Current aspects of surgical methods for removal of bladder stones in patients with bladder outlet obstruction

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The prevalence of bladder stones is quite high, which represents a significant medical and social problem. Despite significant progress in the field of medicine, there are currently no generally accepted standards for the treatment of patients with cystolithiasis. This review presents an analysis of literature sources using the PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, eLibrary, Cyberleninka databases, dedicated to modern aspects of the treatment of patients with bladder stones and bladder outlet obstruction. The features, advantages and disadvantages of various surgical methods for treating such patients are described in detail. It has been shown that despite the fact that transurethral cystolithotripsy with litholapaxy is the most common surgical option, modern medicine offers alternative methods of surgical treatment. It is emphasized that to achieve the greatest effectiveness of treatment, the correct choice of surgical method is necessary, based on the individual characteristics of the patient. It was noted that there is a need to optimize the treatment algorithm for patients with bladder stones and bladder outlet obstruction.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Toirkhon H. Nazarov

North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Email: Tair-Nazarov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9644-720X
SPIN-code: 9585-5865

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

 

Russian Federation, 41, Kirochnaya st., Saint Petersburg, 191015

Dilmurod N. Madumarov

North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Author for correspondence.
Email: dima_96.kg@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1469-2023
Russian Federation, 41, Kirochnaya st., Saint Petersburg, 191015

References

  1. Dutov VV, Gal’ko AA, Rumyantsev AA. Features of diagnosis and treatment of urolithiasis combined with infravesical obstruction in elderly and elderly patients. RMJ. 2014;22(29):2116–2119. EDN: TJCEJL
  2. Skolarikos A, Jung H, Neisius A, et al. EAU Guideline on Urolithiasis. European Association of Urology, 2023 [Internet]. Available at: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis
  3. Yoshida S, Takazawa R, Uchida Y, et al. The significance of intraoperative renal pelvic urine and stone cultures for patients at a high risk of post-ureteroscopy systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Urolithiasis. 2019;47(6):533–540. doi: 10.1007/s00240-019-01112-6
  4. Schwartz BF, Stoller ML. The vesical calculus. Urol Clin North Am. 2000;27(2):333–346. doi: 10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70262-7
  5. Hiremath AC, Shivakumar KS. Cystolitholapaxy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in a case of multiple urinary bladder calculi and vault prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;243:12–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.10.002
  6. Kum F, Mahmalji W, Hale J, et al. Do stones still kill? An analysis of death from stone disease 1999–2013 in England and Wales. BJU Int. 2016;118(1):140–144. doi: 10.1111/bju.13409
  7. Halstead SB. Epidemiology of bladder stone of children: precipitating events. Urolithiasis. 2016;44(2):101–108. doi: 10.1007/s00240–015–0835–8
  8. Maresca G, Mc Clinton S, Swami S, et al. Do men with bladder stones benefit from treatment of benign prostatic obstruction? BJU Int. 2022;130(5):619–627. doi: 10.1111/bju.15761
  9. Abufaraj M, Al Karmi J, Yang L. Prevalence and trends of urolithiasis among adults. Curr Opin Urol. 2022;32(4):425–432. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000994
  10. Rudnicka E, Napierała P, Podfigurna A, et al. The World Health Organization (WHO) approach to healthy ageing. Maturitas. 2020;139:6–11. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.05.018
  11. Nazarov TH, Nikolaev VA, Rychkov IV, et al. Physico-biochemical parameters of urine and blood and biominerology of urinary bladder stones in patients with bladder outlet obstruction. Urology reports (St. Petersburg). 2021;11(4):325–334. EDN: YCHEBW doi: 10.17816/uroved83128
  12. Novikov A, Nazarov T, Startsev VY. Epidemiology of stone disease in the Russian federation and post-soviet era. In: Talati JJ, Tiselius H-G, Albala DM, Ye Z. Urolithiasis: Basic science and clinical practice. London: Springer, 2012. P. 97–105. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471-4387-1_13
  13. Gravas S, Gacci M, Gratzke C, et al. Summary paper on the 2023 European Association of Urology guidelines on the management of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms. Eur Urol. 2023;84(2):207–222. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.008
  14. Krambeck AE, Handa SE, Lingeman JE. Experience with more than 1,000 holmium laser prostate enucleations for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2010;183(3):1105–1109. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.034
  15. Nazarov TN. Physicochemical basis of lithogenic properties of urine. Urologiia. 2007;(5):75–78. EDN: ICEJPL
  16. Nazarov TKh, Akhmedov MA, Stecik EO, et al. The value of some physicochemical and biochemical factors of urine predisposingto recurrent urolithiasis. Preventive and clinical medicine. 2015;(2):65–71. EDN: VKRKIX
  17. Lee H-Y, Wang C-S, Juan Y-S. Detrusor underactivity in men with bladder outlet obstruction. Biomedicines. 2022;10(11):2954. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10112954
  18. Aune D, Mahamat-Saleh Y, Norat T, Riboli E. Body fatness, diabetes, physical activity and risk of kidney stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33(11):1033–1047. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0426-4
  19. McCarthy J-P, Skinner TAA, Norman RW. Urolithiasis in the elderly. Can J Urol. 2011;18(3):5717–5720.
  20. Leslie SW, Sajjad H, Murphy PB. Bladder stones. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2023.
  21. Lerner LB, McVary KT, Barry MJ, et al. Management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia: AUA guideline part II — surgical evaluation and treatment. J Urol. 2021;206(4):818–826. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002184
  22. NICE. Lower urinary tract symptoms in men: management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), 2015.
  23. Alyaev YuG, Glybochko PV, Pushkar’ DYu, editors. Urology. Russian clinical recommendations. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2015. 345 p. (In Russ.)
  24. Jia Q, Jin T, Wang K, et al. Comparison of 2 kinds of methods for the treatment of bladder calculi. Urology. 2018;114:233–235. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.01.015
  25. Gou L, Wang Z, Zhou Y, Zheng X. Comparison of nephroscopy and cystoscopy used in the treatment of bladder stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Surg. 2021;21(1):448. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01461-3
  26. Donaldson JF, Ruhayel Y, Skolarikos A, et al. Treatment of bladder stones in adults and children: A systematic review and meta-analysis on behalf of the European Association of Urology urolithiasis guideline panel. Eur Urol. 2019;76(3):352–367. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.06.018
  27. Nazarov TKh, Komyakov BK, Rychkov IV, et al. Role of biomarkers of acute kidney damage during lithotripsy of high-density stones. Urologiia. 2019;(1):23–27. EDN: FKKLMH doi: 10.18565/urology.2019.1.23–27
  28. Philippou P, Volanis D, Kariotis I, et al. Prospective comparative study of endoscopic management of bladder lithiasis: is prostate surgery a necessary adjunct? Urology. 2011;78(1):43–47. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.10.035
  29. Hasan AM, AbdelRazek M, Ali AF, et al. Synchronous transurethral cystolitholapaxy and TURP reveals better results than transurethral cystolitholapaxy plus medical therapy for BPH: a randomized prospective study on 100 patients with concomitant urinary bladder stone(s) and BPH. World J Urol. 2022;40(2):483–487. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03882-4
  30. Ali AI, Fathelbab TK, Abdelhamid AM, et al. Transurethral pneumatic cystolithotripsy: A novel approach. J Endourol. 2016;30(6): 671–673. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0862
  31. Nazarov TKh, Rychkov IV, Nikolaev VA, et al. Historical and modern methods of treatment of patients with bladder stones with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Andrology and genital surgery. 2021;22(2): 13–23. EDN: BWBKEG doi: 10.17650/1726-9784-2021-22-2-13-23
  32. Nazarov TKh, Rychkov IV, Lebedev DG, Trubnikova KE. Comparative analysis of data from a dual-energy computer tomograph and the results of a mineralogical research of urinary stones. Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2018;(2):54–58. EDN: RUQGDJ doi: 10.22328/2079-5343-2018-9-2-54-58
  33. D’Souza N, Verma A. Holmium laser cystolithotripsy under local anaesthesia: Our experience. Arab J Urol. 2016;14(3):203–206. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2016.06.002
  34. Lv J, Wang N, Zhu Y, et al. A meta-analysis and systematic review of holmium laser treatment of bladder stones. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10(8):3465–3475. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-563
  35. Tangpaitoon T, Marien T, Kadihasanoglu M, et al. Does cystolitholapaxy at the time of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate affect outcomes? Urology. 2017;99:192–196. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.08.042
  36. Li A, Ji C, Wang H, et al. Transurethral cystolitholapaxy with the AH-1 stone removal system for the treatment of bladder stones of variable size. BMC Urol. 2015;15(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0003-z
  37. Ercil H, Altunkol A, Alma E, et al. Comparison of Ho: Yag laser and pneumatic lithotripsy combined with transurethral prostatectomy in high burden bladder stones with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Asian J Surg. 2016;39(4):238–242. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2015.03.010
  38. Ali M, Hashem A, Helmy TE, et al. Shock wave lithotripsy versus endoscopic cystolitholapaxy in the management of patients presenting with calcular acute urinary retention: a randomised controlled trial. World J Urol. 2019;37(5):879–884. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2434-0
  39. Olaoluwa HA, Polenakovik H, Hakim J. The andes of bladder stones: Gigantic bladder calculi in a patient with bladder outlet obstruction and hyperparathyroidism. Urol Case Rep. 2023;48:102416. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2023.102416
  40. Liu G, Deng Y, Zhang S, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotripsy: An effective treatment for bladder stones with urethral strictures. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2016;9:19907.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Eco-Vector


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ №ФС77-65570 от 04 мая 2016 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies