Maternal mortality: structure and solutions to the problem

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Maternal mortality is the most important indicator of women’s health, but its level is still high. In 2018, 146 cases of maternal death were registered in the Russian Federation. Its main causes were extragenital diseases, bleeding, preeclampsia and eclampsia, amniotic fluid embolism, clinical narrow pelvis, and unsafe abortion. The aim of this study was to assess the structure of maternal mortality in recent years and to evaluate possible ways to reduce it. This was achieved by using an analytical method including carrying out a detailed systematic analysis of modern domestic and foreign literature on the maternal mortality issue. The study used databases such as eLIBRARY.RU, Scopus, PubMed, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library from the creation until July 2021. The measures adopted so far do not allow for counting on a further decrease in maternal mortality rate, therefore the coming decade requires the introduction of artificial intelligence technologies.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Aydar M. Ziganshin

Bashkir State Medical University

Email: zigaidar@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5474-1080
Scopus Author ID: 57196372895

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor

Russian Federation, Ufa

Elvina M. Nagimova

Bashkir State Medical University

Email: elvina.nagimova.97@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3112-4538
Russian Federation, Ufa

Rail M. Marakanov

City Clinical Hospital No. 21

Email: marail@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6869-385X

MD

Russian Federation, Ufa

Viktor A. Mudrov

Chita State Medical Academy

Author for correspondence.
Email: mudrov_viktor@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5961-5400
Scopus Author ID: 57204736023

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor

Russian Federation, Chita

References

  1. Maternal mortality. Mediacentre WHO: Fact sheet; 2019. [cited 09.06.2021]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality
  2. Ziganshin AM, Kulavskii VA, Nagimova EM, et al. Maternal mortality from postpartum bleeding. Medical Bulletin of Bashkortostan. 2019;14(6):52−56. (In Russ.)
  3. Zdravoohranenie v Rossii. 2019. Statisticheskij sbornik. Rosstat, 2019. (In Russ.). [cited 09.06.2021]. Available from: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/Zdravoohran-2019.pdf
  4. Volkov VG, Granatovich NN. Maternal mortality from extragenital diseases in the Tula region. Women’s health issues. 2016;11(4):42−45. (In Russ.)
  5. Aylamazyan EK, Atlasov VO, Yaroslavsky KV, Yaroslavsky VK. Audit of quality of care in critical conditions in obstetrics (“near miss”). Journal of obstetrics and women’s diseases. 2016;65(4):15−23. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17816/JOWD65415-23
  6. Shifman EM, Kulikov AV, Protsenko DN, et al. Anesthesia and intensive care in massive obstetric haemorrhage. Clinical guidelines (Treatment protocol). Gynecology, Obstetrics and Perinatology. 2018;17(3):81−100. (In Russ.). doi: 10.20953/1726-1678-2018-3-81-100
  7. Sidorova IS, Ishhenko AI, Nikitina NA, et al. Akusherstvo i ginekologija: Uchebnik. Kn. 1. Fiziologicheskoe akusherstvo. Organizacija akusherskoj pomoshhi v Rossijskoj Federacii. Moscow: MIA; 2019. (In Russ.)
  8. Zainulina MS, Eremeeva DR, Krivonos MI. Maternal mortality and “near miss”: do algorithms for preventing bleeding work? Obstetrics, gynecology and reproduction. 2018;12(1):62−72. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17749/2313-7347.2018.12.1.062-072
  9. Milovanov AP, Dobryakov AV. Increasing significance of extragenital pathology in the structure of maternal mortality in Russia. Archive of pathology. 2018;80(2):3−6. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/patol20188023-6
  10. Sidorova IS, Ishhenko AI, Nikitina NA, et al. Akusherstvo i ginekologija: Uchebnik. Kn. 2. Patologicheskoe akusherstvo. Moscow: MIA; 2019. (In Russ.)
  11. Beremennost’ vysokogo riska. Ed. by A.D. Makacarija, F.A. Chervenaka, V.O. Bicadze. Moscow: MIA; 2015. (In Russ.)
  12. Mravjan SR, Petruhin VA, Fedorova SI, Pronina VP. Zabolevanija serdca u beremennyh. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2014. (In Russ.)
  13. Kirgizova MA, Dedkova AA, Kisteneva IV, et al. Assessment of the effect of cardiac rhythm and conduction disorders on the course and outcome of pregnancy: data of the Arrhythmia Center. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2019;24(7):7−11. (In Russ.). doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2019-7-7-11
  14. Mikhaleva LM, Konoplyannikov AG, Kudryavtseva YY, et al. Extragenital noninfectious pathology in the maternal mortality structure in Moscow. Clinical and experimental morphology. 2021;10(2):21−31. (In Russ.). doi: 10.31088/CEM2021.10.2.21-31
  15. Toktarova OA, Zamaleeva RS, Yupatov EYu. Near miss: a clinical case of a successful childbirth in a pregnant woman with Vasa Previa. Practical medicine. 2019;17(4):107−110. (In Russ.)
  16. Repina MA. Extragenital diseases in the structure of maternal mortality in Saint Petersburg. Journal of obstetrics and women’s diseases. 2015;64(2):92−96. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17816/JOWD64292-96
  17. Adilova LR. Comparative assessment of the outcomes of pregnancy and childbirth in women with different types of prosthetic heart valves. [abstract dissertation] Moscow; 2016. (In Russ.). [cited 13 Jul 2021]. Available from: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01006647708
  18. Adilova LR, Adamyan LV, Shifman EM, et al. Modern views on course of pregnancy in patients with prosthetic heart valves (a review). Problems of reproduction. 2014;20(2):84−89. (In Russ.)
  19. Ziganshin AM, Mudrov VA, Galimzyanov VZ, et al. Modern approaches to the management of pregnant women with asymptomatic bacteriuria. Medical Bulletin of Bashkortostan. 2019;14(2):66−70. (In Russ.)
  20. Ziganshin AM, Mudrov VA. Optimization of complex therapy of inflammatory diseases of the pelvic organs in women. Gynecology. 2019;21(3):30−34. (In Russ.)
  21. Akusherstvo: nacional’noe rukovodstvo. Ed. by G.T. Suhih, V.N. Serov, V.E. Radzinsky. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2018. (In Russ.)
  22. Tetelyutina FK, Chernenkova ML. Peculiarities of birth activity in women with chronic pyelonephritis. Practical medicine. 2017;7(108):67−71. (In Russ.)
  23. Khudovekova AM, Mozgovaya EV. Optimization of methods for the diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections in pregnant women. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2019;68(5):115−122. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17816/JOWD685115-122
  24. MacIntyre C, Iwuala C, Parkash R. Cardiac arrhythmias and pregnancy. Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2018;20(8):63. doi: 10.1007/s11936-018-0660-9
  25. Zaynulina MS, Kornyushina EA, Krivonos MI. Strategy of prevention of bleeding − related maternal mortality. Journal of obstetrics and women’s diseases. 2015;64(2):33−41. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17816/JOWD64233-41
  26. Krasnopol’skii VI, Logutova LS. Sovremennaya kontseptsiya rodorazresheniya i perinatal’naya smertnost’. Medical advice. 2014;(9):54−58. (In Russ.)
  27. Shifman EM, Kulikov AV, Krugova LV, et al. Safety of uterotonics: what anaesthesiologist should know about them? Anesteziologiya i reanimatologiya. 2017;62(3):220−224. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18821/0201-7563-2017-62-3-220-224
  28. Profilaktika, algoritm vedeniya, anesteziya i intensivnaya terapiya pri poslerodovykh krovotecheniyakh. Clinical recommendations (treatment protocols) of MZ RF No. 15-4/10/2-2535 of 26 March 2019. (In Russ.). [cited 9 Jun 2021]. Available from: https://sudact.ru/law/pismo-minzdrava-rossii-ot-26032019-n-15-4i2-2535/
  29. Ziganshin AM, Nagimova EM, Mudrov VA, et al. The diagnostic problem of massive obstetric haemorrhage. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2021;21(1):88−92. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/rosakush20212101188
  30. Profilaktika, lechenie i algoritm vedeniya pri akusherskikh krovotecheniyakh. Clinical recommendations (treatment protocols). MZ RF No. 15-4/10/2-3881 of 29 May 2014. (In Russ.). [cited 9 Jun 2021]. Available from: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_320698/
  31. Mazurok VA, Lebedinskij KM, Karelov AE. Ostraja massivnaja krovopoterja. Saint Petersburg: SPbMAPO; 2009. (In Russ.)
  32. Ziganshin AM, Mudrov VA. Technology for quantifying the postpartum blood loss. Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine. 2020;12(3):71−76. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17691/stm2020.12.3.09
  33. Pylaeva NYu, Shifman EM, Kulikov AV, et al. Preeclampsia. Eclampsia. Anesthesia and intensive care in childbirth and the puerperium. Review. Annals of Critical Care. 2020;1:41−52. (In Russ.)
  34. Gipertenzivnye rasstroystva vo vremya beremennosti, v rodakh i poslerodovom periode. Preeklampsiya. Eklampsiya. Clinical recommendations (treatment protocols). MZ RF No. 15-4/10/2-3483 of 07 June 2016. (In Russ). [cited 9 Jun 2021]. Available from: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_319532/
  35. Volkov VG, Granatovich NN, Survillo EV, Cherepenko OV. Retrospective analysis of maternal mortality from preeclampsia and eclampsia. Russian Bulletin of obstetrician-gynecologist. 2017;17(3):4−8. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/rosakush20171734-8
  36. Tomayeva KG, Gaydukov SN. A model for predicting the risk of preeclampsia in women with different somatotypes. Journal of obstetrics and women’s diseases. 2019;68(6):65−72. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17816/JOWD68665-72
  37. Aylamazyan EK, Repina MA. Maternal mortality due to eclampsia – what can I learn? Journal of obstetrics and women’s diseases. 2013;62(3):3−8. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17816/JOWD6233-8
  38. Ghulmiyyah L, Sibai B. Maternal mortality from preeclampsia/eclampsia. Seminars in Perinatology. 2012;36(1):56−59. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2011.09.011
  39. Galimova IR, Evstratov AA, Cheremisin AE, et al. Pregnancy-related acute kidney injury in preeclampsia complicated with (H)ELLP syndrome. Practical medicine. 2018;16(7):30−34. (In Russ.)
  40. Emboliya amnioticheskoy zhidkost’yu: intensivnaya terapiya i akusherskaya taktika. Clinical recommendations (treatment protocols). MZ RF No. 15-4/10/2-7317 of 20 October 2017. (In Russ). [cited 9 Jun 2021]. Available from: http://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71717874/
  41. Vozgoment OV. On the diagnosis of amniotic fluid embolism. Difficult patient. 2016;14(2–3):10−15. (In Russ.)
  42. Vasileva LN. Clinically narrow pelvis. Medical journal. 2011;(1):133−135. (In Russ.)
  43. Mochalova MN, Mudrov VA, Mudrov AA. Significance of ultrasound research in the diagnostics of clinical narrow pelvis. Zabaikal’skii meditsinskii vestnik. 2019;(2):48−56. (In Russ.)
  44. Okazanie meditsinskoi pomoshchi pri anatomicheski i klinicheski uzkom taze. Clinical recommendations (treatment protocols). MZ RF No. 15-4/10/2-3402 of 23 May 2017. (In Russ.). [cited 9 Jun 2021]. Available from: http://base.garant.ru/71741786/
  45. Avdonina AS. Problema klinicheski uzkogo taza v sovremennom akusherstve. Nauchnye stremleniya. 2013;(1):76−79. (In Russ.)
  46. Dikke GB, Khamoshina MB. Controversy about safe and unsafe abortions. Doktor.Ru. 2014;8−1(96):73−77. (In Russ.)
  47. Gladkaya VS, Gritsinskaya VL, Medvedeva NN. Modern trends in reproductive health and reproductive behavior of the female population in Russia. Mother and Baby in Kuzbass. 2017;1(68):10−15. (In Russ.)
  48. Rannie sroki beremennosti. Ed. by V.E. Radzinsky, A.A. Orazmuradov. Moscow: Status Praesens; 2009. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2021 Eсо-Vector


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 66759 от 08.08.2016 г. 
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия Эл № 77 - 6389 от 15.07.2002 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies