Chronobiological approach to the treatment of patients with benign prostate hyperplasia and chronic prostatitis: results of a morphological examination

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

MATERIALS AND METHODS: 60 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and category II chronic prostatitis (NIH, 1995) were examined. The average age of the patients was 60.5 ± 5.5 years. The patients were divided into two groups of 30 people each. The comparison group (GC) included patients who received standard therapy with drugs from the group of alpha-blockers and fluoroquinolones. The main group (MG) consisted of patients who received standard therapy in combination with physiotherapy sessions with the device “SMART-PROST”, which were carried out in the acrophase of the chronorhythm. After the end of the course of therapy all patients underwent transurethral resection of the prostate, after which a morphological and morphometric (immunohistochemical) study of the obtained material was carried out.

RESULTS: According to the results of the morphological and morphometric examination of the histological material in patients of the CG and MG, statistically significant differences were revealed in all the studied parameters, which testify to the persistence of signs of the inflammatory process in the CG, while in the MG, the severity of inflammation was significantly lower.

CONCLUSION: According to the results of the study, personalized complex therapy of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia in combination with chronic prostatitis using a combined physiotherapeutic effect of the SMART-PROST device, taking into account the individual chronobiological characteristics of patients, allows to more effectively arrest the inflammatory process in the prostate tissue, which can lead to a decrease in the number of postoperative complications. However, the last statement requires further more detailed study.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Andrey V. Kuzmenko

Burdenko Voronezh State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: kuzmenkoav09@yandex.ru
SPIN-code: 6981-7490
Scopus Author ID: 7003998310
http://vrngmu.ru/academy/personnel/978/

Dr. Sci. (Med), Professor, Head of the Urology Department

Russian Federation, 10, Studencheskaya str., Voronezh, 394036

Timur A. Gyaurgiev

Burdenko Voronezh State Medical University

Email: tima001100@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6261-3641
SPIN-code: 8050-7190

Cand. Sci. (Med), Associate Professor of the Urology Department

Russian Federation, 10, Studencheskaya str., Voronezh, 394036

Ivan I. Barannikov

Burdenko Voronezh State Medical University

Email: vanchyck@yandex.ru

Postgraduate student, Urology Department

Russian Federation, 10, Studencheskaya str., Voronezh, 394036

Boris E. Leybovich

Private Healthcare Institution "Clinical Hospital "Russian Railways-Medicine" of the city of Voronezh"

Email: bel.46@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6673-1859
SPIN-code: 4206-4245

Head of thePathological Department of the Stationary Unit No. 1 at the Voronezh-1 Station

Russian Federation, 2, Zdorovye lane,Voronezh, 394036

References

  1. Alyaev YuG, Glybochko PV, Pushkar’ DYu [editors]. Urologiya. Rossiiskie klinicheskie rekomendatsii. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2018. 480 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Gravas S, Cornu JN, Gacci M, et al. Management of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) [Internet]. EAUGuideline. 2020 [cited 01.06.2021]. Available from: https: // uroweb.org/guideline/treatment-of-non-neurogenic-male-luts.
  3. Roehrborn CG. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Etiology, Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, and Natural History. Campbell-Walsh. Urology, 10th edition. 2012. P. 2570–2610. doi: 10.1016/B978-1-4160-6911-9.00091-8
  4. Kuz’menko AV, Kuz’menko VV, Gyaurgiev TA. Combination drug therapy in patients with BPH. Urologiia. 2018;(1):101–105. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18565/urology.2018.1.101-105
  5. Schaeffer AJ. Classification (Traditional and National Institutes of Health) and Demographics of Prostatitis. Urology. 2002;60(6):5–6. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02292-6
  6. Nickel J. Prostatitis. CUA Guidelines. Can Urol Assoc J. 2011;5(5):306–315. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.11211
  7. Rees J, Abrahams M, Doble A, Cooper A. Prostatitis Expert Reference Group (PERG). Diagnosis and treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis and chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a consensus guideline. BJU Int. 2015;116(4):509–525. doi: 10.1111/bju.13101
  8. Kudryavcev YuV, Sivkov AV. Morphological alteration in benign prostatic hyperplasia tissue. Experimental & clinical urology. 2010;(1):18–22. (In Russ.)
  9. Bartoletti R, Cai T, Mondaini N, et al. Prevalence, incidence estimation, risk factors and characterization of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome in urological hospital outpatients in Italy: results of a multicenter case-control observational study. J Urol. 2007;178(6):2411–2415. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.046
  10. Huang XH, Qin B, Liang YW. LUTS in BPH patients with histological prostatitis before and after transurethral resection of the prostate. Zhonghua Nan KeXue. 2013;19(1):35–39. (In Chinese).
  11. Krsmanovic A, Tripp D, Nickel J, et al. Psychosocial mechanisms of the pain and quality of life relationship for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). Can Urol Assoc J. 2014;8(11–12):403–408. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2179
  12. Asgari SA, Mohammadi M. The role of intraprostatic inflammation in the acute urinary retention. Int J Prev Med. 2011;2(1):28–31.
  13. Logvinov LA. Kliniko-morfologicheskie kharakteristiki khronicheskogo prostatita [dissertation]. Moscow, 2008. (In Russ.)
  14. Vaupel P, Kelleher DK. Blood flow and oxygenation status of prostate cancers. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;765:299–305. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4989-8_42
  15. Mustafaev AT, Kyzlasov PS, Dianov MP, et al. Surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: the past and the present. Urologicheskie vedomosti. 2019;9(1):47–56. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/uroved9147-56
  16. Al’-Shukri SKh, Tkachuk VN, Gorbachev AG, et al. Urodinamicheskie issledovaniya v diagnostike infravezikal’noi obstruktsii u muzhchin. Urologiya i nefrologiya. 1998;(6):27–29. (In Russ.)
  17. Kuz’menko AV, Kuz’menko VV, Gyaurgiev TA. The efficacy of fesoterodine in patients after transurethral resection of the prostate. Urologiia. 2019;(1):52–55. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18565/urology.2019.1.52-55
  18. Martov AG, Merinov DS, Kornienko SI, et al. Posleoperatsionnye urologicheskie oslozhneniya transuretral’nykh ehlektrokhirurgicheskikh vmeshatel’stv na predstatel’noi zheleze po povodu adenomy. Urologiia. 2006;(2):25–31. (In Russ.)
  19. Kuzmenko AV, Kuzmenko VV, Gyaurgiev TA, Barannikov II. Chronobiological status of patients with chronic prostatitis and prostate adenoma. System analysis and management in biomedical systems. 2017;16(3):513–516. (In Russ.)
  20. Lanina VA, Khimicheva MN, Kuz’menko VV, et al. Khronobiologicheskie osobennosti bol’nykh s khronicheskim prostatitom pri adenome prostaty. Tendentsii razvitiya nauki i obrazovaniya. 2020;(66–1):111–114. (In Russ.)
  21. Barannikov II, Kuzmenko AV, Gyaurgiev TA, Kuzmenko VV. Evaluation of the effectiveness of personalized complex therapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and chronic prostatitis. Urology reports (St. Petersburg). 2021;11(1):39–48. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/uroved56773
  22. Al-Shukri SKh, Gorbachev AG, Borovets SYu, et al. Prostatilen treatment of prostatic adenoma. Urologiia. 2006;(6):22–25. (In Russ.)
  23. Bokov AI, Zabelin MV, Kyzlasov PS. Efficiency of physiotherapy treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis. Urologicheskie vedomosti. 2016;6(1):10–15. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/uroved6110-15.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Micrograph of the preparation. Chronic prostatitis, inflammatory infiltrate in the stroma, hematoxylin-eosin staining, ×100 (а) and ×200 (b)

Download (258KB)
3. Fig. 2. Micrograph of the preparation. Chronic prostatitis, the formation of a lymphoid follicle, hematoxylin-eosin staining, ×100 (а) and ×200 (b)

Download (313KB)
4. Fig. 3. Micrograph of the preparation. Van Gieson’s picrofuchsin staining of collagen fibers, ×20

Download (160KB)
5. Fig. 4. Micrograph of the area of fibrosis. Split into three channels: red, green, blue

Download (203KB)
6. Fig. 5. Micrograph of a sample. Collagen fibers isolated with the “Threshold” tool

Download (310KB)
7. Fig. 7. Immunohistochemical study of plasma cells, reaction with CD138, ×200: a – plasma cells in the stroma; b – plasma cells in the stroma between the glands of the prostate; c – plasma cells in the lymphoid follicle

Download (163KB)
8. Fig. 6. Micrograph of a sample. Prostate. Measurement of vessel diameters. Hematoxylin-eosin staining, ×200

Download (254KB)

Copyright (c) 2021 Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ №ФС77-65570 от 04 мая 2016 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies