Intestinal microbiota in children undergoing surgery for vesicoureteral reflux

封面


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

BACKGROUND: Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is one of the most common congenital anomalies of the urinary system in children. In most cases, urinary tract infection (UTI) serves as a clinical prerequisite for identifying VUR. However, a standardized approach to the diagnosis and management of this patient cohort has not yet been established.

AIM: To study the intestinal microbiota in children with VUR who received antibiotic therapy and antibiotic prophylaxis due to episodes of UTIs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 40 children (12 boys and 28 girls) with VUR and chronic UTIs. All children received antibiotic therapy for acute episodes of infection, and, after the diagnosis of VUR, they also received continuous antibiotic prophylaxis. The control groups included 18 healthy boys and 14 healthy girls. Identification of microorganisms isolated from feces was carried out using generally accepted methods.

RESULTS: In the feces of children with VUR, aerobic taxa of microbiota dominate over anaerobic ones. Klebsiella spp., Proteus vulgaris, and Pseudomona aeruginosa appear in the feces of both boys and girls. An increase in the detection rate of most aerobic microorganisms and a decrease in anaerobic taxa were observed compared to healthy controls. In boys with VUR, the maximum (100%) detection rate of microorganisms is more common than in girls.

CONCLUSIONS: Dysbiotic changes were detected in the feces of all children after antibiotic therapy, providing new insights into the effects of the conventional strategy of long-term antibacterial treatment and prevention of UTIs in children with VUR.

全文:

BACKGROUND

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is one of the most common congenital anomalies of the urinary system in children [1]. Its diagnosis by voiding cystourethrography remains a subject of long-standing debate between pediatricians and pediatric urologists [1–4]. The key question is when this diagnostic procedure should be performed: after the first episode of urinary tract infection (UTI), as favored by pediatric urologists, or only in cases of recurrent UTI, as supported by pediatricians. UTIs are essentially the clinical trigger for detecting VUR [5, 6]. UTIs are common in children, and since uncomplicated cases can typically be managed with 7 to 10 days of oral antibiotic therapy (ABT), pediatricians often see no rationale for diagnosing VUR. However, renal and bladder ultrasound is recommended after the first UTI episode, and findings such as pelvicalyceal system dilatation, voiding dysfunction, or atypical clinical course with poor response to antibiotics are clear predictors of VUR [7]. The combination of UTI and VUR is generally considered an indication for long-term antibiotic prophylaxis (ABP). Surgical intervention is recommended for high-grade (III–IV) VUR associated with recurrent episodes of acute pyelonephritis, despite continuous ABP, and progressive upper urinary tract dilatation [5, 8]. Thus, continuous and prolonged ABP is postulated to prevent the need for surgical correction of VUR, even in high-grade cases [1, 2, 6, 9].

However, the adverse effects of ABT in acute UTI and particularly of ABP in recurrent cases are well known. These include the development of antibiotic resistance among uropathogens with all related consequences and, equally concerning, alterations in the microbiota of various organ systems, especially the intestine [10–13]. Even short-term ABP in infants with VUR has been shown to disrupt the intestinal microbiome by increasing the proportion of opportunistic pathogens and reducing beneficial taxa, potentially posing long-term clinical risks [14].

This study aimed to assess the state of the intestinal microbiota in children with VUR who received ABT and ABP due to episodes of UTI.

METHODS

The study included 40 children with VUR and chronic UTI, including 12 boys (group 1) and 28 girls (group 2), aged 28 months [Q1, 12; Q3, 72.5]. VUR was diagnosed between 1 and 147 months of age: on the right side in 12.5%, on the left in 32.5%, and bilaterally in 55.0% of patients. Active VUR was identified in 17.5% of cases, passive VUR in 5.0%, and combined VUR in 77.5%. All patients underwent surgical treatment with bulking agents (Refluxin, DAM+, and Vantris) at age of 60 months [24; 91]. All children received antibiotic therapy (ABT) for acute UTI episodes, followed by continuous antibiotic prophylaxis (ABP) after VUR diagnosis. Prior to surgery, leukocyturia was detected in 2 patients (5.0%), while asymptomatic bacteriuria was identified in all 40 patients through extended urine culture using 10 to 12 nutrient media types [15].

The control group included 18 healthy boys (group 3) and 14 healthy girls (group 4), aged 60 months [16; 74].

Inclusion criteria for group 1 and group 2: ineffective continuous ABP with recurrent episodes of acute UTI, progressive pelvicalyceal system dilatation, and reflux nephropathy. Exclusion criteria: a history of urinary tract surgery, urinary tract drainage, and voiding or bowel dysfunction. Inclusion criteria for group 3 and group 4: being in the first health status group (healthy child), no history of renal or urinary tract disease or anomalies, and no antibiotic use in the past 3 months.

Fecal samples for bacteriological analysis in children were collected in sterile plastic containers according to para. 6.6.2.7 of MU 4.2.2039–05,1 and the bacteriological analysis was conducted in accordance with the industry standard.2 In addition to conventional media, chromogenic media (HiMedia, India) were used: HiCrome Klebsiella Selective Agar Base, HiCrome Candida Differential Agar, HiCrome Enterococci Agar, Streptococcus Selection Agar, Bifidobacterium Agar, MRS Agar, Anaerobic Agar, Shaedler Agar, and Bacteroides Bile Esculinum Agar. Cultures were incubated under aerobic (t 37°C for 24–48 h) and anaerobic (AnaeroHiGas Pak, 48–72 h) conditions. Microorganisms were identified using standard microbiological methods. Gram Stains-Kit (a differential Gram staining set, HiMedia) was used to assess morpho-tinctorial characteristics.

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 23. For microorganisms isolated from fecal samples, detection frequency (absolute count and percentage) was calculated. The chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare detection frequencies between groups 1 and 2. Because fecal microbial loads were not normally distributed (as confirmed by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test with Lilliefors correction and the Shapiro–Wilk test), they were expressed as medians (Me) and lower and upper quartiles [Q1; Q3]. The Mann–Whitney U test was used for group comparisons. Statistical significance was defined as p <0.01 and p <0.05.

RESULTS

Table 1 shows the results of fecal microbiota analysis in patients with VUR. A total of 23 microbial taxa were identified: 16 aerobic and 7 anaerobic. Among aerobes, the most stable associates across the studied groups were Escherichia coli with typical characteristics (lactose-fermenting, lactose-positive [L+], and non-hemolytic [Hly]) and Enterococcus spp. Within the anaerobic microbiota cluster, the predominant taxa were Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacterium spp., Eubacterium spp., and Clostridium spp. Notably, the first two taxa were detected in 100% of fecal samples from the boys. Statistically significant differences in detection frequency were found for three taxa.

 

Table 1. Fecal microbiota of patients with vesicoureteral reflux

Таблица 1. Микробиота фекалий пациентов с пузырно-мочеточниковым рефлюксом

Microorganisms

Detection frequency, %

p

Quantitative bacterial load, log10 CFU/mL

p

Group 1 (n=12)

Group 2 (n=28)

Group 1

Group 2

Ме

Percentile

Ме

Percentile

25

50

75

25

50

75

Corynebacterium spp.

0

7.1

0.342

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

CNS

41.7

46.4

0.781

2.0

2.0

2.0

4.0

3.0

2.0

3.0

3.5

0.749

Staphylococcus haemolyticus

8.3

0

0.300

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

S. saprophyticus

16.7

7.1

0.358

2.5

2.0

2.5

2.5

4.0

3.0

4.0

4.0

0.221

S. epidermidis

33.3

32.1

0.941

2.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

3.5

0.864

S. lentus

0

10.7

0.238

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

S. aureus

41.7

28.6

0.418

3.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.75

0.152

Enterococcus spp.

91.7

92.9

0.896

5.0

4.0

5.0

7.0

6.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

0.348

Enterococcus undif.

25.0

0

0.006*

3.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

E. faecalis

41.7

75.0

0.043*

4.0

4.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

4.0

5.0

5.5

0.518

E. faecium

58.3

75.0

0.292

6.0

5.0

6.0

8.0

6.0

5.0

6.0

8.0

0.913

Enterobacterales

100.0

96.4

0.507

6.5

6.0

6.5

8.0

7.0

6.0

7.0

7.0

0.899

Escherichia coli L+, Hly

100.0

92.9

0.342

6.5

6.0

6.5

8.0

7.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

0.806

E. coli L

8.3

21.4

0.318

7.0

7.0

7.0

7.0

5.5

4.25

5.5

7

0.295

E. coli Hly+

0

7.1

0.342

7.0

7.0

7.0

7.0

Klebsiella spp.

33.3

21.4

0.426

6.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

6.5

5.0.

6.5

7.0

0.814

Enterobacter spp.

0

3.8

0.507

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

Proteus vulgaris

8.3

0

0.122

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

8.3

10.7

0.818

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

0.317

Bacillus spp.

33.3

14.3

0.168

5.0

2.75

5.0

6.5

4.0

2.25

4.0

6.5

0.765

Lactobacillus spp.

100.0

89.3

0.238

4.0

3.25

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

5.0

0.366

Bifidobacterium spp.

100.0

96.4

9.0

8.0

9.0

9.0

8.0

8.0

8.0

9.0

0.296

Propionibacterium spp.

8.3

7.1

0.896

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

4.5

2.0

4.5

4.5

1.0

Eubacterium spp.

91.7

75.0

0.227

6.0

3.0

6.0

7.0

6.0

3.0

6.0

7.0

0.609

Bacteroides spp.

41.7

7.1

0.008*

5.0

3.0

5.0

6.0

8.0

7.0

8.0

8.0

0.046*

Peptococcus spp.

41.7

35.7

0.722

5.0

2.5

5.0

7.0

4.0

3.0

4.0

6.25

0.949

Clostridium spp.

83.3

96.4

0.150

5.0

4.75

5.0

6.5

5.0

3.0

5.0

7.0

0.602

Candida albicans

33.3

39.3

0.722

3.0

2.25

3.0

5.25

3.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

0.946

Note. Me, median; p, nonparametric Mann–Whitney test. *p <0.05.

Примечание. Ме — медиана; p — непараметрический критерий Манна–Уитни. *p <0,05.

 

Among the boys, the highest detection rate (100%) was observed for three taxa (E. coli L+, Hly, Lactobacillus spp., and Bifidobacterium spp.), whereas these genera and/or species were only dominant among the girls. Notably, Klebsiella spp. were isolated from the feces of one in three boys, and Staphylococcus aureus was detected in 41.7%.

The highest fecal colonization levels (CFU/g) among aerobes in children with VUR were observed for Enterococcus spp. and Enterobacterales, and for Bifidobacterium spp., Eubacterium spp., and Bacteroides spp among anaerobes. The latter taxon showed a significantly higher colonization level in the girls compared with the boys (Table 1).

The comparative analysis of fecal microbiota between the boys with VUR and healthy boys (Table 2) revealed the presence of Enterobacterales representatives — Klebsiella spp., P. vulgaris, and P. aeruginosa — in VUR patients. The analysis of the detection frequency of various microbial taxa revealed increased levels of the aerobic cluster of microbiota and decreased levels of anaerobic taxa in patient groups compared with healthy individuals. Stable associates across both compared groups included E. coli (L+, Hly), Lactobacillus spp., and Bifidobacterium spp. Statistically significant differences between healthy and affected boys were found for four taxa.

 

Table 2. Comparison of fecal microbiota in healthy boys and boys with vesicoureteral reflux

Таблица 2. Сравнение микробиоты фекалий здоровых мальчиков и пациентов с пузырно-мочеточниковым рефлюксом

Microorganisms

Detection frequency, %

p

Quantitative bacterial load, log10 CFU/mL

p

Group 3 (n=18)

Group 1 (n=12)

Group 3

Group 1

Ме

Percentile

Ме

Percentile

25

50

75

25

50

75

CNS

38.9

41.7

0.879

2.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

4.0

0.628

Staphylococcus haemolyticus

5.5

8.3

0.765

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

0.317

S. saprophyticus

22.2

16.7

0.709

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.8

2.5

2.0

2.5

2.5

0.567

S. epidermidis

22.2

33.3

0.678

2.0

2.0

2.0

3.5

2.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

0.739

S. aureus

5.5

41.7

0.015*

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

0.317

Enterococcus spp.

100.0

91.7

0.213

5.0

5.0

5.0

6.0

5.0

4.0

5.0

7.0

0.981

Enterococcus undif.

22.4

25.0

0.860

5.0

4.3

5.0

5.8

3.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

0.476

E. faecalis

50.0

41.7

0.654

6.0

5.0

6.0

6.5

4.0

4.0

4.0

5.0

0.010*

E. faecium

44.4

58.3

0.456

4.5

4.0

4.5

6.5

6.0

5.0

6.0

8.0

0.059

Enterobacterales

100.0

100.0

8.0

7.0

8.0

8.3

6.5

6.0

6.5

8.0

0.048*

Escherichia coli L+, Hly

100.0

100.0

8.0

7.0

8.0

8.3

6.5

6.0

6.5

8.0

0.048*

E. coli L

0

8.3

0.213

7.0

7.0

7.0

7.0

Klebsiella spp.

0

33.3

0.009*

6.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

Proteus vulgaris

0

8.3

0.213

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

0

8.3

0.213

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

Bacillus spp.

27.8

33.3

0.745

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

5.0

2.75

5.0

6.5

0.028*

Lactobacillus spp.

100.0

100.0

6.5

5.0

6.5

7.0

4.0

3.25

4.0

4.0

<0.001*

Bifidobacterium spp.

100.0

100.0

9.0

8.0

9.0

9.0

9.0

8.0

9.0

9.0

0.766

Propionibacterium spp.

33.3

8.3

0.113

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.3

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

0.041*

Eubacterium spp.

100.0

91.7

0.213

8.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

6.0

3.0

6.0

7.0

0.001*

Bacteroides spp.

72.2

41.7

0.094

8.0

6.5

8.0

9.0

5.0

3.0

5.0

6.0

0.021*

Peptococcus spp.

61.1

41.7

0.296

5.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

2.5

5.0

7.0

0.725

Peptostreptococcus spp.

44.4

0

0.004*

6.0

4.3

6.0

7.8

Clostridium spp.

100.0

83.3

0.073

5.0

3.0

5.0

6.3

5.0

4.75

5.0

6.5

0.433

Candida albicans

44.4

33.3

0.009*

2.0

2.0

2.0

4.3

3.0

2.25

3.0

5.25

0.183

Note. Me, the median; p, the nonparametric Mann–Whitney test. *p <0.05.

Примечание. Ме — медиана; p — непараметрический критерий Манна–Уитни. *p <0,05.

 

The quantitative analysis of fecal microbiota in the boys with VUR showed oppositely directed changes — some taxa increased; others decreased — compared with similar results in the healthy children. Statistically significant differences were found for seven taxa. Despite the heterogeneous nature of these differences, a pattern was noted: decreased detection of E. faecalis, Eubacterium spp., and Bacteroides spp. was associated with a significant reduction in their quantitative abundance.

Compared with healthy girls, the feces of the girls with VUR showed significantly greater differences in the frequency of detection than in the compared groups of the boys (Table 3). As in the boys, VUR was associated with the microbial taxa not found in healthy individuals: Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., P. aeruginosa, and E. coli L, Hly+. Most aerobic and anaerobic taxa exhibited decreased detection frequencies in patients, except for four aerobic taxa: S. epidermidis, S. aureus, E. faecalis, and E. faecium.

 

Table 3. Comparison of fecal microbiota in healthy girls and girls with vesicoureteral reflux

Таблица 3. Сравнение микробиоты фекалий здоровых девочек и пациенток с мочеточниковым рефлюксом

Microorganisms

Detection frequency, %

p

Quantitative bacterial load, log10 CFU/mL

p

Group 4 (n=14)

Group 2 (n=28)

Group 4

Group 2

Ме

Percentile

Ме

Percentile

25

50

75

25

50

75

Corynebacterium spp.

21.4

7.1

0.178

4.0

3.0

4.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

0.048

CNS

35.7

46.4

0.508

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.5

3.0

2.0

3.0

3.5

0.170

Staphylococcus haemolyticus

7.1

0

0.152

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

S. saprophyticus

28.6

7.1

0.041

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

4.0

3.0

4.0

4.0

0.028

S. epidermidis

14.3

32.1

0.215

2.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

3.5

0.896

S. lentus

0

10.7

0.204

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

S. aureus

14.3

28.6

0.306

2

2

2

2

3

3

3

3.75

0.047

Enterococcus spp.

100.0

92.9

0.306

4.5

4.0

4.5

5.3

6.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

0.004

Enterococcus undif.

28.6

0

0.003

4.0

2.5

4.0

5.5

E. faecalis

50.0

75.0

0.105

5.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

5.0

4.0

5.0

5.5

0.847

E. faecium

35.7

75.0

0.013

4.0

3.0

4.0

5.5

6.0

5.0

6.0

8.0

0.019

Enterobacterales

100.0

96.4

8.0

7.8

8.0

8.3

7.0

6.0

7.0

7.0

Escherichia coli L+

100.0

92.9

0.306

8.0

7.8

8.0

8.3

7.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

0.001

E. coli L

0

21.4

0.048

5.5

4.25

5.5

7

E. coli Hly+

0

7.1

0.306

7.0

7.0

7.0

7.0

Klebsiella spp.

0

21.4

0.048

6.5

5.0.

6.5

7.0

Enterobacter spp.

0

3.6

0.474

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

0

10.7

0.204

3.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

Bacillus spp.

35.4

14.3

0.111

3.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

4.0

2.25

4.0

6.5

0.379

Lactobacillus spp.

100.0

89.3

0.204

5.5

5.0

5.5

7.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

5.0

<0.001

Bifidobacterium spp.

100.0

100.0

8.5

1.0

8.5

9.0

8.0

8.0

8.0

9.0

0.494

Propionibacterium spp.

28.6

7.1

0.041

3.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

2.0

4.5

4.5

1.0

Eubacterium spp.

100.0

75.0

0.040

8.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

6.0

3.0

6.0

7.0

<0.001

Bacteroides spp.

64.3

7.1

<0.001

7.0

5.5

7.0

8.5

8.0

7.0

8.0

8.0

0.469

Peptococcus spp.

50.0

35.7

0.374

5.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

4.0

3.0

4.0

6.25

0.765

Peptostreptococcus spp.

14.3

0

0.040

6.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

Clostridium spp.

100.0

96.4

0.474

5.5

4.0

5.5

7.0

5.0

3.0

5.0

7.0

0.303

Candida albicans

64.3

39.3

0.126

3.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

0.232

Note. Me, the median; p, the nonparametric Mann–Whitney test. *p <0.05.

Примечание. Ме — медиана; p — непараметрический критерий Манна–Уитни. *p <0,05.

 

The quantitative analysis in the girls with VUR showed that decreased detection frequency of Corynebacterium spp., S. saprophyticus, Enterococcus spp., E. coli L+, Hly, Lactobacillus spp., and Eubacterium spp. was accompanied by a significant reduction in their abundance. Conversely, an increased detection frequency of S. aureus and E. faecium corresponded with a significant rise in their quantitative levels.

Thus, all patients with VUR, regardless of sex, exhibited dysbiotic changes in fecal microbiota compared with healthy children.

DISCUSSION

The intestinal microbiota comprises the community of microorganisms residing in the gastrointestinal tract that maintain symbiotic relationships with the host and perform metabolic, immunological, and neurological functions [14]. Microbial colonization begins at birth, with various taxa identified in meconium [16]. The maturation of intestinal microbiota occurs during the first three years of life [17, 18].

Antibiotic use for various infections in children, including UTIs, alters intestinal microbiota composition, for example, by increasing the abundance of Enterobacteriaceae [19]. In a study of 39 children aged 0 to 3 years, multiple courses of ABT led to reduced microbial diversity and a peak in the abundance of antibiotic resistance genes [20].

Our earlier study on bladder urine microbiota in the children with VUR following multiple ABT courses and ABP for UTIs revealed urinary dysbiosis in 60% of cases [21]. The current study evaluates intestinal microbiota in the same cohort and compares the findings with those in healthy children. All 40 children, both girls and boys, exhibited intestinal dysbiosis. These findings suggest that ABT and ABP more severely affected the intestinal microbiota than the urinary microbiota.

In children with VUR, fecal microbiota demonstrated a broader aerobic spectrum and higher detection frequencies of aerobes, along with reduced detection of anaerobes. Klebsiella spp., P. vulgaris, and P. aeruginosa were detected in feces from both boys and girls following ABT and ABP. Despite persistently high levels of Lactobacillus spp. and Bifidobacterium spp., there was a marked increase in the frequency of S. aureus and E. faecium, with concurrent decreases in Eubacterium spp., Bacteroides spp., Peptococcus spp., Propionibacterium spp., and the absence of Prevotella. A decline in Bacteroides spp. and absence of Prevotella may be seen as delayed intestinal microbiota maturation compared with the adult microbial profile [22, 23].

Our analysis supports that multiple courses of ABT, supplemented by short-term ABP for UTIs in children with VUR, lead to notable changes in intestinal microbiota and delayed microbial maturation. This dysbiosis may compromise intestinal barrier function, potentially explaining the presence of Klebsiella, Proteus, and Pseudomonas spp. in the microbiota. The impact on the risk of infectious complications in VUR surgery still remains to be clarified. However, it is evident that deviations from the eubiotic composition of the intestinal and urinary microbiota can result in metabolic and immunologic disturbances in children [24, 25]. On the other side, prolonged ABP — commonly recommended for up to two years in patients with VUR — may further contribute to clinical consequences, such as obesity, allergies, and other conditions related to intestinal microbiota disruption [26, 27]. In addition, both ABT and ABP are associated with the proliferation of resistance genes in urinary and intestinal microorganisms, facilitating the development of specific virulence factors [28].

The study has certain limitations. The relatively small sample size may affect the magnitude of intergroup differences. Nonetheless, the statistical analysis confirmed significant distinctions between healthy children and those with VUR.

Future research should investigate the post-surgical dynamics of intestinal microbiota and guide strategies for UTI prevention in children with VUR.

CONCLUSION

In children with VUR who received ABT and ABP for UTIs, aerobic microbial taxa were detected more than twice as frequently as anaerobic taxa in fecal samples. All cases exhibited intestinal dysbiosis, characterized by the emergence of Klebsiella, Proteus, and Pseudomonas spp., increased abundance of most aerobic organisms, reduced levels of anaerobes, and dominance of Escherichia coli, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, and Bifidobacterium. These findings enhance our understanding of the impact of prolonged antimicrobial treatment and prophylaxis strategies for UTI management in children with VUR.

ADDITIONAL INFO

Authors’ contribution. Ju.L. Naboka, research concept and design, writing the text of the manuscript; V.V. Sizonov, research concept and design, data analysis, editing the text of the manuscript; I.A. Gudima, data analysis; E.M. Kotieva, review of publications; K.T. Jalagonia, performing diagnostic studies; A.I. Anopko, data collection; R.A. Rodina, data collection, patient management; M.I. Kogan, research concept, scientific editing, scientific guidance. The authors have approved the version for publication and have also agreed to be responsible for all aspects of the work, ensuring that the accuracy and integrity of any part of it is properly reviewed and addressed.

Ethics approval. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Rostov State Medical University (protocol No. 2/24 dated 2024 Jan 25).

Consent for publication. The authors obtained written informed voluntary consent from the patients’ legal representatives to publish personal data in a scientific journal, including its electronic version.

Funding source. No funding.

Disclosure of interests. The authors have no relationships, activities or interests for the last three years related with for-profit or not-for-profit third parties whose interests may be affected by the content of the article.

Generative AI. Generative AI technologies were not used for this article creation.

 

1 Methodological Guidelines MU4.2.2039–05. Procedure for Collection and Transportation of Biomaterials to Microbiological Laboratories. Moscow: Federal Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor. 2006. P. 43–59.

2 Industry Standard Patient Management Protocol. Intestinal Dysbiosis (ОСТ 91500.11.0004–2003). Moscow, 2003.

×

作者简介

Julia Naboka

Rostov State Medical University

Email: nagu22@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4808-7024
SPIN 代码: 4507-2152

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

俄罗斯联邦, Rostov-on-Don

Vladimir Sizonov

Rostov State Medical University; Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital

Email: vsizonov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9145-8671
SPIN 代码: 2155-5534

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)

俄罗斯联邦, Rostov-on-Don; Rostov-on-Don

Irina Gudima

Rostov State Medical University

Email: nagu22@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0995-7848
SPIN 代码: 4761-3726

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)

俄罗斯联邦, Rostov-on-Don

Elizaveta Kotieva

Rostov State Medical University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: elizaveta.kotieva@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5595-8799
SPIN 代码: 8493-3957

Student

俄罗斯联邦, Rostov-on-Don

Ksenia Dzalagonia

Rostov State Medical University

Email: 7kseka7@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4668-8704
SPIN 代码: 7673-4169

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

俄罗斯联邦, Rostov-on-Don

Anastasia Anopko

Rostov State Medical University

Email: anastasiyaan2696@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-3979-7510

MD

俄罗斯联邦, Rostov-on-Don

Roza Rodina

Rostov State Medical University

Email: rozarodina0208@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-7701-5064

MD

俄罗斯联邦, Rostov-on-Don

Mikhail Kogan

Rostov State Medical University

Email: dept_kogan@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1710-0169
SPIN 代码: 6300-3241

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation

俄罗斯联邦, Rostov-on-Don

参考

  1. Miyakita H, Hayashi Y, Mitsui T, et al. Guidelines for the medical management of pediatric vesicoureteral reflux. Int J Urol. 2020;27(6):480–490. doi: 10.1111/iju.14223
  2. Lotfollahzadeh S, Leslie SW, Aeddula NR. Vesicoureteral reflux. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2024.
  3. Ammenti A, Alberici I, Brugnara M, et al. Updated Italian recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of the first febrile urinary tract infection in young children. Acta Paediatr. 2020;109(2):236–247. doi: 10.1111/apa.14988
  4. Mattoo TK, Shaikh N, Nelson CP. Contemporary management of urinary tract infection in children. Pediatrics. 2021;147(2): e2020012138. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-012138
  5. Gnech M, ‘t Hoen L, Zachou A, et al. Update and summary of the European Association of Urology / European Society of Paediatric Urology Paediatric Guidelines on vesicoureteral reflux in children. Eur Urol. 2024;85(5):433–442. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.12.005
  6. Thergaonkar RW, Hari P. Current management of urinary tract infection and vesicoureteral reflux. Indian J Pediatr. 2020;87(8): 625–632. doi: 10.1007/s12098-019-03099-9
  7. Meena J, Mathew G, Hari P, et al. Prevalence of bladder and bowel dysfunction in toilet-trained children with urinary tract infection and/or primary vesicoureteral reflux: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:84. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00084
  8. Chang C-L, Yang S-S, Hsu C-K, et al. Effectiveness of various treatment modalities in children with vesicoureteral reflux grades II–IV: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023;7(1):e002096. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002096
  9. Yang SS, Tsai J-D, Kanematsu A, Han C-H. Asian guidelines for urinary tract infection in children. J Infect Chemother. 2021;27(11):1543–1554. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.07.014
  10. Autore G, Bernardi L, Ghidini F, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of urinary tract infections in children: Guideline and recommendations from the emilia-romagna pediatric urinary tract infections (UTI-Ped-ER) study group. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023;12(6):1040. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12061040
  11. Läckgren G, Cooper CS, Neveus T, Kirsch AJ. Management of vesicoureteral reflux: what have we learned over the last 20 years? Front Pediatr. 2021;9:650326 doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.650326
  12. ‘t Hoen LA, Bogaert G, Radmayr C, et al. Update of the EAU/ESPU guidelines on urinary tract infections in children. J Pediatr Urol. 2021;17(2):200–207. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.01.037
  13. Meena J, Hari P. Vesicoureteral reflux and recurrent urinary tract infections. Asian Journal of Pediatric Nephrology. 2019;2(2):61–70. doi: 10.4103/AJPN.AJPN_26_19
  14. Morello W, D’Amico F, Serafinelli J, et al. Low-dose antibiotic prophylaxis induces rapid modifications of the gut microbiota in infants with vesicoureteral reflux. Front Pediatr. 2021;9:674716. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.674716
  15. Naboka YL, Kogan MI, Mayr JM, et al. Urinary microbiota of healthy prepubescent girls and boys — a pilot study. Children. 2025;12(1):40. doi: 10.3390/children12010040
  16. Naboka YL, Bondarenko VM, Rymashevsky AN, Svirava EG. Formation of normal microflora in newborns. Rostov-on-Don: Omega-Print; 2014. (In Russ.)
  17. Stewart CJ, Ajami NJ, O’Brien JL, et al. Temporal development of the gut microbiome in early childhood from the TEDDY study. Nature. 2018;562(7728):583–588. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0617-x
  18. Bäckhed F, Roswall J, Peng Y, et al. Dynamics and stabilization of the human gut microbiome during the first year of life. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17(5):690–703. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.04.004
  19. Greenwood C, Morrow AL, Lagomarcino AJ, et al. Early empiric antibiotic use in preterm infants is associated with lower bacterial diversity and higher relative abundance of Enterobacter. J Pediatr. 2014;165(1):23–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.01.010
  20. Yassour M, Vatanen T, Siljander H, et al. Natural history of the infant gut microbiome and impact of antibiotic treatment on bacterial strain diversity and stability. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(343):343ra81. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad0917
  21. Naboka YL, Sisonov BB, Kotieva EM, et al. Urothelial urine microbiota in children with vesicoureteral reflux before its surgical treatment. Urology Herald. 2025;(2):In Press.
  22. Bokulich NA, Chung J, Battaglia T, et al. Antibiotics, birth mode, and diet shape microbiome maturation during early life. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(343):343ra82. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad7121
  23. Schnorr SL, Candela M, Rampelli S, et al. Gut microbiome of the Hadza hunter-gatherers. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3654. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4654
  24. Tamburini S, Shen N, Wu HC, Clemente JC. The microbiome in early life: implications for health outcomes. Nat Med. 2016;22(7): 713–722. doi: 10.1038/nm.4142
  25. Cox LM, Yamanishi S, Sohn J, et al. Altering the intestinal microbiota during a critical developmental window has lasting metabolic consequences. Cell. 2014;158(4):705–721. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.052
  26. Gibson MK, Crofts TS, Dantas G. Antibiotics and the developing infant gut microbiota and resistome. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2015;27:51–56. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2015.07.007
  27. Nogacka AM, Salazar N, Arboleya S, et al. Early microbiota, antibiotics and health. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75(1):83–91. doi: 10.1007/s00018-017-2670-2
  28. Kudinha T, Johnson JR, Andrew SD, et al. Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of Escherichia coli isolates from children with urinary tract infection and from healthy carriers. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013;32(5):543–548. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31828ba3f1

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Eco-Vector, 2025

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用-禁止演绎 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 89281 от 21.04.2025.