk M.V. Urban-type settlements: problems and ways of development (on the example of Krasnoyarsk Krai). Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Geogr.) Dissertation. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical Univ. Named after V. P. Astafyev, 2002. 22 p.
  10. Simagin Yu.A. Change in the ratio of urban and rural population in the regions of Russia for the period 1991-1997. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2000, no. 4, pp. 56-63. (In Russ.).
  11. Simagin Yu.A. Change of a role of urban-type settlements in the Russian settlement system throughout the 20th century. Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Pedagogicheskogo Univ., Ser. Estestvennye Nauki, 2009, no. 1, pp. 20-27. (In Russ.).
  12. Simagin Yu.A. Poselki gorodskogo tipa Rossii: transformatsiya seti i osobennosti razvitiya [Settlements of Urban Type in Russia: Network Transformation and Development Features]. Moscow: Inst. Sots.-Ekon. Probl. Narodonaseleniya Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2009. 224 p.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian academy of sciences, 2019