Sacrovaginopexy with combined access and mesh-vaginopexy in the treatment of genital prolapse
- Authors: Popov A.A.1, Gorsky S.L.1, Shaginyan G.G.1, Ramazanov M.R.1
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology M3 RF
- Issue: Vol 50, No 3 (2001)
- Pages: 23-24
- Section: Original Research
- Submitted: 29.12.2021
- Accepted: 29.12.2021
- Published: 30.12.2021
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/jowd/article/view/95552
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD95552
- ID: 95552
Cite item
Abstract
Comparative analysis of two modem methods of women’s genital prolapse treatment was carried out. Comparing close and some remote results of MESH- vaginopexy (97patients) andtransvaginal retroperitonealsacrovaginopexy with laparoscopic control (24 patients), the authors determine particular indications, advantages and expediency of the elaborated methods.
Full Text
![Restricted Access](https://journals.eco-vector.com/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/text_lock.png)
About the authors
A. A. Popov
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology M3 RF
Author for correspondence.
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Moscow
S. L. Gorsky
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology M3 RF
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Moscow
G. G. Shaginyan
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology M3 RF
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Moscow
M. R. Ramazanov
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology M3 RF
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Moscow
References
Supplementary files
![](/img/style/loading.gif)