Assessment of results of using three types of vascular access for isolated hepatic chemoperfusion
- Authors: Unguryan V.M.1, Kazantsev A.N.1,2,3, Korotkikh A.V.4, Ivanov S.A.5, Belov Y.V.2,6, Kaprin A.D.7
-
Affiliations:
- Kostroma Clinical Oncological Dispensary
- Petrovsky National Researcher Center of Surgery
- Kostroma Regional Clinical Hospital named after E. I. Korolev
- Cardiac Surgery Clinic of the Amur State Medical Academy
- Medical Radiological Research Center named after A. F. Tsyba
- I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenovskiy University)
- Moscow Scientific Research Oncological Institute named after P. A. Herzen
- Issue: Vol 32, No 4 (2024)
- Pages: 517-527
- Section: Original study
- Submitted: 06.05.2023
- Accepted: 14.09.2023
- Published: 27.12.2024
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/pavlovj/article/view/397226
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/PAVLOVJ397226
- ID: 397226
Cite item
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Uveal melanoma (UM) is an oncological disease, which develops metastases mainly to the liver. One of treatments for this pathology is isolated hepatic chemoperfusion (IHCP). The implementation of this method requires surgical isolation of the liver from the systemic circulation and the use of a heart-lung machine. Due to a small number of observations of this treatment method in the world, the optimal vascular access for its implementation has not been determined so far.
AIM: To analyze the in-hospital results of IHCP in patients with UM metastases performed from three different vascular accesses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over three years, 38 IHCP procedures were performed of the Kostroma Clinical Oncological Dispensary. Depending on the vessels into which the cannula for perfusion with Melphalan was inserted, patients were divided into 3 groups: group 1 with cava-porto-arterial access (perfusion into the inferior vena cava, portal vein, and common hepatic artery), n = 14; group 2 with cava-arterial access (perfusion into the inferior vena cava and common hepatic artery), n = 21; group 3 with a forced access, n = 3. The study took into account major complications: death, bleeding; and minor complications: tumor lysis syndrome, abscess of the left lobe of the liver, peritonitis, a systole, deep vein thrombosis of the lower limbs, hydrothorax, acute liver failure, anasarca, polyserositis, ischemic cholangiopathy, thrombosis of the common hepatic artery, detachment of the common hepatic artery intima. A combined endpoint was the achievement of at least one of the listed complications. In case of several complications in one patient, they were not summed up and were considered as ‘1’.
RESULTS: In the postoperative period, the highest number of bleedings including those requiring revision, was noted in groups 1 and 3. The combined endpoint in the total sample made 42.11% and was lowest in group 2. Fatal outcomes were recorded in 3 cases (2 in group 1 and 1 in group 2), and were caused by increasing liver failure.
CONCLUSION: The lowest number of complications IHCP was identified with cava-arterial access. Further continuation of the study is necessary to investigate the immediate and remote outcomes of IHCP.
Full Text

About the authors
Vladimir M. Unguryan
Kostroma Clinical Oncological Dispensary
Author for correspondence.
Email: avkor@internet.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2094-0596
SPIN-code: 7319-5814
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, KostromaAnton N. Kazantsev
Kostroma Clinical Oncological Dispensary; Petrovsky National Researcher Center of Surgery; Kostroma Regional Clinical Hospital named after E. I. Korolev
Email: dr.antonio.kazantsev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1115-609X
SPIN-code: 8396-1845
Russian Federation, Kostroma; Moscow; Kostroma
Aleksandr V. Korotkikh
Cardiac Surgery Clinic of the Amur State Medical Academy
Email: ssemioo@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9709-1097
SPIN-code: 6080-1442
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, BlagoveshchenskSergey A. Ivanov
Medical Radiological Research Center named after A. F. Tsyba
Email: ivanovSA72@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7689-6032
SPIN-code: 4264-5167
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor
Russian Federation, ObninskYuriy V. Belov
Petrovsky National Researcher Center of Surgery; I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenovskiy University)
Email: belovmed@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9280-8845
SPIN-code: 2740-1439
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowAndrey D. Kaprin
Moscow Scientific Research Oncological Institute named after P. A. Herzen
Email: kaprinAD68@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8784-8415
SPIN-code: 1759-8101
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Amaro A, Gangemi R, Piaggio F, et al. The biology of uveal melanoma. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2017;36(1):109–40. doi: 10.1007/s10555-017-9663-3
- Aronow ME, Topham AK, Singh AD. Uveal Melanoma: 5-Year Update on Incidence, Treatment, and Survival (SEER 1973–2013). Ocul Oncol Pathol. 2018;4(3):145–51. doi: 10.1159/000480640
- Korotkikh AV, Babunashvili AM, Kazantsev AN, et al. Distal Radial Artery Access in Noncoronary Procedures. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023; 48(8):101207. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101207
- Kaliki S, Shields CL. Uveal melanoma: relatively rare but deadly cancer. Eye (Lond). 2017;31(2):241–57. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.275
- Unguryan VM, Kazantsev AN, Korotkikh AV, et al. Isolated liver chemo perfusion for hepatic metastases from uveal melanoma: a report of 38 cases. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024;40(2):198–204. doi: 10.1007/s12055-023-01620-6
- Shields CL, Shields JA. Ocular melanoma: relatively rare but requiring respect. Clin Dermatol. 2009;27(1):122–33. doi: 10.1016/j.clin dermatol.2008.09.010
- Ulmer A, Beutel J, Süsskind D, et al. Visualization of circulating melanoma cells in peripheral blood of patients with primary uveal melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(14):4469–74. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-0012
- Korotkikh AV, Babunashvili AM, Kazantsev AN, et al. Distal Radial Access: Is There a Clinical Benefit? Cardiol Rev. 2024;32(2):110–3. doi: 10.1097/crd.0000000000000472
- Rowcroft A, Loveday BPT, Thomson BNJ, et al. Systematic review of liver directed therapy for uveal melanoma hepatic metastases. HPB (Oxford). 2020;22(4):497–505. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.11.002
- Ben–Shabat I, Belgrano V, Ny L, et al. Long-Term Follow-Up Evaluation of 68 Patients with Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases Treated with Isolated Hepatic Perfusion. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(4):1327–34. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4982-5
- Kaprin AD, Ivanov SA, Petrov LO, et al. Isolated endovascular liver chemoperfusion for liver metastases of uveal melanoma. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2023;(8):75–80. (In Russ). doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202308175
- Ben–Shabat I, Belgrano V, Hansson C. et al. The effect of perfusate buffering on toxicity and response in isolated hepatic perfusion for uveal melanoma liver metastases. Int J Hyperthermia. 2017;33(4): 483–8. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2017.1286046
- Korotkikh AV, Babunashvili AM, Kazantsev AN, et al. A narrative review of history, advantages, future developments of the distal radial access. J Vasc Access. 2024;25(3):745–52. doi: 10.1177/11297298221129416
Supplementary files
