Premature rupture of membranes in preterm pregnancy: prospects for prediction

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

One of the major issues in modern midwifery is premature birth, which is often the result of premature rupture of membranes. Currently known methods for predicting premature rupture of membranes do not have sufficient predictive value in preterm pregnancy. This article summarizes modern views on the biochemical, immunological and microbiological aspects of the etiology and pathogenesis of premature rupture of membranes and premature birth. Further ways of searching for predictors of these complications are outlined herein.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Marina Kh. Afanasyeva

City Polyclinic No. 44

Author for correspondence.
Email: ak-gin128@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 8558-2670

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Maternity Welfare Centre No. 19

Russian Federation, 12 Prazhskaya St., Saint Petersburg, 192241

Vyacheslav M. Bolotskikh

Maternity Hospital No. 9; St. Petersburg State University

Email: docgin@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4745-1768
SPIN-code: 3143-5405

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

Tanja Nikolova

Klinikum Mittelbaden, Academic Teaching Hospital of Heidelberg University

Email: docgin@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3737-800X

MD, MSc, PhD

Germany, Baden-Baden

Ekaterina A. Avdeyeva

Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University

Email: docgin@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Radzinsky VE, Kostin IN, Olenev AS, et al. Preterm delivery is an unsettled world problem. Obstetrics and Gynecology: News, Opinions, Training. 2018;6(3,Suppl.):55−64. (In Russ.). doi: 10.24411/2303-9698-2018-13909
  2. Dyatlova LI, Yermolayeva YeI, Glukhova TN. Znacheniye izmeneniy tsitokinovogo profilya v patogeneze prezhdevremennogo razryva plodnykh obolochek pri nedonoshennoy beremennosti. Innovatsionnaya nauka. 2015;(11−3): 218−221. (In Russ.)
  3. Radzinskiy VE, Orazmuradov AA, Savenkova IV, et al. Prezhdevremennye rody − nereshennaya problema XXI veka. Kubanskii nauchnyi meditsinskii vestnik. 2020;27(4):27−37. (In Russ.). doi: 10.25207/1608-6228-2020-27-4-27-37
  4. Tokova ZZ, Tetruashvili NK, An AV. Materinskaya smertnost’ pri prezhdevremennykh rodakh. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010;(6):97–101. (In Russ.)
  5. Ailamazyan EK, Evsyukova II. Debatable problems of premature birth and assistance to extremely low birth weight newborn babies. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2011;(3):183–189. (In Russ.)
  6. Savelyeva GM, Shalina RI, Kurtser MA, et al. Preterm birth as the most important problem of modern obstetrics. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012;(8−2):4−10. (In Russ.)
  7. Prezhdevremennye rody. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii / OOO “Rossiyskoye obshchestvo akusherov-ginekologov” (ROAG), Assotsiatsiya akusherskikh anesteziologov-reanimatologov (AAAR), Nauchno-prakticheskiy Sovet Minzdrava RF. Moscow; 2020. (In Russ.). [cited 2022 Jan 1]. Available from: https://mz.mosreg.ru/download/document/9270087
  8. WHO Recommendations on Interventions to Improve Preterm Birth Outcomes. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. [cited 2022 Jan 1]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/183037/9789241508988_eng.pdf?sequence=1
  9. Davey MA, Watson L, Rayner JA, Rowlands S. Risk scoring systems for predicting preterm birth with the aim of reducing associated adverse outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(11):CD004902. doi: 10.1002/14651858
  10. Baev OR, Vasilchenko ON, Kan NE, et al. Clinical guidelines for preterm amniorrhea. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013;(9):123−134. (In Russ.)
  11. Bolotskikh V.M. Prezhdevremennoye izlitiye okoloplodnykh vod: teoriya i praktika. Saint Petersburg: Eko-Vektor; 2018. [cited 2022 Jan 1]. Available from: https://akusher-lib.ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Prezhdevremennoe-izlitie-okoloplodnyh-vod.-Teoriya-i-praktika.pdf
  12. Vdovichenko YuP. Vliyaniye dlitel’nogo bezvodnogo promezhutka na rannyuyu neonatal’nuyu smertnost’ pri prezhdevremennom izlitii okoloplodnykh vod i nedonoshennoy beremennosti. In: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov assotsiatsii akusherov-ginekologov Ukrainy. Kiyev: Feniks; 2001: 483−486. (In Russ.)
  13. Dvoryanskiy SA. Prezhdevremenn·yye rody: prolongirovaniye nedonoshennoy beremennosti, oslozhnennoy prezhdevremnnym izlitiyem vod. Moscow: Meditsinskaya kniga; 2002. (In Russ.)
  14. Aleyev IA. Prezhdevremennyy razryv plodnykh obolochek: informatsionnoye pis’mo. Ed. by V.E. Radzinskiy, I.M. Ordiyants. Moscow: Status Praesens; 2011. (In Russ.)
  15. Aylamazyan EK, Tarasova MA, Baranov VS, et al. Akusherstvo: uchebnik. 10th ed. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2019. (In Russ.). doi: 10.33029/9704-5168-7-AKU-2019-1-268
  16. Serova OF, Sedaya LV, Shutikova NV, et al. Preterm labor complicated by pre-labor rupture of membranes. Lecheniye i profilaktika. 2017;2(22):43−46. (In Russ.)
  17. Enkin M, Keyrs M, Neylson D, et al. Rukovodstvo po effektivnoy pomoshchi pri beremennosti i rozhdenii rebenka. Saint Petersburg: Petropolis; 2003.
  18. Novikova VA, Penzhoyan GA, Rybalka YeV, et al. Rol’ infektsii v prezhdevremennom razryve plodnykh obolochek. Rossiyskiy vestnik akushera-ginekologa. 2012;12(6):35−39. (In Russ.)
  19. Mohr T. Premature rupture of the membranes. Welfare of Women Global Health Programme. 2008; doi: 10.3843/GLOWM.10120. cited 2022 Jan 1]. Available from: https://www.glowm.com/section-view/heading/Preterm %20Premature %20Rupture %20of %20the %20Membranes/item/120#
  20. Sidel’nikova VM. Infektsiya kak faktor riska nevynashivaniya beremennosti. Ginekologiya. 2008;10(5):28−30. (In Russ.)
  21. Tyurina NA, Narvatkina MA. Vliyaniye infektsiy peredavayemykh polovym putem na dorodovoye izlitiye okoloplodnykh vod i razvitiye prezhdevremennykh rodov u beremennykh s nevynashivaniyem. Nauchnyy al’manakh. 2016;(11−2):417−420. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17117/na.2016.11.02.417
  22. Khvan VO, Shipitsyna EV, Zatsiorskaya SL, et al. Clinical and microbiological rationale for the prophylaxis of obstetric and perinatal pathology caused by group B streptococci. Journal of obstetrics and women’s diseases. 2018;67(1):73−84. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17816/JOWD67173-84
  23. Bochkova AV, Kostina YuV, Sakhnova YeYe. Opravdannost’ vnedreniya skriningovykh programm s tsel’yu profilaktiki infektsii, vyzyvayemykh streptokokkom gruppy B u beremennykh i novorozhdennykh v Rossii. Meditsina. Sotsiologiya. Filosofiya. Prikladnye issledovaniya. 2019;(1):42−45. (In Russ.)
  24. Khvan VO, Shipitsyna EV, Zatsiorskaya SL, et al. Frequency and risk factors of colonization of pregnant women with group B streptococci. Journal of obstetrics and women’s diseases. 2017;66( 6):44−58. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17816/JOWD66644-58
  25. Enkova EV, Fomina AS, Khoperskaya OV, et al. Premature rupture of membranes, premature labor. Modern concepts of etiology and pathogenesis (brief review of literature). Journal of New Medical Technologies. eJournal. 2020;(6):63−69. (In Russ.). doi: 10.24411/2075-4094-2020-16779
  26. Hermanns-Lê T, Piérard GE. Collagen fibril arabesques in connective tissue disorders. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2006;7(5):323−326. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200607050-00006
  27. Biokhimiya: uchebnik dlya studentov meditsinskikh dlya vuzov. Ed. by Ye.S. Severin. Moscow: GEOTAR-MED; 2003. (In Russ.)
  28. Kozlov PV. The etiology and pathogenesis of premature rupture of membranes in incomplete abortion. Voprosy ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii. 2007;6(20):64−72. (In Russ.)
  29. Wall PD, Pressman EK, Woods JR Jr. Preterm premature rupture of the membranes and antioxidants: the free radical connection. J Perinat Med. 2002;30(6):447−457. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2002.071
  30. Dutta EH, Behnia F, Boldogh I, et al. Oxidative stress damage-associated molecular signaling pathways differentiate spontaneous preterm birth and preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Mol Hum Reprod. 2016;22(2):143−157. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gav074
  31. Kacerovsky M, Andrys C, Hornychova H, et al. Amniotic fluid soluble Toll-like receptor 4 in pregnancies complicated by preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(7):1148−1155. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.626821
  32. Stuart EL, Evans GS, Lin YS, Powers HJ. Reduced collagen and ascorbic acid concentrations and increased proteolytic susceptibility with prelabor fetal membrane rupture in women. Biol Reprod. 2005;72(1):230−235. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.033381
  33. Wideman GL, Baird GH, Bolding OT. Ascorbic acid deficiency and premature rupture of fetal membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1964;88:592−595. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(64)90885-3
  34. Ota A, Yonemoto H, Someya A, et al. Changes in matrix metalloproteinase 2 activities in amniochorions during premature rupture of membranes. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2006;13(8):592−597. doi: 10.1016/j.jsgi.2006.10.001
  35. Shadrina AS, Tereshkina IV, Plieva YaZ, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases: structure, functions and genetic polymorphism. Pathogenesis. 2017;15(2):14−23. doi: 10.25557/GM.2017.2.7297
  36. Athayde N, Edwin SS, Romero R, et al. A role for matrix metalloproteinase-9 in spontaneous rupture of the fetal membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(5):1248−1253. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70141-3
  37. Menon R, McIntyre JO, Matrisian LM, Fortunato SJ. Salivary proteinase activity: a potential biomarker for preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(6):1609−1615; discussion 1615. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.02.052
  38. Patent RF na izobreteniye № 2405453. Sposob prognozirovaniya prezhdevremennogo izlitiya okoloplodnykh vod u beremennykh / Sotnikova NYu, Borzova NYu, Kroshkina NV, Talanova IYe. Zayavka 2009125383/14,02.07.2009; opubl.0.12.2010. Byul. No. 34. (In Russ.). [cited: 2022 Jan 1]. Available from: https://patents.s3.yandex.net/RU2405453C1_20101210.pdf
  39. Boytsova EA, Azimurodova GO, Kosenkova TV. Interleukin 4: biological functions and clinical importance in allergiesdevelopment (review). Preventive and Clinical Medicine. 2020;2(75):70−79.
  40. Abdullaeva NA. Cytokine imbalance in the mechanisms of preterm rupture of membranes. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya. 2011;(2):23−26.
  41. Jacobsson B, Mattsby-Baltzer I, Andersch B, et al. Microbial invasion and cytokine response in amniotic fluid in a Swedish population of women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82(5):423−431. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00157.x
  42. Konovalov VN, Tskhay VB, yametova NM, Kostareva OV. Prevention of preterm birth. The current state of the problem. Literature review. Mat’ i ditya v Kuzbasse. 2020;4(83):52−58. doi: 10.24411/2686-7338-2020-10049
  43. Radzinskiy VE, Fuks AM. Akusherstvo. Uchebnik. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2016.
  44. Berghella V, Saccone G. Fetal fibronectin testing for prevention of preterm birth in singleton pregnancies with threatened preterm labor: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(4):431−438. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.038
  45. Berghella V, Saccone G. Fetal fibronectin testing for reducing the risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;7(7):CD006843. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006843. pub3
  46. Mamedova МА, Bezhenar VF. Predicting premature birth: current status and prospects. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya Sankt-Peterburga. 2018;(1):31−34.
  47. Nikolova T, Uotila J, Nikolova N, et al. Prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery in women presenting with premature labor: a comparison of placenta alpha microglobulin-1, phosphorylated insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1, and cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(6):610.e1−610.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.016
  48. Radan AP, Aleksandra Polowy J, Heverhagen A, et al. Cervico-vaginal placental α-macroglobulin-1 combined with cervical length for the prediction of preterm birth in women with threatened preterm labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(3):357−363. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13744
  49. Mediko-biologicheskiye aspekty reabilitatsionno- vosstanovitel’nykh tekhnologiy v akusherstve / Ed. by K.A. Khadartsev. Tula: Tul’skiy Poligrafist; 2013.
  50. Shakhbazov VG, Grigor’yeva NN, Kolupayeva TE. Novyy tsitobiofizicheskiy pokazatel’ biologicheskogo vozrasta i fiziologicheskogo sostoyaniya organizma cheloveka. Fiziologiya cheloveka. 1996;22(6):71−75.
  51. Pal’tsev MA, Kvetnoy IM, Polyakova VO, et al. Signal’n·yye molekuly v bukkal’nom epitelii: optimizatsiya diagnostiki sotsial’no znachimykh zabolevaniy. Molekulyarnaya meditsina. 2012;(4):18−23.
  52. Afanas’yeva MKh. Prezhdevremennoye izlitiye okoloplodnykh vod: optimizatsiya podkhodov k prognozirovaniyu i rodovozbuzhdeniyu [dissertation]. Saint Petersburg; 2017. [cited 2022 Jan 1]. Available from: https://www.dissercat.com/content/prezhdevremennoe-izlitie-okoloplodnykh-vod-optimizatsiya-podkhodov-k-prognozirovaniyu-i-rodo

Supplementary files

There are no supplementary files to display.


Copyright (c) 2022 Eсо-Vector


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 66759 от 08.08.2016 г. 
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия Эл № 77 - 6389 от 15.07.2002 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies