Email this article 
Influence of significant difference in diameters of ureters on the possibility and effectiveness of ureteroureterostomy in the treatment of obstructive uropathies of the duplicated kidney
- Authors: Kagantsov I.M.1,2, Kondrateva E.A.1,2, Karavaeva S.A.2,3, Sukhotskaya A.A.1, Smyslova L.V.1, Pervunina T.M.1
-
Affiliations:
- Almazov National Medical Research Centre
- North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
- Children’s City Multidisciplinary Clinical Specialized Center оf High Medical Technologies
- Issue: Vol 14, No 2 (2024)
- Pages: 121-127
- Section: Original articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/uroved/article/view/626646
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/uroved626646
- ID: 626646
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription or Fee Access
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy is increasingly used as a surgical correction method for obstructive uropathies of the duplicated kidney. A complicating factor for this technique may be a significant difference between the diameters of the ureters.
AIM: This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy in patients with obstructive uropathies of the duplicated kidney with a twofold or more difference in ureter diameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 14 children who underwent laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy for obstructive uropathies of the duplicated kidney at Almazov National Medical Research Centre between 2021 and 2023, in 10 patients (71.4%), the diameter of the “donor” ureter exceeded the diameter of the “recipient” ureter two times or more.
RESULTS: In most patients, the indication for surgery was obstructive megaureter of the segment. All patients underwent laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy, proximal in 90% of cases and distal in one child. One of five patients underwent transurethral resection of the ureterocele as the first stage of operative treatment. The only complication observed in the postoperative period in the presented patients was a stent-associated urinary tract infection, which was treated conservatively. One child (10%) required ureter reimplantation with stump resection after ureteroureterostomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy is a safe and effective method for surgical correction of obstructive uropathies of the duplicated kidney although a significant difference is noted between the diameters of the “donor” and “recipient” ureters. This factor does not reduce the effectiveness of ureteroureterostomy and does not lead to an increased risk of postoperative complications and reoperations. Thus, laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy can be used in patients with obstructive uropathies of the duplicated kidney.
About the authors
Iliya M. Kagantsov
Almazov National Medical Research Centre; North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Email: ilkagan@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3957-1615
SPIN-code: 7936-8722
Scopus Author ID: 55358760000
Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint PetersburgEvgeniya A. Kondrateva
Almazov National Medical Research Centre; North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Author for correspondence.
Email: zhenya-muz@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5435-8487
SPIN-code: 4818-9170
MD
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint PetersburgSvetlana A. Karavaeva
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov; Children’s City Multidisciplinary Clinical Specialized Center оf High Medical Technologies
Email: swetl.karawaewa2015@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5884-9128
SPIN-code: 4224-5532
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint PetersburgAnna A. Sukhotskaya
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Email: anna.a.sukhotskaya@gmail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8734-2227
SPIN-code: 6863-7436
Scopus Author ID: 57215907643
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgLidiya V. Smyslova
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Email: vladi-lidiya@yandex.ru
MD
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgTatiana M. Pervunina
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Email: ptm.pervunina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9948-7303
SPIN-code: 3288-4986
Scopus Author ID: 56572907100
Dr. Sci. (Med), Director of the Institution of Perinatology and Pediatrics
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- Chertin L, Neeman BB, Stav K, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic ipsilateral uretero-ureterostomy foe upper urinary tract duplications in the pediatric population: a multi-institutional review of outcomes and complications. J Pediatr Surg. 2021;56(12):2377–2380. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.12.022
- Harms M, Haid B, Schnabel MJ, et al. Ureteroureterostomy in patients with duplex malformations: does a large diameter of the donor ureter affect the outcome? J Pediatr Urol. 2019;15(6):666.e1–666.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.016
- Lashley DB, McAleer IM, Kaplan GW. Ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux or obstruction associated with complete ureteral duplication. J Urol. 2001;165(2):552–554. doi: 10.1097/00005392-200102000-00067
- McLeod DJ, Alpert SA, Ural Z, Jayanthi VR. Ureteroureterostomy irrespective of ureteral size or upper pole function: a single center experience. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10(4):616–619. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.05.003
- Herz D, Smith J, McLeod D, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic management of duplex renal anomaly: comparison of surgical outcomes to traditional pure laparoscopic and open surgery. J Pediatr Urol. 2015;12(1):44.e1–44.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2015.04.046
- Villanueva CA. Open versus robotic ureteroureterostomy. J Pediatr Urol. 2019;15(4):390.e1–390.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2019.05.003
- Kozlov YuA, Ochirov ChB, Kapuller VM. Minimally invasive interventions for kidney duplication in children. Endoscopic Surgery. 2019;25(6):4957. EDN: JRLZPX doi: 10.17116/endoskop20192506149
- Kagantsov IM, Sizonov VV, Dubrov VI, et al. Uretero-ureteral anastomosis (ureteropyeloanastomosis) for the duplicated upper urinary tract in children. Urologiia. 2018;(2):83–88. EDN: XOTLYT doi: 10.18565/urology.2018.2.00-00
- Chandradekharam VVS, Jayaram H. Laparoscopic ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy for the management of children with duplication anomalies. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2015;20(1):27–31. doi: 10.4103/0971-9261.145442
- Gonzalez R, Piaggio L. Initial experience with laparoscopic ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy in infants and children for duplication anomalies of the urinary tract. J Urol. 2007;177(6):2315–2318. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.177
- Gutierrez J, Chang C-Y, Nesbit RM. Ipsilateral uretero-ureterostomy for vesicoureteral reflux in duplicated ureter. J Urol. 1969;101(1):36–39. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)62266-3
- Kondrateva EA, Kagantsov IM, Karavaeva SA, et al. Ureteroureterostomy in case of renal duplication. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2022;15(3)148–155. EDN: LLFOBQ doi: 10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-3-148-155
- Dubrov VI, Bondarenko SG, Kagantsov IM, Sizonov VV. Laparoscopic transuretheroureterostomy in children: multicenter study results. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2020;(3):162–167. EDN: ULMBZV doi: 10.29188/2222-8543-2020-12-3-162-16
- Wong NC, Braga LH. Open ureteroureterostomy for repair of upper-pole ectopic ureters in children with duplex systems: is stenting really necessary? J Pediatr Urol. 2019;15(1):72:e1–72.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.10.014
- Hidas G, McLorie G, McAleer I. Split ureteral stent after ureteroureterostomy. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9(4):521–523. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.01.010
Supplementary files
