Immunohistochemical markers for neurobiology

Cover Page

Abstract


In neurobiological studies, crucial is the selection of most appropriate and informative experimental methods, one of which is immunohistochemistry. This review briefly summarizes the experience of adaptation of immunohistochemical methods to nervous system studies accumulated over years the Laboratory of Functional Morphology of the Central and Peripheral Nervous System (Institute of Experimental Medicine). The aim of this work was to determine the most effective and reliable immunomarkers for neurobiological studies. The article contains theoretical basis and practical recommendations for use of key cytospecific and functional markers used in studies of structural and functional organization of brain and spinal cord of mammalian animals and human. In particular, the results of immunohistochemical reactions to neural markers (NeuN, neurofilament proteins, alpha-tubulin, alpha-synuclein), neurotransmitter synthesizing enzymes (tyrosine hydroxylase, glutamate decarboxylase, choline acetyltransferase, NO synthase) and glial markers (GFAP, glutamine synthetase, Iba-1, vimentin) are demonstrated. The presented methodology is useful for experimental neurobiology and clinical morphological diagnostics.


Full Text

In neurobiological studies, the identification of cells that respond to experimental influences and the determination of their functional status has always been an important task. In recent years, scientists have had access to a significant range of immunohistochemical, molecular, and genetic techniques to address these problems. Unfortunately, immunohistochemistry methods, which are the most accessible to neuroscientists, do not always produce high-quality results, as the antibodies used to identify specific structural and functional markers may not be suitable for certain tasks or cannot be combined with secondary reagents. Immunohistochemical labeling failures during experimental neurobiological studies also occur due to attempts to use antibodies created for use on human materials to detect similar markers in laboratory animals. Such extrapolations are not always possible, even when considering the recommendations of reagent manufacturers.

Due to the great interest in the field of neurobiology for immunohistochemistry methods capable of labeling various types of neurons and glial cells, in addition to the identification of progenitor, activated, and dying cells, this study aimed to determine the most effective and reliable immunomarkers that can produce high-quality results during neurobiological studies.

In this study, archival material was used, consisting of brain, spinal cord, and sciatic nerve sections from Wistar rats (n = 50). The materials were fixed in zinc–ethanol–formaldehyde (ZEF). The samples were dehydrated and embedded in paraffin, according to the gene­rally accepted technique. Sections prepared on a microtome were glued onto adhesive-coated slide plates and dewaxed. Some of the preparations were subjected to thermal unmasking, using­ modified S1700 citrate buffer (Agilent, USA). Immunohistochemical studies were performed using primary antibodies, which are presented in the table.

 

Primary antibodies used in neuroscience research

Первичные антитела, применяемые в нейробиологических исследованиях

Antigen under study

Primary antibody source

Clone

Catalog number, manufacturer

Works that
describe the details of antibody use

Tyrosine hydroxylase

Rabbit

Polyclonal

ab112, Abcam, UK

[1]

GAD67

Mouse

Clone K-87

Ab26116, Abcam, UK

[2]

Rabbit

Polyclonal

E10260, Spring Bioscience, USA

Choline acetyltransferase

Goat

Polyclonal

AB144, Merck, USA

[3–5]

uNOS

Rabbit

Polyclonal

E393, Spring Bioscience, USA

[6]

Neurofilament protein Smi-32

Mouse

Clone Smi-32

SMI-32P, BioLegend, USA

[7]

α-Tubulin

Mouse

Clone DM-1A

MU121-5UC, BioGenex, USA

[8]

α-Synuclein

Rabbit

Polyclonal

E2684, Spring Bioscience, USA

[9]

NeuN

Mouse

Clone A-60

MAB377, Merck, USA

[10, 11]

GFAP

Rabbit

Polyclonal

Z033401-2, Agilent, USA

[12, 13]

Mouse

Clone GA5

CM065 A, B, C,

Biocare Medical, USA

Mouse

Clone spm507

E16510, Spring Bioscience, USA

GS

Mouse

Clone GS-6

MAB302, Merck, USA

[7, 14]

Vimentin

Mouse

Clone V-9

M0725, Agilent, USA

[15, 16]

Iba-1

Goat

Polyclonal

ab5076, Abcam, UK

[17, 18]

 

Reveal Polyvalent horseradish peroxidase (HRP) 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) Detection System kits (SPD-015, Spring Bioscience, USA) and MACH2 Universal HRP Polymer Kit for mouse or rabbit (M2U522 G, H, L, Biocare Medical, USA) were used as the secondary reagents for light microscopy. An immunohistochemical reaction product was developed ­using DAB from the DAB+ kit (K3468, Agilent, USA). The reagents used for fluorescence microscopy included antibodies against goat immunoglobulins, labeled with biotin, from the R&D Systems kit (CTS008, R&D Systems, USA), donkey antibodies against murine immunoglobulins, labeled with biotin (#715-065-150, Jackson ImmunoResearch, USA); a monovalent Fab fragment from a donkey anti-rabbit immunoglobulin, conjugated to the Rhodamine Red-X fluorochrome (RRX) (#711-295-152, Jackson ImmunoResearch, USA), as well as a streptavidin-conjugated with the Cy2 fluorochrome (#016220-084, Jackson ImmunoResearch, USA). Cell nuclei were stained with aluminous hematoxylin, for light microscopy, or SYTOX Green nuclear fluorescent dye (S7020, Invitrogen, USA), for fluorescent and confocal laser microscopy. The resulting preparations were analyzed using a Leica DM750 light microscope (Germany) and photographed using an ICC50 camera (Leica, Germany). The images were processed using the LAS EZ program (Leica, Germany). The obtained fluorescent preparations were studied using an LSM 800 confocal laser microscope (Zeiss, Germany). A laser with a wavelength of 488 nm was used to excite Cy2 and SYTOX Green fluorescence, whereas a wavelength of 561 nm was used to excite Rhodamine Red-X. Obtained images were analyzed using the computer programs ZEN2012 and LSM Image Browser (Zeiss, Germany). More detailed information regarding the drug treatment protocols used during this study is presented in the works cited, which can be found in the last column of the table.

One of the primary tasks of contemporary neuromorphology is the determination of the type and chemical specificity of nervous system cells. The immunohistochemical detection of protein markers, neurotransmitters, and/or enzymes ­being synthesized in each cell represents a typical and effective method for determining cell types. The visualization of neurotransmitter synthesis enzymes is preferable to the identification of neurotransmitters themselves because monoamine molecules (serotonin, norepinephrine, and adrenaline) act not only as neurotransmitters but also as hormones (products of endocrine and mast cells) and, therefore, can be extracerebral in origin. In addition, amino acid neurotransmitters, such as glutamate and glycine, are involved in the metabolism of all cells, regardless of cell type or neurotransmitter­ specificity, and, therefore, can be found in cells of various natures. Therefore, to determine the transmitter specificity of neurons, the immunohistochemical identification of neurotransmitter synthesis enzymes, such as tyrosine hydroxylase (which synthesizes catecholamines), choline acetyltransferase (which synthesizes acetylcholine), and glutamate decarboxylase (which synthesizes gamma-aminobutyric acid [GABA]) is optimal.

Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) is an enzyme that catalyzes the hydroxylation of the tyrosine amino acid in the presence of oxygen, tetrahydrobiopterin, and iron, which represents the rate-limiting step of catecholamine synthesis, including dopamine, noradrenaline, and adre­naline. These are well-known neurotransmitters that are involved in the regulation of various physiological and psychoemotional functions and reactions, such as stress, sleep and wakefulness, learning, attention, memory, and energy meta­bolism. Accordingly, disruptions in TH function represents a pathogenetic factor in the development of many neurological and psychiatric di­seases, including Parkinson’s disease, attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder, depression, schizophrenia, Alzheimer’s disease, and drug addiction [19].

Catecholamines and TH are contained in nerve cells, which are distributed unevenly within the central nervous system (CNS). The majority of dopaminergic neurons and the conduction pathways formed by these neurons can be divi­ded into three groups: nigrostriatal, mesocortical (or mesocorticolimbic), and tuberoinfundibular [20, 21]. Neurons in the zona compacta induce the nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathway, which ends in the caudate nucleus and the putamen, and plays a crucial role in the regulation of locomotor function in vertebrates [22]. Damage to nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons in humans is associated with parkinsonism and Parkinson’s disease [23].

Currently, a wide range of both monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against TH are produced, which facilitate the detection of this enzyme immunohistochemically, in the CNS and other parts of the human body and various animal species. Our previous studies revealed that one of the most successful antibody variants, which is capable of visualizing TH in catecholaminergic neurons and their processes in the brains of both laboratory animals (rats and mice) and humans is a polyclonal antibody against TH produced by Abcam (ab112), obtained against a purified protein from rat pheochromocytoma cells. The bodies and processes of TH-immunoreactive neurons are stained well in the substantia nigra and hypothalamus, and catecholaminergic nerve fibers are stained in the striatum (especially the putamen), the nucleus accumbens, the neocortex, septal nuclei, and olfactory bulbs (Fig. 1).

 

Fig. 1. The section of the rat brain through the corpus striatum. Left — figure of the rat brain areas, right — tyrosine hydroxylase immunohistochemistry (gray color). Cate­cholaminergic nerve fibers are predominantly distributed in the striatum (ПТ) and olfactory bulb (ОЛ). ПК — cingulate cortex, Пер — septum, ЯЛТП — bed nucleus of the stria terminalis

Рис. 1. Срез головного мозга крысы, проходящий через область полосатого тела (corpus striatum). Слева — карта областей головного мозга крысы, справа — иммуногистохимическое окрашивание среза головного мозга крысы на тирозингидроксилазу (серая окраска). Продемонстрировано преимущественное распределение катехоламинергических нервных волокон в полосатом теле (ПТ) и обонятельной луковице (ОЛ). ПК — поясная кора, Пер — перегородка, ЯЛТП — ядро ложа терминальной полоски

 

According to our experiments, the optimal detection of TH in the brains of humans and experimental animals was achieved using zinc-containing fixatives, especially ZEF, which resulted in high-quality immunohistochemical preparations for both light and confocal laser microscopy [24, 25].

Glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) is an enzyme that catalyzes the decarboxylation of glutamic acid to form GABA, which is the primary inhibitory transmitter in the CNS. Two primary GAD isoforms have been identified in the CNS, which differ in molecular weight (65 and 67 kDa). These isoforms are designated as GAD65 and GAD67 and are encoded by the genes Gad1 and Gad2, respectively. GAD67 was detected in the bodies, processes, and synaptic terminals of neurons, whereas GAD65 was detected only in synaptic terminals [26]; therefore, antibodies against GAD67 are more often used for the immunohistochemical visualization of GABAergic brain structures.

Normally, the expression of GAD67 is noted in the neurons of the cortex, cerebellum, striatum, olfactory bulb, paleostriatum, reticular zone of substantia nigra, hippocampus, and inferior colliculus [2, 27–29]. Enzyme expression can be impaired during various neurological and psychiatric diseases (brain ischemia, schizophrenia, and Parkinson’s disease).

The techniques used in this study are intended for the application to both the light-optical and immunofluorescence detection of GABAergic structures, in the brains of mice, rats, and humans. To detect GAD67 in rats, a murine monoclonal (clone K-87) antibody (Abcam, UK) or a rabbit polyclonal antibody (Spring Bio­science, USA) can be recommended. Staining using the murine monoclonal (clone K-87) anti-GAD67 antibody on rat cerebellar cortex slices are presented in Fig. 2, a. GAD67-immunopositive structures are present in all layers of the cerebellar cortex. Purkinje cell bodies are intensely stained, as are the fibers of basket cells, which form “baskets” around Purkinje cells. In the granular layer, GAD67 can be found in the axons of Golgi cells, found in the peripheral region of the cerebellar glomeruli. In the molecular, ganglionic, and granular layers, many GAD67 immunopositive fibers can be identified (see Fig. 2, a).

 

Fig. 2. Immunohistochemical visualization of various neural markers in the rat brain using light microscopy. a — GABA-ergic structures in the cerebellum, GAD67 immunohistochemistry, ob. ×100; b — cholinergic motor neurons of the spinal cord, choline acetyltransferase immunohistochemistry, ob. ×100; c — NOS-immunopositive neuron in the subventricular zone of the lateral ventricle, NOS immunohistochemistry, ob. ×100; d — neurofilaments in the axial cylinder of the nerve fibers of the rat sciatic nerve (cross section), SMI-32 immunohistochemistry, ob. ×10; e — alpha-tubulin in the processes of pyramidal neurons in the CA1 zone of the hippocampus, alpha-tubulin immunohistochemistry, ob. ×100; f — alpha-synuclein in giant synapses of mossy fibers of the CA3 zone of the hippocampus, alpha-synuclein immunohistochemistry, ob. ×100; a–c, e, f — nuclear counterstaining with alum hematoxylin; d — counterstaining of tissue structures with astra blue

Рис. 2. Иммуногистохимическое выявление различных нейральных маркеров с использованием световой микроскопии: а — ГАМК-ергические структуры в мозжечке крысы. Иммуногистохимическая реакция на GAD67, об. ×100; b — холинергические мотонейроны спинного мозга крысы. Иммуногистохимическая реакция на холин­ацетилтрансферазу, об. ×100; c — NOS-иммунопозитивный нейрон в субвентрикулярной зоне бокового желудочка головного мозга крысы. Иммуногистохимическая реакция на NO-синтазу (NOS), об. ×100; d — нейрофиламенты в осевых цилиндрах нервных волокон седалищного нерва крысы (поперечный срез). Иммуногистохимическая реакция с применением антител против белков нейрофиламентов (SMI-32), об. ×10; e — альфа-тубулин в отростках пирамидных нейронов в зоне CA1 гиппокампа крысы. Иммуногистохимическая реакция на альфа-тубулин, об. ×100; f — альфа-синуклеин в гигантских синапсах мшистых волокон зоны CA3 гиппокампа. Иммуногистохимическая реакция на альфа-синуклеин, об. ×100; аcef — подкраска клеточных ядер гематоксилином Джилла, d — подкраска тканевых структур астровым синим

 

Thus, the use of antibodies against GAD67 enables the distribution of GABAergic structures to be identified.

Choline acetyltransferase (CAT) is a widely used marker for cholinergic neurons. CAT is a cytosolic protein that serves as the key enzyme for the synthesis of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine, from acetyl coenzyme A and choline [30]. Choline acetyltransferase is synthesized in the rough endoplasmic reticulum within the neuron body before being transported by the axoplasmic flow to the nerve terminal. CAT is concentrated at the nerve terminals, where it synthesizes neurotransmitters [31]. Cholinergic neurons play important roles in the regulation of learning, memory, and sleep. They also provide motor functions and are involved in the regulation of gastrointestinal motility [32–36].

In modern morphological studies, cholinergic neurons are identified, as a rule, by the pre­sence of CAT [4, 37]. Antibodies against CAT can be used to detect cholinergic structures in immunohistochemical studies of both the CNS and the peripheral nervous system, in normal and pathological conditions. CAT is particularly relevant to Alzheimer’s disease, the pathogenesis of which has been associated with the significant loss of cholinergic neurons in the basal forebrain nuclei [38, 39]. In patients with cognitive impairments, the densities of CAT-containing fibers and neurons­ in the frontal cortex and amygdala were reduced [39].

In modern studies, both monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against CAT have been used. The high-quality staining of paraffin tissue sections can be achieved using a staining protocol that we previously proposed [4]. Various types of fixation materials are acceptable for histological materials; however, the optimal staining results were obtained using ZEF [24, 25]. Using this method, the distribution of rat cholinergic nerve cells in the spinal cord (SC) was studied at different stages of embryonic development, during the early postnatal period, and in adult animals [3, 40, 41]. Primary goat polyclonal antibodies (AB144, Merck Millipore, Chemicon, USA) were used to detect the CAT [3, 41].

In the substantia grisea centralis (Rexed la­mina X), CAT expression has been observed in the cytoplasm of small interneurons and their processes, some of which reach the Rexed lami­na IX. In the intermediate zone of the SC gray matter, spindle-shaped, mediolaterally oriented neurons are expressed on the border between the Rexed lamina VI and VII of the SC. In the gray matter of the SC anterior horns, in the region of the Rexed lamina IX, large CAT-containing motor neurons, with a large number of immunopositive processes that form the SC ventral roots, were identified (Fig. 2, b). The study shows that CAT was localized not only in the neuronal cytoplasm but also in the nuclei of individual motor neurons. When examining the immunohistochemical reaction against CAT in dendrites and the bodies of large and medium neurons in the anterior horns, immunopositive synaptic buds were detected (see Fig. 2, b). Similar synapses are present on immunonegative nerve cells, located in the region of the Rexed lamina VIII–IX.

When studying the expression of CAT in the cervical SC of an adult rat, by light microscopy, several areas with intense immunohistochemical reactions were revealed. In the region of the SC posterior horns, the network-forming processes of neurons and single cells of the Rexed lamina II–IV were immunopositive. In the substantia grisea centralis (Rexed lamina X), the expression of CAT was noted in the cytoplasm of small interneurons and their processes, some of which reach the Rexed lamina IX. In the intermediate zone of the SC gray matter, spindle-shaped, mediolaterally oriented neurons were expressed on the border between the Rexed lamina VI and VII of the SC. In the gray matter of the anterior SC horns, in the region of the Rexed lamina IX, large CAT-containing motor neurons, with a large number of immunopositive processes that form the SC ventral roots, were identified (see Fig. 2, b). The study shows that in individual motor neurons, CAT was found to localize not only in the cell cytoplasm but also in the nucleus. Immunohistochemical reactions against CAT revealed its expression in dendrites and the bo­dies of large and medium neurons of the anterior horns, and immunopositive synap­tic buttons can be detected (see Fig. 2, b). Similar synapses are present on immunonegative nerve cells, which are located in the region of the Rexed lamina VIII–IX. Thus, the method used to visualize cholinergic neurons was highly effective.

NO synthase

In the late 1980s, nitrogen monoxide (NO) molecules were discovered to have a vasodilative effect and to be involved in interneuronal connections, as a type of neurotransmitter. Nerve cells that synthesize and use NO as a neurotransmitter are scattered throughout the brain and SC and form the nitroxidergic (nitrergic) system of the brain, which is important for the general re­gulation of nervous system function. The regulatory role played by NO in the processes of memory, neurogenesis, sleep, participation in the stress-limiting system, and the perception of auditory signals has been demonstrated.

NO is a key participant in free radical processes and glutamate excitotoxicity and is, therefore, involved in the pathogenesis of many neurodegenerative and psychiatric diseases. NO has been demonstrated to both contribute to and counteract cellular degeneration [42–44]. Therefore, all aspects of NO in the nervous system are of importance for neurology and psychiatry.

In cells, NO is produced by the oxidation of the amino acid arginine (with the simultaneous formation of citrulline), by the enzyme NO synthase (NOS). Three isoforms of this enzyme have been identified: endothelial (eNOS), neuronal (nNOS), and inducible (iNOS). eNOS and nNOS localize primarily in endothelial and neuronal cells, respectively, and iNOS is expressed in different types of cells, regulated by cytokines and other signaling molecules [45].

We studied the localization of various NO-ergic cells, using a universal rabbit polyclonal antibody from Spring Bioscience (USA), which predominantly detected nNOS [6]. In the subventricular zone of the forebrain, individual, rounded, nNOS-immunoreactive cells were detected. Fig. 2, c, presents a part of the subventricular zone, in the dorsal angle of the rat brain lateral ventricle. Among the numerous immunonegative cells, a large nNOS-immunopositive neuron can be observed. The reaction product is evenly distributed throughout the cytoplasm and is absent in the nucleus (Fig. 2, c). Other NOS-immunopositive structures in the subventricular zone were not detected using this antibody. Deeper in the striatum neuropil, numerous small immunoreactive fibers form a dense
plexus.

The participation of NO in the regulation of neurogenesis, in both the growing and adult brain, is widely accepted [46]. The NO molecule is short-living, does not have time to diffuse far from the location of synthesis and release; therefore, the neurogenesis regulatory properties in the subventricular zone are most likely manifested by NO molecules released by cells located directly in this region, indicating the functional significance of the subventricular zone of the adult brain and the few NOS-immunopositive cells that control this process. The conducted reaction fully meets the requirements of neurobiological studies.

SMI-32 antibodies against neurofilament proteins

Antibodies against cytoskeletal proteins can be used to label nerve cells and nerve fibers. Thus, the visualization of neurofilaments detected using SMI-32 antibodies is widely used in neurobiolo­gical and clinical studies to label neurons and their processes. Using SMI-32 antibodies, the non-phosphorylated epitope of the heavy subunit of neurofilaments can be visua­lized. Neurofilaments are one of the primary ele­ments of the cytoskeleton and play important structural roles in nerve cells. In addition, they participate in slow axonal transport, regulate the state of other cytoskeleton proteins, and link the cytoskeleton and cytoplasmic structures.

The SMI-32 marker is contained in the perikaryon of large nerve cells, which facilitates the study of their shape and size, as well as the distribution of these neurons in different parts of the nervous system. Therefore, it is widely used as a marker of ganglionic [47] and amacrine cells [48] in the retina, pyramidal neurons in the neocortex [49], neurons in the substantia nigra in norm [50] and Parkinson’s disease [51], SC motor neurons [52], and axons in white matter [53]. Using SMI-32 antibodies, the brains of humans and laboratory animals have been exa­mined [50, 54]. SMI-32 is a convenient marker for studying emerging neurons during postnatal ontogenesis [55, 56].

In our studies, a monoclonal murine antibody against the SMI-32 protein (Bio Legend, USA) was used to study the nerve fibers in rat normal sciatic nerves before and after trauma. The reaction was conducted on paraffin sections, after fixing the material in ZEF [24, 25].

The study of histological preparations allowed the visualization of the axial cylinders of nerve fibers with different diameters (1.5–14.0 microns) on transverse sections through the intact rat sciatic nerve, in the region of the upper third of the thigh. In this case, the other structural elements of the nerve (Schwann cells, myelin sheaths, perineurium) were not stained, and the reaction proceeded without background (Fig. 2, d).

According to our own and others’ published data, the high selectivity of this marker, the reproducibility of the reaction on paraffin and frozen sections, and the ability to evaluate the material using light, fluorescence, and laser confocal microscopy facilitate the morphological assessments of nerve guide restoration. We intend to use our developed method in further studies, to assess nerve regeneration after trauma and experimental cell therapy.

Alpha-tubulin

Alpha-tubulin is another important marker of the nerve cell cytoskeleton. The tubulin molecule, the primary microtubule protein, is a he­terodimer, consisting of two subunits, alpha- and beta-tubulin. Tubulin is localized in the nervous system, in the bodies of mature neurons, their dendrites, and axons, as well as in the synaptic membrane and the postsynaptic density. Tubulin is a component of microtubules during the formation of the neuron cytoskeleton and their processes and is involved in the growth of axons, the formation of synapses, and axoplasmic transport. Genetic disorders of tubulin synthesis (tubulopathies) result in severe brain damage [57], and many diseases of the nervous system are associated with quantitative and qualitative disorders of neuronal tubulin [58]. The widespread prevalence of tubulin (including alpha-tubulin) in the nervous system and the universality of its functions indicate the importance of studying this protein in the CNS.

In the rat brain, uneven staining was noted when establishing an immunohistochemical reaction to alpha-tubulin. The most intense reaction was registered in the superficial (first) layer of the neocortex, especially in the cingulate cortex, and intense staining was revealed in the pyriform cortex, olfactory tubercles, optical chiasm, and anterior commissure. The neocortex also has a band of increased immunoreactivity against alpha-­tubulin in the middle (III–IV) and lower (VI) layers of the neocortex. A significant immune response is typical for the hippocampus and the medial part of the septum. In the area of the lateral ventricles, a fimbriate band of ependyma from the ventricle, which marks the cilia, is highlighted with a bright color, whereas the cytoplasm of the ependymocytes and the vascular plexus cells are immunonegative for alpha-tubulin.

Alpha-tubulin is present in cells that correspond to neurons and astrocytes, according to morphological characteristics. Alpha-tubulin was not detected in microglia. In all cases, alpha-tubulin-immunopositive cells, regardless of size, demonstrated a characteristic staining pattern, showing intense staining of the peripheral zone of the cytoplasm and the visible portions of axons­ and dendrites, with the complete absence of color in the nucleus and the perinuclear zone (Fig. 2, e); therefore, the immunohistochemical reaction to alpha-tubulin somewhat outlines the contours of nerve cells, providing an image of a neuron, similar to that observed following silver impregnation the Golgi method.

Thus, immunohistochemical staining for tubulin enables the efficient detection of nerve cells and processes, in all areas of the brain, and is promising for studying the cyto- and myelo-archi­tectonics of various brain structures.

Alpha-synuclein

Alpha-synuclein is a small molecule, weighing­ 19 kDa, which belongs to the synuclein protein family, along with β- and γ-synuclein. The protein is encoded by the SNCA gene, located on the long arm of the fourth human chromosome (4q21.3–q22). Due to alternative spli­cing, α-synuclein isoforms of 140, 126, 119, and 98 amino acids in length can be formed, with the 140 aa isoform representing the primary isoform [59]. The protein structure includes the N-terminal domain (1–60 amino acids), the central hydrophobic domain (61–95 amino acids), also known as the non-amyloid component, and the acidic C-terminal domain (96–140 amino acids). The N-terminal region is characterized by the presence of 7 highly conserved repeating sequences, consisting of 11 amino acids. This region forms an amphipathic alpha-helix and mediates the protein binding to membrane lipids. The central domain is amyloidogenic and can form protein aggregates. The C-terminus consists of charged amino acid residues, under­goes post-translational modifications, and mediates the binding of α-synuclein to other proteins, ligands, and metal ions, and its chaperone activity [60, 61]. Alpha-synuclein can either be identified in the native, soluble, unfolded protein form, or as a membrane-bound protein, which is accompanied by the conformational transition into an alpha-helix [62].

To date, the function of α-synuclein has not been established. α-Synuclein may be involved in a variety of physiological processes, including vesicular neuronal transport, calcium regulation, mitochondrial homeostasis, gene expression, protein phosphorylation, and fatty acid-bin­ding [59]. In a number of studies, α-synuclein has been shown to be able to affect intracellular dopamine contents by directly acting on the proteins involved in dopamine synthesis [63].

Today, most studies of α-synuclein aim to establish its role in the development of Parkinson’s disease, although the fibrillar form of this protein has also been associated with other neurodegenerative diseases, which are collectively referred to as synucleinopathies, including Lewy body dementia, multiple system atrophy, and Bradbury-Eggleston syndrome [59, 64].

In our laboratory, a polyclonal rabbit anti­body (Spring Bioscience, USA) was used to study α-synuclein in various brain structures. Figure 2, f shows the distribution of α-synuclein in the CA3 region of the rat brain hippocampus. Immunopositive alpha-synuclein granules were diffusely distributed in the stratum lucidum and stratum radiatum. In the pyramid layer, no reaction to α-synuclein was observed. Immunopositive granules have a predominantly rounded shape, whereas oval- and rod-shaped structures were less common (Fig. 2, f). In the in the stratum lucidum and stratum radiatum, numerous rounded structures of various sizes were well-contoured, where the reaction to α-synuclein is completely absent. These structures, apparently, represent the sites of pyramidal cell dendrites that have laterally entered the section. Around these areas, immunopositive α-synuclein granules were unevenly distributed inside the layer, which appear to represent conglomerates of α-synuclein-immunopositive axodendritic and axospiny synapses of giant mossy fiber terminals (Fig. 2, f).

Thus, the reaction to α-synuclein can be successfully used both for the analysis of neurodegeneration and for the study of the hippocampal synaptic apparatus during experiments.

NeuN

In neurobiological experiments, of importance is determination of not only neurotransmitter specificity of neurons, but also the typical specificity of the cells. Currently, a large number of immunohistochemical markers can be used to determine the types of cells under study, inclu­ding whether they represent neurons, glia, or other types of cells. One of the most common neuronal markers is the NeuN nuclear protein. This protein is localized in the nucleus and perinuclear cytoplasm of most mammalian CNS neurons and is absent in astrocytes. The protein highly conserved and can be detected using­ the same antibodies in mammals, including humans [65], birds [66], amphibians [67], and fish [68]. This neuronal marker was discovered in 1992 when a group of researchers managed to obtain monoclonal antibodies (clone A60) against a previously unknown nuclear protein [65]. However, the nucleotide sequence of the gene encoding this protein was not deciphered until 2009, when NeuN was discovered to be the product of the Fox-3 gene, one of the Fox genes that regulate splicing [69], and is synthesized during the late stages of differentiation among postmitotic neuro­blasts [70]. However, NeuN, which is a typical neuronal marker, cannot be identified in a number of nerve cells, in particular, neurons in the cerebellum (basket cells, stellate cells, unipolar brush neurons, Purkinje cells, Golgi cells, Lugaro cells, dentate nucleus neurons), neocortex (in Cajal–Retzius cells [65, 71], inferior olive neurons, mitral cells of the olfactory bulbs [65], spinal gamma-motor neurons [72, 73], and sympathetic ganglia neurons [74]). The substantia nigra neurons in the brain of experimental animals and humans revealed only weak immunohistochemical staining of NeuN or were not stained at all [10].

The reaction to NeuN was widespread du­ring our experimental studies. With the development of pathological conditions, NeuN detection in cells can be altered, including the complete disappearance of the reaction, as obser­ved fol­lowing ischemic damage to striatal neurons [11]. In pathomorphological studies, the reaction to NeuN can be used as a sensitive test for the detection of early autolytic changes in biological objects, which has been associated with the fairly rapid catabolism of NeuN protein [75]. These data indicated that NeuN protein may not be detected in some neurons; however, if NeuN is visualized in cells, this interaction reliably demon­strated their neuronal
nature.

In our laboratory, a murine monoclonal (clone A60) antibody against the NeuN protein, made by Merck Millipore (formerly Chemicon), USA, was used. To demonstrate the results of the immunohistochemical reaction to NeuN, a section of the dentate fascia of the rat hippocampus is presented (Fig. 3, a). The nucleus of neurons were clearly visible, due to the high-intensity reaction against NeuN (Fig. 3, a, green). Within the hippocampal granular zone, neurons were loca­lized in dense rows, whereas in the subgranular zone and the chyle zone, they were located at considerable distances from each other. In the nucleus of neurons, the NeuN protein is distribu­ted in the form of small discrete clusters, throughout the entire volume of the nucleus. NeuN is also present in the cytoplasm of the perinuclear region. In some neurons of the hilus hippocampi, the reaction product was also identified in the initial segments of the processes (Fig. 3, a, green).

In addition to neurons, micrographs containing astrocytes can be detected by an immunofluorescence reaction against the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (Fig. 3, a, red). In the CNS, the neuronal and astrocytic functions are closely interrelated; therefore, the simultaneous detection of nerve cells and astroglia represents an urgent task for most neurobiological studies. Conducting the NeuN/GFAP double reaction enables the simultaneous detection of neurons and astrocytes, facilitating the assessment of structural aspects and the functional status of each of these cell types, in addition to studying their mutual arrangement, relative to each other.

 

Fig. 3. Fluorescence imaging of neural and glial markers (confocal microscopy): а — fascia dentata of the rat hippocampus. Double immunofluorescence staining for NeuN (green) and GFAP (red), ob. ×63; b–d — astrocyte in the striatum of the rabbit brain. Double immunofluorescence staining for GFAP (red) and glutamine synthetase (green). Confocal images obtained in single channels are shown in (b) and (c) while merged images are shown in (d), ob. ×63; e — tanycytes of the third ventricle of the rat brain. Vimentin immunohistochemistry, ob. ×63, the asterisk marks the ventricular cavity; f — microgliocyte in the striatum of the rat brain. Iba-1 immunohistochemistry (red color) with nuclear counterstaining with SYTOX Green (green color), ob. ×63

Рис. 3. Флуоресцентная визуализация нейральных и глиальных маркеров (конфокальная микроскопия): а — зубчатая фасция гиппокампа крысы. Двойная иммуногистохимическая реакция на NeuN (зеленый цвет) и GFAP (красный цвет), об. ×63; bd — астроцит в стриатуме головного мозга кролика. Двойная иммуногистохимическая реакция на GFAP (красный цвет) и глутаминсинтетазу (зеленый цвет), раздельное (bc) и совмещенное (d) представление красного и зеленого каналов, об. ×63; e — танициты третьего желудочка головного мозга крысы. Иммуногистохимическая реакция на виментин, об. ×63; звездочка — полость желудочка; f — микроглиоцит в стриатуме головного мозга крысы. Иммуногистохимическая реакция на Iba-1 (красный цвет) с подкраской ядер клеток красителем SYTOX Green (зеленый цвет), об. ×63

 

Glial fibrillary acidic protein-a marker of astrocytes

Astrocytes are multifunctional glia cells that serve a number of functions in the CNS, such as providing neurons with an energy substrate (lactate), participating in synaptogenesis, synaptic plasticity, and the modulation of synaptic transmission, removing neurotoxic glutamate from the synaptic cleft after signal transmission between neurons, participating in the formation of the blood-brain barrier, the regulation of microcirculation, and maintaining the water ion balance [76]. In addition to numerous functions in the CNS, astrocytes respond to brain damage through a process called reactive astrogliosis [77]. Therefore, the study of astrocytes represents the aim of a huge number of neurobiological studies, indicating the need for a reliable marker that can be used to study the structurally functional characteristics of this cell population. Currently, more than 20 proteins are known to serve as astrocyte markers, among which GFAP is used the most widely [78, 79]. GFAP is a class III intermediate filaments (IF), which is the primary protein that composes the astrocyte cytoskeleton, ensuring the stability of neuronal body and process morphologies, and is involved in the regulation of astrocyte volume and the modulation of their movement. GFAP localization in astrocytic bodies and processes enables the identification of this cell population and the creation of high-quality 3D astrocyte reconstructions, which can be used to study the features of their structural organization and spatial mutual arrangement [12]. In addition, GFAP can act as an important functional marker for astroglia. The increased expression of this protein has been observed in many CNS pathologies, including ischemia, neurodegenerative diseases, tumor development, and traumatic brain damage.

The catalogs of many manufacturers present various poly- and monoclonal antibodies against GFAP. Three types of these anti­bodies have been used in our laboratory, including a rabbit polyclonal antibody made by Agilent (formerly Dako), USA, and two clones of murine (monoclonal) antibodies (clone GA-5, made by Monosan, Netherlands, and clone SPM507, made by Spring Bioscience, USA). These antibodies allow the specific detection of astrocytes in paraffin-embedded brain sections from laboratory animals (mouse, rat, rabbit, and cat) and humans. Fig. 3, a (red), shows the results of using­ the rabbit polyclonal antibody against GFAP (Agilent, USA), to identify astrocytes in the rat hippocampus. Astrocytes have the appearance of arborizing cells, and are mainly stellate. In the subgranular zone and hilus, the bodies and processes of astrocytes were clearly visible, whereas in the granular zone, only the astrocytic processes that penetrate the dense rows of neurons can be identified (Fig. 3, a, red).

Glutamine synthetase

When conducting neurobiological studies, the type of cell must be identified and its functional state must be determined. One marker that can be used to studying the function of astroglia is glutamine synthetase (GS). GS is a ligase class enzyme that catalyzes the reaction of ATP-dependent binding of glutamate with ammonia to produce glutamine. In the brain, GS is synthesized primarily in astrocytes. GS represents a key enzyme in the glutamate-glutamine cycle, during which astrocytes absorb extracellular glutamate, which has neurotoxic properties and converts it to non-toxic glutamine, using GS [80–82]. As a result of the same reaction, an excess amount of neurotoxic ammonia becomes inactivated, which accumulates during liver pathologies and acts as a pathogenic factor in hepatic encephalopathy [83].

Currently, GS is widely used as a functional marker of astrocytes, in both experimental and clinical neurobiological studies. Unlike other widely used astroglial markers, such as GFAP, GS is present in all astrocyte subtypes, which facilitates the identification of this cell population most fully [84].

Antibodies against GS that are suitable for immunohistochemical studies are currently supplied by many manufacturers (for example, Thermo Fisher Scientific, BioLegend, Merc, and others). In our laboratory, a murine monoclonal (clone GS-6) antibody against GS, generated by Merck (formerly Chemicon), USA, was used. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, these antibo­dies can be used to work with the tissues of sheep, rats, mice, and humans. According to our studies, they are also applicable to the study of the rabbit brain. Fig. 3, b–d, presents the results of the double-immunofluorescence GFAP/GS reaction, in rabbit brain preparations. GFAP (red) is primarily localized in the body and large processes of astrocytes. However, regions characterized by the absence of GFAP immunoreactivity were vi­sible in the perinuclear region, and the fluorescence intensity in thin processes is low (Fig. 3, b). Unlike GFAP, GS (green) can be detected in all parts of the perinuclear cytoplasm of astrocytes, as well as in large and small cell processes, and the amount and intensity of fluorescence were visually increased compared with GFAP immunostaining (Fig. 3, c). Fig. 3, d, with the combined representation of the green and red channels, demonstrates that GFAP and GS did not completely colocalize within astrocytes in the rabbit striatum. GFAP appears to be distributed in the bodies and processes of astrocytes, in the form of fibrous structures (Fig. 3, b), whereas GS staining is characterized by a discrete distribution and is identified in the form of numerous small clusters (Fig. 3, c).

Thus, GS represents a convenient astrocyte marker, which in combination with GFAP, enables the full evaluation of astroglial structural aspects, during both normal and pathological conditions.

Vimentin

In some studies, the selective labeling of the cells that line the brain ventricles (ependymocytes and tanycytes) is necessary, for which vimentin can be used as a marker [15]. Vimentin belongs to class III intermediate filaments and forms homo- and heterodimers with other IF proteins, including nestin and desmin. Vimentin is a highly conserved protein among vertebrates, has a molecular weight of 57 kDa, and consists of 466 amino acids.

The primary cellular function of vimentin is the maintenance of cellular integrity, ensuring rigidity, mechanical stability, and the maintenance of cell shape. Vimentin filaments are involved in the intracellular distribution of organelles and proteins in the cytoplasm, as well as organelle transport, cell adhesion, migration, and intracellular signal transmission. A number of studies have demonstrated the role played by vimentin in cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis.

Normally, vimentin is a component of brain barrier structures. Vimentin IFs are expressed in large amounts in ependymocytes, tanycytes, astrocytes, meningocytes, and endotheliocytes [16]. In addition, along with nestin, vimentin is a component of the cytoskeleton in neural stem and progenitor cells. During embryogenesis, vimentin is expressed in radial glial cells [15]. Under the influence of various types of damaging factors, astrocytes become reactive and were characterized, in addition to GFAP overexpression, by the expression of vimentin (which is normally non-characteristic for astrocytes in the adult mammalian brain). The expression of IFs is believed to be necessary for the neuroprotective functions of astrocytes [85].

In our laboratory, vimentin expression studies were performed, using a monoclonal antibody (clone V9) made by Agilent (formerly Dako), USA. Fig. 3, e presents the floor portion of the rat brain third ventricle. Vimentin-immunopositive tanycytes form the lining of this area of the brain, which appear as bipolar cells, with a long basal process. Vimentin filaments were evenly distributed throughout the cell cytoplasm and were present in both the bodies and the processes of tanycytes. One basal process branch from the base of the tanycytes body, which then branches into smaller branches. The processes were long, thin, and differ in a wavy course. They end on the vessels of the hypothalamus, containing endotheliocytes, which were also vimentin-immunopositive (endotheliocytes, smooth myocytes, and adventitia cells were stained).

Thus, the immunohistochemical reaction to vimentin enables the characterization of the structural and spatial organization of the hypothalamus circumventricular zone.

Iba-1

The Iba-1 protein is a reliable marker for microglial cells. Currently, the nervous and immune systems are known to function in close cooperation and mutually affect each other [86]. Various aspects of neuroimmune interactions have been the subject of a large number of current scientific studies. The CNS is characterized by the presence of its own immune system, formed by microglial cells, which are tissue macrophages of mesenchymal origins. The great interest of researchers in the study of this cell population is likely due to the fact that microglia represent a key factor during the neuroinflammation process, which is associated with neurodegenerative di­seases, such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and Huntington’s chorea. Therefore, researchers require selective microglial markers, which facilitate the evaluation of quantitative changes and the functional status of this cell population.

Iba-1 calcium-binding protein (ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule-1), also known as AIF-1 (allograft inflammatory factor-1), has been widely used as a selective marker for microglia [17, 18, 87, 88]. Using an antibody against the Iba-1 protein, both activated amoeboid microglia and resting ramified microglia could be detected, as well as all intermediate states. The uniform distribution of Iba-1 in the cytoplasm of microglia enables the full characterization of the structural features of these cells [89, 90].

Currently, a variety of commercial antibo­dies against Iba-1/AIF-1 (for example, made by Wako Chemicals, Abcam, and others) are available to researchers. An Abcam goat polyclonal antibody against Iba-1 (ab5076) is currently ­being used for research in our laboratory, and is suitable for electron microscopic immunohistochemistry, immunohistochemical studies on paraffin and free-floating sections, western blotting, and immunofluorescence. The immunogen for these antibodies is a synthetic peptide that corresponds to the C-terminal portion of the human Iba-1 molecule. These antibodies are specific for microglia and macrophages and do not cross-react with neurons, astrocytes, or oligodendrocytes. They are suitable for the immunostaining of brain tissue in rats, rabbits, guinea pigs, cows, dogs, primates, and humans. These antibodies enable high-quality preparations to be obtained for light, fluorescence, and confocal laser microscopy. The use of antibodies against the Iba-1 protein and SYTOX Green fluorescent nuclear dye provides good results. The tinting of cellular nuclei greatly facilitates the orientation of structures in the preparation and enables the assessment of functional cell states (based on the sizes of the nucleus and nucleolus and the state of chromatin). Figure 3, f presents the results of the immunofluorescence response to the Iba-1 protein, on sections of the brain from a mature rat, with nuclei stained with SytoxGreen (Invitrogen, USA). Iba-1 protein is evenly distributed in the cytoplasm of the microglial cell, allowing both the body of the cell and its many thin, complex branching processes to be detected (Fig. 3, f, red). Using the fluorescent nuclear stain SYTOX Green enables the identification of microglia nucleus and clearly demonstrates the intranuclear localization of the Iba-1 protein, as well as the identification (based on the size and structure of nucleus) of neighboring cells, and the evalua­tion of their functional status (Fig. 3, f, green).

Thus, the immunohistochemical reaction to the Iba-1 protein represents a robust tool for assessing the microglial cell population, both in normal and experimental studies.

Conclusion

This article summarizes our experiences with the use of the 12 significant markers for neurobiological studies, for which the optimal combinations of primary and secondary antibodies are presented. The combination of these immunocytochemical approaches with the fixation of samples in ZEF enables the high selectivity of cell labeling to be achieved while maintaining the structure and tinctorial properties of the nervous tissue. This, in turn, enables high-quality preparations to be obtained, using both immunohistochemical markers and classical histological staining. This methodology is promising for use in experimental neurobiology and clinical and morphological diagnostics.

Additional information

The study was conducted within the state task of the Institute of Experimental Medicine.

The study was approved by protocols No. 1/14 of 04/21/2014, No. 3/17 of 11/30/2017, and No. 3/19 of 04/25/2019 of the local ethics committee of the Institute of Experimental Medicine.

Conflict of interests. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

List of abbreviations

GABA — gamma-aminobutyric acid; IF — intermediate filaments; TH — tyrosine hydroxylase; CNS — central nervous system; GAD — glutamate decarboxylase; GFAP — glial fibrillary acidic protein; GS — glutamine synthetase; nNOS — neuronal form of NO synthase; NOS — NO synthase.

About the authors

Dmitrii E. Korzhevskii

Institute of Experimental Medicine

Email: DEK2@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2456-8165
SPIN-code: 3252-3029
Scopus Author ID: 12770589000

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

MD, PhD, Professor of the RAS, Head of the Laboratory of Functional Morphology of the Central and Peripheral Nervous System, Department of General and Special Morphology

Igor P. Grigor’ev

Institute of Experimental Medicine

Email: ipg-iem@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3535-7638
SPIN-code: 1306-4860
Scopus Author ID: 7102851509

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

PhD, Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Functional Morphology of the Central and Peripheral Nervous System, Department of General and Special Morphology

Valeriia V. Gusel’nikova

Institute of Experimental Medicine

Author for correspondence.
Email: Guselnicova.Valeriia@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9499-8275
SPIN-code: 5115-4320
Scopus Author ID: 55354616100

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

PhD, Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Functional Morphology of the Central and Peripheral Nervous System, Department of General and Special Morphology

Elena A. Kolos

Institute of Experimental Medicine

Email: koloselena1984@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9643-6831
SPIN-code: 1479-5992
Scopus Author ID: 55354374400

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Researcher, Laboratory of Functional Morphology of the Central and Peripheral Nervous System, Department of General and Special Morphology

Elena S. Petrova

Institute of Experimental Medicine

Email: morphologija@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0972-8658
SPIN-code: 3973-1421
Scopus Author ID: 7103035013

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

PhD, Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Functional Morphology of the Central and Peripheral Nervous System, Department of General and Special Morphology

Olga V. Kirik

Institute of Experimental Medicine

Email: olga_kirik@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6113-3948
SPIN-code: 5725-8742
Scopus Author ID: 27171304100

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

PhD, Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Functional Morphology of the Central and Peripheral Nervous System, Department of General and Special Morphology

Dina A. Sufieva

Institute of Experimental Medicine

Email: dinobrione@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0048-2981
SPIN-code: 3034-3137
Scopus Author ID: 56479139700

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Researcher, Laboratory of Functional Morphology of the Central and Peripheral Nervous System, Department of General and Special Morphology

Valeriia A. Razenkova

Institute of Experimental Medicine

Email: valeriya.raz@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3997-2232
SPIN-code: 8877-8902

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

PhD-student

Mariia V. Antipova

Institute of Experimental Medicine; Saint Petersburg State University

Email: maria.antipova814@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3853-5671
SPIN-code: 3607-3630

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Research Assistant, Laboratory of Functional Morphology of the Central and Peripheral Nervous System, Department of General and Special Morphology

Mariia V. Chernysh

Institute of Experimental Medicine; Saint Petersburg State University

Email: chernysh.mariah@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4903-4047
SPIN-code: 3371-0447
Scopus Author ID: 57207832833

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

студент

References

  1. Grigoriev IP, Vasilenko MS, Sukhorukova EG, Korzhevskii DE. Use of Different Antibodies to Tyrosine Hydroxylase to Study Catecholaminergic Systems in the Mammalian Brain. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2011;42(2):210-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-011-9555-x.
  2. Korzhevskii DE, Gilerovich EG, Kirik OV, et al. Simultaneous Detection of Glutamate Decarboxylase and Synaptophysin in Paraffin Sections of the Rat Cerebellum. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2015;46(1):106-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-015-0205-6.
  3. Колос Е.А., Коржевский Д.Э. Неоднородность реакции на холинацетилтрансферазу в холинергических нейронах // Нейрохимия. – 2016. – Т. 33. – № 1. – С. 56–62. [Kolos EA, Korzhevskii DA. Heterogeneous choline acetyltransferase staining in cholinergic neurons. Neirokhimiia. 2016;33(1):56-62. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1819712416010104.
  4. Коржевский Д.Э., Григорьев И.П., Кирик О.В., и др. Метод иммуноцитохимического определения холинергических нейронов центральной нервной системы лабораторных животных // Морфология. – 2013. – Т. 144. – № 6. – С. 69–72. [Korzhevskiy DE, Grigoriyev IP, Kirik OV, et al. Method of immunocytochemical demonstration of cholinergic neurons in the central nervous system of laboratory animals. Morphology. 2013;144(6):69-72. (In Russ.)]
  5. Коржевский Д.Э., Григорьев И.П., Новикова А.Д., и др. Холинергические структуры поясной коры головного мозга крысы // Медицинский академический журнал. – 2013. – Т. 13. – № 4. – С. 49–53. [Korzhevskii DE, Grigorev IP, Novikova AD, et al. Cholinergic structures of the cingulate cortex of the rat brain. Medical Academic Journal. 2013;13(4):49-53. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.17816/MAJ13449-53.
  6. Сырцова М.А. Нитроксидергические клетки легкого у крысы // Морфология. – 2016. – Т. 150. – № 6. – С. 51–54. [Syrtsova MA. Nitroxidergic cells of the rat lung. Morfology. 2016;150(6):51-54. (In Russ.)]
  7. Иммуноцитохимия и конфокальная микроскопия / под ред. Д.Э. Коржевского. – СПб.: СпецЛит, 2018. [Immunotsitokhimiya i konfokal’naya mikroskopiya. Ed. by D.E. Korzhevskiy. Saint Petersburg: SpetsLit; 2018. (In Russ.)]
  8. Grigor’ev IP, Shklyaeva MA, Kirik OV, et al. Distribution of alpha-tubulin in rat forebrain structures. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2013;44(1):1-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-013-9864-3.
  9. Бровко М.А., Суфиева Д.А., Коржевский Д.Э. Иммуногистохимическое выявление альфа-синуклеина в синаптической зоне области CA3 гиппокампа // Журнал анатомии и гистопатологии. – 2018. – Т. 7. – № 2. – С. 23–28. [Brovko MA, Sufieva DA, Korzhevskiy DE. Immunohistochemical revealing of alpha-synuclein in synaptic contact area of hippocampal CA3 zone. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2018;7(2):23-28. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2018-7-2-23-28.
  10. Сухорукова Е.Г. Ядерный белок NeuN в нейронах черного вещества головного мозга человека // Морфология. – 2013. – Т. 143. – № 2. – С. 78–80. [Sukhorukova YG. NeuN nuclear protein in neurons of human brain substantia Nigra. Morfology. 2013;143(2):78-80. (In Russ.)]
  11. Кирик О.В., Сухорукова Е.Г., Власов Т.Д., Коржевский Д.Э. Селективная гибель нейронов стриатума крысы после транзиторной окклюзии средней мозговой артерии // Морфология. – 2009. – Т. 135. – №2. – С. 80-82. [Kirik OV, Sukhorukova YG, Vlasov TD, Korzhevskiy DE. Selective death of the striatum neurons in rats after the transient occlusion of the middle cerebral artery. Morfology. 2009;135(2):80-82. (In Russ.)].
  12. Sukhorukova EG, Kirik OV, Sufieva DA, et al. Structural organization of astrocytes in the subgranular zone of the rabbit hippocampal dentate fascia. J Evol Biochem Physiol. 2019;55(2):148-154. https://doi.org/10.1134/s002209301902008x.
  13. Калинина Ю.А., Суфиева Д.А. Иммуногистохимический метод одновременного выявления нейронов и астроцитов в головном мозге крысы // Медицинский академический журнал. – 2018. – Т. 18. – № 3. – С. 46–51. [Kalinina YuA, Sufieva DA. Immunohistochemical method of simultaneous detection of neurons and astrocytes in the rat brain. Medical Academic Journal. 2018;18(3):46-51. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.17816/MAJ18346-51.
  14. Sukhorukova EG, Gusel’nikova VV, Korzhevskii DE. Glutamine synthetase in rat brain cells. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2018;48(7):890-893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-018-0644-y.
  15. Kirik OV, Korzhevskii DE. Vimentin in ependymal and subventricular proliferative zone cells of rat telencephalon. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2013;154(4):553-557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-013-1998-3.
  16. Kirik OV, Nazarenkova AV, Sufieva DA. Three-dimensional visualization of the ependyma and tanycytes in the brain. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2015;45(2):127-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-015-0049-0.
  17. Kolos EA, Korzhevskii DE. Activation of microglyocytes in the anterior horns of rat spinal cord after administration of bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2017;163(4):515-518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-017-3841-8.
  18. Коржевский Д.Э., Кирик О.В., Сухорукова Е.Г., Сырцова М.А. Микроглия черного вещества головного мозга человека // Медицинский академический журнал. – 2014. – Т. 14. – № 4. – C. 68–73. [Korzhevskii DE, Kirik OV, Sukhorukova EG, Syrszova MA. Microglia of the human Substantia Nigra. Medical Academic Journal. 2014;14(4):68-73. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.17816/MAJ14468-72.
  19. Klein MO, Battagello DS, Cardoso AR, et al. Dopamine: Functions, Signaling, and Association with Neurological Diseases. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2019;39(1):31-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-018-0632-3.
  20. Dunnett SB, Bentivoglio M, Björklund A, Hökfelt T. Handbook of chemical neuroanatomy: dopamine. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1984.
  21. Sukhorukova EG, Alekseeva OS, Korzhevsky DE. Catecholaminergic neurons of mammalian brain and neuromelanin. J Evol Biochem Physiol. 2014;50(5):383-391. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0022093014050020
  22. Отеллин В.А., Арушанян Э.Б. Нигрострионигральная система. – М.: Медицина, 1989. [Otellin VA, Arushanyan EB. Nigrostrionigral’naya sistema. Moscow: Meditsina; 1989. (In Russ.)]
  23. Голубев В.Л., Левин Я.И., Вейн А.М. Болезнь Паркинсона и синдром паркинсонизма. М.: МЕДпресс, 2000. [Golubev VL, Levin YI, Vejn AM. Bolezn’ Parkinsona i sindrom parkinsonizma. Moscow: MEDpress; 2000. (In Russ.)]
  24. Korzhevskii DE, Sukhorukova EG, Gilerovich EG, et al. Advantages and disadvantages of zinc-ethanol-formaldehyde as a fixative for immunocytochemical studies and confocal laser microscopy. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2014;44(5):542-545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-014-9948-8.
  25. Korzhevskii DE, Sukhorukova EG, Kirik OV, Grigorev IP. Immunohistochemical demonstration of specific antigens in the human brain fixed in zinc-ethanol-formaldehyde. Eur J Histochem. 2015;59(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/ejh.2015.2530.
  26. Kaufman DL, Houser CR, Tobin AJ. Two forms of the gamma-aminobutyric acid synthetic enzyme glutamate decarboxylase have distinct intraneuronal distributions and cofactor interactions. J Neurochem. 1991;56(2):720-723. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1991.tb08211.x.
  27. Fong AY, Stornetta RL, Foley CM, Potts JT. Immunohistochemical localization of GAD67-expressing neurons and processes in the rat brainstem: subregional distribution in the nucleus tractus solitarius. J Comp Neurol. 2005;493(2):274-290. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.20758.
  28. Fukuda T, Heizmann CW, Kosaka T. Quantitative analysis of GAD65 and GAD67 immunoreactivities in somata of GABAergic neurons in the mouse hippocampus proper (CA1 and CA3 regions), with special reference to parvalbumin-containing neurons. Brain Res. 1997;764(1-2):237-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-8993(97)00683-5.
  29. Esclapez M, Tillakaratne NJ, Kaufman DL, et al. Comparative localization of two forms of glutamic acid decarboxylase and their mRNAs in rat brain supports the concept of functional differences between the forms. J Neurosci. 1994;14(3):1834-1855. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.14-03-01834.1994.
  30. From molecules to networks. An introduction to cellular and molecular neuroscience. 3rd ed. Ed. by J.H. Byrne, R. Heidelberger, M.N. Waxham, et al. New York: Academic Press; 2014.
  31. Acetylcholine in basic neurochemistry. 8th ed. Ed. by S.T. Brady, R.W. Albers, G.J. Siegel, D.L. Price. New York: Academic Press; 2012.
  32. Буданцев А.Ю. Диссоциированное обучение и холинергические системы мозга // Успехи современной биологии. – 2000. – Т. 120. – № 6. – С. 587–598. [Budantsev AY. Dissotsiirovannoe obuchenie i kholinergicheskie sistemy mozga. Advances in modern biology. 2000;120(6):587-598. (In Russ.)]
  33. Zakharova EI, Dudchenko AM, Svinov MM, et al. Cholinergic systems of the rat brain and neuronal reorganization under conditions of acute hypoxia. Neurochem J. 2010;4(4):290-303. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1819712410040082.
  34. Klinkenberg I, Sambeth A, Blokland A. Acetylcholine and attention. Behav Brain Res. 2011;221(2):430-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.11.033.
  35. Micheau J, Marighetto A. Acetylcholine and memory: a long, complex and chaotic but still living relationship. Behav Brain Res. 2011;221(2):424-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.bbr.2010.11.052.
  36. Balentova S, Conwell S, Myers AC. Neurotransmitters in parasympathetic ganglionic neurons and nerves in mouse lower airway smooth muscle. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2013;189(1):195-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.resp.2013.07.006.
  37. Matsumoto M, Xie W, Inoue M, Ueda H. Evidence for the tonic inhibition of spinal pain by nicotinic cholinergic transmission through primary afferents. Mol Pain. 2007;3:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-3-41.
  38. Ikonomovic MD, Abrahamson EE, Isanski BA, et al. Superior frontal cortex cholinergic axon density in mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2007;64(9):1312-1317. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur. 64.9.1312.
  39. Benzing WC, Mufson EJ, Armstrong DM. Immunocytochemical distribution of peptidergic and cholinergic fibers in the human amygdala: their depletion in Alzheimer’s disease and morphologic alteration in non-demented elderly with numerous senile plaques. Brain Res. 1993;625(1):125-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(93)90145-d.
  40. Колос Е.А., Коржевский Д.Э. Формирование холинергических нейронов спинного мозга крыс в пренатальный и ранний постнатальный период развития // Международная научная конференция «Актуальные вопросы морфогенеза в норме и патологии»; Апрель 16–17, 2014; Москва. – М., 2014. [Kolos YA, Korzhevskiy DE. Formirovanie kholinergicheskikh neyronov spinnogo mozga krys v prenatal’nyy i ranniy postnatal’nyy period razvitiya. In: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference “Aktual’nye voprosy morfogeneza v norme i patologii”; 2014 Apr 16-17; Moscow. (In Russ.)]
  41. Колос Е.А., Коржевский Д.Э. Распределение холинергических и нитроксидергических нейронов в спинном мозгу у новорожденных и взрослых крыс // Морфология. – 2015. – Т. 147. – № 2. – С. 32-37. [Kolos YA, Korzhevskiy DE. The distribution of cholinergic and nitroxidergic neurons in the spinal cord of newborn and adult rats. Morfology. 2015;147(2):32-37. (In Russ.)]
  42. Akyol O, Zoroglu SS, Armutcu F, et al. Nitric oxide as a physiopathological factor in neuropsychiatric disorders. In vivo. 2004;18(3):377-390.
  43. Knott AB, Bossy-Wetzel E. Nitric oxide in health and disease of the nervous system. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2009;11(3):541-553. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2008.2234.
  44. Соловьева А.Г., Кузнецова В.Л., Перетягин С.П., и др. Роль оксида азота в процессах свободнорадикального окисления // Вестник Российской военно-медицинской академии. – 2016. – № 1. – С. 228–233. [Solovieva AG, Kuznetsova VL, Peretyagin SP, et al. Role of nitric oxide in processes of free radical oxidation. Vestnik Rossiiskoi voenno-meditsinskoi akademii. 2016;(1):228-233. (In Russ.)]
  45. Forstermann U, Sessa WC. Nitric oxide synthases: regulation and function. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(7):829-837, 837a-837d. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr304.
  46. Matarredona ER, Murillo-Carretero M, Moreno-Lopez B, Estrada C. Role of nitric oxide in subventricular zone neurogenesis. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2005;49(2):355-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.01.001.
  47. Sexton TJ, Bleckert A, Turner MH, Van Gelder RN. Type I intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells of early post-natal development correspond to the M4 subtype. Neural Dev. 2015;10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13064-015-0042-x.
  48. Lim E-J, Kim I-B, Oh S-J, Chun M-H. Identification and characterization of SMI32-immunoreactive amacrine cells in the mouse retina. Neurosci Lett. 2007;424(3):199-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2007.07.046.
  49. Law AJ, Harrison PJ. The distribution and morphology of prefrontal cortex pyramidal neurons identified using anti-neurofilament antibodies SMI32, N200 and FNP7. Normative data and a comparison in subjects with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or major depression. J Psychiatr Res. 2003;37(6):487-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3956 (03)00075-x.
  50. Korzhevskii DE, Grigor’ev IP, Sukhorukova EG, Gusel’nikova VV. Immunohistochemical characteristics of neurons in the substantia nigra of the human brain. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2018;49(1):109-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-018-0702-5.
  51. Gai WP, Vickers JC, Blumbergs PC, Blessing WW. Loss of non-phosphorylated neurofilament immunoreactivity, with preservation of tyrosine hydroxylase, in surviving substantia nigra neurons in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57(9):1039-1046. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.57.9.1039.
  52. Penas C, Casas C, Robert I, et al. Cytoskeletal and activity-related changes in spinal motoneurons after root avulsion. J Neurotrauma. 2009;26(5):763-779. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2008-0661.
  53. Singh S, Metz I, Amor S, et al. Microglial nodules in early multiple sclerosis white matter are associated with degenerating axons. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;125(4):595-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-013-1082-0.
  54. Merkul’eva NS, Mikhalkin AA, Nikitina NI, et al. Changes in the formation of Y neurons in the cat visual system during early postnatal ontogeny on exposure to binocular rhythmic light stimulation. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2014;44(9):1088-1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-014-0030-3.
  55. Ang LC, Munoz DG, Shul D, George DH. SMI-32 immunoreactivity in human striate cortex during postnatal development. Dev Brain Res. 1991;61(1):103-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-3806(91)90119-4.
  56. Kogan CS, Zangenehpour S, Chaudhuri A. Developmental profiles of SMI-32 immunoreactivity in monkey striate cortex. Dev Brain Res. 2000;119(1):85-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-3806(99)00162-5.
  57. Goncalves FG, Freddi TAL, Taranath A, et al. Tubulinopathies. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;27(6):395-408. https://doi.org/10.1097/RMR.0000000000000188.
  58. Millecamps S, Julien JP. Axonal transport deficits and neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14(3):161-176. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3380.
  59. Benskey MJ, Perez RG, Manfredsson FP. The contribution of alpha synuclein to neuronal survival and function — Implications for Parkinson’s disease. J Neurochem. 2016;137(3):331-359. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc. 13570.
  60. Mehra S, Sahay S, Maji SK. alpha-Synuclein misfolding and aggregation: Implications in Parkinson’s disease pathogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom. 2019;1867(10):890-908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap. 2019.03.001.
  61. Das T, Eliezer D. Membrane interactions of intrinsically disordered proteins: The example of alpha-synuclein. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom. 2019;1867(10):879-889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2019.05.001.
  62. Пчелина С.Н. Альфа-синуклеин как биомаркер болезни Паркинсона // Анналы клинической и экспериментальной неврологии. – 2011. – Т. 5. – № 4. – С. 46–51. [Pchelina SN. Alpha-synuclein as a biomarker of Parkinson’s disease. Annaly klinicheskoy i eksperimental’noy nevrologii. 2011;5(4):46-51. (In Russ.)]
  63. Perez RG, Waymire JC, Lin E, et al. A role for α-synuclein in the regulation of dopamine biosynthesis. J Neurosci. 2002;22(8):3090-3099. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci. 22-08-03090.2002.
  64. Burre J. The synaptic function of alpha-synuclein. J Parkinsons Dis. 2015;5(4):699-713. https://doi.org/10.3233/JPD-150642.
  65. Mullen RJ, Buck CR, Smith AM. NeuN, a neuronal specific nuclear protein in vertebrates. Development. 1992;116(1):201-211.
  66. Scott BB, Lois C. Generation of tissue-specific transgenic birds with lentiviral vectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(45):16443-16447. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 0508437102.
  67. Tochinai S, Yoshino J. Phylogeny and ontogeny of regeneration in vertebrates. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on “Dawn of a New Natural History — Integration of Geoscience and Biodiversity Studies”; Sapporo, 2004 Mar 5-6. Okada: Graduate School of Science, Hokkaido University; 2004. P. 45-51.
  68. King C, Lacey R, Rodger J, et al. Characterisation of tectal ephrin-A2 expression during optic nerve regeneration in goldfish: implications for restoration of topography. Exp Neurol. 2004;187(2):380-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.expneurol.2004.02.006.
  69. Kim KK, Adelstein RS, Kawamoto S. Identification of neuronal nuclei (NeuN) as Fox-3, a new member of the Fox-1 gene family of splicing factors. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(45):31052-31061. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.052969.
  70. Korzhevskii DE, Petrova ES, Kirik OV, Otellin VA. Assessment of neuron differentiation during embryogenesis in rats using immunocytochemical detection of doublecortin. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2009;39(6):513-516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-009-9164-0.
  71. Weyer A, Schilling K. Developmental and cell type-specific expression of the neuronal marker NeuN in the murine cerebellum. J Neurosci Res. 2003;73(3):400-409. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.10655.
  72. Friese A, Kaltschmidt JA, Ladle DR, et al. Gamma and alpha motor neurons distinguished by expression of transcription factor Err3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(32):13588-13593. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906809106.
  73. Shneider NA, Brown MN, Smith CA, et al. Gamma motor neurons express distinct genetic markers at birth and require muscle spindle-derived GDNF for postnatal survival. Neural Dev. 2009;4:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8104-4-42.
  74. Wolf HK, Buslei R, Schmidt-Kastner R, et al. NeuN: a useful neuronal marker for diagnostic histopathology. J Histochem Cytochem. 1996;44(10):1167-1171. https://doi.org/10.1177/44.10.8813082.
  75. Сухорукова Е.Г., Кирик О.В., Зеленкова Н.М., Коржевский Д.Э. Нейрональный ядерный антиген NeuN — показатель сохранности нервной ткани и пригодности ее для иммуноцитохимического исследования // Медицинский академический журнал. – 2015. – Т. 15. – № 1. – С. 63–67. [Sukhorukova EG, Kirik OV, Zelenkova NM, Korzhevskii DE. Neuronal nuclear antigen NeuN as an indicator of the nervous tissue preservation and suitability for immunocytochemical study. Medical Academic Journal. 2015;15(1):63-67. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.17816/MAJ15163-67.
  76. Santello M, Toni N, Volterra A. Astrocyte function from information processing to cognition and cognitive impairment. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22(2):154-166. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0325-8.
  77. Sofroniew MV. Astrogliosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;7(2):a020420. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a020420.
  78. Sofroniew MV, Vinters HV. Astrocytes: biology and pathology. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;119(1):7-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-009-0619-8.
  79. Sukhorukova EG, Korzhevskii DE, Alekseeva OS. Glial fibrillary acidic protein: The component of iintermediate filaments in the vertebrate brain astrocytes. J Evol Biochem Physiol. 2015;51(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0022093015010019.
  80. Сухорукова Е.Г., Гусельникова В.В. Ферменты-маркеры астроцитов // Медицинский академический журнал. – 2015. – Т. 15. – № 3. – С. 31–37. [Sukhorukova EG, Guselnikova VV. Astrocyte marker enzymes. Medical Academic Journal. 2015;15(3):31-37. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.17816/MAJ15331-37.
  81. Rose Christopher F, Verkhratsky A, Parpura V. Astrocyte glutamine synthetase: pivotal in health and disease. Biochem Soc Trans. 2013;41(6):1518-1524. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst20130237.
  82. Jayakumar AR, Norenberg MD. Glutamine synthetase: role in neurological disorders. Adv Neurobiol. 2016;13:327-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45096-4_13.
  83. Hepatic encephalopathy. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(2): 186-186. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1614962.
  84. Anlauf E, Derouiche A. Glutamine synthetase as an astrocytic marker: its cell type and vesicle localization. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2013;4:144. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2013.00144.
  85. Pekny M, Wilhelmsson U, Tatlisumak T, Pekna M. Astrocyte activation and reactive gliosis-A new target in stroke? Neurosci Lett. 2019;689:45-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.neulet.2018.07.021.
  86. Корнева Е.А., Новикова Н.С., Шаинидзе К.З., Перекрест С.В. Взаимодействие нервной и иммунной систем. Молекулярно-клеточные аспекты. – СПб.: Наука, 2012. [Korneva EA, Novikova NS, Shainidze KZ, Perekrest SV. Vzaimodeystvie nervnoy i immunnoy sistem. Molekulyarno-kletochnye aspekty. Saint Petersburg: Nauka; 2012. (In Russ.)]
  87. Han F, Perrin RJ, Wang Q, et al. Neuroinflammation and myelin status in Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and normal aging brains: a small sample study. Parkinsons Dis. 2019;2019:7975407. https://doi.org/10.1155/ 2019/7975407.
  88. Rubino SJ, Mayo L, Wimmer I, et al. Acute microglia ablation induces neurodegeneration in the somatosensory system. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4578. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05929-4.
  89. Korzhevskii DE, Kirik OV. Brain microglia and microglial markers. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2016;46(3):284-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-016-0231-z.
  90. Korzhevskii DE, Kirik O, Sukhorukova E. Immunocytochemistry of microglial cells. In: Immunocytochemistry and related techniques. Ed. by A. Adalberto, L. Lossi. New York: Humana Press; 2015. P. 101; 209-224. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2313-7_12.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files Action
1.
Fig. 1. The section of the rat brain through the corpus striatum. Left — figure of the rat brain areas, right — tyrosine hydroxylase immunohistochemistry (gray color). Cate­cholaminergic nerve fibers are predominantly distributed in the striatum (ПТ) and olfactory bulb (ОЛ). ПК — cingulate cortex, Пер — septum, ЯЛТП — bed nucleus of the stria terminalis

Download (152KB) Indexing metadata
2.
Fig. 2. Immunohistochemical visualization of various neural markers in the rat brain using light microscopy. a — GABA-ergic structures in the cerebellum, GAD67 immunohistochemistry, ob. ×100; b — cholinergic motor neurons of the spinal cord, choline acetyltransferase immunohistochemistry, ob. ×100; c — NOS-immunopositive neuron in the subventricular zone of the lateral ventricle, NOS immunohistochemistry, ob. ×100; d — neurofilaments in the axial cylinder of the nerve fibers of the rat sciatic nerve (cross section), SMI-32 immunohistochemistry, ob. ×10; e — alpha-tubulin in the processes of pyramidal neurons in the CA1 zone of the hippocampus, alpha-tubulin immunohistochemistry, ob. ×100; f — alpha-synuclein in giant synapses of mossy fibers of the CA3 zone of the hippocampus, alpha-synuclein immunohistochemistry, ob. ×100; a–c, e, f — nuclear counterstaining with alum hematoxylin; d — counterstaining of tissue structures with astra blue

Download (1MB) Indexing metadata
3.
Fig. 3. Fluorescence imaging of neural and glial markers (confocal microscopy): а — fascia dentata of the rat hippocampus. Double immunofluorescence staining for NeuN (green) and GFAP (red), ob. ×63; b–d — astrocyte in the striatum of the rabbit brain. Double immunofluorescence staining for GFAP (red) and glutamine synthetase (green). Confocal images obtained in single channels are shown in (b) and (c) while merged images are shown in (d), ob. ×63; e — tanycytes of the third ventricle of the rat brain. Vimentin immunohistochemistry, ob. ×63, the asterisk marks the ventricular cavity; f — microgliocyte in the striatum of the rat brain. Iba-1 immunohistochemistry (red color) with nuclear counterstaining with SYTOX Green (green color), ob. ×63

Download (1MB) Indexing metadata

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 362

PDF (Russian) - 86

PDF (English) - 18

Cited-By


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

PlumX

Dimensions

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Korzhevskii D.E., Grigor’ev I.P., Gusel’nikova V.V., Kolos E.A., Petrova E.S., Kirik O.V., Sufieva D.A., Razenkova V.A., Antipova M.V., Chernysh M.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies