The experience of extended in vitro human embryo cultivation in a culture medium containing endometrium cells. A pilot study
- Authors: Bespalova O.N.1, Kogan I.Y.1, Komarova E.M.1, Lesik E.A.1, Tolibova G.K.1, Tral T.G.1, Zagaynova V.A.1, Obyedkova K.V.1, Gzgzyan A.M.1
-
Affiliations:
- The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
- Issue: Vol 71, No 4 (2022)
- Pages: 13-20
- Section: Original Research
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/jowd/article/view/109215
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD109215
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: At present, the knowledge on initial human embryogenesis stages is limited to the period of development from zygote to blastocyst. The creation of models based on the interaction between the embryo and endometrium in vitro, which accurately imitate the in vivo processes, represents the major way for implantation and post-implantation evaluation. Currently, no reports have been made on models reflecting the both processes simultaneously: the interaction of the embryo with the substrate, which represents many aspects of normal implantation, and the early post-implantation embryo development. The creation of a relevant model would allow investigation of implantation and early post-implantation processes as a whole.
AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the vitality and developmental potential of human embryos from the day 6 blastocyst stage during their extended co-incubation with the endometrium in a culture medium specifically designed for cultivation to the blastocyst stage.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Embryos obtained in assisted reproductive technology programs were cultivated from the day 6 blastocyst stage up to 14 days of development in vitro in a culture medium designed for cultivation to the blastocyst stage, in the presence of endometrium cells. On day 14 of development, embryos and endometrial samples were first evaluated under an inverted microscope using Hoffman modulation contrast, then transferred to a special mold and impregnated with paraffin for cytoblock preparation. Obtained blocks were sliced, stained with hematoxylin and eosin and morphologically assessed.
RESULTS: The first sample visual assessment on day 14 of cultivation in a culture medium with endometrium cells revealed a viable developing embryo with no signs of degradation. During the histological examination, the endometrial sample corresponded to the secretory phase of the cycle. The morphological assessment of the conceptus detected trophoblast cells. The second sample visual assessment on the day 14 of cultivation in a culture medium with endometrium cells revealed a viable embryo with no signs of degradation, which was in direct contact with the endometrial component. A histological examination detected a secretory endometrial fragment of the surface (luminal) epithelium. During the morphological assessment of the embryo, trophoblast cells were detected.
CONCLUSIONS: The data obtained indicate the ability of the embryo to further develop from the day 6 blastocyst stage up to 14 days in a culture medium specifically designed for cultivation to the blastocyst stage, in the presence of endometrium cells. The latter can serve as an experimental model for both in vitro endometrial receptivity evaluation and intercellular interactions during implantation investigation.
Keywords
Full Text

About the authors
Olesya N. Bespalova
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: shiggerra@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6542-5953
SPIN-code: 4732-8089
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, 3 Mendeleevskaya Line, Saint Petersburg, 199034I. Yu. Kogan
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: ikogan@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7351-6900
SPIN-code: 6572-6450
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation, 3 Mendeleevskaya Line, Saint Petersburg, 199034Evgenia M. Komarova
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: evgmkomarova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9988-9879
SPIN-code: 1056-7821
Cand. Sci. (Biol.)
Russian Federation, 3 Mendeleevskaya Line, Saint Petersburg, 199034Elena A. Lesik
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: lesike@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1611-6318
SPIN-code: 6102-4690
Cand. Sci. (Biol.)
Russian Federation, 3 Mendeleevskaya Line, Saint Petersburg, 199034Gulrukhsor Kh. Tolibova
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: gulyatolibova@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6216-6220
SPIN-code: 7544-4825
Scopus Author ID: 23111355700
ResearcherId: Y-6671-2018
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, 3 Mendeleevskaya Line, Saint Petersburg, 199034Tatyana G. Tral
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: ttg.tral@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8948-4811
SPIN-code: 1244-9631
Scopus Author ID: 37666260400
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, 3 Mendeleevskaya Line, Saint Petersburg, 199034Valeria A. Zagaynova
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: zagaynovav.al.52@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6971-7024
SPIN-code: 7409-4944
MD, Post-Graduate Student, The Assisted Reproduction Technology Department
Russian Federation, 3 Mendeleevskaya Line, Saint Petersburg, 199034Ksenia V. Obyedkova
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: obedkova_ks@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2056-7907
SPIN-code: 2709-2890
Scopus Author ID: 57201161145
ResearcherId: A-7258-2019
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, 3 Mendeleevskaya Line, Saint Petersburg, 199034Alexandr M. Gzgzyan
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Author for correspondence.
Email: agzgzyan@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3917-9493
SPIN-code: 6412-4801
ResearcherId: G-7814-2015
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor
Russian Federation, 3 Mendeleevskaya Line, Saint Petersburg, 199034References
- Evans J, Walker KJ, Bilandzic M, et al. A novel “embryo-endometrial” adhesion model can potentially predict “receptive” or “non-receptive” endometrium. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37(1):5–16. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01629-0
- You Y, Stelzl P, Zhang Y, et al. Novel 3D in vitro models to evaluate trophoblast migration and invasion. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2019;81(3):e13076. doi: 10.1111/aji.13076
- Berneau SC, Ruane PT, Brison DR, et al. Characterisation of osteopontin in an in vitro model of embryo implantation. Cells. 2019;8(5):432. doi: 10.3390/cells8050432
- Zambuto SG, Clancy KBH, Harley BAC. A gelatin hydrogel to study endometrial angiogenesis and trophoblast invasion. Interface Focus. 2019;9(5):20190016. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2019.0016
- Stern-Tal D, Achache H, Jacobs Catane L, et al. Novel 3D embryo implantation model within macroporous alginate scaffolds. J Biol Eng. 2020;14:18. doi: 10.1186/s13036-020-00240-7
- ISSCR. Guidelines for the Conduct of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. 2006. Version 1: December 21, 2006. [cited 2022 Aug 15]. Available from: https://www.isscr.org/docs/default-source/all-isscr-guidelines/hesc-guidelines/isscrhescguidelines2006.pdf?sfvrsn=0
- ISSCR. Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation update. 2021. Version 1.0, May, 2021. [cited 2022 Aug 15]. Available from: https://www.isscr.org/docs/default-source/all-isscr-guidelines/2021-guidelines/isscr-guidelines-for-stem-cell-research-and-clinical-translation-2021.pdf?sfvrsn=979d58b1_4
- Pera MF, de Wert G, Dondorp W, et al. What if stem cells turn into embryos in a dish? Nat Methods. 2015;12(10):917–919. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3586
- Shahbazi MN, Jedrusik A, Vuoristo S, et al. Self-organisation of the human embryo in the absence of maternal tissues. Nat Cell Biol. 2016;18(6):700–708. doi: 10.1038/ncb3347
- Deglincerti A, Croft GF, Pietila LN, et al. Self-organization of the in vitro attached human embryo. Nature. 2016;533:251–254. doi: 10.1038/nature17948
- Teklenburg G, Salker M, Molokhia M, et al. Natural selection of human embryos: Decidualizing endometrial stromal cells serve as sensors of embryo quality upon implantation. PLoS One. 2010;5(4):2–7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010258
- Brosens JJ, Salker MS, Teklenburg G, et al. Uterine selection of human embryos at implantation. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4–11. doi: 10.1038/srep03894
- Izmailova LSh, Vorotelyak EA, Vasiliev AV. Modeling of early development of mouse and human embryos in vitro. Ontogenez. 2020;51(5):323–337. (In Russ.). doi: 10.31857/S0475145020050043
- Kolahi KS, Donjacour A, Xiaowei L, et al. Effect of substrate stiffness on early mouse embryo development. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041717
- Hiramatsu R, Matsuoka T, Kimura-Yoshida C, et al. External mechanical cues trigger the establishment of the anterior-posterior axis in early mouse embryos. Dev Cell. 2013;27(2):131–144. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.09.026
- Koot YEМ, Teklenburg G, Salker MS, et al. Molecular aspects of implantation failure. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1822(12):1943–1950. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.05.017
- Weimar CH, Post Uiterweer ED, Teklenburg G, et al. In-vitro model systems for the study of human embryo-endometrium interactions. Reprod BioMed Online. 2013;27(5):461–476. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.08.002
Supplementary files
