Email this article Optimization of treatment of patients of older age groups with osteoporosis and fractures of the proximal femur
- Authors: Kucheev I.O.1, Kabanov M.Y.1, Linnik S.A.2, Sementsov K.V.1, Kashanskii Y.B.3, Polikarpov A.V.1, Romashov P.P.4, Kondratev I.P.3, Tsololo Y.B.4, Radysh V.G.1
-
Affiliations:
- Hospital for War Veterans
- North Western State Medical University n.a. I.I. Mechnikov
- Saint Petersburg Scientific Research Institute of Emergency Medicine named after. I.I. Dzhanelidze
- North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
- Issue: Vol 15, No 1 (2023)
- Pages: 97-106
- Section: Original research
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/vszgmu/article/view/209839
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/mechnikov209839
- ID: 209839
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is mainly found in elderly people, often leading to fractures of the proximal part of the femur, and can worsen the patient’s quality of life. The article describes approaches to the choice of tactics and techniques of medical assistance to patients of older age groups (elderly, senile age, and centenarians according to World Health Organization criteria) with fractures of the proximal femur (S72.0, S72.1, S72.2. according to International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision) and with concomitant osteoporosis.
AIM: To improve the treatment results of patients of older age groups with fractures of the proximal femur by modernizing and developing new methods for implant fixation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 322 patients with fractures of the proximal femur with the presence of II and III degree of osteoporosis, who were treated at the Hospital for War Veterans in Saint Petersburg from 2017 to 2020 were included for the analysis. All the patients were divided into two groups depending on the methods of the treatment used. The first group consisted of 145 patients treated with the proposed method. The patients of the 2nd group (177 people) were treated using the traditional method. To assess the immediate results, the anatomical and functional result and possible complications (false joint, delayed consolidation of fragments, shortening of the damaged lower limb, dislocation of the endoprosthesis, migration of metal structures, osteomyelitis) were studied. The results were evaluated according to Leken’s functional index, and the quality of life was assessed according to the World Health Organization scale.
RESULTS: In 52.5% of the paients from the first group, good outcomes were obtained after 6 months according to the Leken’s scale, while in group 2 such results were demonstrated only in 21.6% of the patients, and a year later, in 53.7% and 19.1%, respectively. In the first group, 13 patients (12.0%) had unsatisfactory outcomes after a year, 12 (13.5%) — after 3 years, while in the second group 36 patients (31.3%) had unsatisfactory outcomes after a year, and 38 (35.8%) — after 3 years.
CONCLUSIONS: As a result, the use of the proposed method for providing care to patients with fractures of the proximal femur ensures significant improve (p < 0.01) of the treatment outcomes for this category of patients.
Full Text
About the authors
Ivan O. Kucheev
Hospital for War Veterans
Email: 9513533@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8557-8431
SPIN-code: 9494-9102
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, 41 Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg, 191015Maksim Yu. Kabanov
Hospital for War Veterans
Email: makskabanov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3413-6382
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor
Russian Federation, 41 Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg, 191015Stanislav A. Linnik
North Western State Medical University n.a. I.I. Mechnikov
Email: stanislavlinnik@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4840-6662
SPIN-code: 3442-9930
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor
Russian Federation, 41 Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg, 191015Konstantin V. Sementsov
Hospital for War Veterans
Email: konstantinsementsov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1056-3168
SPIN-code: 2293-0045
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, 41 Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg, 191015Yurii B. Kashanskii
Saint Petersburg Scientific Research Institute of Emergency Medicine named after. I.I. Dzhanelidze
Email: 9513533@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 6407-4248
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgAnatolii V. Polikarpov
Hospital for War Veterans
Email: multifisher@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 8122-2191
Russian Federation, 41 Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg, 191015
Pavel P. Romashov
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Email: pavelromashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6045-5037
SPIN-code: 7367-8776
ResearcherId: O-3211-2014
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor
Russian Federation, 41 Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg, 191015Igor P. Kondratev
Saint Petersburg Scientific Research Institute of Emergency Medicine named after. I.I. Dzhanelidze
Email: darksun--30@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 8591-4666
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgYaroslav B. Tsololo
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Email: yaroslav.tsololo@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7744-0002
SPIN-code: 5363-6020
Assistant Lecturer
Russian Federation, 41 Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg, 191015Vasilii G. Radysh
Hospital for War Veterans
Author for correspondence.
Email: Radishv@gmail.com
SPIN-code: 1686-2015
Russian Federation, 41 Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg, 191015
References
- Avdey GM. Osteoporosis as actual problem in medicine. Healthcare (Minsk). 2011;(4):65–70. (In Russ.)
- Patent RU 2494694 C1 / 2013.10.10. Bagnenko SF, Kashansky YuB, Galtsev GA, et al. A method for the treatment of fractures of tubular bones in severe osteoporosis. (In Russ.)
- Beloselsky NN, Smirnov AV. X-ray diagnosis of osteopenic syndrome. Moscow: IMA-PRESS; 2010. 120 p. (In Russ.)
- Verbovoy AF, Pashentseva AV, Sharonova LA. Osteoporosis: current state of the art. Therapeutic archive. 2017;89(5):90–97. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/terarkh201789590-97
- Linnik SA, Afinogenov GE, Afinogenova AG, et al. The choice of a spacer at the first stage of treatment for late deep periprosthetic hip joint infection. The Genius of Orthopedics. 2021;27(5):548–554. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2021-27-5-548-554
- Ershova OB, Sinitsina OS, Belova KYu, et al. Epidemiology of fractures of the proximal femur. Farmateka. 2012;(2):10–16. (In Russ.)
- Lesnyak OM, Benevolenskaya LI. Osteoporosis. 2nd ed. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2009. 272 p. (In Russ.)
- Rozhinskaya LYa. Osteoporoz: aktual’naya problema. Farmateka. 2012;(S2):54–63. (In Russ.)
- Smirnov AV. X-ray diagnosis of primary osteoporosis. Modern rheumatology. 2011;(1):47–52. (In Russ.)
- Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM, Rosen AB. Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States. JAMA. 2009;302(14):1573–1579. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1462
- Cosman F, de Beur S, LeBoff M, et al. Clinician’s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(10):2359–2381. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2794-2
- Kanis J, McCloskey E, Johansson H, et al. European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(1):23–57. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2074-y
- Kurra S, Siris E. Diabetes and bone health: the relationship between diabetes and osteoporosis-associated fractures. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2011;27(5):430–435. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.1197
Supplementary files
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).