АНТИМИКРОБНАЯ АКТИВНОСТЬ ЛИЗОЦИМА В ОТНОШЕНИИ LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES В РАЗЛИЧНЫХ УСЛОВИЯХ СРЕДЫ

Полный текст

Introduction. Though lysozyme (Lz) as an antimicrobial protein is studied about a century, its specific contribution to human defense against infection is far from clear. Lz is an enzyme which hydrolyzes glycoside bonds in the bacterial peptidoglycan thus destroying the cell wall. Gram-negative bacteria are usually resistant to Lz since their peptidoglycan is protected by the outer membrane. Moreover, it is generally accepted that under physiological conditions, most gram-positive bacteria also survive under Lz action as protoplasts, but at hypotonic conditions, they are lysed as a result of osmotic shock. On the other hand, some authorsconsider Lz as the main bactericidal factor of human plasma for gram-positive bacteria [1]. In addition, there are some data indicating that enzymatic activity of Lz is not essential for its antimicrobial properties, instead, it could function as a membrane-active cationic protein similar to antimicrobial peptides such as defensins [2; 3]. In spite of the simplicity of this idea, we could not find in literature direct comparison of antimicrobial (not just enzymatic) activity of Lz at different ionic strength. The aim of this study was to investigate an antimicrobial activity of Lz towards gram-positive bacterium Listeria monocytogenes at various medium conditions. Three concentrations of NaCl were selected for these experiments, namely 150 mM for mimicking physiological conditions; 75 mM for optimal enzymatic activity of Lz [4]; and 0 mM (NaCl-free buffer) for optimal osmotic lysis. In addition, we tested the influence of buffer nature (phosphate or veronal) and growth phase of bacterial culture on the antimicrobial activity of Lz. Material and methods. Lysozyme was isolated from human leukocytes by their freezing-thawing destruction and protein fractionation by consecutive cation-exchange chromatography on CM-cellulose and gel filtration on G-75. The purified protein revealed a typical for Lz capacity to lyse lyophilized cell walls of Micrococcus lysodeikticus. Antimicrobial activity towards Listeria monocytogenes EGD was evaluated by a colony counting assay as described previously [5]. 10 mM buffer solutions with pH 7.4 were used in these experiments. If not specified otherwise, bacterial cells in the exponential growth phase were taken for antimicrobial tests. Minimum inhibitory concentration was determined as a minimum dose of Lz leading to at least a one order of magnitude decrease in the number of bacterial colonies compared with the control. Results and discussion. We found that ionic strength dramatically affects the antimicrobial activity of Lz (see Table). However, the inhibitory effect of NaCl can be overcome by increasing the Lz concentration. In addition, Lz is more active in the veronal buffer than in the phosphate buffer. It seems that the antimicrobial action of Lz involves two stages: enzymatic lysis of the cell wall peptidoglycan and non-enzymatic disruption of the cytoplasmic membrane. The latter requires more than an order of magnitude higher Lz doses. Under hypotonic conditions, the second step probably is not essential since membrane lysis is achieved by osmotic force. In addition, lower doses of Lz would be effective in the second step in NaCl-free buffer because it is expected to be salt-sensitive as described for defensins. It is known that defensins are much more active towards bacteria in the exponential growth phase compared with the stationary phase. However, we did not observe a remarkable difference in the case of Lz as an antimicrobial agent. Presumably, it is easier for defensins to gain access to the cytoplasmic membrane of dividing bacterial cells, but it is not important for Lz, which provide access to the membrane by its own enzymatic action on peptidoglycan. Conclusion. Our results imply that Lz alone can exhibit an antimicrobial effect on some gram-positive bacteria such as L. monocytogenes or equally sensitive in human saliva, tears or milk. On the other hand, in the blood plasma Lz level is insufficient to kill bacteria at physiological ionic strength. However, plasma Lz can convert bacterial cells to protoplasts making them susceptible to other bactericidal factors such as complement or antimicrobial peptides. This assumption is partially confirmed by literature data [6].

Об авторах

М Н Берлов

ФГБНУ «Институт экспериментальной медицины»

С В Легковой

Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет

Е С Умнякова

ФГБНУ «Институт экспериментальной медицины»

В Н Кокряков

ФГБНУ «Институт экспериментальной медицины»; Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет

Список литературы

Дополнительные файлы