AN AUTOMATED CLINICAL GUIDELINES AND (SACRAL) TREATMENT AUDIT SYSTEM IN NEUROLOGY


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The given system (using a neurological module as an example) provides support for treatment decision on the basis of guidelines and individual risk factors, generates protocols, and ensures a statistical analysis of data, automatic generation of a registry and an audit that includes quality indicators corrected for an individual risk profile.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

G. Nazarenko

Medical Center, Bank of Russia; Institute of Systems Analysis, Russian Academy of Sciences

Professor Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow

E. Kleimenova

Medical Center, Bank of Russia

Email: e.kleymenova@gmail.com
MD Moscow

M. Konstantinova

Medical Center, Bank of Russia

Candidate of Medical Sciences Moscow

O. Kashevskaya

Medical Center, Bank of Russia

Candidate of Medical Sciences Moscow

S. Payushchik

Medical Center, Bank of Russia

Moscow

References

  1. Epstein D., Mason A., Manca A. The hospital cost of care for stroke in nine European countries // Health Economics. - 2008; 17 (Suppl. 1): 21-31.
  2. Суслина З.А., Варакин Ю.Я. Клинико-эпидемиологические исследования - перспективное направление изучения цереброваскулярной патологии (сообщение первое) // Анн. клин. экспер. неврол. - 2009; 3: 4-11.
  3. Evers S., Ament A., Blaauw G. Economic evaluation in stroke research: A systematic review // Stroke. - 2000; 5 (31): 1046-53.
  4. Гусев Е.И., Скворцова В.И., Стаховская Л.В. Проблема инсульта в Российской Федерации: время активных совместных действий // Журн. неврол. психиат. - 2007; 8: 4-10.
  5. Коваленко И.И., Гожий А.П., Марцинковский И.Б. и др. Принципы построения системы поддержки принятия решений при формировании прогноза и планов лечения артериальной гипертензии // Наукові праці. Комп’ютерні техології. - 2008; 90 (77): 115-21.
  6. Kawamoto K., Houlihan C., Balas E. et al. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success // BMJ. - 2005; 330: 765-8.
  7. Fox J., Glasspool D., Patkar V. et al. Delivering clinical decision support services: There is nothing as practical as a good theory // J. Biomed. Inform. -2010; 43 (5): 831-43.
  8. Bufalino V., Masoudi F., Stranne S. et al. The American Heart Association’s recommendations for expanding the applications of existing and future clinical registries. A policy statement from the American Heart Association // Circulation. - 2011; 123: 2167-79.
  9. Lundström M. Handbook for establishing quality registries / Sweden: Eyenet, 2005

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2014 Russkiy Vrach Publishing House

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies