DURATION OF NORMAL LABOR UNDER PRESENT CONDITIONS


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To study the impact of current management of spontaneous labor on its duration to elaborate criteria for its normal course. Subjects and methods. Four hundred and forty-two cases of labors with good maternal and perinatal outcomes were analyzed. Of them, 339 labor histories were retrospectively analyzed and 103 women formed a prospective management group. The study included parturients with full-term singleton pregnancy and fetal cephalic presentation without severe somatic and gynecological diseases. Results. The duration of latent and active phases does not greatly differ in primiparas. In secundiparas, the reduction in total labor duration is determined by the rapider course of the active phase in the first period and to a lesser extent in the second one. When employing epidural analgesia (EA), there was a significant increase in total labor duration in both primiparas and secundiparas due to the f irst period; a prolonged waterless interval; the higher frequency of cases of powerless labor in primiparas; acute fetal hypoxia was more common. Conclusion. Parity remains a leading natural factor that influences labor duration. The latter is significantly affected by obstetric tactics in a low-risk group.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

O. R BAYEV

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

Email: metod_obsgyn@hotmail.com

S. V RUBTSOVA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

O. N VASILCHENKO

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

V. P RUMYANTSEVA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

N. V ALEKSANDROVA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

References

  1. Акушерство. Национальное руководство / Под ред. Э.К. Айламазяна и др. — М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2009.
  2. Царегородцев И.С. Особенности постнатальной адаптации новорожденных, родившихся у матерей, получивших в родах эпидуральную анестезию. — ЧГМА, 2008. — С. 22.
  3. Cheng Y.W., Shaffer B.L., Allison S., Caughey A.B. Length of first stage of labor and associated perinatal outcomes in nulliparous women // Obstet. and Gynecol. — 2010. — Vol. 116, № 5. — Р. 1127—1135.
  4. Friedman E.A. Labor: clinical evaluation and management. — 2nd ed. — Norwalk (CT): Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1978. — Р 417.
  5. Fyneface-Ogan S., Mato C.N., Anya S.E. Epidural anesthesia: views and outcomes of women in labor in a Nigerian hospital // Ann Afr. Med. — 2009. — Vol. 8, № 4. — Р. 250—256.
  6. Incerti M., Locatelli A., Ghidini A. et al. Variability in rate of cervical dilation in nulliparous women at term // Birth. — 2011. — Vol. 38, № 1. — Р 30—35.
  7. Kilpatrick S., Laros R. Characteristics of normal labor // Obstet. and Gynecol. — 1989. — Vol. 74, № 1. — Р. 85—87.
  8. Lauzone L., Hodnett E. Labor assessment programs to delay admission to labour wards // Cochrane Syst. Rev. — 2004. — № 2.
  9. Neal J.L., Lowe N.K., Ahijevych K.L. et al. «Active labor» duration and dilation rates among low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset: a systematic review. // Womens Health. — 2010. — Vol. 55, № 4. — Р. 308—318.
  10. Peisner D.B., Rosen M.G. Transition from latent to active labor // Obstet. and Gynecol. — 1986. — Vol. 68, № 4. — Р. 448— 451.
  11. Pernoll Martin L. Benson & Pernoll’s handbook of obstetrics and gynecology. — 10th ed. — McGraw-Hill Medical Publ., 2001.
  12. Rouse D.J., Owen J., Hauth J.C. Criteria for failed labor induction: prospective evaluation of a standardized protocol // Obstet. and Gynecol. — 2000. — Vol. 96, № 5, pt 1. — Р 671—677.
  13. Vahratian A., Hoffman M.K., Troendle J.F., Zhang J. The impact of parity on course of labor in a contemporary population // Birth. — 2006. — Vol. 33, № 1. — Р 12—17.
  14. Williams Obstetrics/ Eds F. Gary Cunningham et al. — 22 nd ed. McGraw-Hill Medical Publ., 2005.
  15. Zhang J., Troendle J., Mikolajczyk R. et al. The Natural history of the normal first stage of labor // Obstet. and Gynecol. — 2010. — Vol. 115, №4. — Р. 705—710.
  16. Zhang J., Landy H.J., Branch D.W., Burkman R. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes // Obstet. and Gynecol. — 2010. — Vol. 116, № 6. — Р. 1281— 1287.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2012 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies