A comparative analysis of the relationship between stature and ultrasound dimensions of internal organs in adolescents

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The aim of the study was a comparative characteristic of the size of internal organs according to ultrasonography data in subjects with various deviations in stature, determined using international standardized norms.

Materials and methods. The stature was measured in 93 adolescents, aged 13 to 17 years. Based on the measurements, the Z-score of body length was calculated according to the WHO Growth Reference, 2007 and three groups were formed for comparing the sizes of internal organs: “average”, “above average”, “below average”. Ultrasonography data of the internal organs dimensions and thyroid gland was performed using a Toshiba Aplio 500 ultrasound scanner.

Results. There were statistically significantly lower values of the liver span and the longitudinal size of the gallbladder in the examined subjects from the “below average” group compared to the rest of the subjects. The length of the spleen and the total volume of the thyroid gland were statistically significantly different in subjects from all three groups, with the highest values in volunteers from the “above average” group. A weak direct correlation was shown between the Z-score of body length and liver span, the length of the cauda of the pancreas, and the width of the spleen. An average direct statistical relationship was found between the Z-score of stature and the length of the spleen, as well as the total volume of the thyroid gland.

Conclusion. To a greater extent, body length is associated with the size of the parenchymal organs with a pronounced connective tissue frame - the liver and spleen, as well as the thyroid gland due to the relationship of its volume with hormones that regulate growth and development. Clinical substantiation of the relationship between the structure of the body and internal organs opens up the possibility of creating anatomical standards that allow ultrasound morphometric assessment of internal organs, taking into account the individual characteristics of the patient’s body size.

Full Text

INTRODUCTION

The regulation of the growth and development of the skeleton and internal organs is a single humoral mechanism [33]. Thus, it becomes possible to use physical development parameters as predictors of the deviations in the size of internal organs from the standards during ultrasound (US) examination [20, 24, 26, 28, 31, 34].

The anatomical dimension of internal organs is a constant value; therefore, they may be considered as signs that determine the characteristics of a person’s somatotype [8]. Studies have discussed the relationshipbetween individual typological characteristics of internal organs, namely, the size of the liver, gallbladder, pancreas, and thyroid, and their relationshipwith a person’s somatotype to create standards for the US assessment of these parameters [9, 18, 19].

Many studies have identified a mosaic distribution of differences in the size of internal organs in children with different somatotypes [3–5]. Thus, the focus on the constitutional characteristics of the organism as a factor capable of influencing the results of US morphometry of internal organs should be optional until the mechanisms and structure of these characteristics are clarified in detail. However, the results of these studies were less meaningful in the clinic because of the limited use of somatotyping in routine healthcare practice, that is, even if specialists determine the somatotype, they often do it by guesswork, without using special techniques [8]. Thus, comparing the dimensions of internal organs in individuals with different levels of physical development, that is, a certain length and body weight, ranked according to some generally accepted classifications, becomes necessary. The literature provides no unequivocal opinion on the problem of which approach to assess physical development should be considered a reference [6, 10, 11]. Several experts insist on the creation of updated standards in Russia, taking into account the ethnic, regional, and constitutional characteristics of the physical development of the population [6], and consider the method of centile tables by Mazurin and Vorontsov obsolete because of the accelerated development of children [10]. However, most authors [10, 11] suggest following the recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO) for these purposes [25]. This method is easy to use, and the materials for its application are publicly available [11].

Reference values of US dimensions of the liver, spleen, kidneys, and thyroid gland, normalized for the length and body weight, were obtained when examining children living in Europe, Asia, and North America [20–24, 26–28, 31, 34]. In Russian scientific publications, such information is nearly nonexistent.

This study aimed to compare characteristics of the dimensions of internal organs according to US data in individuals with various deviations in body length, determined using international standardized norms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was performed during a routine preventive examination of children, which was conducted according to Order No. 27-O* in the Children’s Polyclinic Department No. 3 of the Saint Petersburg City Polyclinic No. 109. All study participants signed voluntary informed consent for preventive examinations and processing of personal data. In total, 93 adolescent boys aged 13–17 years participated in the study. Apical body length was measured using a floor-standing medical stadiometer PM-2 Diakoms (Diakoms, Russia) with a measurement accuracy of upto 5 mm. The Z-index of body length was calculated according to the WHO Growth Reference standards (2007) using the WHO AnthroPlus program [25]. The body length of each participant was assessed not only by determining the significance of differences from the Z-indices in the indicated groups but also individually. If the Z-scores were within the range of –1 SD to +1 SD, body length values were qualified as “average,” and their correspondence to ranges of less than –1 SD or more than +1 SD was accepted as “below-average” and “above-average” deviations, respectively [25]. Thus, three groups were formed for the comparison of US measurements of internal organs.

For US examination of the thyroid gland, a Toshiba Aplio 500 US scanner with a linear probe was used with a central frequency of 8.0 MHz (Toshiba Medical System Corporation, Japan). The volume of each lobe was estimated according to a generally accepted method by measuring the width, thickness, and length of each lobe, followed by calculating the lobe volume by multiplying its width, thickness, and length with an ellipsoidal correction factor, K=0.479. The total volume of the thyroid gland was calculated by adding the volumes of the two lobes. Abdominal organs were examined using a Toshiba Aplio 500 US scanner with a convex probe with a central frequency of 3.75 MHz (Toshiba Medical System Corporation). Oblique vertical dimensions of the right liver lobe, longitudinal and transverse dimensions of the gallbladder, length of the head, body, and tail of the pancreas, as well as the length and width of the spleen, were measured.

The significance of the differences in the Z-index of the body length and size of internal organs in groups with different levels of deviations in body length (“below-average values,” “average values,” and “above-average values”) was tested using the Kruskal–Wallis test. If the three samples demonstrated significant differences, pairwise comparison was performed using the Mann–Whitney test, with the Bonferroni correction for the multiplicity of comparisons. The ratio of the Z-index of the length and size of internal organs was assessed by calculating the Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ). When the ρ value was equal to 0, the relationshipwas considered absent; 0.01–0.29 (–0.01 to –0.29), weak direct correlation (reverse); 0.3–0.69 (–0.3 to –0.69), average direct correlation (reverse); 0.7–0.99 (–0.7 to –0.99), strong direct correlation (reverse); and 1 (–1), full direct correlation (reverse) [16]. The results were considered significant at p< 0.05. Calculations were performed using built-in Excel functions from the Microsoft Office 2010 application package, past version 2.17 (Norway, Oslo, 2012) software, and StatXact-8 statistical data processing algorithm with Cytel Studio version 8.0.0 software shell. Values are presented as mean (µ) of the Z-index of body length or size of the internal organ as well as the lower and upper bounds of the 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In the comparison of the values of the Z-index of body length, significant differences were revealed in all participants from all three comparison groups (Table 1).

Data analysis showed significantly lower values of the oblique vertical size of the right lobe of the liver and the longitudinal size of the gallbladder from the groupwith “below-average” deviations in body length compared with groups with “above-average” and “average” deviations in body length. In addition, the length of the spleen and the total size of the thyroid gland were significantly different in all three groups, and their values were the greatest in the groupwith “above-average” deviations in body length, and the smallest values were noted in the groupwith “below-average” deviations in body length (Table).

 

Table / Таблица

Ultrasound dimensions of internal organs and Z-scores of body length in adolescents from three comparison groups (µ; 95% CI)/ Размеры внутренних органов и значений Z-индекса длины тела у подростков из трех групп сравнения (µ; 95% CI)

Parameter / Параметр

“Above average” / «Выше средних»

“Average” / «Средние»

“Below average” / «Ниже средних»

p-value / p-значения

Kruskal–Wallis test / тест Крас­келла–Уоллиса

pairwise comparisons / попарные сравнения

“above average” –“average” / «выше средних» –«средние»

“above average” –“below average” / «выше средних»–«ниже средних»

“average” – “below average” / «средние»–«ниже средних»

Z-score / Z-индекс длины тела

1.59 (1.40; 1.75)

0.33 (0.20; 0.46)

–1.20 (–1.66;  –0.74)

1.64·10–16

1.839·10–13

3.852·10–13

7.015·10–7

Liver span, cm / Косой вертикальный размер правой доли печени, см

12.95 (12.61; 13.30)

12.88 (12.64; 13.11)

12.07 (11.68; 12.46)

0.00646

1

0.01376

0.006353

Longitudinal dimension of the gall bladder, cm / Продольный размер желчного пузыря, см

6.26 (5.75; 6.76)

6.34 (5.97; 6.72)

5.04 (4.28; 5.81)

0.0154

1

0.03536

0.01487

Transversal dimension of the gall bladder, cm / Поперечный размер желчного пузыря, см

2.25 (1.96; 2.53)

2.27 (2.15; 2.40)

2.09 (1.78; 2.40)

0.1394

0.06766

1

0.1824

Dimension of the pancreas caput, cm / Длина головки поджелудочной железы, см

2.20 (1.04; 3.35)

1.60 (1.54; 1.65)

1.54 (1.39; 1.70)

0.489

1

0.6529

1

Dimension of the pancreas corpus, cm / Длина тела поджелудочной железы, см

1.01 (0.94; 1.08)

1.22 (0.87; 1.58)

0.98 (0.88; 1.09)

0.3597

0.8878

1

0.6505

Dimension of the pancreas cauda, cm / Длина хвоста поджелудочной железы, см

1.79 (1.66; 1.91)

1.71 (1.65; 1.78)

1.66 (1.54; 1.79)

0.4952

1

0.8095

1

Spleen length, cm / Длина селезенки, см

11.50 (11.07; 11.93)

9.82 (9.56; 10.07)

8.99 (8.60; 9.40)

3.243·10–10

3.26·10–8

6.879·10–6

0.01494

Spleen width, cm / Ширина селезенки, см

4.08 (3.84; 4.32)

4.04 (3.86; 4.23)

3.81 (3.65; 3.97)

0.3907

1

0.4098

1

Thyroid gland volume, cm3 / Общий объем щитовидной железы, см3

9.95 (8.85; 11.05)

8.15 (7.59; 8.71)

6.89 (6.31; 7.47)

0.000124

0.00516

0.001725

0.04273

 

Data analysis revealed no significant differences in the transverse size of the gallbladder, all dimensions of the pancreas, and width of the spleen in all three groups, as well as the oblique vertical dimension of the liver and longitudinal size of the gallbladder in the groups with “above-average” and “average” deviations in body length.

Analysis of the relationshipbetween the size of internal organs and physical development revealed a weak direct correlation between the Z-index of body length and oblique vertical size of the liver (p=0.22; p=0.029325), length of the pancreatic tail (p=0.21; p=0.042216), and spleen width (p=0.24; p=0.018383). An average significant relationshipwas found between the Z-index of body length and spleen length (p=0.37; p=0.00030704), as well as the total volume of the thyroid gland (p=0.44; p=1.0462·10–5). The correlation coefficient between the Z-index of body length, longitudinal (p=0.14; p=0.19191) and transverse (p=–0.01; p=0.85438) dimensions of the gallbladder, as well as the head (p=0.09; p=0.38561) and body (p=0.07; p=0.48775) of the pancreas were not significantly different from zero.

In this study, the dimensions of the internal organs have the expected characteristic differences, as participants with low Z-index values for body length have smaller dimensions of the liver, spleen, and thyroid gland than participants with deviations in body length toward a higher dimension. The liver and spleen are parenchymal organs with a rigid tissue framework; therefore, in this study, stable and expected differences in their dimensions were revealed, which is in good agreement with the data from Russian [9, 18, 19] and international [20, 24, 26, 28, 31, 34] literatures. The obtained patterns of relationships between the volume of the thyroid gland and physical development were also representative [21–23, 27]. Body length and weight have a direct correlation not only with the thyroid gland volume but also with the concentration of insulin-like growth factor 1 in the blood [21–23], as well as protein and calorie supply in adolescents [22]. In addition, the formation of various physique and organ dimensions is partially regulated by thyroid hormones [12], since they can inhibit the proliferation of fibroblasts and the synthesis of collagen by these cells [29, 32]. Children with smaller body dimensions than their peers with body lengths above the average have an increased concentration of thyroid hormones [12].

Based on the data presented, these mechanisms may play important roles in the development of individual characteristics of the dimensions of the thyroid gland and other organs in participants with different levels of physical development.

In the present study, conflicting results were obtained regarding the relationshipbetween physical development and the size of the pancreas. Significant differences were noted only in the gallbladder longitudinal size, not in all comparison groups. The dimensions of the head, tail, and body of the pancreas were not significantly different in adolescents with various deviations in body length as determined by the Z-index. The weak direct correlation of the Z-index of body length and length of the pancreatic tail cannot be regarded as a cause-and-effect relationship[16].

Methodological errors of the US morphometry of the pancreas and gallbladder dimensions in children with individual typological features of physical development are widely discussed [1, 2, 15, 14, 17]. The dependence of the pancreatic anatomical location on the size of the abdominal cavity [1], its abundant vascularization, deterioration of the US signal [2, 17], and abdominal obesity in children with increased body mass index [2, 17] lead to “blurring” of the image and appearance of optical illusions [2] when visualizing dimensions. Therefore, US data on the length of the head, body, and tail of the pancreas are very contradictory, unstable, and operator-dependent and correlate with the organization of the body [1, 2, 17].

As a result of computer modeling of the topographic location of the gallbladder based on spiral tomography data, significant individual differences were revealed in people with different anthropometric parameters [15]. This leads to the variabilities in the determination of its longitudinal and transverse US dimensions in children with different le­vels of physical development [2, 15]. The pancreas and gallbladder function continuously, changing constantly the exocrine and tonic activities, even in the “cerebral” phase of the regulation of these processes, which undoubtedly affects their size [7]. Therefore, the methodological organization of experiments to finally resolve the issue of the relationshipbetween the somatotype and size of the pancreas and gallbladder should consider the standardization of nutritional conditions of the individuals examined and determination of the functional activity of these organs [13].

CONCLUSION

This study substantiates the relationshipbetween deviations in body length, determined using international standardized norms, and the size of internal organs. To a greater extent, body length is associated with the size of parenchymal organs with a pronounced connective tissue framework, namely, the liver, spleen, as well as thyroid gland due to the relationshipof its volume with hormones that regulate growth and development. Clinical substantiation of the relationshipbetween the organization of the body and internal organs opens upthe possibility of creating anatomical standards that enable US morphometric assessment of internal organs, taking into account the individual characteristics of the patient’s body size. The application of these standards in clinical practice will helplimit erroneous positive and negative conclusions about hypotrophy and hypertrophy of internal organs.

* Order No. 27-O “On the organization of work to fulfill the order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation of August 10, 2017 No. 514-n “On the procedure for conducting preventive medical examinations of minor children” in the children’s polyclinic department No. 3 of the St. Petersburg City Polyclinic No. 109.”

×

About the authors

Valerii O. Yerkudov

Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: verkudov@gmail.com

MD, PhD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Senior Lecturer, Department of Human Physiology

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Andrey P. Pugovkin

Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Email: apugovkin@mail.ru

PhD, Dr. Sci. (Biol.), Senior Researcher, Professor, Department of Human Physiology

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Aleksej J. Volkov

Saint Petersburg Regional Polyclinic No. 109

Email: pd3@zdrav.spb.ru

Head of Children’s Polyclinic Department No. 3

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Oksana I. Musaeva

Saint Petersburg Regional Polyclinic No. 109

Email: oksana-musaeva@yandex.ru

Нead of the School-Preschool Department, Children’s Polyclinic Department No. 3

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Dmitriy J. Volkov

“SOGAZ” International Medical Center

Email: dvolkov@sogaz-clinic.ru

Head of Pediatric Department

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Sergej S. Rogozin

Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Email: box.rogozin@yandex.ru

Assistant Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Mar’jana V. Chistjakova

School No. 225 of Admiralteysky District

Email: m.chistyakova714@yandex.ru

10-year Student

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Andrej V. Kochubeev

Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Email: andrej.ko4@yandex.ru

MD, PhD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Department of Human Physiology

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Maria A. Pakhomova

Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Email: mariya.pahomova@mail.ru

MD, Senior Researcher

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Tatiana V. Brus

Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Email: bant.90@mail.ru

MD, PhD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor Department of Pathologic Physiology and Course Immunopathology

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Mikhail M. Zabezhinsky

Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Email: mih.zabezhinsky@yandex.ru

MD, PhD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor Department of Pathologic Physiology and Course Immunopathology

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Бахарева Н.С., Мещерикова Т.П., Герасюта А.Е. Морфометрические параметры поджелудочной железы в зависимости от соматотипа, половой и возрастной принадлежности человека // Международный научно-исследовательский журнал. – 2014. – № 11-4(30). – С. 63–65. [Bakhareva NS, Mesherikova TP, Gerasuta AE. Morphological parameters of pancreas in dependence of somatotype, gender and age belonging of a human. International research journal. 2014; (11-4):63-65. (In Russ.)]
  2. Видюков В.И. Определение объема внутренних органов и его диагностическое значение // Медицинский алфавит. – 2017. – Т. 1. – № 12. – С. 31–33. [Vidyukov VI. Determination of volume of internal organs and its diagnostic value. Medical alphabet. 2017;1(12):31-33. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.1177/8756479316686303
  3. Волков А.Я., Мусаева О.И., Еркудов В.О., Пуговкин А.П. Морфометрические особенности щитовидной железы у 17-летних подростков с разными соматотипами: гендерные различия и взаимосвязь с размерами тела // Материалы XXIII съезда Физиологического общества им. И.П. Павлова. –18–22 сентября, 2017. – Воронеж. – С. 2250–2252. [Volkov AJa, Musaeva OI, Erkudov VO, Pugovkin AP. Morphometric diversity of the thyroid gland in teenagers with somatotypic differences: gender differences and dependence from the body dimentions. Proceedings of the Russian science conference “Materialy XXIII s’ezda Fiziologicheskogo obshchestva imeni I.P. Pavlova”. 18–22 Sep 2017; Voronezh. P. 2250–2252. (In Russ.)] Режим доступа: http://vrngmu.ru/upload/iblock/19c/19c3af15a1650df8c7a276f73fb80c44.pdf.
  4. Еркудов В.О., Пуговкин А.П., Волков А.Я., и др. Конституциональное разнообразие размеров внутренних органов у подростков // Российский вестник перинатологии и педиатрии. – 2019. – Т. 64. – № 2. – С. 94–99. [Erkudov VO, Pugovkin AP, Volkov AJa, et al. Constitutional diversity in the dimensions of internal organs of teenagers. Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics. 2019;64(2):94-99. (In Russ.)]. https:// doi.org/10.21508/1027-4065-2019-64-2-94-99
  5. Еркудов В.О., Пуговкин А.П., Волков А.Я., и др. Гендерные различия размеров внутренних органов у 17-летних подростков с различными соматотипами // Педиатр. – 2017. – Т. 8. – № 5. – С. 67–73. [Erkudov VO, Pugovkin AP, Volkov AY, et al. Gender differences in the normative dimensions of internal organs of 17-years teenagers with different somatotypic characteristics. Pediatrician (St. Petersburg). 2017;8(5):67-73. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.17816/PED8567-73
  6. Кильдиярова Р.Р. Оценка физического развития детей с помощью перцентильных диаграмм // Вопросы современной педиатрии. – 2017. – Т. 16. – № 5. – С. 431–437. [Kildiyarova RR. Assessing physical development of children with percentile diagrams. Current pediatrics. 2017;16(5):431-437. (In Russ.)] https://doi. org/10.15690/vsp.v16i5.1808
  7. Климов П.К. Внепеченочные желчные пути и их функции. Физиология пищеварения. Серия: «Руководство по физиологии». – Л.: Наука, 1974. – С. 419–446. [Klimov PK. Vnepechenochnye zhelchnye puti i ikh funktsii. Fiziologiya pishchevareniya. Seriya: “Rukovodstvo po fiziologiI”. Leningrad: Nauka, 1974. P. 419-446 (In Russ.)]
  8. Клиорин А.И., Чтецов В.П. Биологические проблемы учения о конституциях человека. – Л.: Наука, 1979. – 164 с. [Kliorin AI, Chtetsov VP. Biologicheskie problemy ucheniya o konstitutsiyakh cheloveka. Leningrad: Nauka, 1979. 164 p. (In Russ.)]
  9. Кучиева М.Б. Вариабельность объема щитовидной железы у лиц различных соматических типов // Журнал анатомии и гистопатологии. – 2012. – Т. 1. – № 2. – С. 23–27. [Kuchieva MB. Anatomic variability of the thyroid gland at persons of various somatic types. Journal of anatomy and histopathology. 2012;1(2): 23-27. (In Russ.)]
  10. Макарова С.Г. Действительно ли существует необходимость в создании «Региональных перцентильных кривых» массо-ростовых показателей? (комментарий к статье Р.Р. Кильдияровой «Оценка физического развития детей с помощью перцентильных диаграмм») // Вопросы современной педиатрии. – 2017. – Т. 16. – № 5. – С. 438–440. [Makarova SG. Is there really a need to create “regional percentile curves” of weight-height parameters? (comment to the article by Rita R. Kildiyarova “Assessing physical development of children with percentile diagrams”). Current pediatrics. 2017;16(5):438-440. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v16i5.1809
  11. Мартинчик А.Н., Батурин А.К., Кешабянц Э.Э., Пескова Е.В. Ретроспективная оценка антропометрических показателей детей России в 1994–2012 гг. по новым стандартам ВОЗ // Педиатрия. Журнал им. Г.Н. Сперанского. – 2015. – Т. 94. – № 1. – С. 156–160. [Martinchik AN, Baturin AK, Keshabyants EE, Peskova EV. Retrospective assessment of anthropometric measurements of children in Russia 1994–2012 according to the new who standards. Pediatria. Journal named after G.N. Speransky. 2015;94(1):156-160. (In Russ.)]
  12. Муджикова О.М., Строев Ю.И., Чурилов Л.П. Соединительная ткань, соматотип и щитовидная железа // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Медицина. – 2009. – № 2. – С. 35–47. [Mudzhikova OM, Stroev YuI, Churilov LP. Connective tissue, somatotype and thyroid gland. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Medicine. 2009;(2):35-47. (In Russ.)]
  13. Патент РФ на изобретение 2293521/09.02.2006. Пыков М.И., Иззатдуст Ф.Н., Коровина Н.А., и др. Способ диагностики моторно-эвакуаторной функции желчного пузыря у детей. [Patent RUS2293521/09.02.2006. Pykov MI, Izzatdust FN, Korovina NA, et al. Sposob diagnostiki motorno-ehvakuatornoi funktsii zhelchnogo puzyrya u detei. (In Russ.)]
  14. Радченко Е.М., Радченко Л.М. Поджелудочная железа и метаболический синдром // Современная гастроэнтерология. – 2013. – Т. 5. – № 73. С. 21–28. [Radchenko OM, Radchenko LM. Pancreas and metabolic syndrome. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2013;5(73):21-28. (In Russ.)]
  15. Трунин Е.М., Щёголев А.И., Сигуа Б.В., и др. Особенности топографии желчного пузыря у женщин с различными типами телосложения и абдоминальным ожирением // Вестник экспериментальной и клинической хирургии. – 2016. – Т. 9. – № 4. – С. 328–334. [Trunin EM, Shchegolev AI, Sigua BV, et al. Characteristic features of gall bladder topography in women of different somatotypes and those with abdominal obesity. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Surgery. 2016;9(4):328-334. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.18499/2070-478X-2016-9-4-328-334
  16. Унгуряну Т.Н., Гржибовский А.М. Корреляционный анализ с использованием пакета статистических программ STATA // Экология человека. – 2014. – № 9. – С. 60–64. [Unguryanu TN, Grjibovski AM. Correlation analysis using STATA. Human ecology. 2014;(9):60-64 (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.33396/1728-0869-2014-9-60-64
  17. Хайруллоев П.Д., Хайруллоева Е.Д. Актуальные проблемы визуализации поджелудочной железы // Вестник последипломного образования в сфере здравоохранения. – 2015. – № 3. – С. 59–61. [Hairulloev PJ, Hairulloeva EJ. Actual problems of visualization of the pancreas. Vestnik poslediplomnogo obrazovaniya v sfere zdravookhraneniya. 2015;(3):59-61. (In Russ.)]
  18. Чаплыгина Е.В., Губарь А.С. Значения линейных параметров печени в связи с типом телосложения обследуемых лиц // Медицинский вестник Северного Кавказа. – 2014. – Т. 9. – № 4. – С. 356–359. [Chaplygina EV, Gubar’ AS. Znacheniya lineinykh parametrov pecheni v svyazi s tipom teloslozheniya obsleduemykh lits. Medical news of the North Caucasus. 2014;9(4):356-359. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.14300/mnnc.2014.09099
  19. Чаплыгина Е.В., Неласов Н.Ю., Кучиева М.Б. Соматотипологические и региональные закономерности ультразвуковой анатомии щитовидной железы // Морфология. – 2013. – Т. 143. – № 3. – С. 50–53. [Chaplygina YeV, Nelasov NYu, Kuchiyeva MB. Somatotypological and regional regularities of ultrasound anatomy of the thyroid gland. Morphology. 2013;143(3):50-53. (In Russ.)]
  20. Akinlade FT, Asaleye CM, Ayoola OO, Aremu AA. Ultrasound assessment of normal liver, spleen, and kidney dimensions in southwest Nigerian children: a bedside formula for sonologists. Acta Radiol. 2020;284185120948488. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0284185120948488
  21. Boas M, Hegedüs L, Rasmussen UF, et al. Association of thyroid gland volume, serum insulin-like growth factor-I, and anthropometric variables in euthyroid prepubertal children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(10): 4031-4035. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-0939
  22. Brahmbhatt SR, Brahmbhatt RM, Boyages SC. Impact of protein energy malnutrition on thyroid size in an iodine deficient population of Gujarat (India): Is it an aetiological factor for goiter? Eur J Endocrinol. 2001;145(1):11-17. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1450011
  23. Chen H, Zhang H, Tang W, et al. Thyroid function and morphology in overweight and obese children and adolescents in a Chinese population. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2013;26(5-6):489-496. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpem-2012-0299
  24. Chow KU, Luxembourg B, Seifried E, Bonig H. Spleen Size Is Significantly Influenced by Body Height and Sex: Establishment of Normal Values for Spleen Size at US with a Cohort of 1200 Healthy Individuals. Radiology. 2016;279(1):306-313. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015150887
  25. de Onis M, Onyango AW, Borghi E, et al. Comparison of the World Health Organization (WHO) Child Growth Standards and the National Center for Health Statistics/WHO international growth reference: implications for child health programmes. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9(7):942-947. https://doi.org/10.1017/phn20062005.
  26. Dhingra B, Sharma S, Mishra D, et al. Normal values of liver and spleen size by ultrasonography in Indian children. Indian Pediatr. 2010;47(6):487-492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-010-0090-6
  27. Karaoglan M, Balci O, Keskin M. Changes in thyroid volume and insulin-like growth factor 1 in pre- and post-pubertal obese children. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019;22(10):1417-1422. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_262_19
  28. Khan SA, Yasmeen S, Adel H, et al. Sonographic Evaluation of Normal Liver, Spleen, and Renal Parameters in Adult Population: A Multicenter Study. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2018;28(11):834-839. https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2018.11.834
  29. Lindsey RC, Aghajanian P, Mohan S. Thyroid Hormone Signaling in the Development of the Endochondral Skeleton. Vitam Horm. 2018;106:351-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.vh.2017.06.003
  30. Mello MA, Tuan RS. Effects of TGF-beta1 and triiodothyronine on cartilage maturation: In vitro analysis using long-term high-density micromass cultures of chick embryonic limb mesenchymal cells. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(11):2095-2105. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20233
  31. Rousan LA, Fataftah J, Al-Omari M, et al. Sonographic assessment of liver and spleen size based on age, height, and weight: evaluation of Jordanian children. Minerva Pediatr. 2019;71(1):28-33. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4946.16.04433-9
  32. Smith TJ, Murata Y, Horwitz AL, et al. Regulation of Glycosaminoglycan Synthesis by Thyroid Hormone in Vitro. J Clin Invest. 1982;70(5):1066-1073. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI110694
  33. Texada MJ, Koyama T, Rewitz K. Regulation of Body Size and Growth Control. Genetics. 2020;216(2):269-313. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.120.303095
  34. Warnakulasuriya D, Peries P, Rathnasekara Y, et al. Ultrasonographic parameters of the liver, spleen and kidneys among a cohort of school children in Sri Lanka. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17(1):192. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0943-4.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2021 Yerkudov V.O., Pugovkin A.P., Volkov A.J., Musaeva O.I., Volkov D.J., Rogozin S.S., Chistjakova M.V., Kochubeev A.V., Pakhomova M.A., Brus T.V., Zabezhinsky M.M.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 69634 от 15.03.2021 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies