Intraperitoneal perforations of the bladder in pediatric urological practice. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of various therapeutic and diagnostic approaches

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intraperitoneal damage to the bladder in the pediatric population is a rare phenomenon. Publications describe small series of observations, generalizing studies are isolated. There are no uniform diagnostic algorithms and tactics of patient management, a large number of diagnostic and tactical errors.

AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the possibilities of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of patients under 18 years of age with intraperitoneal bladder injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The work was based on the results of treatment of 16 patients with intraperitoneal perforations of the bladder under the age of 18, who were in the Regional Pediatric Clinical Hospital (Yaroslavl) and Vologda Regional Children’s Hospital No.2 (Cherepovets) for the period 2003–2023. In 10 cases, the perforations were traumatic in nature, in 6 — iatrogenic in nature.

RESULTS: Surgical treatment was performed with traditional access in 6 cases, laparoscopic — in 10. The groups of patients are similar in clinical parameters. Laparotomic surgical intervention was performed from the lower median access (n = 4) and Pfanenstiel access (n = 2); with laparoscopic intervention (n = 10), a trocar arrangement with umbilical access for the camera and two accesses in the iliac regions for instruments was used. Laparoscopic surgery was accompanied by less blood loss. The duration of bladder drainage with laparoscopic intervention is reduced by 1.7 days. Laparoscopic surgery in 1 case was accompanied by the installation of a cystostomy, in the rest drainage was carried out by catheterization of the bladder. Open surgery was mainly completed by performing a cystostomy or combined drainage with a cystostomy and a urethral catheter. The duration of hospitalization is significantly shorter after laparoscopic intervention. In the first 10 years (2002–2012) 5 open operations and 2 laparoscopic operations were performed, and in the second 10 years (2013–2023) — 8 laparoscopic and one open operations. The tactics regarding bladder drainage are changing: in the first analyzed period, drainage was carried out mainly by cystostomy (n = 5) and less often by urethral catheter (n = 2), subsequently — mainly by urethral catheter (n = 7), less often by cystostomy (n = 1) or by simultaneous drainage by stoma and catheter (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic suturing is the method of choice in all cases of isolated intraperitoneal perforations of the bladder and in most combined injuries. Indications for open intervention are combined abdominal injuries, active intra-abdominal bleeding. The urethral catheter has advantages over cystostomy.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Dmitry N. Shchedrov

Yaroslavl State Medical University; Regional Pediatric Clinical Hospital

Email: shedrov.dmitry@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0686-0445
SPIN-code: 7354-7379

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Yaroslavl; Yaroslavl

Igor S. Shormanov

Yaroslavl State Medical University

Email: i-s-shormanov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2062-0421
SPIN-code: 7772-8420
Scopus Author ID: 6507085029

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

                   

Russian Federation, Yaroslavl

Aleksei A. Logval

Vologda Regional Children’s Hospital No. 2

Email: alex.logval@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3797-1156
Russian Federation, Cherepovets

Evgeny V. Morozov

Regional Pediatric Clinical Hospital

Email: wasker93@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3451-5494
SPIN-code: 8824-5330
Scopus Author ID: 57217475951

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Yaroslavl

Daria Yu. Garova

Regional Pediatric Clinical Hospital; Central City Hospital

Email: dar.garova@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4457-9694
SPIN-code: 5789-8889
Russian Federation, Yaroslavl; Yaroslavl

Natalia A. Sidorova

Yaroslavl State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: nsidorova775@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-3624-8639
Russian Federation, Yaroslavl

References

  1. Kim B, Roberts M. Laparoscopic repair of traumatic intraperitoneal bladder rupture: Case report and review of the literature. Can Urol Assoc J. 2012;6(6):E270–E273. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.11237
  2. Maheshwari PN, Bhandarkar DS, Shah RS. Laparoscopic repair of idiopathic perforation of urinary bladder. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2005;15(4):246–248. doi: 10.1097/01.sle.0000174569.89172.a7
  3. Deibert CM, Glassberg KI, Spencer BA. Repair of pediatric bladder rupture improves survival: results from the National Trauma Data Bank. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47(9):1677–1681. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.02.012
  4. Flancbaum L, Morgan AS, Fleisher M, Cox EF. Blunt bladder trauma: manifestation of severe injury. Urology. 1988;31(3):220–222. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(88)90144-6
  5. Allazov SA, Khurramov BM, Gafarov RT. Traditional and minimally invasive methods of diagnosis and treatment of bladder injuries (literature review). Issues of science and education. 2020;12(96): 58–72. (In Russ.) doi: 10.24411/2542-081Х-2020-11201
  6. Nidal A, Jabbar JA, Abboudi YH. Urinary bladder perforation due to foley catheter: A case report and review of literature. Cureus. 2022;14(12): e32887. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32887
  7. Spees EK, Mara CO, Murphy JB, et al. Unsuspected intraperitoneal perforation of the urinary bladder as an iatrogenic disorder. Surgery. 1981;89(2):224–231.
  8. Bergeron E, Lewinshtein D, Bure L, Vallee C. Pneumoperitoneum and peritonitis secondary to perforation of an infected bladder. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2021;81:105783. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.105783
  9. Shingaki K, Abe T, Ameda T, Nakamura T. Intraperitoneal rupture of the urinary bladder mimics an intra-abdominal hemorrhage: A case report. Cureus. 202214(8):e28275. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28275
  10. Parra RO. Laparoscopic repair of intraperitoneal bladder perforation. J Urol. 1994;151(4):1003–1005. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35150-9
  11. Roos R, Makhadi S. Slow down with that full bladder: A case report describing an intraperitoneal bladder rupture repaired laparoscopically. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2021;82:105901. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.105901
  12. Kim FJ, Chammas MFJr, Gewehr EV, et al. Laparoscopic management of intraperitoneal bladder rupture secondary to blunt abdominal trauma using intracorporeal single layer suturing technique. J Trauma. 2008;65(1):234–236. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318169279e
  13. Osman Y, El-Tabey N, Mohsen T, El-Sherbiny M. Nonoperative treatment of isolated posttraumatic intraperitoneal bladder rupture in children-is it justified? J Urol. 2005;173(3):955–957. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000152220.31603.dc
  14. Isakov MN, Mikhailikov TG, Yartsev PA. Comparison of surgical treatment of bladder rupture. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2020;13(5):86–90. (In Russ.) doi: 10.29188/2222-8543-2020-13-5-86-90
  15. Rashidov MM, Boimuradov SH. The role of videolaparoscopy in the diagnostics and treatment of urinary bladder injuries. Vestnik Ehkstrennoi Meditsiny. 2017; X(2):28–30.
  16. Deshpande AV, Michail P, Gera P. Laparoscopic repair of intra-abdominal bladder perforation in preschool children. J Minim Access Surg. 2017;13(1):63–65. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.181762
  17. Marchand TD, Сuada RH, Ricchiuti DJ. Laparoscopic repair of a traumatic bladder rupture. JSLS. 2012;16(1):155–158. doi: 10.4293/108680812X13291597716546
  18. Khubutiya MSH, Yartsev PA, Ermolov AS, et al. Emergency laparoscopic surgery. Russian Sklifosovsky Journal Of Emergency Medical Care. 2011;(1):36–39.
  19. Kapoor RM. Two-layer laparoscopic repair of intraperitoneal bladder rupture in blunt abdominal trauma: a case report with literature review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22(4): e204–e205. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31824ea67e
  20. Wirth GJ, Peter R, Poletti PA, Iselin CE. Advances in the management of blunt traumatic bladder rupture: experience with 36 cases. BJU Int. 2010;106(9):1344–1349. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09377.x
  21. Davidov MI, Gerner AO, Nikonova OE. An algorithm for diagnostics and treatment of intraperitoneal rupture of the bladder. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2016;(4):116–121. (In Russ.)
  22. Shah А, Shah А. Intraperitoneal bladder rupture in a 1 year old: A very unusual accident. Journal of Minimal Access Surgery. 2022;18(4):603–605. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_287_21
  23. P’yankova OB, Gerner AO, Zinets SI. The clinical experience of laparoscopic suturing of intraperitoneal rhexes of urinary bladder of differen genesis. Medical Almanac. 2012;2(21):176–178.
  24. Mulkey APJr, Witherington R. Conservative management of vesical rupture. Urology. 1974;4(4):426–430. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(74)90012-0
  25. Richardson JRJr, Leadbetter GWJr. Non-operative treatment of the ruptured bladder. J Urol. 1975;114(2):213–216. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)66988-x
  26. Zhan C, Maria PP, Dym RJ. Intraperitoneal urinary bladder perforation with pneumoperitoneum in association with indwelling Foley catheter diagnosed in emergency department. J Emerg Med. 2017;53(5):e93–e96. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.06.006
  27. Martin J, Convie L, Mark D, McClure M. An unusual cause of abdominal distension: intraperitoneal bladder perforation secondary to intermittent self-catheterisation. BMJ Case Rep. 2015;2015: bcr2014207097. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2014-207097
  28. Cottam D, Gorecki PJ, Curvelo M, Shaftan GW. Laparoscopic repair of traumatic perforation of the urinary bladder. Surg Endosc. 2001;15(12):1488–1489. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-4116-y

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Bladder perforation during laparoscopic excision of a urachus cyst using bipolar coagulation on the second day after injury

Download (226KB)
3. Fig. 2. Combined injury to the bladder and rectum with a knitting needle from a toy, intraperitoneal perforation of the bladder: а — type of perforation hole; b — stage of suturing the defect; c — 14 days after surgery, postoperative scars from trocar approaches

Download (353KB)
4. Fig. 3. Methods of bladder drainage for intraperitoneal perforations during different periods of observation

Download (109KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ №ФС77-65570 от 04 мая 2016 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies