Eubiotic preparations in the forming of vaginal microbiocenosis in women during the puerperal period
- Authors: Martikainen Z.M.1, Koroliuk A.M.1, Derkach O.I.1, Golovacheva S.N.1, Zatsiorskaya S.L.1, Omelyaniuk E.V.1, Savitcheva A.M.1
-
Affiliations:
- D.O. Ott Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
- Issue: Vol 48, No 5S (1999)
- Pages: 109-109
- Section: Articles
- Submitted: 20.02.2022
- Accepted: 20.02.2022
- Published: 15.12.1999
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/jowd/article/view/101211
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD101211
- ID: 101211
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Objective. To study a period of the vaginal microbiocenosis recovery in puerperants taking eubiotic preparations (bifidumbacterin and lactobacterin).
Full Text
Objective. To study a period of the vaginal microbiocenosis recovery in puerperants taking eubiotic preparations (bifidumbacterin and lactobacterin).
Methods. 50 patients were examined after vaginal delivery who had physiological course of the puerperal period. Daily, for the first six days after delivery, microbiological investigation of vaginal discharge and quantitative determination of lactobacilli, bifidobacteria, corynebacteria, Gram -positive and Gram - negative bacteria was carried out. Microbiological analysis was performed in 16 women who were given bifidumbacterin and lactobacterin per os 10 doses two times a day before meal from the first puerperal day.
Results. Restoration of normal vaginal microflora (lactobacilli, bifidobacteria, corynebacteria, a.o. in a quantity of 106 CFU/ml and more) occurred on the 5th-6th day. When bifidumbacterin was administered the beginning of vaginal normocenosis was noted on the 4th day. In women, taking lactobacterin, vaginal microbiocenosis began to recover from the third day.
Conclusion. The use of eubiotics favoured earlier restoration of vaginal microbiocenosis in the puerperal period.
About the authors
Z. M. Martikainen
D.O. Ott Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg
A. M. Koroliuk
D.O. Ott Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg
O. I. Derkach
D.O. Ott Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg
S. N. Golovacheva
D.O. Ott Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg
S. L. Zatsiorskaya
D.O. Ott Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg
E. V. Omelyaniuk
D.O. Ott Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg
A. M. Savitcheva
D.O. Ott Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg