Development of a diagnostic panel of biomarkers for predicting the survival rate of dental implants in patients of older age groups

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The development of a diagnostic panel of biomarkers to improve the survival rate of dental implants is an urgent scientific and applied problem. The recovery rate for bone tissue innervation and vascularization is one of the important criteria for the success of implantation. Objective. To develop a diagnostic panel of biomarkers to assess the success of implantation in patients of older age groups Subjects and methods. The buccal epithelium was investigated in people of different ages. The sample size was 210 patients (5 age groups) and 420 observations (before and after implantation). Results. It was found that with increasing age, there were significant decreases in the expression level of the vascularization markers VEGF, VEGFR1 before implantation and in the level of the marker for the rate of innervation recovery in the implantation zone of NO synthase before and after implantation. After implantation, the level of VEGFR1 expression decreased in all studied groups; that of VEGF expression increased in all the groups, except for the group of long-livers, in whom the level of VEGF reduced after implantation compared to that before implantation. Conclusion. This investigation makes it possible to approach the solution of the problem of creating a differential diagnostic model to predict the survival rate of implants and to choose a habilitation method. The development and implementation of a diagnostic panel of biomarkers will be able to proceed to personalized medicine, high-tech healthcare, and health-saving technologies.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

A. A. Polyakova

Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: aapol13@yandex.ru

D. S. Medvedev

Research Institute of Hygiene, Occupational Diseases and Human Ecology, Federal Biomedical Agency of Russia

Email: aapol13@yandex.ru

Professor

V. O. Polyakova

Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology, Ministry of Health of Russia; Belgorod State National Research University

Email: aapol13@yandex.ru

Biol.D; Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences

References

  1. Бойчук Н.В., Челышев Ю.А. Гистология органов полости рта: учебно-методическое пособие. Казань: КГМУ, 2011; 96 с.
  2. Быков В.Л. Функциональная морфология эпителиального барьера слизистой оболочки полости рта. Стоматология. 1997; 76 (3): 12-7.
  3. Быков В.Л. Тканевая инженерия слизистой оболочки полости рта. Морфология. 2010; 137 (1): 62-70. Bykov V.L. Tissue engineering of the oral mucosa. Morfologiya. 2010; 137 (1): 62-70 (in Russ.).
  4. Ортопедическая стоматология: учебник. Под ред. И.Ю. Лебеденко, Э.С. Каливраджияна. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2016; 640 с.
  5. Пальцев М.А., Кветной И.М., Полякова В.О. и др. Сигнальные молекулы в буккальном эпителии: оптимизация диагностики социально значимых заболеваний. Молекулярная медицина. 2012; 2: 18-23.
  6. Полякова А.А. Метод клеточной биологии в реализации клинических задач: оценка приживаемости имплантов у пожилых пациентов. В. кн.: VIII Международная научно-практическая конференция молодых ученых: биофизиков, биотехнологов, молекулярных биологов и вирусологов - 2021. Сб. тез. конф., проход. в рамках площадки открытых коммуникаций OpenBio-2021. Новосибирск, 2021; с. 324.
  7. Полякова В.О., Пальцева Е.М., Крулевский В.А. Буккальный эпителий. Новые подходы к молекулярной диагностике социально значимой патологии. СПб: Изд-во Н-Л, 2015.
  8. Симаненков В.И., Маев И.В., Ткачева О.Н. и др. Синдром повышенной эпителиальной проницаемости в клинической практике. Мультидисциплинарный национальный консенсус. Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика. 2021; 20 (1): 2758. doi: 10.15829/17288800-2021-2758
  9. Шахбазов В.Г., Григорьева Н.Н., Колупаева Т.В. Новый цитобиологический показатель биологического возраста и биологического состояния организма человека. Физиология человека. 1996; 22 (6): 71-5.
  10. Carbone A., Linkova N., Polyakova V. et al. Melatonin and Sirtuins in Buccal Epithelium: Potential Biomarkers of Aging and Age-Related Pathologies. Int J. Mol Sci. 2020; 21 (21): 8134. doi: 10.3390/ijms21218134
  11. Polyakova A., Medvedev D., Semiglazova J. et al. Buccal epithelium: as an object of non-invasive diagnostics of implant survival in people of different ages. Eur J. Clin Invest Suppl. 2021; 51 (S1): 123-4.
  12. Saba R., Halytskyy O., Saleem N. et al. Buccal Epithelium, Cigarette Smoking, and Lung Cancer: Review of the Literature. Oncology. 2017; 93 (6): 347-53. doi: 10.1159/000479796

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. VEGF expression area before and after implantation

Download (133KB)
3. Fig. 2. VEGFR1 expression area before and after implantation

Download (143KB)
4. Fig. 3. Choline acetyltransferase expression area before and after implantation

Download (142KB)
5. Fig. 4. NO synthase expression area before and after implantation

Download (139KB)

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies