THE INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF THE DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING THE SEVERITY OF SCOLIOTIC SPINAL DEFORMITY BY THE ANALYSIS OF RADIOGRAPHS.
- Authors: Lein G.A.1, Nechaeva N.S.2, Demchenko M.O.3, Koch N.S.4, Levykin A.G.4
-
Affiliations:
- Рrosthetic and orthopedic center «Scoliologic.ru»
- Scoliologic.ru Limited Liability Company
- Prosthetic and Orthopedic Center “Scoliologic.ru”
- North-Western Scientific and Practical Rehabilitation and Prosthetics Center «Orthetika»
- Section: Clinical studies
- Submitted: 31.03.2024
- Accepted: 24.07.2024
- Published: 24.09.2024
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/turner/article/view/629748
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/PTORS629748
- ID: 629748
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Backgraund. First domestic computer program "Decision support system for determining severity of scoliotic spinal deformity in analysis of radiographs" was developed in 2020 and integrated into medical base of prosthetic and orthopedic center "Sсoliologic.ru".
Aims. To evaluate performance of computer program for determining Cobb angle by comparing obtained automated data with manual measurement data by various specialists.
Materials and methods. From medical base of prosthetic and orthopedic center "Sсoliologic.ru" selected 411 radiographs of spine, which were drawn by radiologist (BP-etalon), orthopedic traumatologist with 5 years of experience and experience in vertebrology (OO), orthopedic traumatologist with less than 1 year of experience and no experience in vertebrology (OB) and computer program (KP). Number and proportion of exact matches, as well as the average deviation of results of measuring Cobb angle of reference data, were compared with indicators obtained by OO, OB and KP in general, for various types of scoliosis according to classification of M. Rigо, as well as in determining the main arc. Bland–Altman graphs were used.
Results. Exact matches of KP with standard were 21%, so every fifth measurement of Cobb angle on X-ray, calculated automatically, is identical to standard. The highest proportion of matches with standard is in OO (33%), the lowest in OB (16%). The highest accuracy of KP was found at type E1,2 arc of 3 is 30% and 24%, respectively. Proportion of KP matches with standard increases to 61% with an error of 3 °, 75% with an error of 5 °, and with an error of 7 °, the proportion of matches reaches 84%. At the same time, proportion of coincidences of a non-experienced researcher increases only from 34 to 58%. When determining magnitude of main arc of scoliosis, OO researcher increases its accuracy by almost 2,6 times, KP by 2,1 times, and OB researcher by 1,5 times.
Conclusions. It can be concluded about operability of computer program, use of which can be recommended for automated determination of Cobb angle, since it has been proven that current algorithm of computer program gives accuracy compared to reference measurement, it is significantly higher than novice orthopedic traumatologists with no experience in vertebrology.
Full Text
About the authors
Grigori A. Lein
Рrosthetic and orthopedic center «Scoliologic.ru»
Author for correspondence.
Email: eearzh@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7904-8688
кандидат медицинских наук, генеральный директор
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgNatalia S. Nechaeva
Scoliologic.ru Limited Liability Company
Email: n.nechaeva@scoliologic.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3510-9164
MD, scientific worker, radiologist
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgMikhail O. Demchenko
Prosthetic and Orthopedic Center “Scoliologic.ru”
Email: dmo@scoliologic.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8422-8779
PhD, Cand. Sci. (Econom.)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgNikita S. Koch
North-Western Scientific and Practical Rehabilitation and Prosthetics Center «Orthetika»
Email: e.co4@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-6660-3618
врач травматолог-ортопед
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgArtem G. Levykin
North-Western Scientific and Practical Rehabilitation and Prosthetics Center «Orthetika»
Email: agl@scoliologic.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-6528-4721
врач травматолог-ортопед
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- Negrini S., Donzelli S., Aulisa A.G., Czaprowski D., Schreider S. et al. 2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth // Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2018; 13:3. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0145-8
- Cobb JR Outline for the study of scoliosis. Am Acad Orthop Surg Instr Course Lect. 1948. 5:261–275
- Romano M, Minozzi S, Bettany-Saltikov J, Zaina F, Chockalingam N, Kotwicki T, Maier-Hennes A, Negrini S. Exercises for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD007837. 2012. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007837.pub2 3.
- Negrini S, Minozzi S, Bettany-Saltikov J, Zaina F, Chockalingam N, Grivas TB, Kotwicki T, Maruyama T, Romano M, Vasiliadis ES. Braces for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010. 35(13):1285–1293. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e 3181dc48f4
- Langensiepen S., Semler O., Sobottke R., Fricke O., Franklin J. et al. Measuring procedures to determine the Cobb angle in idiopathic scoliosis: A systematic review // Eur Spine J 2013. 22: 2360–2371.
- Srinivasalu S, Modi HN, Smehta S, Suh SW, Chen T, Murun T. Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis using computer measurement of digitally acquired radiographs-intraobserver and interobserver variability. Asian Spine J. 2008. 2(2):90–93. doi:10.4184/ asj.2008.2.2.90
- Tanure MC, Pinheiro AP, Oliveira AS. Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods. Spine J. 2010. 10(9):769–774. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.020
- Corona J, Sanders JO, Luhmann SJ, Diab M, Vitale MG. Reliability of radiographic measures for infantile idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012. 94(12):e861–e868. doi:10.2106/ JBJS.K.00311
- Allen S, Parent E, Khorasani M, Hill DL, Lou E, Raso JV. Validity and reliability of active shape models for the estimation of cobb angle in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Digit Imaging. 2008. 21(2):208–218. doi: 10.1007/s10278-007-9026-7
- Zhang J, Lou E, Hill DL, Raso JV, Wang Y, Le LH, Shi X. Computer-aided assessment of scoliosis on posteroanterior radiographs. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2010. 48(2):185–195. doi:10.1007/ s11517-009-0556-7
- Shaw M, Adam CJ, Izatt MT, Licina P, Askin GN (2012) Use of the iPhone for Cobb angle measurement in scoliosis. Eur Spine J 21(6):1062–1068. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2059-0.
- Qiao J, Liu Z, Xu L, Wu T, Zheng X, Zhu Z, Zhu F, Qian B, Qiu Y (2012) Reliability analysis of a smartphone-aided measurement method for the Cobb angle of scol15. Rigo M, Villagrasa M, Gallo D. A specific scoliosis classification correlating with brace treatment: description and reliability. Scoliosis. 2010; 5:1. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-5-1.
- Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. The Statistician. 1983. 32 (3): 307-317. doi: 10.2307/2987937. JSTOR 2987937.
- Bland JM, Altman DG. "Measuring agreement in method comparison studies". Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 1999. 8 (2): 135-60. doi: 10.1177/096228029900800204.
- Федотова З.И., Першин А.А. Обзор методов исследования деформации туловища и индексов деформации при сколиозе // Физическая и реабилитационная медицина. – 2020. – Т. 2. – № 2. – С. 35-50. doi: 10.26211/2658-4522-2020-2-2-35-50 [Fedotova Z.I., Pershin A.A. A Review of the Trunk Surface Metrics Used as Scoliosis and Other Deformities Evaluation Indices. Physiсal and Rehabilitation Medicine; vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 35-50. (In Russian). doi: 10.26211/2658-4522-2020-2-2-35-50
- Cassar-Pullicino VN, Eisenstein SM: Imaging scoliosis: what, why and how? Clin Radiol. 2002, 57: 543 doi: 10.1053/crad.2001.0909.
- iosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 25(4):E88–E92. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182463964.
- Srinivasalu S, Modi H, SMehta S, Suh S–W, Chen T, Murun T: Cobb Angle Measurement of Scoliosis Using Computer Measurement of Digitally Acquired Radiographs– Intraobserver and Interobserver Variability. Asian Spine Journal. 2008, 2 (2): 90–93.
- Pruijs J.E., Hageman M.A., Keessen W. et al. Variation in Cobb Angle Measurements in Scoliosis // Skeletal Radiology. 1994. Vol. 23 (7). P. 517—520.
- Morrissy R. T., Goldsmith G. S., Hall E. C. et al. Measurement of the Cobb Angle on Radiographs of Patients Who Have Scoliosis: Evaluation of Intrinsic Error //J Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1990. Vol.72 (3). P.320-327. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199072030-0000
- Beauchamp M., Labelle H., Grimard G. et al. Diurnal Variation of Cobb Angle Measurement in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993. Vol. 18 (12). P. 1581—1583. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199309000-00002