Laparoscopic nerve-sparing cystoprostatectomy with intracorporeal orthotopic sigmoid neobladder formation

封面


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

The following clinical case is presented: performing of minimally invasive laparoscopic nerve-sparing cystoprostatectomy with intracorporeal orthotopic sigmoid neobladder formation for patient aged 62 with invasive bladder cancer. This case proves that the performed method of urine derivation is safe and can be used as alternative to other techniques in patients who underwent radical laparoscopic cystoprostatectomy.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Salman Al-Shukri

First State Pavlov Medical University of St Petersburg

Email: alshukri@mail.ru
doctor of med. science, professor, head of the department. Department of Urology

Aleksandr Zaharenko

First State Pavlov Medical University of St Petersburg

Email: 9516183@mail.ru
doctor of medical science, professor, head of Oncological Unit

Adel Al-Shukri

First State Pavlov Medical University of St Petersburg

Email: ad330@mail.ru
doctor of medical science, professor, Urology Department

Yevgeniy Nevirovich

First State Pavlov Medical University of St Petersburg

Email: enevirovich@gmail.com
candidate of medical science, head of Urological Unit

Vladislav Dubinskiy

First State Pavlov Medical University of St Petersburg

Email: Dubinskyvlad@mail.ru
candidate of medical science, associate professor, Urology Department

Maria Potapova

First State Pavlov Medical University of St Petersburg

Email: mashock@mail.ru
urologist. Urology Department

参考

  1. Аль-Шукри С. Х., Корнеев И. А. Общие принципы лечения больных раком мочевого пузыря. Значение клинических, гистологических и биологических факторов прогноза для выбора метода лечения // Практическая онкология. 2003. Т. 4. № 4. С. 204-213.
  2. Bruins H. M., Arends T. J., Pelkman M. et al. Radical cystectomy in a Dutch University hospital: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors in a homogeneous surgery-only series // Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2014. Vol. 12. N 3. P. 190-195.
  3. Петров С. Б., Левковский Н. С., Король В. Д., Паршин А. Г. Радикальная цистэктомия как основной метод лечения мышечно-инвазивного рака мочевого пузыря (показания, особенности техники, профилактика осложнений) // Практическая онкология. 2003. Т. 4. № 4. С. 225-230.
  4. Novara G., De Marco V., Aragona M. et al. Complications and mortality after radical cystectomy for bladder transitional cell cancer // J Urol. 2009. Vol. 182. N 3. P. 914-921.
  5. Zakaria A. S., Santos F., Dragomir A. et al. Postoperative mortality and complications after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in Quebec: A population-based analysis during the years 2000-2009 // Can Urol Assoc J. 2014. Vol. 8. N 7-8. P 259-267.
  6. Носов А. К., Рева С. А., Джалилов И. Б., Петров С. Б. Радикальная цистэктомия при раке мочевого пузыря: сравнение ранних хирургических осложнений при лапароскопической, открытой и видеоассистированной операции // Онкоурология. 2015. Т. 11. N 3. С. 71-78.
  7. Aboumarzouk O. M., Hughes O., Narahari K. et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic radical cystectomy for the treatment of bladder cancer // J Endourol. 2013. Vol. 27. N 9. P. 1083-1095.
  8. Tang K., Li H., Xia D. et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy in bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies // PLoS One. 2014. Vol. 9. N 5. P. e95667
  9. Fonseka T., Ahmed K., Froghi S. et al. Comparing robotic, laparoscopic and open cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2015. Vol. 87. N 1. P. 41-48.
  10. Albisinni S., Rassweiler J., Abbou C. C. et al. Long-term analysis of oncological outcomes after laparoscopic radical cystectomy in Europe: results from a multicentre study by the European Association of Urology (EAU) section of Uro-technology // BJU Int. 2015. Vol. 115. N 6. P. 937-945.
  11. Shao P., Li P., Ju X. et al. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal orthotopic ileal neobladder: technique and clinical outcomes // Urology. 2015. Vol. 85. N 2. P. 368-373.
  12. Miyake H., Furukawa J., Sakai I. et al. Orthotopic sigmoid vs. ileal neobladders in Japanese patients: a comparative assessment of complications, functional outcomes, and quality of life // Urol Oncol. 2013. Vol. 31. N 7. P. 1155-1160.
  13. Liu D., Feng F., Shen Z. et al. Clinical experience in a modified Roux-Y-shaped sigmoid neobladder: assessment of complications and voiding patterns in 43 patients // BJU Int. 2010. Vol. 105. N 4. P. 533-538.
  14. Xu K., Liu C. X., Zheng S. B. et al. Orthotopic detaenial sigmoid neobladder after radical cystectomy: technical considerations, complications and functional outcomes // J Urol. 2013. Vol. 190. N 3. P. 928-934.
  15. Singh V., Yadav R., Sinha R. J., Gupta D. K. Prospective comparison of quality-of-life outcomes between ileal conduit urinary diversion and orthotopic neobladder reconstruction after radical cystectomy: a statistical model // BJU Int. 2014. Vol. 113. N 5. P. 726-732.
  16. Miyake H., Furukawa J., Muramaki M. et al. Health related quality of life after radical cystectomy: comparative study between orthotopic sigmoid versus ileal neobladders // Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012. Vol. 38. N 11. P. 1089-1094.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

版权所有 © Al-Shukri S.H., Zaharenko A.A., Al-Shukri A.S., Nevirovich Y.S., Dubinskiy V.Y., Potapova M.K., 2015

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名 4.0国际许可协议的许可
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ №ФС77-65570 от 04 мая 2016 г.


##common.cookie##