ACUTE CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT: PATHOGENETIC, CLINICAL, AND REHABILITATION ASPECTS


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The paper considers the pathogenetic, clinical, and rehabilitation aspects of stroke. It emphasizes the dynamics of neuroplastic processes, their role in rehabilitation, and the value of impaired cerebral connections. The ypical errors that slow down the recovery of motor functions are discussed.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

I. Damulin

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University; A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Research and Practical Center

Professor

D. Degterev

A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Research and Practical Center

Candidate of Medical Sciences

A. Strutsenko

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Email: doctoralla08@rambler.ru
Candidate of Medical Sciences

References

  1. Wissel J., Olver J., Stibrant Sunnerhagen K. Navigating the poststroke continuum of care // J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. - 2013; 22 (1): 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis. 2011.05.021.
  2. Murphy T., Corbett D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behavior // Nature Rev. Neurosci. - 2009; 10 (12): 861-72. doi: 10.1038/nrn2735.
  3. Cummings J., Trimble M. Concise Guide to Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Neurology. 2nd ed. / Washington, London: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc., 2002; 275 p.
  4. Miller E., Murray L., Richards L. et al. Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association // Stroke. - 2010; 41 (10): 2402-48. doi: 10.1161/str.0b013e3181e7512b.
  5. Walha K., Ricolfi F., Bejot Y., et al. Hippocampus: a «forgotten» border zone of brain ischemia // J. Neuroimaging. - 2013; 23 (1): 98-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2011.00610.x.
  6. Cordonnier C. Brain microbleedens: more evidence, but still a clinical dilemma // Curr. Opin. Neurol. - 2011; 24 (1): 69-74. doi: 10.1097/wco.0b013e328341f8c0.
  7. del Zoppo G. Stroke and endovascular protection // N. Engl. J. Med. - 2006; 354 (6): 353-5. doi: 10.1056/nejmp058312.
  8. Mergenthaler P., Dirnagl U., Kunz A. Ischemic Stroke: Basic Pathophysiology and Clinical Implication. In: Neuroscience in the 21st Century. From Basic to Clinical. Second Edition. D.W. Pfaff, N.D. Volkow (Editors-in-Chief). Ch.181 / New York: Springer, 2016; p. 3385-405.
  9. Grefkes C., Fink G. Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches // Brain. - 2011; 134 (5): 1264-76. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr033.
  10. Jiang L., Xu H., Yu C. Brain connectivity plasticity in the motor network after ischemic stroke // Neural Plasticity. - 2013; 2013: 1-11. doi: 10.1155/2013/924192.
  11. Takeuchi N., Izumi S.-I. Maladaptive plasticity for motor recovery after stroke: mechanisms and approaches // Neural Plasticity. - 2012; 2012: 1-9 doi: 10.1155/2012/359728.
  12. Almeida S., Vicentini J., Bonilha L. et al. Brain connectivity and functional recovery in patients with ischemic stroke // J. Neuroimaging. - 2016; 27 (1): 65-70. doi: 10.1111/jon.12362.
  13. de Haan E., Nys G., Van Zandvoort M. Cognitive function following stroke and vascular cognitive impairment // Curr. Opin. Neurol. - 2006; 19 (6): 559-64. doi: 10.1097/01.wco.0000247612.21235.d9.
  14. Thiel A., Vahdat S. Structural and resting-state brain connectivity of motor networks after stroke // Stroke. - 2014; 46 (1): 296-301. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.114.006307.
  15. Crofts J., Higham D., Bosnell R. et al. Network analysis detects changes in the contralesional hemisphere following stroke // NeuroImage. - 2011; 54 (1): 161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.032.
  16. Grefkes C., Nowak D., Eickhoff S. et al. Cortical connectivity after subcortical stroke assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging // Ann. Neurol. -2008; 63 (2): 236-46. doi: 10.1002/ana.21228.
  17. Sharma N., Baron J.-C., Rowe J. Motor imagery after stroke: Relating outcome to motor network connectivity // Ann. Neurol. - 2009; 66 (5): 604-16. doi: 10.1002/ana.21810.
  18. Chen Y., Wang A., Tang J., et al. Association of white matter integrity and cognitive functions in patients with subcortical silent lacunar infarcts // Stroke. -2015; 46 (4): 1123-6. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.115.008998.
  19. Chong J., Lee H.-S., Boden-Albala B. et al. Gender differences in self-report of recovery after stroke: The Northern Manhattan Study // Neurology. - 2006; 67 (7): 1282-4. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000238161.71591.e9.
  20. Bernhardt J., Indredavik B., Langhorne P. When should rehabilitation begin after stroke? // Int. J. Stroke. - 2013; 8 (1): 5-7. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12020.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies