Eversion carotid endarterectomy with transposition of the internal carotid artery according to A.N. Kazantsev. Hospital and long-term results.

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Aim. This study provides an analysis of the results of eversion carotid endarterectomy (CEE) with transposition of the internal carotid artery (ICA) over the hypoglossal nerve, according to A.N. Kazantsev.

Materials and Methods. The given prospective open study covering the period from
January 2017 to May 2020 involved 311 patients who underwent eversion CEE with transposition of ICA over the hypoglossal nerve, according to A.N. Kazantsev. Transposition was performed in the following way: after standard isolation of the carotid arteries, their compression, arteriosection, and removal of atherosclerotic plaque, ICA was extracted in the area above the hypoglossal nerve and was implanted to the same position. The condition of the patient was controlled on repeated visits to the clinic every six months. Hemodynamics in the reconstruction zone were studied using multispiral computed tomography with angiography of carotid bifurcation with 0.6 mm steps and processing the obtained results in Sim Vascular and Open Foam programs in DICON format. The follow-up period was 18.3±7.1 months. In case of development of restenosis, reCEE was performed with patch plasty of the reconstruction zone. For histologic examination, the restenosis area was stained by the van Gieson method.

Results. In the hospital follow-up period, one case of myocardial infarction was noted
that developed due to the stent’s thrombosis in the anterior descending artery deployed two years before. When studying the hemodynamic properties of carotid bifurcation in the postoperative period using computer modeling, in all cases, no changes or obstacles to blood flow were formed in the ICA in the area above the hypoglossal nerve. In the long-term follow-up period, two cases of lethal outcome were recorded connected with the onset of an oncological disease. In one case, due to recurrence of the pulmonary artery thromboembolism. In two cases, the cause of myocardial infarction was thrombosis/occlusion of venous anastomoses (in one patient to the circumflex
artery, in the other – to the right coronary artery). In four cases, repeated acute cerebrovascular accidents developed due to restenosis after CEE. In cases of significant restenosis (n=8), reCEE was performed with plasty of the reconstruction zone with a patch. The average restenosis period was 8.2±3.6 months. No cardiovascular complications and cases of hypoglossal nerve traumatization were identified. Intraoperatively, it was confirmed that restenosis was formed in the bifurcation zone, in front of the perimeter of the primary arteriosection. According to the results of histological examination, the main cause of all restenoses was hyperplasia of the neointima.

Conclusion. The eversion CEE with the transposition of the ICA, according to A.N. Kazantsev, creates conditions for additional maneuvers in case of restenosis and implementation of reCEE. The ICA’s placement over the hypoglossal nerve during primary CEE allows more confident isolation of carotid artery bifurcation from scar tissues with a zero risk of damage to the hypoglossal nerve. Such a course of the operation makes it possible to apply a clamp on the ICA and perform arteriotomy in any location without the threat of injury to the nerve structures.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Anton N. Kazantsev

Alexander Hospital

Author for correspondence.
Email: dr.antonio.kazantsev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1115-609X
SPIN-code: 8396-1845

Cardiovascular Surgeon

Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

Konstantin P. Chernykh

Alexander Hospital

Email: info@eco-vector.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5089-5549
SPIN-code: 3968-2649

Cardiovascular Surgeon

Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

Nona E. Zarkua

Mechnikov North-West State Medical University

Email: info@eco-vector.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7457-3149
SPIN-code: 4568-4125

MD, PhD, Surgeon

Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

Artem D. Abdullaev

Pskov Regional Infection Hospital

Email: info@eco-vector.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1594-7611
SPIN-code: 1265-3122

Head of the Admission Department

Russian Federation, Pskov, Russia

Anastasiya V. Povtoreiko

Pskov Regional Infection Hospital

Email: info@eco-vector.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9017-0190

Chief Physician

Russian Federation, Pskov, Russia

Goderzi Sh. Bagdavadze

Alexander Hospital

Email: info@eco-vector.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5970-6209

Cardiovascular Surgeon of the Surgery

Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

Еvgeniy Yu. Kalinin

Mechnikov North-West State Medical University

Email: info@eco-vector.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3258-4365
SPIN-code: 9120-1351

MD, PhD, Head of the Surgery Department №3

Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

Tatyana E. Zaitseva

Alexander Hospital

Email: info@eco-vector.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8971-7558
SPIN-code: 5323-1513

MD, PhD, Deputy Chief Physician for Medical Work

Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

Aleksandr E. Chikin

Alexander Hospital

Email: info@eco-vector.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6539-0386
SPIN-code: 3461-6134

к.м.н., зам. главного врача по хирургической помощи, СПб ГБУЗ Городская Александровская больница

Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

Yuriy P. Linets

Alexander Hospital

Email: info@eco-vector.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2279-3887
SPIN-code: 4522-6791

MD, PhD, Professor, Chief Physician

Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

References

  1. Kazantsev AN, Tarasov RS, Burkov NN, et al. In-hospital outcomes of transcutaneous coronary intervention and carotid endarterectomy in hybrid and staged regimens. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2019; 25(1):101-7. (In Russ). doi: 10.33529/angio2019114
  2. National guidelines for the management of patients with brachiocephalic artery disease. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2013;19(S2):4-68. (In Russ).
  3. Kazantsev AN, Tarasov RS, Burkov NN, et al. Carotid endarterectomy: three-year results of follow up within the framework of a single-centre register. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2018;24(3):101-8. (In Russ).
  4. Pokrovsky AV, Golovyuk AL. Sostoyaniye sosudistoy khirurgii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii v 2018 godu. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. Suppl. 2019;25(2):1-40. (In Russ).
  5. Pokrovsky AV, Beloyartsev DF, Talybly OL. Analysis of remote results of eversion carotid endarterectomy. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2014;20 (4):100-8. (In Russ).
  6. Kazantsev AN, Chernykh KP, Zarkua NE, et al. Novel method for glomus-saving carotid endarterectomy sensu A.N. Kazantsev: cutting the internal carotid artery on the site from external and common carotid artery. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(8): 10-7. (In Russ). doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3851
  7. Bokeria LA, Bakhmet’ev AS, Kovalenko VI, et al. The choice of carotid endarterectomy method in atherosclerotic disease of internal carotid artery. Russian Journal of Surgery. 2017;22(5):265-71. (In Russ). doi: 10.18821/1560-9502-2017-22-5-265-271
  8. Kazantsev AN, Chernykh KP, Leader RYu, et al. Glomus-saving carotid endarterectomy by A.N. Ka-zantsev. Hospital and mediumremote results. Patologiya Krovoobrashcheniya i Kardiokhirurgiya. 2020; 24(3):70-9. (In Russ). doi: 10.21688/1681-3472-2020-3-70-79
  9. Kazantsev AN, Tarasov RS, Burkov NN, et al.
  10. Hybrid revascularization of the brain and myocardium: risk stratification for in-hospital complications. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2020;26(2):118-23. (In Russ). doi: 10.33529/ANGIO2020212
  11. Kazantsev AN, Vinogradov RA, Chernyavsky MA, et al. Urgent intervention of hemodynamically significant stenosis of the internal carotid artery in the acutest period of an ischaemic stroke. Patologiya Krovoobrashcheniya i Kardiokhirurgiya. 2020;24 (3S):89-97. (In Russ). doi: 10.21688/1681-3472-2020-3S-89-97
  12. Kazantsev AN, Burkov NN, Bayandin MS, et al. In-hospital outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with multifocal atherosclerosis. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2020;13(3):224-9. (In Russ). doi:10.17116/ kardio202013031224
  13. Pokrovsky AV, Kuntsevich GI, Beloyartsev DF, et al. Carotid artery grafting for restenosis after carotid endarterectomy. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2007;13(4):115-25. (In Russ).
  14. Kazantsev AN, Bogomolova AV, Burkov NN, et al. Morphological features of restenosis after carotid endarterectomy with diepoxide-treated xenopericardial patch angioplasty. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2020;13(1):68-71. (In Russ). doi: 10.17116/kardio202013011168
  15. Elchaninov AP, Amosova NV, Zhuravlev PV, et al. Antiphospholipid activity of hemostasis as a risk factor for restenosis after carotid endarterectomy and ischemic stroke in antiphospholipid syndrome. Sovremennaya Nauka: Aktual’nyye Problemy i Puti ikh Resheniya. 2016;(5):49-54. (In Russ).
  16. Yevtushenko SK, Dyuba DSh, Simonyan VA, et al. Correction of hyperhomocysteinemia and basic indicators of blood coagulation to prevent recurrent strokes before and after carotid endarterectomy. International Neurological Journal. 2011;(2):23-6. (In Russ).
  17. Sleptsov AA, Nazarenko MS, Zaitseva AV, et al. Somatic mosaicism and structural variability of GBP3 gene in atherosclerosis. Ateroscleroz. 2019;15(4): 46-51. (In Russ). doi: 10.15372/ATER20190404
  18. Nazarenko MS, Sleptcov AA, Lebedev IN, et al. Genomic structural variations for cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidity. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:41268. doi: 10.1038/srep41268
  19. Kazantsev AN, Burkov NN, Borisov VG, et al. Computer-assisted simulation of haemodynamic parameters of carotid artery bifurcation after carotid endarterectomy. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2019;25 (3):107-12. (In Russ). doi: 10.33529/ANGIO2019311
  20. Kazantsev AN, Chernykh KP, Zarkua NE, et al. «Chik-chirik» carotid endarterectomy. The Bulletin of Bakoulev Center. Cardiovascular Diseases. 2020;21(4):414-28. (In Russ). doi: 10.24022/1810-0694-2020-21-4-414-428
  21. Marsman MS, Wetterslev J, Jahrome AK, et al. Carotid endarterectomy with primary closure versus patch angioplasty in patients with symptomatic and significant stenosis: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(4):e026419. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026419
  22. Kazantsev AN, Burkov NN, Zakharov YuN, et al. Personalized brain revascularization: computer modeling of the reconstruction zone for carotid endarterectomy. Pirogov Journal of Surgery. 2020;(6):71-5. (In Russ). doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202006171
  23. Kazantsev AN, Burkov NN, Chernyavsky MA, et al. Carotid endarterectomy in a patient with bilateral restenosis of stents in internal carotid arteries. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2020;26(4):86-9. (In Russ). doi: 10.33529/ANGIO2020424
  24. Gusel’nikova YuI, Lider RYu, Kazantsev AN, et al. Kharakteristika restenoza i progressirovaniye ateroskleroza posle karotidnoy endarter ektomii v otdalennom periode nablyudeniya. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2019;8(S3-2):17. (In Russ).
  25. Burkov NN, Kazantsev AN, Tarasov RS, et al. Ksenoperikardial’naya plastika vnutrenney sonnoy arterii pri eye restenoze. Complex Issues of Cardio-vascular Diseases. 2019;8(S3):26. (In Russ).
  26. Tarasov RS, Kazantsev AN, Anufriev AI, et al. Surgical factors of internal carotid artery restenosis after carotid endarterectomy. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2018;11 (4):47-53. (In Russ). doi: 10.17116/kardio201811447
  27. Texakalidis P, Giannopoulos S, Jonnalagadda AK, et al. Carotid Artery Endarterectomy versus Carotid Artery Stenting for Restenosis After Carotid Ar-tery Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurgery. 2018;115:421-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.196
  28. Kazantsev AN, Sultanov RV, Burkov NN, et al. Long-term results of surgical and conservative treatment of patients with occlusive-stenotic lesions of carotid arteries. Pirogov Journal of Surgery. 2020;(1):67-73. (In Russ). doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202001167
  29. Kazantsev AN, Burkov NN, Shabayev AR, et al. Surgical treatment of a patient with stent restenosis in the mouth of the general carotid artery and the proximal department of the internal carotid artery. Patologiya Krovoobrashcheniya i Kardiokhirurgiya. 2019;23(3):104-10. (In Russ). doi: 10.21688/1681-3472-2019-3-104-110

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Scheme of hypoglossal nerve transposition, according to A.N. Kazantsev: A – Natural location of the hypoglossal nerve over the internal carotid artery; B – Location of the hypoglossal nerve under the internal carotid artery after transposition, according to A.N. Kazantsev; 1A – hypoglossal nerve; 2A – internal carotid artery; 2A – internal carotid artery; 2B – hypoglossal nerve

Download (9KB)
3. Fig. 2. The result of eversion CEE with transposition of the internal carotid artery, according to A.N. Kazantsev:A – intraoperative photo: 1 – common carotid artery; 2 – area of arteriosection with primary suture; 3 – the place of implantation of the internal carotid artery to the same position; 4 – internal carotid artery; 5 – a part of the internal carotid artery above the hypoglossal nerve; B – multislice computed tomography with angiography after 12 months after eversion CEE with transposition of the internal carotid artery, according to A.N. Kazantsev: 1 – a part of the internal carotid artery above the hypoglossal nerve; 2 – the place of implantation of the internal carotid artery to the same position; 3 – area of arteriosection with primary suture; 4 – common carotid artery

Download (41KB)
4. Fig. 3. Computer modeling of carotid bifurcation in the postoperative period: 1 – common carotid artery; 2 – projection of arteriosection; 3 – external carotid artery; 4 – internal carotid artery; 5 – the area of the internal carotid artery above the hypoglossal nerve

Download (13KB)
5. Fig. 4. Death-free survival (noncardiovascular causes)

Download (9KB)
6. Fig. 5. Myocardial infarction-free survival

Download (8KB)
7. Fig. 6. Stroke-free survival

Download (8KB)
8. Fig. 7. Combined endpoint-free survival

Download (8KB)
9. Fig. 8. ICA restenosis-free survival

Download (8KB)

Copyright (c) 2021 Kazantsev A.


Media Registry Entry of the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Communications (Roskomnadzor) PI No. FS77-76803 dated September 24, 2019.



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies