Morphokinetic characteristics of preimplantation development of human donor embryos

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background: The introduction of time-lapse incubators into assisted reproductive technology practices provides a detailed examination of human pre-implantation embryo development. The continuous time-lapse filming technology is used to determine prognostic markers of embryo viability and implantation potential based on morphokinetic parameters. At present, the main time intervals for morphokinetic events during the pre-implantation phase of human embryo development have been documented primarily in embryos from infertile patients, with limited data available concerning the development of donor embryos. In this regard, it becomes relevant to follow the early development of such embryos and describe the embryonic development timeline using time-lapse technology.

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the time intervals of critical events in the pre-implantation development of human donor embryos.

Materials and methods: The material for the study was 18 donor embryos obtained after fertilization of donor oocytes with donor sperm. The embryos were cultured for 140 hours in an EmbryoVisor time-lapse incubator (Westtrade Ltd., Russia).

Results: The video image analysis of diploid donor embryo development showed that the disappearance of both pronuclei occurred at 22.2 (21.0–25.4) hours post fertilization, the 2-cell embryo stage was observed at 24.5 (23.4–27.3) hours post fertilization, the 4-cell embryo stage at 35.9 (34.6–38.6) hours post fertilization, and the 8-cell embryo stage at 52.8 (49.0–58.8) hours post fertilization. Morula formation occurred at 86.0 (76.9–95.4) hours post fertilization, and complete blastocyst formation was recorded at 107.0 (99.1–114.3) hours post fertilization. Triploid embryos tended to have a delay in the cleavage stage and a shorter compaction phase, yet generally developed within similar timeframes as diploid embryos.

Conclusions: The analysis of video recordings obtained after culturing donor embryos in the time-lapse incubator allows for comparing the morphokinetic parameters of pre-implantation development of the donor embryos, taking into account their ploidy. The checkpoints in the development of pre-implantation embryos from the zygote stage to blastocyst formation are characterized. A tendency is noted for earlier disappearance of pronuclei, a delay at the cleavage stage from four to eight cells, and a shorter compaction stage in the donor embryos with impaired ploidy. Various anomalies in the development of such embryos are also described. Special attention should be paid, perhaps, to embryos that do not fit into the established development intervals, exhibit anomalies such as reverse cleavage, direct division from one to three cells, and excessive fragmentation, or stop developing at one point or another, since this may indicate anomalies in the embryo’s genome such as, for example, aneuploidy. Timely identification of these deviations may lead to the exclusion of embryos with morphokinetic abnormalities from transfer, thereby favoring the selection of normally developing embryos to enhance implantation success and promote ongoing pregnancies. An increase in the sample of donor embryos under study, information on their genetic status and the clinical results of pregnancy after embryo transfer, and further accumulation of data will augment the ability to predict embryo implantation potential without the use of invasive methods.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Mariia A. Ishchuk

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Author for correspondence.
Email: mashamazilina@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4443-4287
SPIN-code: 1237-6373

 

 

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Evgeniia M. Komarova

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D. O. Ott

Email: evgmkomarova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9988-9879
SPIN-code: 1056-7821

Cand. Sci. (Biology)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Elena A. Lesik

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Email: lesike@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1611-6318
SPIN-code: 6102-4690

Cand. Sci. (Biology)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Yanina M. Sagurova

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Email: yanina.sagurova96@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4947-8171
SPIN-code: 8908-7033
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Valeria Yu. Zhiliaeva

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Email: lera.zhilyaeva.03@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-2701-0598
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Ksenia V. Ob’edkova

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D. O. Ott

Email: obedkova_ks@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2056-7907
SPIN-code: 2709-2890

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Alexander M. Gzgzyan

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Email: agzgzyan@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3917-9493
SPIN-code: 6412-4801

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Natalia I. Tapilskaya

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D. O. Ott

Email: tapnatalia@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5309-0087
SPIN-code: 3605-0413

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Olesya N. Bespalova

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Email: shiggerra@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6542-5953

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Payne D, Flaherty SP, Barry MF, et al. Preliminary observations on polar body extrusion and pronuclear formation in human oocytes using time-lapse video cinematography. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(3):532–541. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.3.532
  2. Kahraman S, Sahin Y, Yelke H, et al. High rates of aneuploidy, mosaicism and abnormal morphokinetic development in cases with low sperm concentration. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37(3):629–640. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01673-w
  3. Pribenszky C, Nilselid AM, Montag M. Time-lapse culture with morphokinetic embryo selection improves pregnancy and live birth chances and reduces early pregnancy loss: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35(5):511–520. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.06.022
  4. Armstrong S, Bhide P, Jordan V, et al. Time-lapse systems for ART. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;36(3):288–289. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.12.012
  5. ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine. The Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of ART laboratory performance indicators. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35(5):494–510. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.06.015
  6. Gardner D, Schoolcraft W. In vitro culture of human blastocysts. In: Jansen R., Mortimer D., editors. Towards reproductive certainty: infertility and genetics beyond. New York, London: Parthenon Publishing Group; 1999.P. 378–388.
  7. Shurygina O, Bachurin A, Bichevaya N, et al. Evaluation of oocytes and embryos in the ART laboratory. Methodological recommendations. 2021. 17 p. Available from: https://www.rahr.ru/d_pech_mat_metod/MR_evaluation_of_embryos.pdf (In Russ.)
  8. Kida Y, Fukunaga N, Kitasaka H, et al. Identification of embryo markers predicting blastocyst formation before 1st cleavage. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(3):25. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.078
  9. Kljajic M, Sayme N, Krebs T, et al. Zygote morphokinetics as a predictor of blastocyst quality. Human Reprod. 2021;36(1):130–139. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab130.139
  10. Márquez-Hinojosa S, Noriega-Hoces L, Guzmán L. Time-Lapse Embryo culture: a better understanding of embryo development and clinical application. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2022;26(3):432–443. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210107
  11. Barrie A, Smith R, Campbell A, et al. Optimisation of the timing of fertilisation assessment for oocytes cultured in standard incubation: lessons learnt from time-lapse imaging of 78 348 embryos. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(11):2840–2847. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab209
  12. Niemann-Seyde SC, Rehder H, Zoll B. A case of full triploidy (69,XXX) of paternal origin with unusually long survival time. Clin Genet. 1993;43(2):79–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1993.tb04432.x
  13. Daumová M, Hadravská Š, Putzová M. Hydatidiform mole. Cesk Patol. 2023;59(2):50–54.
  14. Devriendt K. Hydatidiform mole and triploidy: the role of genomic imprinting in placental development. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11(2):137–142. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmh060
  15. Asakawa T, Ishikawa M, Shimizu T, et al. The chromosomal normality of in vitro-fertilized rabbit oocytes. Biol Reprod. 1988;38(2):292–295. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod38.2.292
  16. Mutia K, Wiweko B, Iffanolida PA, et al. The Frequency of chromosomal euploidy among 3PN embryos. J Reprod Infertil. 2019;20(3):127–131.
  17. Wong CC, Loewke KE, Bossert NL, et al. Non-invasive imaging of human embryos before embryonic genome activation predicts development to the blastocyst stage. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(10):1115–1121. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1686
  18. Campbell A., Fishel A. Atlas of Embryology. Timelapse technology. Moscow: MEDpress-inform; 2018. 120 p. (In Russ.)
  19. Ivec M, Kovacic B, Vlaisavljevic V. Prediction of human blastocyst development from morulas with delayed and/or incomplete compaction. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(6):1473–1478.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.015
  20. Wata K, Yumoto K, Sugishima M, et al. Analysis of compaction initiation in human embryos by using time-lapse cinematography. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31(4):421–426. doi: 10.1007/s10815-014-0195-2
  21. Skiadas CC, Jackson KV, Racowsky C. Early compaction on day 3 may be associated with increased implantation potential. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(5):1386–1391. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.03.051
  22. Ishchuk MA, Lesik EA, Sagurova YM, et al. TIME-LAPSE technology in modern embryological practice. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2023;73(6):193–201. EDN: OCIEST doi: 10.17816/JOWD609504
  23. Tabibnejad N, Soleimani M, Aflatoonian A. Serum Anti-Mullerian hormone and embryo morphokinetics detecting by time-lapse imaging: a comparison between the polycystic ovarian syndrome and tubal factor infertility. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2018;16(8):483–490.
  24. Barnes J, Brendel M, Gao VR, et al. A non-invasive artificial intelligence approach for the prediction of human blastocyst ploidy: a retrospective model development and validation study. Lancet Digit Health. 2023;5(1):e28–e40. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00213-8
  25. Alomar M, Tasiaux H, Remacle S, et al. Kinetics of fertilization and development, and sex ratio of bovine embryos produced using the semen of different bulls. Anim Reprod Sci. 2008;107(1–2):48–61. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.06.009
  26. Setti AS, Braga DP, Figueira RC, et al. The predictive value of high-magnification sperm morphology examination on ICSI outcomes in the presence of oocyte dysmorphisms. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29(11):1241–1247. doi: 10.1007/s10815-012-9868-x
  27. Ciray HN, Aksoy T, Goktas C, et al. Time-lapse evaluation of human embryo development in single versus sequential culture media – a sibling oocyte study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29(9):891–900. doi: 10.1007/s10815-012-9818-7

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Morphokinetic parameters of donor embryo development in an incubator with time-lapse technology with own photo images. t0–9, time of embryo formation, the number indicates the number of cells; tPNf, time from insemination to the pronuclear fading; tM, compact morula formation; tSB, the start of a cavity forming; tB, when the blastocoel cavity is filled up and the embryo starts to expand; tEB, when the blastocyst is expanded and the zona pellucida is thin; EEC2, cc2b, cell cycle, as a result of which the embryo reaches four cells from two; EEC3, cc3b, cell cycle, as a result of which the embryo reaches eight cells from four

Download (131KB)
3. Fig. 2. Abnormally fertilized zygotes (a, 3 pronuclei; b, 3 pronuclei; c, without pronuclei) and blastocysts formed on day 5 of development (d, 3BC; e, 3AB; f, 4AB)

Download (400KB)
4. Fig. 3. Development of donor embryos with normal ploidy (2PN) and triploid (3PN) embryos. Data are presented as medians

Download (96KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Eсо-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 66759 от 08.08.2016 г. 
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия Эл № 77 - 6389
от 15.07.2002 г.