PERINATAL OUTCOMES OF MULTIPLE BIRTHS


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To study perinatal outcomes in women with multiple pregnancy achieved by different methods. Subjects and methods. A retrospective continuous clinicostatistical analysis of primary medical records was made in 94 puerperas with multiple births (including 5 triple ones) given in the obstetric departments of the Center in 2008. According to the multiple pregnancy-achieving methods, the women were divided into 3 groups: 1) 34 (36.2%) women with spontaneous pregnancy, 2) 50 (53.2%) with pregnancy achieved by assisted reproductive technologies; 3) 10 (10.6%) with pregnancy due to ovulation induction. Results. Statistically significant differences were found between the groups in a number of gynecological diseases: infertility, oligomenorrhea, endometriosis, or polycystic ovary syndrome. The leading obstetric complications were threatening miscarriage, isthmic-cervical insufficiency, early toxicosis, and preeclampsia. Abdominal delivery occurred in 76.5, 98.0, and 80.0% in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The group rate of preterm labors was 55.9, 64.0, and 70%, respectively. There were 184 (96.3%) and 9 (4.7%) live and still births, respectively, including 58 (61.7%) and 36 (38.3%) same- and different-sex twin pairs, respectively, among the twin births and 2 and 3 same- and different-sex triple pairs among the triple births. Mild, moderate, and severe asphyxia was noted in 49.2, 9.3, and 7.8%, respectively. Stillbirth rates were 26.3%; early neonatal and perinatal mortality rates were 5.4% and 31.7%, respectively. Conclusion. The main cause of fetal and neonatal deaths is extreme immaturity and intragatric hemorrhages. The high rates of perinatal mortality and its components are associated with preterm labor and prematurity. The onrush of neonatal intensive care in the past decade has determined the substantial reduction of early neonatal mortality.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

I. I BARANOV

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

Email: i_baranov@oparina4.ru

Z. Z TOKOVA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

A. A TADEVOSYAN

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

References

  1. Назаренко Т.А. Стимуляция функции яичников. — М.: Медпресс-информ, 2008.
  2. Минздравсоцразвития России ФГУ Научный центр акушерства, гинекологии и перинатологии им. академика В.И. Кулакова «Основные показатели деятельности службы охраны здоровья матери и ребенка в Российской Федерации». — М., 2009. — С. 25.
  3. Сведения о медицинской помощи беременным, роженицам и родильницам за 2008 год (форма № 32 по РФ).
  4. Bush M., Pernoll M.L. Многоплодная беременность // Де Черни А.Х., Лорен Натан. Акушерство и гинекология. Диагностика и лечение: Пер. с англ. — М.: Медпресс-информ, 2008. — С. 388—403.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies