“New” rural settlements – former urban-type settlements

Cover Page

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Since the 1920s, when the notion of “urban-type settlement” (UTS) was introduced in Russia, and until the 1980s the number of UTSs was constantly increasing. But since the 1990s, their rapid decline began, and by 2019 more than a third of them were transformed into rural settlements. In this article, the authors try to find out what the “new villages” – the former UTSs are; where they are located; what their functions (largely lost) are, and what the specific features of their population are. From 1989 to 2010, the processes of transformation of UTSs into rural settlements administratively increased rural population of Russia by 2.4 mln people and held back the growth of the urban population share, which increased only slightly from 73.4 to 73.7%. When comparing the census data of 1989 and 2010 in many regions, the “administrative ruralization” radically changed the dynamics of the population: instead of a real decrease in the number of rural residents, Census-2010 showed the increase of rural population. Former UTSs are losing population more rapidly than the rural areas of their municipal districts, and the most intensive outflow is in logging settlements, centers of construction and colonies-settlements. The average population size of the former UTSs is minimal in the North of European Russia and the Far North, and maximum in the European South and in the Ural-Volga area, where the former UTSs-district centers are mostly concentrated, in which change of their status was purely formal.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

A. S. Chuchkalov

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: chuchkalov_sashka@mail.ru

Faculty of Geography

Russian Federation, Moscow

A. I. Alekseev

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: alival@mail.ru

Faculty of Geography

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Glezer O.B. Local self-government system as a component of the institutional background of settlement pattern in modern Russia. In Voprosy geografii. Sb. 135: Geografiya naseleniya i sotsial'naya geografiya [Problems of Geography. Vol. 135: Geography of Population and Social Geography]. Moscow: Kodeks Publ., 2013, pp. 224-244. (In Russ.).
  2. Glezer O.B. The continuing municipal reform in Russia and the innovations of 2014-2015. In Rossiya 2016: Ezhegodnyi doklad Franko-rossiiskogo analiticheskogo tsentra Observo [Russia 2016: Annual Report of the Franco-Russian Analytical Center Observo]. Moscow: Observo, 2016, pp. 373-386. (In Russ.).
  3. Glezer O.B., Borodina T.L., Artobolevsky S.S. Local self-government reform and administrative territorial system of the subjects of the Russian Federation. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2008, no. 5, pp. 51-64. (In Russ.).
  4. Glezer O.B., Borodina T.L., Artobolevsky S.S. Municipal and administrative territorial system of the subjects of the Russian Federation. In Regional'noe razvitie i regional'naya politika Rossii v perekhodnyi period [Regional Development and Regional Policy in Russia during the Transition Period]. Artobolevsky S.S., Glezer O.B., Eds. Moscow: MGTU im. Baumana, 2011, pp. 241-264. (In Russ.).
  5. Grigorovich M.A. Modern socio-geographical trends in the development of urban-type settlements in old industrial region (on the example of the Middle Urals). Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Geogr.) Dissertation. Yekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical Univ., 2006. 20 p.
  6. Kopoteva I.V. Modern trends in the development of small urban settlements of Karelia. Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Geogr.) Dissertation. St. Petersburg: the Herzen State Pedagogical Univ. of Russia, 1999. 22 p.
  7. Kumo K., Litvinenko T.V. The population of Chukotka in space and time. Ross. Regiony: Vzglyad v Budushchee, 2016, vol. 3, no. 3, рp. 50-66. (In Russ.).
  8. Litvinenko T.V. Post-soviet transformation of natural resources utilization and its impact on dynamics of population in Chukotka Autonomous Okrug. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2013, no. 2, pp. 30-42. (In Russ.).
  9. Prokhorchuk M.V. Urban-type settlements: problems and ways of development (on the example of Krasnoyarsk Krai). Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Geogr.) Dissertation. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical Univ. Named after V. P. Astafyev, 2002. 22 p.
  10. Simagin Yu.A. Change in the ratio of urban and rural population in the regions of Russia for the period 1991-1997. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2000, no. 4, pp. 56-63. (In Russ.).
  11. Simagin Yu.A. Change of a role of urban-type settlements in the Russian settlement system throughout the 20th century. Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Pedagogicheskogo Univ., Ser. Estestvennye Nauki, 2009, no. 1, pp. 20-27. (In Russ.).
  12. Simagin Yu.A. Poselki gorodskogo tipa Rossii: transformatsiya seti i osobennosti razvitiya [Settlements of Urban Type in Russia: Network Transformation and Development Features]. Moscow: Inst. Sots.-Ekon. Probl. Narodonaseleniya Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2009. 224 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. The share of settlements that lost the status of the town in 1989–2018, in the total number of town that existed in 1989,%.

Download (114KB)
3. Fig. 2. The proportion of the population of urban settlements converted into rural settlements in 1989–2018, of the total number of rural residents in 2010

Download (133KB)
4. Fig. 3. The population of urban settlements demoted for the period 1989–2018, according to the 2010 census

Download (138KB)
5. Fig. 4. The average population of former townships demoted for the period 1989–2018, according to the 2010 census

Download (122KB)
6. Fig. 5. The ratio of the population of the former towns in 2010 to the largest population according to the All-Union and All-Russian population censuses.

Download (148KB)
7. Fig. 6. The average population of former urban settlements of different functional types, according to the 2010 census

Download (129KB)
8. Fig. 7. The dynamics of the population of the former urban settlements in relation to the dynamics of the rural population in 2002–2010.

Download (239KB)
9. Fig. 8. The ratio of the share of people over working age to the share of people under working age in the population of former towns and rural populations of the respective constituent entities of the Russian Federation (according to the 2010 All-Russian Population Census).

Download (12KB)
10. Fig. 9. The ratio of the share of people over working age to the share of people under working age in the former village (according to the 2010 All-Russian Population Census).

Download (96KB)

Copyright (c) 2019 Russian academy of sciences