Atmospheric Planetary Waves at Ionospheric Heights Measured at the Moscow Observatory (IZMIRAN)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The variations of the ionospheric current in the lower ionosphere and the plasma density of the upper ionosphere have been studied based on the monitoring of the horizontal component of the geomagnetic field induction and high-frequency sounding of the critical frequency of the ionosphere F-layer at the Moscow Observatory. It is shown that in the spectra of time variations of the geomagnetic field and the critical frequency of the F2 layer in the range of planetary waves in winter, there are both harmonics associated with solar activity and harmonics corresponding to quasi-5, 10, and 16-day planetary waves. Involvement of geomagnetic field registration data for a twenty-year time interval (from 2001 to 2020) made it possible to identify more subtle effects, namely, the harmonics associated with the modulation effect of longer-period variations and tidal effects were identified.

About the authors

S. A. Riabova

Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences; Sadovsky Institute of Geosphere Dynamics, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: ryabovasa@mail.ru
Russia, 123242, Moscow, Bolshaya Gruzinskaya, 10, build. 1,; Russia, 119334, Moscow, Leninsky prospect, 38, build. 1

S. L. Shalimov

Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: ryabovasa@mail.ru
Russia, 123242, Moscow, Bolshaya Gruzinskaya, 10, build. 1,

References

  1. Адушкин В.В., Рябова С.А., Спивак А.А. Геомагнитные эффекты природных и техногенных процессов. М.: ГЕОС, 2021. 264 с.
  2. Андреев В.С. Теория нелинейных электрических цепей: Учебник для вузов. М.: Радио и связь, 1982. 280 с.
  3. Афраймович Э. Л., Астафьева Э. И., Живетьев И. В., Ойнац А. В., Ясюкевич Ю. В. Глобальное электронное содержание в 23-м цикде солнечной активности // Геомагнетизм и аэрономия. 2008. Т. 48. № 2. С. 195–208.
  4. Данилов А.Д., Казимировский Э.С., Вергасова Г.В., Хачикян Г.Я. Метеорологические эффекты в ионосфере. Л.: Гидрометеоиздат, 1987. 272 с.
  5. Дикий Л.А. Теория колебаний земной атмосферы. Л.: Гидрометеоиздат, 1969. 192 с.
  6. Руководство URSI по интерпретации и обработке ионограмм. Под редакцией П.В. Медниковой. М.: Наука, 1977. 342 с.
  7. Рябова С.А., Спивак А.А. Исследование атмосферного прилива по данным регистрации барических вариаций на среднеширотной обсерватории “Михнево” // Ученые записки физического факультета Московского университета. 2018. № 4. 1840406.
  8. Рябова С.А., Шалимов С.Л. О вариациях параметров плазмы ионосферы, наблюдаемых посредством ионозонда и на магнитной станции в диапазоне периодов планетарных волн // Физика Земли. 2021а. № 6. С. 122–130.
  9. Рябова С.А., Шалимов С.Л. О геомагнитных вариациях, наблюдаемых на поверхности Земли в диапазоне периодов планетарных волн // Физика Земли. 2021б. № 1б. С. 51–60.
  10. Сергиенко А.Б. Цифровая обработка сигналов: учеб. пособие. 3-е изд. СПб.: БХВ Петербург. 2011. 756 с.
  11. Шалимов С.Л., Лапшин В.М. Планетарные волны по одновременным наблюдениям со спутников GPS и на магнитных наземных станциях // Космич. исслед. 2008. Т. 46. № 3. С. 195–200.
  12. Шалимов С.Л. Атмосферные волны в плазме ионосферы. М.: ИФЗ РАН, 2018. 390 с.
  13. Charney J.G., Drazin P.G. Propagation of planatary-scale disturbances from the lower into the upper atmosphere // J. Geophysical Research. 1961. V. 66. № 1. P. 83–109.
  14. Deng W., Salah J.E., Clar R.R. et al. Coordinated global radar observations of tidal and planetary waves in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere during January 20–30, 1993 // J. Geophysical Research. 1997. V. 102. № A4. P. 7307–7318.
  15. Durbin J. The fitting of time series models // Rev. Intern. Stat. Inst. 1960. V. 28. P. 233–244.
  16. Forbes J.M., Leveroni S. Quasi 16-day oscillation of the ionosphere // Geophysical Research Letters. 1992. V. 19. P. 981–984.
  17. Fraser G. The 5-day wave and ionospheric absorption // J. Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics. 1977. V. 39. P. 121–124.
  18. Gjerloev J.W. The SuperMAG data processing technique // J. Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 2012. V. 117. № A9. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA017683
  19. Hagan M.E., Forbes J.M., Vial F. Numerical investigation of the propagation of the quasi-two-day wave into the lower thermosphere // J. Geophysical Research. 1993. V. 98. P. 23193–23205.
  20. Hocke K. Oscillations of global mean TEC // J. Geophys. Res. 2008. V. 113. A04302. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012798
  21. Kelley M.C. The Earth’s ionosphere: Plasma Physics and Electrodynamics, Academic Press. 1989. 487 p.
  22. Kohsiek A., Glassmeier K.H., Hirooka T. Periods of planetary waves in geomagnetic variations // Annales Geophysicae. 1995. V. 13. P. 168–176.
  23. Koval A.V., Gavrilov N.M., Didenko K.A., Ermakova T.S., Savenkova E.N. Sensitivity of the 4–10-Day Planetary Wave Structures in the Middle Atmosphere to the Solar Activity Effects in the Thermosphere. Atmosphere 2022. V. 13. P. 1325. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13081325
  24. Lawrence A.R., Jarvis M.J. Initial comparisons of planetary waves in the stratosphere, mesosphere and ionosphere over Antarctica // Geophysical Research Letters. 2001. V. 28. P. 203–206.
  25. Levinson N. The Wiener RMS (root mean square) error criterion infilter design and prediction // J. Math. Phys. 1946. V. 25. P. 261–278.
  26. Lomb N.R. Least-squares frequency analysis of unequally spaced data // Astrophysical and Space Science. 1976. V. 39. P. 447−462.
  27. Riabova S. Features of geomagnetic field variations mid-latitude observatories in range of period and half-period of Carrington. 20th Science and Applied Research Conference on Oil and Gas Geological Exploration and Development “Geomodel 2018”. http://earthdoc.eage.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication =94171.
  28. Riabova S.A. Features of geomagnetic field variations mid-latitude observatories in range of period and half-period of Carrington // 20th Science and Applied Research Conference on Oil and Gas Geological Exploration and Development Geomodel 2018. Conference Paper. 2018. http://earthdoc.eage.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication=94171.
  29. Riabova S.A., Shalimov S.L. Features of geomagnetic variations in the period range from 12 to 17 days according to the Mikhnevo Observatory // Proceedings SPIE. Vol. 11 560. 26th International Symposium on Atmospheric and Ocean Optics, Atmospheric Physics, 115607J (12 November 2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2575699
  30. Rishbath H., Garriott O.K. Introduction to ionospheric physics. 1st edn. N.Y.: Academic press, 1969. 304 p.
  31. Salby M.L. Survey of planetary-scale traveling waves: the state of theory and observations // Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics. 1984. V. 22. P. 209–236.
  32. Scargle J.D. Studies in astronomical time series analysis II. Statistical aspects of spectral analysis of unevenly sampled data // Astrophysical Journal. 1982. V. 263(2). P. 835−853.
  33. Wakai N., Ohyama H., Koizumi T. Manual of ionogram scaling. 3rd edn. Japan: Radio Research Laboratory, Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications, 1987. 119 p.
  34. http://www.dsp.izmiran.ru

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2.

Download (188KB)
Indexing metadata
3.

Download (182KB)
Indexing metadata
4.

Download (275KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2023 С.А. Рябова, С.Л. Шалимов

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.