PRACTICE FOR USING ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS IN WOMEN WITH INFLAMMATORY DISEASES OF SMALL PELVIC ORGANS IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To study real clinical practice for using antimicrobial agents to treat inflammatory diseases of small pelvic organs (IDSPO) in the Russian Federation and its conformity with Russian and foreign guidelines. Material and methods. The authors conducted a multicenter retrospective pharmacoepidemiological study that included data on women who had sought medical advice at the out- and inpatient obstetric or gynecological institutions of the Russian Federation in 2007 to 2009. The inclusion criteria were the established diagnosis of acute IDSPO, use of at least one dose of a systemic or local antimicrobial agent in the study period. Results. A total of 1174 primary medical records of patients with acute IDSPO were analyzed. Forty-five different antimicrobial agents from 17 groups were found to be used to treat acute IDSPO. The drugs most commonly prescribed to treat IDSPO were as follows: the physicians prescribed most frequently the following drugs: metronidazole (32.7%), gentamicin (13.1%), doxycycline (5.2%), cefazolin (5.1%), and ciprofloxacin (4.9%). In addition, the study has revealed that the percentage of prescriptions for original drugs and branded and nonbranded generics is 1.7, 33.9, and 64.4%, respectively. Conclusion. The currently most common antimicrobial agents used to treat IDSPO in the Russian Federation are metronidazole (32.7%), gentamicin (13.1%), and doxycycline (5.2%). In Russian real clinical practice, the antibiotic combinations recommended by Russian and foreign scientists are used sporadically (less than 1%).

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

V. V RAFALSKY

Smolensk State Medical Academy

Email: v.rafalskiy@mail.ru

E. V DOVGAN

Smolensk State Medical Academy

A. N IVANYAN

Smolensk State Medical Academy

A. N SAVRATSKY

Smolensk State Medical Academy

References

  1. Ершов Г.В., Чернавин А.В., Бауман Ю.С. и др. Фармакоэпидемиологическое исследование «Рациональная антибактериальная терапия инфекций мочевыводящих путей у беременных женщин» // Клин. микробиол. и антимикроб. химиотер. — 2001. — № 3. — С. 14.
  2. Карпов О.И. Фармакоэпидемиология антибиотиков при бактериальных респираторных и акушерско-гинекологических инфекциях: Дис..д-ра мед. наук. — СПб, 2001.
  3. Кулаков В.И., Серов В.Н. Рациональная фармакотерапия в акушерстве и гинекологии: Руководство для практикующих врачей. — М.: Littera, 2006.
  4. Чилова Р.А., Ищенко А.И., Рафальский В.В. и др. Практика периоперационной антибиотикопрофилактики при операции кесарево сечение в стационарах Российской Федерации // Клин. микробиол. и антимикроб. химиотер. — 2006. — № 8. — С. 48—53.
  5. Beckmann K.R., Melzer-Lange M.D., Gorelick M.H. Emergency department management of sexually transmitted infections in us adolescents: Results from the national hospital ambulatory medical care survey // Ann. Emerg. Med. — 2004. — Vol. 43. — P. 333—338.
  6. Berthier M., Bonneau D., Perault M.C. et al. Medications exposure during pregnancy. A study in a university hospital // Therapie. — 1993. — Vol. 48. — P. 43—46.
  7. Bosu W.K., Mabey D. The availability and cost of antibiotics for treating PID in the central region of Ghana and implications for compliance with national treatment guidelines // Int. J STD AIDS. — 1998. — Vol. 9. — P. 551— 553.
  8. CDC. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines // MMWR. — 2006. — Vol. 55. — RR—11.
  9. CDC. Update to CDC’s sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines 2006: Fluoroquinolones no longer recommended for treatment of gonococcal infections // MMWR. — 2007. — Vol. 56. — P. 332—336.
  10. Eschenbach D.A. Acute pelvic inflammatory disease // Urol. Clin. North Am. — 1984. — Vol. 11. — P. 65—81.
  11. Haggerty C.L., Ness R.B. Epidemiology, pathogenesis and treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease // Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. — 2006. — Vol. 4. — P. 235—247.
  12. Lacroix I., Damase-Michel C., Lapeyre-Mestre M. et al. Prescription of drugs during pregnancy in France // Lancet. — 2000. — Vol. 356. — P. 1735—1736.
  13. Liabsuetrakul T., Lumbiganon P., Chongsuvivatwong V. Prophylactic antibiotic prescription for cesarean section // Int. J Qual. Hlth Care. — 2002. — Vol. 14. — P. 503—508.
  14. Ross J., Judlin P., Nilas L. European guideline for the management of pelvic inflammatory disease // Int. J STD AIDS. — 2007. — Vol. 18. — P. 662—666.
  15. Washington A.E., Katz P. Cost of and payment source for pelvic inflammatory disease. Trends and projections, 1983 through 2000 // J.A.M.A. — 1991. — Vol. 266. — P. 2565— 2569.
  16. Westrom L. Incidence, prevalence, and trends of acute pelvic inflammatory disease and its consequences in industrialized countries // Am. J Obstet. Gynecol. — 1980. — Vol. 138. — P. 880—892.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies