THE INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF THE DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING THE SEVERITY OF SCOLIOTIC SPINAL DEFORMITY BY THE ANALYSIS OF RADIOGRAPHS.



Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Backgraund. First domestic computer program "Decision support system for determining  severity of scoliotic spinal deformity in  analysis of radiographs" was developed in 2020 and integrated into  medical base of  prosthetic and orthopedic center "Sсoliologic.ru".

Aims. To evaluate  performance of  computer program for determining  Cobb angle by comparing  obtained automated data with manual measurement data by various specialists.

Materials and methods. From  medical base of  prosthetic and orthopedic center "Sсoliologic.ru" selected 411 radiographs of  spine, which were drawn by  radiologist (BP-etalon),  orthopedic traumatologist with 5 years of experience and experience in vertebrology (OO),  orthopedic traumatologist with less than 1 year of experience and no experience in vertebrology (OB) and computer program (KP). Number and proportion of exact matches, as well as the average deviation of  results of measuring  Cobb angle of  reference data, were compared with  indicators obtained by OO, OB and KP in general, for various types of scoliosis according to  classification of M. Rigо, as well as in determining the main arc. Bland–Altman graphs were used.

Results. Exact matches of  KP with  standard were 21%, so every fifth measurement of  Cobb angle on  X-ray, calculated automatically, is identical to  standard. The highest proportion of matches with  standard is in  OO (33%), the lowest in  OB (16%). The highest accuracy of  KP was found at type E1,2  arc of 3 is 30% and 24%, respectively. Proportion of KP matches with  standard increases to 61% with an error of 3 °, 75% with an error of 5 °, and with an error of 7 °, the proportion of matches reaches 84%. At the same time,  proportion of coincidences of a non-experienced researcher increases only from 34 to 58%. When determining  magnitude of  main arc of scoliosis,  OO researcher increases its accuracy by almost 2,6 times,  KP by 2,1 times, and  OB researcher by 1,5 times.

 Conclusions. It can be concluded about  operability of  computer program,   use of which can be recommended for automated determination of Cobb angle, since it has been proven that  current algorithm of  computer program gives accuracy compared to  reference measurement, it is significantly higher than   novice orthopedic traumatologists with no experience in vertebrology.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Grigori A. Lein

Рrosthetic and orthopedic center «Scoliologic.ru»

Author for correspondence.
Email: eearzh@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7904-8688

кандидат медицинских наук, генеральный директор

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Natalia S. Nechaeva

Scoliologic.ru Limited Liability Company

Email: n.nechaeva@scoliologic.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3510-9164

MD, scientific worker, radiologist

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Mikhail O. Demchenko

Prosthetic and Orthopedic Center “Scoliologic.ru”

Email: dmo@scoliologic.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8422-8779

PhD, Cand. Sci. (Econom.)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Nikita S. Koch

North-Western Scientific and Practical Rehabilitation and Prosthetics Center «Orthetika»

Email: e.co4@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-6660-3618

врач травматолог-ортопед

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Artem G. Levykin

North-Western Scientific and Practical Rehabilitation and Prosthetics Center «Orthetika»

Email: agl@scoliologic.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-6528-4721

врач травматолог-ортопед

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Negrini S., Donzelli S., Aulisa A.G., Czaprowski D., Schreider S. et al. 2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth // Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2018; 13:3. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0145-8
  2. Cobb JR Outline for the study of scoliosis. Am Acad Orthop Surg Instr Course Lect. 1948. 5:261–275
  3. Romano M, Minozzi S, Bettany-Saltikov J, Zaina F, Chockalingam N, Kotwicki T, Maier-Hennes A, Negrini S. Exercises for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD007837. 2012. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007837.pub2 3.
  4. Negrini S, Minozzi S, Bettany-Saltikov J, Zaina F, Chockalingam N, Grivas TB, Kotwicki T, Maruyama T, Romano M, Vasiliadis ES. Braces for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010. 35(13):1285–1293. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e 3181dc48f4
  5. Langensiepen S., Semler O., Sobottke R., Fricke O., Franklin J. et al. Measuring procedures to determine the Cobb angle in idiopathic scoliosis: A systematic review // Eur Spine J 2013. 22: 2360–2371.
  6. Srinivasalu S, Modi HN, Smehta S, Suh SW, Chen T, Murun T. Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis using computer measurement of digitally acquired radiographs-intraobserver and interobserver variability. Asian Spine J. 2008. 2(2):90–93. doi:10.4184/ asj.2008.2.2.90
  7. Tanure MC, Pinheiro AP, Oliveira AS. Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods. Spine J. 2010. 10(9):769–774. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.020
  8. Corona J, Sanders JO, Luhmann SJ, Diab M, Vitale MG. Reliability of radiographic measures for infantile idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012. 94(12):e861–e868. doi:10.2106/ JBJS.K.00311
  9. Allen S, Parent E, Khorasani M, Hill DL, Lou E, Raso JV. Validity and reliability of active shape models for the estimation of cobb angle in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Digit Imaging. 2008. 21(2):208–218. doi: 10.1007/s10278-007-9026-7
  10. Zhang J, Lou E, Hill DL, Raso JV, Wang Y, Le LH, Shi X. Computer-aided assessment of scoliosis on posteroanterior radiographs. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2010. 48(2):185–195. doi:10.1007/ s11517-009-0556-7
  11. Shaw M, Adam CJ, Izatt MT, Licina P, Askin GN (2012) Use of the iPhone for Cobb angle measurement in scoliosis. Eur Spine J 21(6):1062–1068. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2059-0.
  12. Qiao J, Liu Z, Xu L, Wu T, Zheng X, Zhu Z, Zhu F, Qian B, Qiu Y (2012) Reliability analysis of a smartphone-aided measurement method for the Cobb angle of scol15. Rigo M, Villagrasa M, Gallo D. A specific scoliosis classification correlating with brace treatment: description and reliability. Scoliosis. 2010; 5:1. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-5-1.
  13. Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. The Statistician. 1983. 32 (3): 307-317. doi: 10.2307/2987937. JSTOR 2987937.
  14. Bland JM, Altman DG. "Measuring agreement in method comparison studies". Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 1999. 8 (2): 135-60. doi: 10.1177/096228029900800204.
  15. Федотова З.И., Першин А.А. Обзор методов исследования деформации туловища и индексов деформации при сколиозе // Физическая и реабилитационная медицина. – 2020. – Т. 2. – № 2. – С. 35-50. doi: 10.26211/2658-4522-2020-2-2-35-50 [Fedotova Z.I., Pershin A.A. A Review of the Trunk Surface Metrics Used as Scoliosis and Other Deformities Evaluation Indices. Physiсal and Rehabilitation Medicine; vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 35-50. (In Russian). doi: 10.26211/2658-4522-2020-2-2-35-50
  16. Cassar-Pullicino VN, Eisenstein SM: Imaging scoliosis: what, why and how? Clin Radiol. 2002, 57: 543 doi: 10.1053/crad.2001.0909.
  17. iosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 25(4):E88–E92. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182463964.
  18. Srinivasalu S, Modi H, SMehta S, Suh S–W, Chen T, Murun T: Cobb Angle Measurement of Scoliosis Using Computer Measurement of Digitally Acquired Radiographs– Intraobserver and Interobserver Variability. Asian Spine Journal. 2008, 2 (2): 90–93.
  19. Pruijs J.E., Hageman M.A., Keessen W. et al. Variation in Cobb Angle Measurements in Scoliosis // Skeletal Radiology. 1994. Vol. 23 (7). P. 517—520.
  20. Morrissy R. T., Goldsmith G. S., Hall E. C. et al. Measurement of the Cobb Angle on Radiographs of Patients Who Have Scoliosis: Evaluation of Intrinsic Error //J Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1990. Vol.72 (3). P.320-327. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199072030-0000
  21. Beauchamp M., Labelle H., Grimard G. et al. Diurnal Variation of Cobb Angle Measurement in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993. Vol. 18 (12). P. 1581—1583. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199309000-00002

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) Эко-Вектор



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС77-54261 от 24 мая 2013 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies