Clinical experience in rehabilitation of patients with Fuchs corneal dystrophy and cataract by ultrasonic phacoemulsification and descemetorhexis

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The potential for peripheral corneal endothelial capabilities is a novel, poorly understood direction. The comprehensive development of various modifications of endothelial keratoplasty goes hand in hand with a lack of donor material. This explains the continuous search for safe tissue-preserving techniques.

AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and functional results of treatment of patients with Fuchs corneal dystrophy and cataract using a combination of cataract ultrasound phacoemulsification and descemetorhexis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 3 patients (3 eyes), 3 women aged 65 to 78 (on average 73.6 ± 7.5 years). The follow-up period in the postoperative period was 36 months. The inclusion criteria were: patient complaints about glare, blurred vision and cloudy vision in the morning; the location of the guttae in the central 5 mm zone, central corneal stromal edema less than 610 microns, the inability to count endothelial cells in the center, endothelial cells density on the periphery in the upper quadrant more than 1400 cells/mm2. All patients underwent phacoemulsification of cataract with IOL implantation and subsequent descemetorhexis in the 4 mm zone.

RESULTS: At 1 month — an increase in the central corneal thickness and a slight increase in uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). By the 3rd month, positive dynamics was present: an increase in UCVA and BCVA in all cases, a decrease in the central corneal thickness (559 ± 20 μm), resorption of stromal edema, increase in corneal transparency, possibility to calculate the endothelial cells density in the center (866 ± 46 cells/mm2). At 36 months, the BCVA was 0.6, 0.4 and 0.5, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: Restoration of corneal transparency was achieved in 100% of cases (3 out of 3). An analysis of the clinical results of the descemetorhexis + phacoemulsification + IOL operation demonstrated an increase in visual acuity, an increase in corneal transparency and a decrease in stromal edema in patients with initial Fuchs corneal dystrophy and cataract. The possibility of not using donor material for the treatment of Fuchs corneal dystrophy is a promising trend. Further accumulation of material is required.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Konstantin I. Katmakov

S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Cheboksary branch

Author for correspondence.
Email: katmakovkostya@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5521-3781
SPIN-code: 3650-0973
Scopus Author ID: 57217072651
ResearcherId: AAI-4226-2020

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.) Ophthalmologist

Russian Federation, Cheboksary

Aleksei N. Pashtaev

S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Cheboksary branch

Email: PashtaevMD@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2305-1401
Scopus Author ID: 57205260939

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Senior Research Associate

Russian Federation, Cheboksary

Nikolai P. Pashtaev

S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Cheboksary branch

Email: pashtaevnp@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7941-2996
Scopus Author ID: 6507569608

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Deputy Director, Ophthalmologist

Russian Federation, Cheboksary

Yurii N. Elakov

S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Cheboksary branch

Email: elakovmntk@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6751-3255

Head of the Cataract Surgery Department, Ophthalmologist

Russian Federation, Cheboksary

Yulia V. Mitrofanova

Postgraduate Doctors Training Institute

Email: mitrofan2697@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5360-5375

Resident Doctor

Russian Federation, Cheboksary

Nadezhda A. Pozdeyeva

S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Cheboksary branch

Email: npozdeeva@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3637-3645
Scopus Author ID: 57195066807

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), director of Cheboksary branch

Russian Federation, Cheboksary

Aslan M. Gelyastanov

S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Kaluga branch

Email: aslan.mntk@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4011-8831
Scopus Author ID: 57200246416

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Ophthalmologist

Russian Federation, Kaluga

References

  1. Cross HE, Maumenee AE, Cantolino SJ. Inheritance of Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1971;85(3):268–272. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1971.00990050270002
  2. Krachmer JH, Purcell JJ, Young CW et al. Corneal endothelial dystrophy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978;96(11):2036–2039. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1978.03910060424004
  3. Astakhov SYu, Riks IA, Papanyan SS, et al. Comparative assessment of the efficacy of primary and secondary corneal endothelial dystrophy treatment by isolated descemetorhexis and accelerated collagen crosslinking method. Ophthalmology Reports. 2018;11(2):41–47. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/OV11241-47
  4. Laing RA, Leibowitz HM, Oak SS, et al. Endothelial mosaic in Fuchs’ dystrophy. A qualitative evaluation with the specular microscope. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99(1):80–83. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1981.03930010082007
  5. Iwamoto T, DeVoe AG. Electron microscopic studies on Fuchs combined dystrophy I. Posterior portion of the cornea. Invest Ophthalmol. 1971;10(1):9–28.
  6. Waring GO. Posterior collagenus layer of the cornea. Ultrastructural classification of abnormal collagenus tissue posterior to Descemet’s membrane in 30 cases. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100(1): 122–134. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1982.01030030124015
  7. Gardea E, Adam P, Brasseur G, Muraine M. Descemet membrane graft in a patient with Fuchs endothelial dystroph. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2007;30(6):658–659. doi: 10.1016/s0181-5512(07)89675-6
  8. Koizumi N, Okumura N, Kinoshita S. Development of new therapeutic modalities for corneal endothelial disease focused on the proliferation of corneal endothelial cells using animal models. Exp Eye Res. 2012;95(1):60–67. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2011.10.014
  9. Rizwan M, Peh GS, Adnan K, et al. In vitro topographical model of Fuchs dystrophy for evaluation of corneal endothelial cell monolayer formation. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5(22):2896–2910. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201600848
  10. Droutsas K, Lazaridis A, Koutsandrea C, et al. Spontaneous corneal clearance in the presence of a partially detached graft after non-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2016;7(2):321–327. doi: 10.1159/000443632
  11. Dirisamer M, Ham L, Dapena I, et al. Descemet membrane endothelial transfer: «free-floating» donor Descemet implantation as a potential alternative to «keratoplasty». Cornea. 2012;31(2):194–197. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31821c9afc
  12. Moloney G, Chan UT, Hamilton A, et al. Descemetorhexis for Fuchs’ dystrophy. Can J Ophthalmol. 2015;50(1):68–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2014.10.014
  13. Malyugin BE, Izmaylova SB, Malyutina EA, et al. Clinical and functional results of one-step phaco surgery and central descemetorhexis for cataract and fuchs primary endothelial corneal dystrophy. Vestnik Oftalmologii. 2017;133(6):16–22. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/oftalma2017133616-22
  14. Moloney G, Petsoglou C, Ball M. Descemetorhexis without grafting for fuchs endothelial dystrophy-supplementation with topical ripasudil. Cornea. 2017;36(6):642–648. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001209
  15. Macsai MS, Shiloach Mira. Use of topical rho kinase inhibitors in the treatment of Fuchs dystrophy after descemet stripping only. Cornea. 2019;38(5):529–534. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001883
  16. Davies E, Ula J, Pineda R. Predictive factors for corneal clearance after descemetorhexis without endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2017;37(2):137–140. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001427
  17. Malyugin BE, Malyutina EA, Borzenok SA. Study of human cornea endothelial cells migration into iatrogenic defect zone in experiment ex vivo. Practical Medicine. 2018;16(5):151–157. (In Russ.)
  18. Koizumi N, Okumura N, Ueno M, et al. New therapeutic modality for corneal endothelial disease using rho-associated kinase inhibitor eye drops. Cornea. 2014;33(Suppl 11): S25–S31. doi: 10.1097/ico.0000000000000240
  19. Borkar DS, Veldman P, Colby KA. Treatment of Fuchs endothelial dystrophy by descemet stripping without endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2016;35(10):1267–1273. doi: 10.1097/ico.0000000000000915
  20. Braunstein RE, Airiani S, Chang MA, Odrich MG. Corneal edema resolution after “descemetorhexis”. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(7):1436–1439. doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01984-3
  21. Zvi T, Nadav B, Itamar K, Tova L. Inadvertent descemetorhexis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):234–235. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.11.001
  22. Patel DV, Phang KL, Grupcheva CN, et al. Surgical detachment of Descemet’s membrane and endothelium imaged over time by in vivo confocal microscopy. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;32(5): 539–542. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2004.00875.x

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Photo of the patient’s eye of on the 1st day after descemetorhexis. The green dots show the boundaries of the descemetorhexis. Corneal edema borders repeat the borders of the descemetorhexis area

Download (58KB)
3. Fig. 2. OCT-image of the patient’s cornea on the 1st day. The arrows show the area of absence of the Descemet’s membrane after descemetorhexis. The thickness of the Descemet’s membrane is 19–23 µm

Download (54KB)
4. Fig. 3. Photo of the eye of patient 3 months after surgery. The cornea is transparent. Absence of fibrosis at the descemetorhexis area

Download (81KB)
5. Fig. 4. Photo of the patient’s eye 3 month after descemetorhexis. The arrows show the area of absence of the Descemet’s membrane after descemetorhexis. Сentral corneal pachymetry is 536 µm. The thickness of the Descemet’s membrane is 15–17 µm

Download (343KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-65574 от 04 мая 2016 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies