Functional Activity of Reciprocal Inhibition of α-Motor Neurons of Antagonistic Muscles in Different Types of Muscle Contractions of Submaximal and Maximal Force
- 作者: Gladchenko D.A.1, Bogdanov S.M.1, Roschina L.V.1, Chelnokov A.A.1
-
隶属关系:
- Velikiye Luki State Academy of Physical Culture and Sports
- 期: 卷 31, 编号 2 (2023)
- 页面: 185-194
- 栏目: Original study
- ##submission.dateSubmitted##: 02.09.2022
- ##submission.dateAccepted##: 24.10.2022
- ##submission.datePublished##: 16.07.2023
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/pavlovj/article/view/110739
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/PAVLOVJ110739
- ID: 110739
如何引用文章
详细
INTRODUCTION: Currently, the results of investigation of different types of spinal inhibition in isometric voluntary contraction of muscles have been published. There are separate reports devoted to the role of recurrent and presynaptic inhibition in the regulation of isometric and anisometric voluntary contractions of submaximal and maximal strength.
AIM: To evaluate the effect of the type and strength of muscle contraction with and without performing Jendrassik maneuver on the manifestation of reciprocal inhibition of α-motor neurons of antagonistic muscles of the lower leg.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 8 healthy men aged 20–22 years. Reciprocal inhibition was evaluated by suppression of the amplitude of testing H-reflex of m. soleus in conditioning stimulation of n. peroneus profundus, and of testing stimulation of n. tibialis with 3 msec interval between stimuli. Reciprocal inhibition was recorded in concentric, eccentric and isometric contractions with 50% and 100% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) with and without Jendrassic maneuver.
RESULTS: In performing concentric, eccentric and isometric contractions of lower leg muscles with increase in strength from 50% to 100% of MVC, the activity of reciprocal inhibition decreased. Reciprocal inhibition was most evident in concentric contraction with 50% of MVC strength, less evident in eccentric contraction and was lowest in isometric contraction. With the maximal strength, reciprocal inhibition was most expressed in isometric contraction, less expressed in concentric contraction and was weakest in eccentric contraction. With Jendrassik maneuver, reduction of reciprocal inhibition was more expressed in different types of MVCs in comparison with parameters obtained with 50% of MVC. Using Jendrassic maneuver with 50% and 100% of MVC effort, strongest reciprocal inhibition was recorded in isometric contraction, weaker inhibition in concentric contraction and weakest in eccentric contraction. The effect of Jendrassik maneuver was manifested by weakening of reciprocal inhibition in concentric and eccentric contraction of submaximal force, and by its enhancement in isometric contraction.
CONCLUSION: Variability of manifestation of reciprocal inhibition of α-motor neurons of antagonistic muscles of lower leg in different types of muscle contractions of submaximal and maximal strength is associated with the fact that the pool of segmental motor neurons of m. soleus is controlled not only by a wide spectrum of excitatory cortico- and reticulospinal influences, but also by other kinds of inhibition, thus providing coordinated motor actions.
全文:
作者简介
Denis Gladchenko
Velikiye Luki State Academy of Physical Culture and Sports
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: gladchenko84@outlook.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6041-3614
SPIN 代码: 7541-0760
Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Associate Professor
俄罗斯联邦, Velikiye LukiSergey Bogdanov
Velikiye Luki State Academy of Physical Culture and Sports
Email: turbon10@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2543-6890
SPIN 代码: 2076-9689
俄罗斯联邦, Velikiye Luki
Lyudmila Roschina
Velikiye Luki State Academy of Physical Culture and Sports
Email: ljudaroschina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7647-2106
SPIN 代码: 6287-8630
Cand. Sci. (Biol.)
俄罗斯联邦, Velikiye LukiAndrey Chelnokov
Velikiye Luki State Academy of Physical Culture and Sports
Email: and-chelnokov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0502-5752
SPIN 代码: 4706-8513
Dr. Sci. (Biol.), Professor
俄罗斯联邦, Velikiye Luki参考
- Côté MP, Murray LM, Knikou M. Spinal Control of Locomotion: Individual Neurons, Their Circuits and Functions. Front Physiol. 2018;25(9):784. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00784
- Chelnokov AA, Roshchina LV, Gladchenko DA, et al. The Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation on the Functional Activity of Spinal Inhibition in the System of Synergistic Muscles of the Lower Leg in Humans. Human Physiology. 2022;48(2):121–33. (In Russ). doi: 10.1134/s0362119722020037
- Sherrington CS. The Integrative Action of the Nervous System. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1906.
- Pierrot–Deseilligny E, Burke D. The Circuitry of the Human Spinal Cord: Spinal and Corticospinal Mechanisms of Movement. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
- Jankowska E, Padel Y, Tanaka R. Disynaptic inhibition of spinal motoneurones from the motor cortex in the monkey. J Physiol. 1976; 258(2):467–87. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011431
- Nielsen J, Petersen N, Deuschl G, et al. Task-related changes in the effect of magnetic brain stimulation on spinal neurones in man. J Physiol. 1993;471(1):223–43. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019899
- Crone C, Nielsen J. Spinal mechanisms in man contributing to reciprocal inhibition during voluntary dorsiflexion of the foot. J Physiol. 1989;416(1):255–72. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017759
- Crone C, Nielsen J. Central control of disynaptic reciprocal inhibition in humans. Acta Physiol Scand. 1994;152(4):351–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1994.tb09817.x
- Dragert K, Zehr EP. Differential modulation of reciprocal inhibition in ankle muscles during rhythmic arm cycling. Neurosci Lett. 2013;534:269–73. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.11.038
- Yavuz US, Negro F, Diedrichs R, et al. Reciprocal inhibition between motor neurons of the tibialis anterior and triceps surae in humans. J Neurophysiol. 2018;119(5):1699–706. doi: 10.1152/jn.00424.2017
- Mummidisetty CK, Smith AC, Knikou M. Modulation of reciprocal and presynaptic inhibition during robotic-assisted stepping in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124(3):557–64. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.09.007
- Jessop T, De Paola A, Casaletto L, et al. Short-term plasticity of human spinal inhibitory circuits after isometric and isotonic ankle training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013;113(2):273–84. doi: 10.1007/s00421-012-2438-1
- Hirabayashi R, Kojima S, Edama M, et al. Activation of the Supplementary Motor Areas Enhances Spinal Reciprocal Inhibition in Healthy Individuals. Brain Sci. 2020;10(9):587. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10090587
- Enoka RM. Eccentric contractions require unique activation strategies by the nervous system. J Appl Physiol. 1996;81(6):2339–46. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1996.81.6.2339
- Duchateau J, Enoka RM. Neural control of shortening and lengthening contractions: influence of task constraints. J Physiol. 2008;586(24):5853–64. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.160747
- Duchateau J, Enoka RM. Neural control of lengthening contractions. J Exp Biol. 2016;219(Pt 2):197–204. doi: 10.1242/jeb.123158
- Duclay J, Martin A. Evoked H-reflex and V-wave responses during maximal isometric, concentric, and eccentric muscle contraction. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94(5):3555–62. doi: 10.1152/jn.00348.2005
- Duclay J, Pasquet B, Martin A, et al. Specific modulation of corticospinal and spinal excitabilities during maximal voluntary isometric, shortening and lengthening contractions in synergist muscles. J Physiol. 2011;589(11): 2901–16. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.207472
- Duclay J, Pasquet B, Martin A, et al. Specific modulation of spinal and cortical excitabilities during lengthening and shortening submaximal and maximal contractions in plantar flexor muscles. J Appl Physiol. 2014;117(12):1440–50. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00489.2014
- Nielsen J, Kagamihara Y. The regulation of disynaptic reciprocal Ia inhibition during co-contraction of antagonistic muscles in man. J Physiol. 1992;456:373–91. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019341
- Chelnokov AA, Gladchenko DA, Fedorov SA, et al. Age-related features of spinal inhibition of skeletal muscles in males in the regulation of voluntary movements. Human Physiology. 2017;43(1):28–36. (In Russ). doi: 10.7868/s0131164616060060
- Matsuya R, Ushiyama J, Ushiba J. Inhibitory interneuron circuits at cortical and spinal levels are associated with individual differences in corticomuscular coherence during isometric voluntary contraction. Sci Rep. 2017;7:е44417. doi: 10.1038/srep44417
- Hirabayashi R, Edama M, Kojima S, et al. Effects of Reciprocal Ia Inhibition on Contraction Intensity of Co-contraction. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019;12:е527. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00527
- Barrue–Belou S., Marque P., Duclay J. Recurrent inhibition is higher in eccentric compared to isometric and concentric maximal voluntary contractions. Acta Physiol. 2018;223(4):e13064. doi: 10.1111/apha.13064
- Bogdanov SM, Gladchenko DA, Roshchina LV, et al. Effect of supraspinal influences on the manifestation of presynaptic inhibition Ia afferents in different types of muscle contraction in humans. RUDN Journal of Medicine. 2020;24(4):338–44. (In Russ). doi: 10.22363/2313-0245-2020-24-4-338-344
- Schieppati M. The Hoffmann reflex: a means of assessing spinal reflex excitability and its descending control in man. Prog Neurobiol. 1987;28(4):345–76. doi: 10.1016/0301-0082(87)90007-4
- Chelnokov AA Gorodnichev RM. Age-Related Features of the Formation of Spinal Inhibition of Skeletal Muscles in Males. Human Physiology. 2015;41(6):86–94. (In Russ). doi: 10.7868/s0131164615060028
- Delwaide PJ, Toulouse P. Jendrassik maneuver vs controlled contractions conditioning the excitability of soleus monosynaptic reflexes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1980;61(11):505–10.
- Gregory JE, Wood SA, Proske U. An investigation into mechanisms of reflex reinforcement by the Jendrassik manoeuvre. Exp Brain Res. 2001;138(3):366–74. doi: 10.1007/s002210100707
- Bikmullina RKh, Rozental' AN, Pleshchinskii IN. Inhibitory systems of the spinal cord in the control of interactions of functionally coupled muscles. Human Physiology. 2007;33(1):105–15. (In Russ). doi: 10.1134/s0362119707010173
- Chelnokov AA, Buchatskaya IN. Functional features of human spinal inhibition during voluntary motor activity. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture. 2015;(6):11–3. (In Russ).
- Pleshchinsky IN, Alekseeva NL. Spinal cord: afferent interactions. Human Physiology. 1996;22(1):123–30. (In Russ).
- Yanagawa S, Shindo M, Nakagawa S. Increase in Ib inhibition by antagonistic voluntary contraction in man. J Physiol. 1991;440:311–23. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018710
- Iles JF, Pisini JV. Cortical modulation of transmission in spinal reflex pathways of man. J Physiol. 1992;455:425–46. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019309
- Nielsen J, Petersin N. Changes in the effect of magnetic brain stimulation accompanying voluntary dynamic contraction in man. J Physiol. 1995;484(Pt 3):777–89. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020703
- Kubota S, Uehara K, Morishita T, et al. Inter-individual variation in reciprocal Ia inhibition is dependent on the descending volleys delivered from corticospinal neurons to Ia interneurons. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2014;24(1):46–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.11.004
- Matsugi A, Mori N, Uehara S, et al. Effect of cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation on soleus Ia presynaptic and reciprocal inhibition. Neuroreport. 2015;26(3):139–43. doi: 10.1097/wnr.0000000000000315