Targeted temperature management, warm alkaline hydrogen peroxide solutions, and dilute solutions of local anesthetics as safety factors for circumcision

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Foreskin circumcision is the oldest surgical procedure that has become part of Muslim and Jewish cultures and has been performed on healthy boys and men since ancient times. In addition, circumcision is a surgical method of treating phimosis, balanitis and balanoposthitis, which is used regardless of religion. A review of the literature showed that surgical and medical factors of foreskin circumcision sometimes lead to local complications such as penile ischemia and amputation, wound infection, bleeding, meatal stenosis, cutaneous urethral fistula, urethral erosion, iatrogenic hypospadias, bruising after injection, inflammation, necrosis and abscess. These complications worsen the aesthetic outcome of circumcision, the mood of patients and their relatives, and increase the costs of the healthcare system associated with the treatment of complications. In this regard, the current priority is to improve the safety of surgical procedures and medicinal solutions of the following pharmacological groups: anesthetics (drugs for intravenous anesthesia), local anesthetics, detergents (disinfectants), antiseptic and anti-inflammatory drugs. The fact is that it is these medicinal solutions that are most often used in circumcision. In recent years, targeted changes in local temperature have become very relevant, since hypothermia inhibits the intensity of local complications, increases the viability of damaged, ischemic and excised tissues and hyperthermia potentiates the disinfecting effect of antiseptics and helps stop bleeding. It has been shown that the risk of local complications during circumcision can be reduced by infrared monitoring of the local temperature of the penis and skin at the injection sites, as this ensures early detection of local hyperthermia in inflammation and local hypothermia in ischemia. It has been shown that the risk of ischemic soft tissue injury and amputation can be reduced by therapeutic hypothermia, as cooling increases tissue resistance to ischemia. It has been reported that the risk of wound infection in phimosis, paraphimosis, balanitis and balanoposthitis can be reduced by the use of antiseptic pyolytics, which are warm alkaline hydrogen peroxide solutions, and the risk of post-injection necrosis and abscesses can be reduced by pre-diluting drug solutions with water for injection by 2 or more times.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Aleksandr L. Urakov

Izhevsk State Medical Academy

Author for correspondence.
Email: urakoval@live.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9829-9463
SPIN-code: 1613-9660

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Izhevsk

Ilina R. Sagidullina

Izhevsk State Medical Academy

Email: ildar.sagidullin@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-3465-2634
Russian Federation, Izhevsk

Petr D. Shabanov

Institute of Experimental Medicine; Kirov Military Medical Academy

Email: pdshabanov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1464-1127
SPIN-code: 8974-7477

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Moyer E, Baas R, Shabalala F. Social complexities of informed consent and assent among young males undergoing voluntary medical male circumcision in Eswatini. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(5): e007918. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007918
  2. Hassan Y, Rasool H, Rather AA, et al. Religious circumcision (Khatna) and circumcision mishaps in Kashmiri children. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2022;19(4):213–216. doi: 10.4103/ajps.ajps_158_21
  3. Morris BJ, Moreton S, Bailis SA, et al. Critical evaluation of contrasting evidence on whether male circumcision has adverse psychological effects: A systematic review. J Evid Based Med. 2022;15(2):123–135. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12482
  4. Shezi MH, Tlou B, Naidoo S. Knowledge, attitudes and acceptance of voluntary medical male circumcision among males attending high school in Shiselweni region, Eswatini: a cross ectional study. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15228-3
  5. Ntshiqa T, Musekiwa A, Manesen R, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, practices, and acceptability of medical male circumcision among males in traditionally circumcising rural communities of Alfred Nzo District, eastern cape, South Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(23):7091. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20237091
  6. Morris B, Rivin BE, Sheldon M, Krieger JN. Neonatal male circumcision: Clearly beneficial for public health or an ethical dilemma? A systematic review. Cureus. 2024;16(2):e54772. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54772
  7. Raveenthiran V. The evolutionary saga of circumcision from a religious perspective. J Pediatr Surg. 2018;53(7):1440–1443. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.03.001
  8. Wani RA, Mir BY. Factors affecting parental satisfaction after male circumcision. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2023;28(5):397–399. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_179_22
  9. Baky Fahmy MA, Sabra TA, Abdelmohsen SM. Management of penile post-circumcision ischemia by pentoxifylline infusion and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. BMC Urol. 2023;23(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01284-9
  10. Mohamed SS, Sheikh OA, Adam MK, et al. A presentation of iatrogenic hypospadias after traditional circumcision: A case report. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022;84:104872. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104872
  11. Weiss SM, Rodriguez VJ, Cook RR, et al. Increasing early infant male circumcision uptake in Zambia: Like father like son. PLoS One. 2023;18(8):e0289819. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289819
  12. Hari P, Meena J, Kumar M, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for management of urinary tract infection and primary vesicoureteric reflux. Pediatr Nephrol. 2024;39(5):1639–1668. doi: 10.1007/s00467-023-06173-9
  13. Dar L, Baarimah A, Alshehrani S, et al. Male genital mutilation in the name of ritual circumcision: A case report and literature review. Case Rep Urol. 2023;2023:9935247. doi: 10.1155/2023/9935247
  14. Qaid S, Ahmed F, Al-Shami E, et al. Repair of total penile skin loss after ritual circumcision using a scrotal flap: a case report. Pan Afr Med J. 2022;42:152. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.42.152.35813
  15. Hașegan A, Mihai I, Bratu D, et al. Severe acute ischemia of glans penis after achieving treatment with only hyperbaric oxygen therapy: A rare case report and systematic literature review. J Pers Med. 2023;13(9):1370. doi: 10.3390/jpm13091370
  16. Nhungo CJ, Mkony C, Mtaturu G, et al. “A successful reconstruction of remnants of corporal bodies and penile urethra after Total Glans Penis amputation following surgical circumcision in a 5-year-old boy”. A case report and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2024;115:109267. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.109267
  17. Çelebi S. Neo-glans reconstruction with dartos flaps covered with buccal mucosal graft after total glans amputation during circumcision: novel technique. Sünnet sırasında tam glans penis amputasyonu: Bukkal mukozal greft ile kaplı dartos flep ile yeni glans oluşturulması — yeni bir teknik. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023;29(6):746–751. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.07903
  18. Uysal M, Şanlı A. Circumcision with thermocautery after local anesthesia in males: A retrospective single-center study with 1821 patients. Urol J. 2022;19(3):221–227. doi: 10.22037/uj.v19i.6748
  19. Ghidini F, Virgone C, Madounkeng BM, et al. Perioperative management of circumcision in children: Is there a difference between African and European hospitals? Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2020; 17(3–4):90–94. doi: 10.4103/ajps.AJPS_24_20
  20. Urakov A, Urakova N, Fisher E, et al. Post-injection complications. Nicolau syndrome as a consequence of local irritant effects of drugs, including antiseptics, local anesthetics, NSAIDs, steroids and anticoagulants. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International. 2022;34(33A):26–36. doi: 10.9734/jpri/2022/v34i33a36123 EDN: HCFKUY
  21. Urakov A, Urakova N, Samorodov A, et al. Thermal imaging of local skin temperature as part of quality and safety assessment of injectable drugs. Heliyon. 2023;10(1):e23417. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23417
  22. Antel R, Sahlas E, Gore G, Ingelmo P. Use of artificial intelligence in paediatric anaesthesia: a systematic review. BJA Open. 2023;5:100125. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2023.100125
  23. Gilbertson LE, Patel C, De S, et al. The utilization of an opioid-free anesthetic for pediatric circumcision in an ambulatory surgery center. Children. 2021;8(8):678. doi: 10.3390/children8080678
  24. Selino S, Krawczyk R. Happiness with circumcision status, not status itself, predicts genital self-image in a geographically diverse sample. Arch Sex Behav. 2023;52(4):1525–1534. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02543-4
  25. Matar L, Zhu J, Chen RT, Gust DA. Medical risks and benefits of newborn male circumcision in the United States: physician perspectives. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2015;14(1):33–39. doi: 10.1177/2325957414535975
  26. Morris BJ, Waskett JH, Banerjee J, et al. A ‘snip’ in time: what is the best age to circumcise? BMC Pediatr. 2012;12:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-20
  27. Galukande M, Sekavuga DB, Duffy K, et al. Mass safe male circumcision: early lessons from a Ugandan urban site—a case study. Pan Afr Med J. 2012;13:88.
  28. Omole F, Smith W, Carter-Wicker K. Newborn circumcision techniques. Am Fam Physician. 2020;101(11):680–685.
  29. Bellieni CV, Alagna MG, Buonocore G. Analgesia for infants’ circumcision. Ital J Pediatr. 2013;39:38. doi: 10.1186/1824-7288-39-38
  30. Ahmed N, Jan ZU, Yasin MD, Aurangzeb M. Circumcision with the plastibell technique: A descriptive case series. Cureus. 2022; 14(10):e30601. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30601
  31. Rossi S, Buonocore G, Bellieni CV. Management of pain in newborn circumcision: a systematic review. Eur J Pediatr. 2021;180(1):13–20. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03758-6
  32. Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Xu S, et al. Association of volatile anesthesia exposure and depth with emergence agitation and delirium in children: Prospective observational cohort study. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1115124. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1115124
  33. Bellieni CV. Neonatal infant pain scale in assessing pain and pain relief for newborn male circumcision. Int J Impot Res. 2023;35(3):282–285. doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00551-x
  34. Siroosbakht S, Rezakhaniha B. A comprehensive comparison of the early and late complications of surgical circumcision in neonates and children: A cohort study. Health Sci Rep. 2022;5(6):e939. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.939
  35. Perera CL, Bridgewater FH, Thavaneswaran P, Maddern GJ. Safety and efficacy of nontherapeutic male circumcision: a systematic review. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(1):64–72. doi: 10.1370/afm.1073
  36. Ince B, Dadaci M, Altuntas Z, Bilgen F. Rarely seen complications of circumcision, and their management. Turk J Urol. 2016;42(1):12–15. doi: 10.5152/tud.2016.78972
  37. Seck M, Sagna A, Guéye MS, et al. Circumcision in hemophilia using low quantity of factor concentrates: experience from Dakar, Senegal. BMC Hematol. 2017;17:8. doi: 10.1186/s12878-017-0080-1
  38. Escrivá Gracia J, Brage Serrano R, Fernández Garrido J. Medication errors and drug knowledge gaps among critical-care nurses: a mixed multi-method study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):640. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4481-7
  39. Urakov AL, Urakova NA, Shubina ZV, et al. Hypertonic activity of injection solutions can cause post-injection complications (Review). Drug Development and Registration. 2023;12(2):164–173. doi: 10.33380/2305-2066-2023-12-2-164-173 EDN: GDSJTI
  40. Al Hamid A. Perceptions and practices of Saudi hospital pharmacists towards reporting medication errors including near misses. Cureus. 2024;16(1):e51987. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51987
  41. Park J, You SB, Ryu GW, Kim Y. Attributes of errors, facilitators, and barriers related to rate control of IV medications: a scoping review. Syst Rev. 2023;12(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02386-z
  42. Adil M, Amin SS, Arif T. Nicolau’s syndrome: A rare but preventable iatrogenic disease. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2017;25(3):251–253.
  43. Urakov AL. Medicines in pharmaceutical form “solution for injection” and the injection of drugs: advantages and limitations. Reviews on Clinical Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2019; 17(2):79–84. doi: 10.17816/RCF17279-84 EDN: PJUCGM
  44. Urakov A, Urakova N, Fisher E, et al. Post-injection сomplications. Nicolau syndrome as a consequence of local irritant effects of drugs, including antiseptics, local anesthetics, NSAIDs, steroids and anticoagulants. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International. 2022;34(33A):26–36. doi: 10.9734/jpri/2022/v34i33A36123 EDN: HCFKUY
  45. Urakov AL. Nikolau syndrome: Necrotic activity of drugs and ways to prevent post-injection abscesses (In memory of Professor László A Gömze). Creative Surgery and Oncology. 2022;12(2):159–163. doi: 10.24060/2076-3093-2022-12-2-159-163 EDN: SGYAXG
  46. Hohlfeld A, Ebrahim S, Shaik MZ, Kredo T. Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;3(3):CD012250. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012250.pub2
  47. Hohlfeld AS-j, Ebrahim S, Zaki Shaik M, Kredo T. Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions: a Cochrane review. BJU Int. 2022;130(1):26–34. doi: 10.1111/bju.15604
  48. Moreno G, Corbalán J, Peñaloza B, Pantoja T. Topical corticosteroids for treating phimosis in boys. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(9):CD008973. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008973.pub2
  49. Zhou G, Yin J, Sun J, et al. The efficacy of topical 0.1% mometasone furoate for treating symptomatic severe phimosis: A comparison of two treatment regimens. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:1025899. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1025899
  50. Moreno G, Ramirez C, Corbalán J, et al. Topical corticosteroids for treating phimosis in boys. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024;1(1):CD008973. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008973.pub3
  51. Sridharan K, Sivaramakrishnan G. Topical corticosteroids for phimosis in children: a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Pediatr Surg Int. 2021;37(8):1117–1125. doi: 10.1007/s00383-021-04906-1
  52. Rosato E, Miano R, Germani S, Asimakopoulos AD. Phimosis in adults: Narrative review of the new available devices and the standard treatments. Clin Pract. 2024;14(1):361–376. doi: 10.3390/clinpract14010028
  53. Balaji BS, Jacob TJK, Gowri MS. Acceptability and outcomes of foreskin preservation for phimosis: An Indian perspective. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9(5):2297–2302. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_49_20
  54. Makhija D, Shah H, Tiwari C, et al. Outcome of topical steroid application in children with non-retractile prepuce. Dev Period Med. 2018;22(1):71–74. doi: 10.34763/devperiodmed.20182201.7174
  55. Carilli M, Asimakopoulos AD, Pastore S, et al. Can circumcision be avoided in adult male with phimosis? Results of the PhimoStopTM prospective trial. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10(11):4152–4160. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-673
  56. Chung E, Polikarpov D, Mazure H, et al. Novoglan device for treatment of adult phimosis: Novoglan-01 open-label clinical trial on safety, efficacy and tolerability. Transl Androl Urol. 2023; 12(7):1050–1061. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-91
  57. Coşkun İ, Yalçın O. Evaluating caudal block enhancements in pediatric circumcision: Do additional analgesics make a difference? Med Sci Monit. 2023;29:e942557. doi: 10.12659/MSM.942557
  58. Ashoor TM, Zain EM, Reyad MK, et al. Ultrasound-guided techniques for perioperative analgesia in pediatric lower abdominal surgeries: Quadratus lumborum block with bupivacaine versus caudal bupivacaine and neostigmine. Pain Physician. 2023;26(2): 137–147.
  59. Arafa SK, Elsayed AA, Hagras AM, Shama AAA. Pediatric postoperative pain control with quadratus lumborum block and dexamethasone in two routes with bupivacaine: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Pain Physician. 2022;25(7):E987–E998.
  60. Di Sarno L, Gatto A, Korn D, et al. Pain management in pediatric age. An update. Acta Biomed. 2023;94(4):e2023174. doi: 10.23750/abm.v94i4.14289
  61. Tempark T, Wu T, Singer C, Shwayder T. Dermatological complications of circumcision: lesson learned from cases in a pediatric dermatology practice. Pediatr Dermatol. 2013;30(5):519–28. doi: 10.1111/pde.12140
  62. Arredondo Montero J, Antona G, Ros Briones R, et al. Glans penis ischemia after circumcision in a 15-year-old patient managed with intravenous Pentoxifylline: A case report and a diagnostic-therapeutic guideline proposal. Urol Int. 2023;107(1):105–110. doi: 10.1159/000527642
  63. Lo K, Katz D, Chan V, Miler I. Successful delayed treatment of acute glans penis ischaemia after adult circumcision: a case report. Diving Hyperb Med. 2023;53(2):151–154. doi: 10.28920/dhm53.2.151-154
  64. Gnatzy R, Fuchs J, Siekmeyer M, et al. Glans ischemia after circumcision in a 16-year-old boy: Full recovery after angiography with local spasmolysis, systemic vasodilatation, and anticoagulation. European J Pediatr Surg Rep. 2018;6(1):e66–e69. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1667330
  65. Bayraktar S, Tanyeri-Bayraktar B. Pentoxifylline in the treatment of neonatal vasospasm and thromboembolism: An observational case series study. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2022;47(4):455–461. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13565
  66. Kumar B. Circumcision is still the gold standard in management of plasma cell balanitis. Dermatol Ther. 2018;31(6):e12661. doi: 10.1111/dth.12661
  67. Hancerliogullari G, Hancerliogullari KO, Koksalmis E. The use of multi-criteria decision making models in evaluating anesthesia method options in circumcision surgery. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017;17(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0409-5
  68. Butler-O’Hara M, LeMoine C, Guillet R. Analgesia for neonatal circumcision: a randomized controlled trial of EMLA cream versus dorsal penile nerve block. Pediatrics. 1998;101(4):E5. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.4.e5
  69. Lenhart JG, Lenhart NM, Reid A, Chong BK. Local anesthesia for circumcision: which technique is most effective? J Am Board Fam Pract. 1997;10(1):13–19.
  70. Garry DJ, Swoboda E, Elimian A, Figueroa R. A video study of pain relief during newborn male circumcision. J Perinatol. 2006;26(2):106–110. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211413
  71. Taddio A, Pollock N, Gilbert-MacLeod C, et al. Combined analgesia and local anesthesia to minimize pain during circumcision. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154(6):620–623. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.154.6.620
  72. Modekwe VI, Ugwu JO, Ekwunife OH, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) and dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) in neonatal circumcision. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019;22(12):1737–1741. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_266_19
  73. Lehr VT, Cepeda E, Frattarelli DA, et al. Lidocaine 4% cream compared with Lidocaine 2.5% and Prilocaine 2.5% or dorsal penile block for circumcision. Am J Perinatol. 2005;22(5):231–237. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-871655
  74. Emordi VC, Osifo DO, Evbuomwan I. A comparison of anesthetic efficacy between dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) with lidocaine and eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) cream during neonatal circumcision. World J Pediatr Surg. 2022;5(3):e000348. doi: 10.1136/wjps-2021-000348
  75. Ogundele IO, Nwokoro CC, Adedeji TA, et al. Comparison of dorsal penile nerve block alone and in combination with lidocaine-prilocaine cream in neonates undergoing circumcision: a randomized controlled study. World J Pediatr Surg. 2022;5(4):e000470. doi: 10.1136/wjps-2022-000470
  76. Taddio A. Pain management for neonatal circumcision. Paediatr Drugs. 2001;3(2):101–111. doi: 10.2165/00128072-200103020-00003
  77. Alanis MC, Lucidi RS. Neonatal circumcision: a review of the world’s oldest and most controversial operation. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2004;59(5):379–395. doi: 10.1097/00006254-200405000-00026
  78. Toprak H, Kandemir E. Comparison of the effects of ring block and dorsal penile nerve block on parental satisfaction for circumcision operation in children: randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Surg Int. 2024;40(1):101. doi: 10.1007/s00383-024-05681-5
  79. Ozen V, Yigit D. A comparison of the postoperative analgesic effectiveness of ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block and ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block in circumcision. Urol Int. 2020;104(11–12):871–877. doi: 10.1159/000509173
  80. Ozen V, Ozen N. Ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block versus ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block for pediatric distal hypospadias surgery. Urol Int. 2023;107(4):370–376. doi: 10.1159/000521718
  81. Çömez MS, Aydın P. Regional Anesthesia in circumcision surgery: Which of the two things is better? Eurasian J Med. 2022;54(1):4–7. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20402
  82. Krill AJ, Palmer LS, Palmer JS. Complications of circumcision. Scientific World Journal. 2011;11:2458–2468. doi: 10.1100/2011/373829
  83. Mangenah C, Mavhu W, Hatzold K, et al. Estimating the cost of early infant male circumcision in Zimbabwe: Results from a randomized noninferiority trial of AccuCirc Device versus Mogen clamp. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;69(5):560–566. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000699
  84. Basourakos SP, Nang QG, Ballman KV, et al. ShangRing versus Mogen clamp for early infant male circumcision in eastern sub-Saharan Africa: a multicentre, non-inferiority, adaptive, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2022;10(10):e1514–e1522. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00326-6
  85. Salazar JE, Park DE, Punjani N, et al. Comparison of the penile microbiome in infant male circumcision: Mogen clamp versus Shangring. EBioMedicine. 2024;105:105216. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105216
  86. Mangenah C, Sibanda EL, Maringwa G, et al. Provider and female client economic costs of integrated sexual and reproductive health and HIV services in Zimbabwe. PLoS One. 2024;19(2):e0291082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291082
  87. Iacob SI, Feinn RS, Sardi L. Systematic review of complications arising from male circumcision. BJUI Compass. 2021;3(2):99–123. doi: 10.1002/bco2.123
  88. Gonçalves MFM, Fernandes ÂR, Rodrigues AG, Lisboa C. Microbiome in male genital mucosa (prepuce, glans, and coronal sulcus): A systematic review. Microorganisms. 2022;10(12):2312. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10122312
  89. Zuber A, Peric A, Pluchino N, et al. Human male genital tract microbiota. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(8):6939. doi: 10.3390/ijms24086939
  90. Wu Y-R, Lai Y-H, Wang C-C. Type 2 diabetes mellitus increases the risk of circumcision among men aged between 30 and 69 years using a nationwide population-based dataset in Taiwan: a five-year follow-up study. BMC Urol. 2024;24(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01392-6
  91. Kılıç S. Comparative analysis of two methods in circumcision: a new disposable device versus classic sleeve technique. BMC Urol. 2024;24:126. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01513-9
  92. Urakov AL, Urakova NA. Temperature of the site of injection in subjects with suspected “injection’s disease”. Thermology International. 2014;24(2):63–64.
  93. Urakov A, Urakova N. Rheology and physical-chemical characteristics of the solutions of the medicines. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2015;602(1):012043. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/602/1/01204
  94. Urakov AL. The change of physical-chemical factors of the local interaction with the human body as the basis for the creation of materials with new properties. Epitőanyag — Journal of Silicate Based and Composite Materials. 2015;67(1):2–6. doi: 10.14382/epitoanyag-jsbcm.2015.1.263
  95. Bodduluri VP, Gurevich KG, Urakov AL. Physico-chemical properties of antiseptics in surgery: What is not taken into account in treating long-term non-healing wounds. Creative Surgery and Oncology. 2021;11(3): 256–259. doi: 10.24060/2076-3093-2021-11-3-256-259 EDN: SOFVYF
  96. Langer S, Sedigh Salakdeh M, Goertz O, et al. The impact of topical antiseptics on skin microcirculation. Eur J Med Res. 2004;9(9):449–454.
  97. Sharma AP, Yashaswi T, John JR, Singh SK. Iatrogenic partial glanular amputation: A rare complication of circumcision. Indian J Urol. 2022;38(4):312–314. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_166_22
  98. Monsour MA, Rabinovitch HH, Dean GE. Medical management of phimosis in children: our experience with topical steroids. J Urol. 1999;162(3–2):1162–1164. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)68112-6
  99. Zhou G, Jiang M, Yang Z, et al. Efficacy of topical steroid treatment in children with severe phimosis in China: A long-term single centre prospective study. J Paediatr Child Health. 2021;57(12): 1960–1965. doi: 10.1111/jpc.15628
  100. Chung J-W, Kim HT, Jang SW, et al. Comparison of the effect of steroids on the treatment of phimosis according to the steroid potencies. Urol J. 2021;18(6):652–657. doi: 10.22037/uj.v18i.6574
  101. Osmonov D, Hamann C, Eraky A, et al. Preputioplasty as a surgical alternative in treatment of phimosis. Int J Impot Res. 2022;34(4):353–358. doi: 10.1038/s41443-021-00505-9
  102. Serefoglu EC. New trend in medicine: aesthetic genital surgery. Int J Impot Res. 2022;34(4):325–326. doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00566-4
  103. Urakov A, Urakova N, Fisher E, et al. Antiseptic pyolytics and warming wet compresses improve the prospect of healing chronic wounds. Explor Med. 2023;4:747–754. doi: 10.37349/emed.2023.00175
  104. Fisher EL, Urakov AL, Samorodov AV, et al. Alkaline hydrogen peroxide solutions: expectorant, pyolytic, mucolytic, haemolytic, oxygen-releasing, and decolorizing effects. Reviews on Clinical Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2023;21(2):135–150. doi: 10.17816/RCF492316 EDN: UDPAZJ
  105. Urakov AL, Urakova NA, Yagudin II, et al. COVID-19: Artificial sputum, respiratory obstruction method and screening of pyolitic and antihypoxic drugs. Bioimpacts. 2022;12(4):393–394. doi: 10.34172/bi.2022.23877
  106. Urakov A, Urakova N, Reshetnikov A, Rozov R. Local warm alkaline hydrogen peroxide solutions and targeted temperature management improve the treatment of chronic wounds. Azerbaijan Pharmaceutical and Pharmacotherapy Journal. 2024;23(1):65–69. doi: 10.61336/appj/23-1-12
  107. Urakov A, Urakova N, Sorokina Y, et al. Targeted modification of physical-chemical properties of drugs as a universal way to transform “old” drugs into “new” drugs. Chapter 3. In: Rudrapal M, editor. Drug repurposing — advances, scopes and opportunities in drug discovery. 2023. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.110480
  108. Urakov AL, Shabanov PD. Physical-chemical repurposing of drugs. History of its formation in Russia. Reviews on Clinical Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2023;21(3):231–242. doi: 10.17816/RCF567782 EDN: IJCHYZ
  109. Patent RU No. 2807851/2023. Urakov AL, Urakova NA, Shabanov PD, et al. Warm alkaline solution of hydrogen peroxide for intrapulmonary injection. (In Russ.)
  110. Urakov AL. Pus solvents as new drugs with unique physical and chemical property. Reviews on Clinical Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2019;17(4):89–95. doi: 10.17816/RCF17489-95 EDN: TNKCYX
  111. Urakov AL, Shabanov PD, Gurevich KG, Lovtsova LV. Supplementing traditional drug formulation with the “needed” gases opens the way for the development of a new generation of drugs. Psychopharmacology and Biological Narcology. 2023;14(1):5–14. doi: 10.17816/phbn321616 EDN: TSUJTP
  112. Aslan A, Karagüzel G, Melikoglu M. Severe ischemia of the glans penis following circumcision: a successful treatment via pentoxifylline. Int J Urol. 2005;12(7):705–707. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01129.x
  113. Raisin G, Kocherov S, Jaber J, et al. Glans injury during ritual circumcision. J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16(4):471.e1–471.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.06.014
  114. Pepe P, Pietropaolo F, Candiano G, Pennisi M. Ischemia of the glans penis following circumcision: case report and revision of the literature. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2015;87(1):93–94. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2015.1.93
  115. Roth K, Izard J, Beiko D. Self-performed glansectomy and surgical repair by a nonpsychotic patient on androgen replacement therapy. Can Urol Assoc J. 2009;3(4):E25-E28. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.1135
  116. de Haseth KB, Gehrels AM, Widdershoven G, Bouman MB, van de Grift TC. Ethical considerations regarding penis transplantation surgery in transgender men-an empirical ethics study. Sex Med. 2023;11(4):qfad041. doi: 10.1093/sexmed/qfad041
  117. Carlaw K, Chia D, Allaway M, Harvey J. Acute ischaemia of the glans penis post-circumcision managed with pentoxifylline, topical nitroglycerin and epidural. BMJ Case Rep. 2023;16(1):e249049. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2022-249049
  118. Zvizdic Z, Anic D, Popovic N, Vranic S. Acute glans ischemia after circumcision successfully treated with low-molecular-weight heparin and topical dihydrotestosterone: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(29):e21340. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021340
  119. Migliorini F, Bianconi F, Bizzotto L, et al. Acute ischemia of the glans penis after circumcision treated with hyperbaric therapy and pentoxifylline: Case report and revision of the literature. Urol Int. 2018;100(3):361–363. doi: 10.1159/000444399
  120. Codrich D, Boscarelli A, Cerrina A, et al. Glans ischemia after circumcision in children: Two case reports. World J Clin Pediatr. 2021;10(4):79–83. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v10.i4.79
  121. Mittino I, Sangalli M, Fabbri F, et al. Ischemia of the glans 24 hours after circumcision: A case report and therapeutic solution. Urologia J. 2018;85(4):174–176. doi: 10.1177/0391560318761288
  122. Patent RU No. 2333001/2008. Urakov AL, Strelkov NS, Ivanova LB, et al. Method for chipping postinjection medicamental infiltrate. (In Russ.)
  123. Patent RU No. 2396562/2010. Urakov AL, Chereshnev VA, Urakova NA, et al. Method for estimating local drug toxicity. (In Russ.)
  124. Patent RU No. 2422164/2011. Urakov AL, Lobkarev OA, Lobkarev AO, et al. Method of funicular anesthesia. (In Russ.)
  125. Urakov AL, Kasatkin AA, Urakova NA, Dement’ev VB. Infrared thermography of human fingers as a method of assessing regional circulation adaptation to blood loss. Regional Blood Circulation and Microcirculation. 2016;15(3):24–29. doi: 10.24884/1682-6655-2016-15-3-24-29 EDN: XIQABV
  126. Urakov AL. Infrared thermal imaging and termologiya as the basis of radiation safety in medical diagnosis. Fundamental Research. 2013;(9–4):747–751. EDN: RSSDXP
  127. Patent RU No. 2394502/2010.07.20. Urakov AL, Tadzhiev RI, Halimov AE. Circumcision technique.
  128. Mowlavi A, Neumeister MW, Wilhelmi BJ, et al. Local hypothermia during early reperfusion protects skeletal muscle from ischemia-reperfusion injury. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(1):242–250. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000034936.25458.98
  129. Antonic A, Dottori M, Leung J, et al. Hypothermia protects human neurons. Int J Stroke. 2014;9(5):544–552. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12224
  130. Zhou T, Lin H, Jiang L, et al. Mild hypothermia protects hippocampal neurons from oxygen-glucose deprivation injury through inhibiting caspase-3 activation. Cryobiology. 2018;80:55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2017.12.004
  131. Mealer C, Konsek H, Travis Z, et al. Mechanisms of cold preservation and reperfusion injury for solid organ transplantation: Implications for partial heart transplantations. Transplantology. 2023;4(3):124–138. doi: 10.3390/transplantology4030013
  132. Ozkan H, Ekinci S, Uysal B, et al. Evaluation and comparison of the effect of hypothermia and ozone on ischemia-reperfusion injury of skeletal muscle in rats. J Surg Res. 2015;196(2):313–319. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.01.053
  133. Dey P, Rajalaxmi S, Saha P, et al. Cold-shock proteome of myoblasts reveals role of RBM3 in promotion of mitochondrial metabolism and myoblast differentiation. Commun Biol. 2024;7(1):515. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06196-4
  134. Ekinci Ş, Kaldırım Ü, Akyıldız F, et al. Effects of hypothermia on skeletal ischemia reperfusion injury in rats. Open Med (Wars). 2015;10(1):194–200. doi: 10.1515/med-2015-0031
  135. Park Y, Ahn JH, Lee TK, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia reduces inflammation and oxidative stress in the liver after asphyxial cardiac arrest in rats. Acute Crit Care. 2020;35(4):286–295. doi: 10.4266/acc.2020.00304
  136. Kim D, Kim B, Sim H, et al. Hypothermic treatment reduces matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression and damage in the liver following asphyxial cardiac arrest in rats. Lab Anim Res. 2021;37(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s42826-021-00095-z
  137. Ahn JH, Lee T-K, Kim B, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia improves hind limb motor outcome and attenuates oxidative stress and neuronal damage in the lumbar spinal cord following cardiac arrest. Antioxidants (Basel). 2020;9(1):38. doi: 10.3390/antiox9010038
  138. Tawaranurak N, Attawettayanon W, Boonchai S, et al. Successful pediatric penile replantation following amputation during ritual circumcision: A case report and literature review. Am J Case Rep. 2023;24:e942448. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.942448

Copyright (c) 2025 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 65565 от 04.05.2016 г.