Secondary cataract in patients after traditional phacoemulsification in comparison with femtolaser extraction

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Secondary cataract is a frequent complication of the postoperative period of cataract surgery.

AIM: To evaluate the timing of secondary cataract formation in pseudophakic eyes after cataract extraction phacoemulsification, carried out as traditional phacoemulsification in comparison with femtolaser cataract surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent YAG laser posterior capsulotomy (98 people, 108 eyes). All patients were divided into two groups. First group (54 people, 58 eyes) consisted of patients in whom secondary cataract occurred after traditional phacoemulsification. In the second group (44 people, 50 eyes) secondary cataract occurred after femtolaser-assisted cataract surgery. All patients were implanted with a monofocal intraocular lens MIOL-2.

RESULTS: The data analysis revealed that the period of secondary cataract formation in the first group was 2.83 ± 1.25 years, in the second group 3.75 ± 1.0 years.

CONCLUSIONS: The analysis showed that the secondary cataract after traditional phacoemulsification occurs earlier by an average of 1 year than after femtolaser-assisted cataract surgery.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Ilya V. Kulikov

S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Cheboksary branch

Email: dockulikov@gmail.com

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Cheboksary

Artur E. Spirin

S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Cheboksary branch

Email: art.spirin2010@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9472-9016

врач-офтальмолог

Russian Federation, Cheboksary

Bulat A. Mullackhmetov

Institute for Advanced Training of Physicians

Email: Butatik@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5393-2213

врач-ординатор

Russian Federation, Cheboksary

Irina L. Kulikova

S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Cheboksary branch; Institute for Advanced Training of Physicians

Author for correspondence.
Email: koulikovail@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5320-8524

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Cheboksary; Cheboksary

References

  1. Balashevich LI, Takhtaev YuV, Molodkina NA. Chastota razvitiya vtorichnoi katarakty posle implantatsii gidrofobnykh gibkikh intraokulyarnykh linz. Novoe v oftal’mologii. 2002;(1):32–34. (In Russ.)
  2. Aznabaev BM, Semes’ko SG. Vtorichnaya katarakta: diagnostika, lechenie, profilaktika: uchebnoe posobie. Moscow: APO FGBU FNKTS FMBA Rossii, 2020. (In Russ.)
  3. Pavlyuchenko KP, Akimova OG. Vtorichnaya katarakta, sovremennye predstavleniya ob ehtiologii, patogeneze, diagnostike, profilaktike i lechenii. Oftal’mologicheskii zhurnal. 2002;(2):51–56. (In Russ.)
  4. Fabrikantov OL, Shutova SV, Aryasov AS, Goydin AP. The probability of secondary cataract development followed phacoemulsification with IOL implantation. Fyodorov journal of ophthalmic surgery. 2015;(3):6–12. (In Russ.)
  5. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Basic and clinical science course. Lens and cataract. 2018–2019. American Academy of Ophthalmology, 2019. 119 p.
  6. Awasthi N, Guo S, Wagner BJ. Posterior capsular opacification: a problem reduced but not yet eradicated. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(4):555–562. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.3
  7. Wormstone IM, Wormstone YM, Smith JO, Eldred JA. Posterior capsule opacification: What’s in the bag? Prog Ret Eye Res. 2021;82:100905. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100905
  8. Wormstone IM, Eldred JA. Experimental models for posterior capsule opacification research. Exp Eye Res. 2016;142:2–12. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2015.04.021
  9. Bantcykina YV, Malov IV, Eroshevskaya EB, Malov VM. Frequency, causes, pathogenesis, types, classifications, and clinical manifestations of a secondary cataract. Aspirantskiy Vestnik Povolzhiya. 2018;(1–2):145–152. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/2075-2354.2018.18.145-152
  10. Kovalevskaya MA, Filina LA, Kokorev VL. Factors of the risk of developing a secondary cataract and recommendations for conducting a primary posterior capsulorhexis. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Surgery. 2018;11(3):213–217. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18499/2070-478X-2018-11-3-213-217
  11. Apple DJ, Solomon KD, Tetz MR, et al. Posterior capsule opacification. Surv Ophthalmol. 1992;37(2):73–116. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(92)90073-3
  12. Vasavada AR, Trivedi RH. Posterior capsule striae. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;22(11):1527–1531. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(99)00197-2
  13. Wolken MA, Oetting TA. Linear posterior capsule opacification with the AcrySof intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;27(11):1889–1891. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(01)00843-4
  14. Zuev VK, Tumanyan EhR, Sorokoletov GV, et al. Chastota razvitiya vtorichnoi katarakty posle provedeniya fakoehmul’sifikatsii s implantatsiei sovremennykh modelei zadnekamernykh intraokulyarnykh linz. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2015;(2):47–49. (In Russ.)
  15. Kolesnikov AV, Kolesnikova MA, Mironenko LV, et al. Chastota razvitiya vtorichnoi katarakty posle implantatsii intraokulyarnykh linz iz gidrofobnogo i gidrofil’nogo akrila. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2017;(3):295–297. (In Russ.)
  16. Bai L, Vasil’ev AV, Egorova AV. Izuchenie chastoty vstrechaemosti razlichnykh tipov vtorichnoi katarakty posle fakoehmul’sifikatsii vozrastnoi katarakty v zavisimosti ot materiala implantirovannoi IOL. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2018;(5):17–19. (In Russ.) doi: 10.25276/2312-4911-2018-5-17-19
  17. Nishi O, Nishi K, Sakanishi K. Inhibition of migrating lens epithelial cells at the capsular bend created by the rectangular optic edge of a posterior chamber intraocular lens. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998;29(7):587–594. doi: 10.3928/1542-8877-19980701-10
  18. Verdina T, Peppoloni C, Barbieri L, et al. Long-term evaluation of capsulotomy shape and posterior capsule opacification after low-energy bimanual femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:6431314. doi: 10.1155/2020/6431314
  19. Xu J, Li W, Xu Z, et al. Comparative visual outcomes of EDOF intraocular lens with FLACS vs conventional phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023;49(1):55–61. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001027
  20. Zhong Y, Zhu Y, Wang W, et al. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification: comparison of internal aberrations and visual quality. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022;260:901–911. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05441-4
  21. Auffarth GU, Friedmann E, Breyer D, et al. Stability and visual outcomes of the capsulotomy-fixated FEMTIS-IOL after automated femtosecond laser-assisted anterior capsulotomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;225:27–37. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.12.025
  22. Kovács I, Kránitz K, Sándor GL, et al. The effect of femtosecond laser capsulotomy on the development of posterior capsule opacification. J Refract Surg. 2014;30(3):154–158. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140217-01
  23. Zhao Y, Yang K, Li J, et al. Comparison of hydrophobic and hydrophilic intraocular lens in preventing posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery: an updated meta-analysis. Medicine. 2017;96(44): e8301. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008301
  24. Shlenskaya OV, Salmina SV. Vtorichnaya katarakta posle implantatsii myagkikh intraokulyarnykh linz MIOL. X International science and practice conferences: “Sovremennye tekhnologii kataraktal’noi i refraktsionnoi khirurgii”. 2007. P. 289–292. (In Russ.)
  25. Wu S, Tong N, Pan L, et al. Retrospective analyses of potential risk factors for posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery. J Ophthalmol. 2018;2018:9089285. doi: 10.1155/2018/9089285
  26. Praveen MR, Vasavada AR, Shah GD, et al. A prospective evaluation of posterior capsule opacification in eyes with diabetes mellitus: a case-control study. Eye (Lond). 2014;28(6):720–727. doi: 10.1038/eye.2014.60
  27. Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F. Posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery in patients with diabetes mellitus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134(1):10–16. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01461-7
  28. Zaczek A, Zetterström C. Posterior capsule opacificationafter phacoemulsification in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25(2):233–237. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(99)80132-1
  29. Küchle M, Amberg A, Martus P, et al. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome and secondary cataract. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81(10): 862–866. doi: 10.1136/bjo.81.10.862
  30. Sorokoletov GV. Vliyanie velichiny peredne-zadnei osi glaza i materiala IOL na chastotu i dinamiku razvitiya vtorichnoi katarakty v otdalennom posleoperatsionnom periode fakoehmul’sifikatsii katarakty. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2015;(4): 91–94. (In Russ.)
  31. Sorokoletov GV, Zuyev VK, Tumanyan ER, et al. Frequency of secondary cataract development in pseudophakic eyes with posterior chamber IOL of current designs in case of axial myopia. Fyodorov journal of ophthalmic surgery. 2013;(2):28–31. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-65574 от 04 мая 2016 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies