RATE OF HARMFUL AND HAZARDOUS ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATEDBY LATENT CLASS ANALYSIS

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract


The rate of harmful and hazardous alcohol consumption at the point of first contact with health care is esti-mated with help of AUDIT questionnaire and consumption recall diaries. The correction for imperfect diagnosticinformation is made. Highest prevalence of harmful and hazardous consumption is found among males visitingdermatologists, lowest-among young female students. After correction for imperfect information prevalence wasestimated to be 45,9% (95% CI = 43,1-48,7%). It is shown that there are four different consumption groupsamong respondents — reasonable consumers, persons that consumed harmful and hazardous amounts in thepast, persons that continue hazardous consumption and those with harmful continuing consumption. The needfor preventive measures in primary care is stressed.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

S L Plavinski

North-Western State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov

S G Boyarski

First Moscow State Medical University named after I. M. Sechenov

A N Barinova

North-Western State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov

O Yu Kuznetsova

North-Western State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov

S L Tchicherina

First Moscow State Medical University named after I. M. Sechenov

T V Karamysheva

First Moscow State Medical University named after I. M. Sechenov

P N Trofimov

ederal Center of Heart, Blood and Endocrinology named after V. A. Almazov

L N Degtyareva

North-Western State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov

References

  1. Leon D., Shkolnikov V., McKee M. Alcohol and Russian mortality: a continuing crisis // Addiction. — 2009. — Vol. 104. — № 10. — P. 1630-1636.
  2. Плавинский С. Л., Плавинская С. И. Потребление алкоголя и смертность мужчин в длительном проспективном исследовании // Вестник Санкт-Петербургской Медицинской Академии последипломного образования. — 2009. — Т. 1. — № 1. — С. 69-73.
  3. Плавинская С. И., Плавинский С. Л. Потребление алкоголя и смертность в регионах Российской Федерации // Российский семейный врач. — 2009. — Т. 13. — № 2. — С. 12-15.
  4. Плавинский С. Л., Плавинская С. И. Оценка вклада потребления алкоголя в смертность и методологические стандарты // Вестник Санкт-Петербургской медицинской академии последипломного образования. — 2009. — Т. 1. — № 3. — С. 110-116.
  5. Babor T. F., Higgins-Biddle J. C., Saunders J. B., Monteiro M. G. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. — Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001. — P. 40.
  6. Плавинский С. Л., Кузнецова О. Ю., Баринова А. Н. и др. Скрининг и краткосрочное вмешательство, направленные на снижение опасного и вредного потребления алкоголя. — СПб.: СПб ИОЗ, 2011. — С. 154.
  7. Enoe C., Georgiadis M. P., Johnson W. O. Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests and disease prevalence when the true disease state is unknown // Prev. Vet. Med. — 2000. — Vol. 45. — № 1-2. — P. 61-81.
  8. Alonzo T. A., Pepe M. S. Using a combination of reference tests to assess the accuracy of a new diagnostic test // Stat Med. — 1999. — Vol. 18. — № 22. — P. 2987-3003.
  9. Lanza S. T., Collins L. M., Lemmon D. R., Schafer J. L. PROC LCA: A SAS Procedure for Latent Class Analysis // Struct. Equ. Modeling. — 2007. — Vol. 14. — № 4. — P. 671-694.
  10. Плавинский С. Л., Баринова А. Н., Кузнецова О. Ю., Дегтярева Л. Н. Распространенность опасного и вредного потребления алкоголя среди пациентов врачей первичного контакта. Значение для организации профилактических вмешательств // Российский семейный врач. — 2011. — Т. 15. — № 4. — С. 12-16.
  11. Conigrave K. M., Hall W. D., Saunders J. B. The AUDIT questionnaire: choosing a cut-off score. Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test // Addiction. — 1995. — Vol. 90. — № 10. — P. 1349-1356.
  12. Плавинский С. Л. Введение в биостатистику для медиков. — М.: Акварель, 2011. — С. 584.
  13. Vrieze S. I. Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) // Psychol. Methods. — 2012. — Jun. — Vol. 17. — № 2. — P. 228-243.
  14. Diggle P. Estimating prevalence using an imperfect test // Epidemiology Research International. — 2011. — Vol. 2011. — P. 1-5.
  15. Kaner E., Dickinson H., Beyer F. et al. Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations review. — Hoboken, NJ: JohnWiley & Sons, Ltd, 2007. — Vol. 2. — P. 1-73.
  16. Conigrave K. M., Saunders J. B., Reznik R. B. Predictive capacity of the AUDIT questionnaire for alcohol-related harm // Addiction. — 1995. — Vol. 90. — № 11. — P. 1479-1485.
  17. Babor T. F., Higgins-Biddle J. C. Brief Intervention For Hazardous and Harmful Drinking. — Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001. — P. 52.

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 360

PDF (Russian) - 220

Cited-By


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

PlumX

Dimensions


Copyright (c) 2012 Plavinski S.L., Boyarski S.G., Barinova A.N., Kuznetsova O.Y., Tchicherina S.L., Karamysheva T.V., Trofimov P.N., Degtyareva L.N.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies