Fingertip defects coverage using reverse-flow homodigital island flaps

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The hand has always been a highly organized tool in human’s daily and professional activity. Distal phalanges are most commonly exposed to trauma, which often cause defects that need to be covered through plastic surgery. One of the most reliable and universal methods for fingertip reconstruction is the reverse-flow homodigital island flap.

CLINICAL CASES: This series of clinical cases describe three children aged 7, 8, and 11 years who underwent coverage of fingertip defects with the reverse-flow homodigital island flap. In all cases, mechanisms of injury were associated with crushing and rupture of soft tissues. All children underwent coverage of fingertip defects with the reverse-flow homodigital island flap. In the first case, evaluation results at 6 months after surgery revealed 4 mm in the Weber’s test and phalanx length deficit of 2 mm. In the second case, the assessment performed 1 month after surgery revealed 5 mm in the Weber’s test and the length of the operated phalanx corresponds to the contralateral one. In the third case, results of the 2-month observation period revealed 4 mm in the Weber’s test and lengths of the operated and contralateral phalanges were the same.

DISCUSSION: The reverse-flow homodigital island flaps have irrefragable advantages among methods of surgical reconstruction of soft tissues of distal phalanges. These are single-stage reconstruction techniques that can possibly replenish sufficient amounts of soft tissues to the defect. A literature data analysis of the outcomes of the fingertip reconstruction through the reverse-flow homodigital island flaps revealed good and satisfactory results.

CONCLUSIONS: The method of the reverse-flow homodigital island flap has potential to take a significant place in pediatric traumatology and reconstructive surgery.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Alexander V. Alexandrov

Filatov Moscow Children’s Clinical Hospital

Email: alexmicrosurg@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6110-2380
SPIN-code: 5229-0038
Russian Federation, Moscow

Alexander A. Smirnov

Filatov Moscow Children’s Clinical Hospital; Russian National Research Medical University

Email: smirnov_aan@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7274-8291

MD, PhD student

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Pavel V. Gonchruk

Filatov Moscow Children’s Clinical Hospital; Russian National Research Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: goncharukpavel@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9560-037X
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

References

  1. Bajtinger VF, Golubev IO. Otcherki klinitcheskoy anatomii kisti. Tomsk: Deltaplan; 2012. (In Russ.)
  2. Doraiswamy NV, Baig H. Isolated finger injuries in children — incidence and aetiology. Injury. 2000;31(8):571–573. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(00)00052-8
  3. Fetter-Zarzeka A, Joseph MM. Hand and fingertip injuries in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2002;18(5):341–345. doi: 10.1097/00006565-200210000-00003
  4. Ljungberg E, Rosberg HE, Dahlin LB. Hand injuries in young children. J Hand Surg Br. 2003;28(4):376–380. doi: 10.1016/s0266-7681(03)00101-3
  5. Yorlets RR, Busa K, Eberlin KR, et al. Fingertip injuries in children: Epidemiology, financial burden, and implications for prevention. Hand (NY). 2017.12(4):342–347. doi: 10.1177/1558944716670139
  6. Foucher G, Norris RW. Distal and very distal digital replantations. Br J Plast Surg. 1992;45(3):199–203. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(92)90076-a
  7. Hirase Y. Salvage of fingertip amputated at nail level: new surgical principles and treatments. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;38(2):151–157. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199702000-00009
  8. Tamai S. Twenty years’ experience of limb replantation — review of 293 upper extremity replants. J Hand Surg Am. 1982;7(6):549–556. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(82)80100-7
  9. Boudard J, Loisel F, El Rifaï S, et al. Fingertip amputations treated with occlusive dressings. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2019;38(4):257–261. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2019.06.002
  10. Germann G, Rudolf KD, Levin SL, Hrabowski M. Fingertip and thumb tip wounds: Changing algorithms for sensation, aesthetics, and function. J Hand Surg Am. 2017;42(4):274–284. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.01.022
  11. Lou X, Zhu H, Xue H, et al. One-stage wound healing of fingertip injuries induced by treatment of artificial dermis. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2018;50(4):269–275. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-102304
  12. Kawaiah A, Thakur M, Garg S, et al. Fingertip injuries and amputations: A review of the literature. Cureus. 2020;12(5):e8291. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8291
  13. Regmi S, Gu JX, Zhang NC, Liu HJ. A systematic review of outcomes and complications of primary fingertip reconstruction using reverse-flow homodigital island flaps. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016;40(2):277–283. doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0624-y
  14. Allen MJ. Conservative management of finger tip injuries in adults. Hand. 1980;12(3):257–265. doi: 10.1016/s0072-968x(80)80049-0
  15. Ozer K, Kramer W, Gillani S, et al. Replantation versus revision of amputated fingers in patients air-transported to a level 1 trauma center. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(6):936–940. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.02.031
  16. Erken HY, Takka S, Akmaz I. Artery-only fingertip replantations using a controlled nailbed bleeding protocol. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(11):2173–2179. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.08.110
  17. Venkatramani H, Sabapathy SR. Fingertip replantation: Technical considerations and outcome analysis of 24 consecutive fingertip replantations. Indian J Plast Surg. 2011;44(2):237–245. doi: 10.4103/0970-0358.85345
  18. Atasoy E, Ioakimidis E, Kasdan ML, et al. Reconstruction of the amputated finger tip with a triangular volar flap. A new surgical procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52(5):921–926.
  19. Filippov VV, Zelyanin AS, Istranov AL. Federal’nye klinicheskie rekomendacii po replantacii pal’cev i segmentov konechnostej. Obshcherossijskaya obshchestvennaya organizaciya Rossijskoe obshchestvo plasticheskih rekonstruktivnyh i esteticheskih hirurgov. 2013. P. 2–16. (In Russ.)
  20. Merle M, Dautel G. Emergency surgery of the hand. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2016.
  21. Mahdi AH. A comparative study of the supraperiosteal and the subperiosteal dissection in the V-Y advancement (atasoy) flap for the management of fingertip injury. Basrah J Surg. 2007;13(1):1–11. doi: 10.33762/bsurg.2007.56239
  22. Jackson EA. The V-Y plasty in the treatment of fingertip amputations. Am Fam Physician. 2001;64(3):455–458.
  23. Okazaki M, Hasegawa H, Kano M, Kurashina R. A different method of fingertip reconstruction with the thenar flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(3):885–888; discussion 889–890. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000153221.39347.ab
  24. Rinker B. Fingertip reconstruction with the laterally based thenar flap: indications and long-term functional results. Hand (NY). 2006;1(1):2–8. doi: 10.1007/s11552-006-0001-4.
  25. Kim KS, Kim ES, Hwang JH, Lee SY. Fingertip reconstruction using the hypothenar perforator free flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66(9):1263–1270. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.05.006
  26. Kodaira S, Fukumoto K. Use of distal hypothenar perforator free flaps for pulp defects. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2020;25(1):20–25. doi: 10.1142/S2424835520500022
  27. Sassu P, Lin CH, Lin YT, Lin CH. Fourteen cases of free thenar flap: a rare indication in digital reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60(3):260–266. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31806ab39f
  28. Loréa P, Chahidi N, Marchesi S, et al. Reconstruction of fingertip defects with the neurovascular tranquilli-leali flap. J Hand Surg Br. 2006;31(3):280–284. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2005.11.007
  29. Han SK, Lee BI, Kim WK. The reverse digital artery island flap: clinical experience in 120 fingers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101(4):1006–1011; discussion 1012–1013. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199804040-00018
  30. Adani R, Busa R, Pancaldi G, Caroli A. Reverse neurovascular homodigital island flap. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;35(1):77–82. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199507000-00015
  31. Yildirim S, Avci G, Akan M, Aköz T. Complications of the reverse homodigital island flap in fingertip reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;48(6):586–592. doi: 10.1097/00000637-200206000-00004
  32. Acar MA, Güzel Y, Güleç A, et al. Reconstruction of multiple fingertip injuries with reverse flow homodigital flap. Injury. 2014;45(10):1569–1573. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.06.009
  33. Mermans JF, Franssen BB, Serroyen J, van der Hulst RR. Digital nerve injuries: a review of predictors of sensory recovery after microsurgical digital nerve repair. Hand (NY). 2012;7(3):233–241. doi: 10.1007/s11552-012-9433-1

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. Fig. 2. Allen classification of defects of the nail phalanges of the fingers

Download (83KB)
Indexing metadata
2. Fig. 3. Schematic representation of the nail phalanx defect closure with a reverse-flow homodigital island flap

Download (124KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 1. An 8-year-old female patient. Distal part avulsion of the nail phalanx of finger II of the right hand: a — soft tissue defect; b — radiographs of the finger II of the right hand upon hospital admission; c — defect closure; d — finger view 6 months after the surgery

Download (423KB)
Indexing metadata
4. Fig. 4. An 11-year-old female patient. Soft tissue avulsion of the distal phalanx of finger IV of the left hand: a — lateral oblique defect of soft tissues; b — radiographs of the finger IV of the left hand; c — finger appearance 2 months after the surgery

Download (150KB)
Indexing metadata
5. Fig. 5. A 7-year-old male patient. Soft tissue avulsion of the nail phalanx of finger III of the right hand: a — transverse defect of soft tissues; b — radiographs of finger III of the right hand; c — appearance 1 month after the surgery

Download (156KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2021 Alexandrov A.V., Smirnov A.A., Gonchruk P.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС77-54261 от 24 мая 2013 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies