Micropercutaneous nephrolithotripsy in the treatment of patients with nephrolithiasis: medical and organizational aspects

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The article is devoted to modern methods of treating nephrolithiasis. A review of the results of studies on the effectiveness and safety of micro- and minipercutaneous nephrolithotripsy and the advantages of different treatment methods is presented. A trend towards miniaturization of surgical methods for the treatment of nephrolithiasis has been shown, accompanied by an improvement in their results and economic feasibility. The issues of organizing surgical treatment of patients with kidney stones are considered.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Oleg M. Mosiychuk

City Hospital No. 15

Email: oleg.mosichuk@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-7979-1086
SPIN-code: 5116-2894

Deputy Chief Physician for Medical Affairs

Russian Federation, 4 Avangardnaya st., Saint Petersburg, 198205

Nikolai Yu. Kostenkov

City Hospital No. 15; Academician I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: drkostenkov@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8246-8798
SPIN-code: 5455-1516

Postgraduate Student, Urologist

Russian Federation, 4 Avangardnaya st., Saint Petersburg, 198205; 6–8 Lva Tolstogo st., Saint Petersburg, 197022

References

  1. Protoshchak VV, Paronnikov MV, Sivakov AA, Kiselev AO. Quality of life of patients with kidney stones. Urology reports (St. Petersburg). 2020;10(2):115–124. EDN: ZHHFDJ doi: 10.17816/uroved102115-124
  2. Mohebbi N. Risk factors for urolithiasis. Ther Umsch. 2021;78(5):223–227. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930/a001264
  3. Khan SR, Pearle MS, Robertson WG, et al. Kidney stones. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16008. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.8
  4. Bultitude M. Urolithiasis around the world. BJU Int. 2017;120(5):601–601. doi: 10.1111/bju.14033
  5. Sorokin I, Mamoulakis C, Miyazawa K, et al. Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol. 2017;35(9):1301–1320. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6
  6. Kaprin AD, Apolihin OI, Sivkov AV, et al. The incidence of urolithiasis in the Russian Federation from 2005 to 2020. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2022;15(2)10–17. EDN: EATILC doi: 10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-2-10-17
  7. Orel VI, Zavrazhnov AA, Yemelyanov OV, et al. Peculiar features of the organization of surgical care in a multidisciplinary hospital repurposed to provide care to COVID-19 patients: the structure of the incoming flow and the methodology of surgical work in pandemic. Medicine and health care. 2022;7(4):40–56. EDN: FPUUTM doi: 10.56871/MHCO.2022.91.85.005
  8. Buzin VN, Son IM. Organization of medical care in inpatient settings during the pandemic: public opinion. Current problems of health care and medical statistics. 2021;(2):322–336. EDN: CZBZPR doi: 10.24412/2312-2935-2021-2-322-336
  9. Safdar OY, Alzahrani WA, Kurdi MA, et al. The prevalence of renal stones among local residents in Saudi Arabia. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021;10(2):974–977. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_262_20
  10. Moe OW. Kidney stones: pathophysiology and medical management. Lancet. 2006;367(9507):333–344. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68071-9
  11. Zingerenko MB, Gazaryan MA, Sapizhuk ER. Minimally invasive surgical treatment of kidney stones in elderly patients. Clinical gerontology. 2018;24(9-10):23–26. EDN: XWBNJR
  12. Tursunov AI, Nazarov TK, Rychkov IV. Retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with high-density stones. Urology reports (St. Petersburg). 2022;12(2):117–126. EDN: SOWLXM doi: 10.17816/uroved106878
  13. Gudkov AV, Boshchenko VS, Lozovskiy MS, Shikunova YaV. Integrated retrograde and antegrade contact electro-impulse lithotripsy in the treatment of kidneys and ureteropelvic junction stones. Urology Herald. 2021;9(1):39–46. EDN: NZJKHY doi: 10.21886/2308-6424-2021-9-1-39-46
  14. Medvedev VL, Budanov AA, Dmitrenko GD, et al. Comparative efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. Innovative Medicine of Kuban. 2021;(1):39–46. EDN: XUVECC doi: 10.35401/2500-0268-2021-21-1-39-46
  15. Seregin IV, Seregin AA, Filimonov EV, et al. Ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in treatment of less than 2 cm kidney stones: Comparative efficacy and safety. Creative surgery and oncology. 2022;12(2):98–105. EDN: AOGGTI doi: 10.24060/2076-3093-2022-12-2-98-105
  16. Tepeler A, Armagan A, Sancaktutar AA, et al. The role of microperc in the treatment of symptomatic lower pole renal calculi. J Endourol. 2013;27(1):13–18. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0422
  17. Hatipoglu NK, Sancaktutar AA, Tepeler A, et al. Comparison of shockwave lithotripsy and microperc for treatment of kidney stones in children. J Endourol. 2013;27(9):1141–1146. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0066
  18. Sabnis RB, Ganesamoni R, Doshi A, et al. Microper-cutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of small renal calculi: a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int. 2013;112(3):355–361. doi: 10.1111/bju.12164
  19. Traxer O, Thomas A. Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol. 2013;189(2):580–584. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.197
  20. Zhang B, Hu Y, Gao J, Zhuo D. Micropercutaneous versus Retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of moderately sized kidney stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Int. 2020;104(1-2):94–105. doi: 10.1159/000503796
  21. Fernstrom I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1976;10(3):257–259. doi: 10.1080/21681805.1976.11882084
  22. Torricelli FCM, Carvalho RS, Marchini GS, et al. Bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus staged approach: a critical analysis of complications and renal function. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2020;66(12):1696–1701. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.66.12.1696
  23. Suleymanov SI, Kadyrov ZA, Aguzarov AM, et al. Advantages and disadvantages of percutaneous surgery of urolithiasis in the patient’s supine position. Urology reports (St. Petersburg). 2023;13(4):369–376. EDN: RXFRVP doi: 10.17816/uroved568970
  24. Khadgi S, Darrad M, El-Nahas AR, Al-Terki A. Tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones larger than 20 mm. Indian J Urol. 2021;37(1):54–58. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_271_20
  25. Bhatia VP, Aro T, Smith SM, et al. Frailty as predictor of complications in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). World J Urol. 2021;39(10):3971–3977. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03681-x
  26. Arora AM, Pawar PW, Tamhankar AS, et al. Predictors for severe hemorrhage requiring angioem-bolization post percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center experience over 3 years. Urol Ann. 2019;11(2):180–186. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_75_18
  27. Mao Q, Wang C, Chen G, Tan FSB. Failure of initial superselective renal arterial embolization in the treatment of renal hemorrhage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A retrospective analysis of risk factors. Exp Ther Med. 2019;18(5):4151–4156. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.8033
  28. Degirmenci T, Bozkurt IH, Celik S, et al. Does leaving residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with positive stone culture and/or renal pelvic urine culture increase the risk of infectious complications. Urolithiasis. 2019;47:371–375. doi: 10.1007/ s00240-018-1063-9
  29. Popov SV, Orlov IN, Martov AG, et al. Our experience of micropercutaneous nephrolithotripsy application in the treatment large kidney stones. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2018;(4):48–53. EDN: YUHIFF
  30. Desai MR, Sharma R, Mishra S, et al. Single-step percutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc): the initial clinical report. J Urol. 2011;186(1):140–145. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.029
  31. Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Seitz M, et al. The “all-seeing needle”: initial results of an optical puncture system confirming access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2011;59(6):1054–1059. doi: 10.1016/ j.eururo.2011.03.026
  32. Popov SV, Orlov IN, Pazin IS, et al. 10 years of micropercutaneus nephrolithotripsy: evolution of method. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2021;14(2):64–69. EDN: KTKCMU doi: 10.29188/2222-8543-2021-14-2-64-69
  33. Kim SC, Kuo RL, Lingeman JE. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update. Curr Opin Urol. 2003;13(3):235–241. doi: 10.1097/00042307-200305000-00012
  34. Zhu W, Liu Y, Liu L, et al. Minimally invasive versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2015;43:563–570. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0808-y
  35. Druskin SC, Ziemba JB. Minimally invasive (“Mini”) percutaneous nephrolithotomy: classification, indications, and outcomes. Curr Urol Rep. 2016;17:30. doi: 10.1007/s11934-016-0591-5
  36. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1006–1012. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
  37. Dundar G, Gokce G, Gokcen K, et al. Microperc versus Miniperc for treatment of renal stones smaller than 2 cm in pediatric patients. Urol J. 2016;13(5):2829–2832. doi: 10.22037/uj.v13i5.3510
  38. Karatag T, Tepeler A, Silay MS, et al. A comparison of 2 percutaneous nephrolithotomy techniques for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones of sizes 10–20 mm: Microperc vs Miniperc. Urology. 2015;85(5):1015–1018. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.02.010
  39. Zhang Y, Li J, Zhang D, et al. Nomograms predicting the outcomes of endoscopic treatments for pediatric upper urinary tract calculi. Int J Urol. 2021;28(3):295–301. doi: 10.1111/iju.14451
  40. Tok A, Akbulut F, Buldu I, et al. Comparison of microperc and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for medium-sized lower calyx stones. Urolithiasis. 2016;44:155–159. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0804-2
  41. Kiremit MC, Guven S, Sarica K, et al. Contemporary management of medium-sized (10–20 mm) renal stones: a retrospective multicenter observational study. J Endourol. 2015;29(7):838–843. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0698
  42. Knoll T, Wezel F, Michel MS, et al. Do patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A comparative prospective study. J Endourol. 2010;24(7):1075–1079. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0111
  43. Ganpule AP, Bhattu AS, Desai M. PCNL in the twenty-first century: role of microperc, miniperc, and ultraminiperc. World J Urol. 2015;33:235–240. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1415-1
  44. Mishra S, Sharma R, Garg C, et al. Prospective comparative study of miniperc and standard PNL for treatment of 1 to 2 cm size renal stone. BJU Int. 2011;108(6):896–899. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09936.x
  45. Helal M, Black T, Lockhart J, Figueroa TE. The Hickman peel-away sheath: alternative for pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 1997;11(3):171–172. doi: 10.1089/end.1997.11.171
  46. Kukreja R, Desai M, Patel S, et al. Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study. J Endourol. 2004;18(8):715–722. doi: 10.1089/0892779042360599
  47. Jiang H, Yu Z, Chen L, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for upper urinary stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2035851. doi: 10.1155/2017/2035851
  48. Armagan A, Tepeler A, Silay MS, et al. Micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of moderate-size renal calculi. J Endourol. 2013;27(2):177–181. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0517
  49. Stern KL. Percutaneous management of upper tract stones: from mini to maxi percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Curr Opin Urol. 2023;33(4):339–344. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001087
  50. Wright A, Rukin N, Smith D, et al. 'Mini, ultra, micro' – nomenclature and cost of these new minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) techniques. Ther Adv Urol. 2016;8(2):142–146. doi: 10.1177/1756287215617674
  51. Hudnall M, Usawachintachit M, Metzler I, et al. Ultrasound guidance reduces percutaneous nephrolithotomy cost compared to fluoroscopy. Urology. 2017;103:52–58. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.030
  52. Ozok HU, Sagnak L, Senturk AB, et al. A comparison of metal telescopic dilators and Amplatz dilators for nephrostomy tract dilation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2012;26(6): 630–634. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0291

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Eco-Vector


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ №ФС77-65570 от 04 мая 2016 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies